[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Attack on the USS Liberty (June 8, 1967) - Speech by Survivor Phillip Tourney At the Revisionist History of War Conference (Video) ‘I Smell CIA/Deep State All Over ThisÂ’ — RFK Jr. VP Nicole Shanahan Blasts Sanctuary Cities, we see peaceful protests launching in Los Angeles” - Democrat Senator Cory Booke We have no legal framework for designating domestic terror organizations Los Angeles Braces For Another Day Of Chaos As Newsom Pits Marxist Color Revolution Against Trump Admin Methylene Blue Benefits Another Mossad War Crime 80 served arrest warrants at 'cartel afterparty' in South Carolina When Ideas Become Too Dangerous To Platform The silent bloodbath that's tearing through the middle-class Kiev Postponed Exchange With Russia, Leaves Bodies Of 6,000 Slain Ukrainian Troops In Trucks Iranian Intelligence Stole Trove Of Sensitive Israeli Nuclear Files In the USA, the identity of Musk's abuser, who gave him a black eye, was revealed Return of 6,000 Soldiers' Bodies Will Cost Ukraine Extra $2.1Bln Palantir's Secret War: Inside the Plot to Cripple WikiLeaks Digital Prison in the Making? In France we're horrified by spending money on Ukraine Russia has patented technology for launching drones from the space station Kill ICE: Foreign Flags And Fires Sweep LA 6,000-year-old skeletons with never-before-seen DNA rewrites human history First Close Look at China’s Ultra-Long Range Sixth Generation J-36Jet I'm Caitlin Clark, and I refuse to return to the WNBA Border Czar Tom Homan: “We Are Going to Bring National Guard in Tonight” to Los Angeles These Are The U.S. States With The Most Drug Use Chabria: ICE arrested a California union leader. Does Trump understand what that means?Anita Chabria White House Staffer Responsible for ‘Fanning Flames’ Between Trump and Musk ID’d Texas Yanks Major Perk From Illegal Aliens - After Pioneering It 24 Years Ago Dozens detained during Los Angeles ICE raids Russian army suffers massive losses as Kremlin feigns interest in peace talks — ISW Russia’s Defense Collapse Exposed by Ukraine Strike

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Field McConnell - Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot Used On 9/11 Planes, Impossible To Hijack!
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5NnBQJ5at4
Published: Jan 24, 2015
Author: staff
Post Date: 2015-01-24 14:13:06 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 29921
Comments: 402

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 170.

#2. To: Horse (#0) (Edited)

Nothing is uninterruptible, expect maybe a nuclear reaction. They definitely were "hijacked" in a sense because they never reached their destinations and they most definitely didn't hit the towers due to not physically being able to stay together at the recorded speeds the planes were flying at when they hit the towers at basically sea level.

RickyJ  posted on  2015-01-24   16:18:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

They definitely were "hijacked" in a sense because they never reached their destinations...

CTers usually prefer to state that the planes were *diverted* to a place or places *unknown*...congrats...you may be on the road to recovery...

war  posted on  2015-04-01   9:20:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

CTers

The official story is a ridiculous Conspiracy Theory, war, that admittedly would be unacceptable by court standards of integrity and is why the invasion of Afghanistan was launched instead -- which makes you and others arrogantly promoting it fanatic Conspiracy Theorists in denial.

Edited for capitalization and punctuation + word insert.

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-04-01   14:39:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The official story is a ridiculous conspiracy theory...

Yea...never have planes been hijacked...nor been used as missiles...a massive explosion and collision don't result in massive damage...10's of thousands of gallons of a volatile accelerant doesn't cause significant fires when introduced, ignited, in to a fuel rich environment doesn't result in fires of any significance and, my personal favorite, gravity doesn't *work* in a direct fashion but in a circuitous one...i.e. a falling object doesn't fall straight down...

PS: If we were going to bomb any nation over a pipeline in that region it would have been Russia...

war  posted on  2015-04-01   15:03:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

10's of thousands of gallons of a volatile accelerant doesn't cause significant fires when introduced,

MOST of which burnt up OUTSIDE the towers, and what was left burned for only several minutes before being spent.

ignited, in to a fuel rich environment doesn't result in fires of any significance

Sure there were OFFICE fires, but they burned for less than an hour, and as the towers acted as HUGE heatsinks, there's no possible way for temperatures to have reached anywhere close enough to weaken steel.

and, my personal favorite, gravity doesn't *work* in a direct fashion but in a circuitous one...i.e. a falling object doesn't fall straight down...

Gravity doesn't pull you through the floor you're standing on now does it? Are you travelling through the core of the earth as we speak, or is the floor you're standing on remaining in place?

FormerLurker  posted on  2015-04-01   15:28:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

MOST of which burnt up OUTSIDE the towers

You have no proof of that whatsoever...in fact, what analysis has been done puts the amount burned as ignited mist outside of the building @ around 15%...

war  posted on  2015-04-01   15:38:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You have no proof of that whatsoever...in fact, what analysis has been done puts the amount burned as ignited mist outside of the building @ around 15%...

You are either chronically challenged in the intellectual department, or you are a HUGE liar.

Not only do videos of the South Tower impact depict huge fireballs created outside the tower, but even FEMA states in their report that a significant percentage of fuel was spent in those fireballs, and the remaining fuel was spent after the first few minutes.

Here's a link to the FEMA report if you wish to educate yourself (see pages 2- 21 and 2-22);

WTC1 and WTC2 (FEMA PDF)

Do you not read up on anything before you make such inane declarations?

FormerLurker  posted on  2015-04-01   16:19:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

FEMA states in their report that a significant percentage of fuel was spent in those fireballs...

In point of fact the very FEMA report you link to says no such thing...

The discussion of fuel dispersal and the fireball begins on 2-20...

Again, your bullshit has been *falsified*...

war  posted on  2015-04-02   9:46:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Tell me, what's it like being a poster-boy for the establishment?

Katniss  posted on  2015-04-02   10:55:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Tell me, what's it like being a poster-boy for the establishment?

I'm anything but...

You have no idea how I wish that this bullshit was true...

war  posted on  2015-04-02   10:56:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You come across as a defender of establishment lies.

Katniss  posted on  2015-04-02   10:59:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You come across as a defender of establishment lies.

For nearly 14 years no one has demonstrated that they are lies...

On the other hand, what has been presented to me over that same time period, and is on display on this very page, has been very easily falsified...

I am a big believer in Occam's Razor...

war  posted on  2015-04-02   11:17:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

For nearly 14 years no one has demonstrated that they are lies...

That a whopper of a lie in and of itself....

FormerLurker  posted on  2015-04-02   11:55:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

That a whopper of a lie in and of itself....

Nothing that you have stated as fact - except for how long the fires in WTC 2 burned and you did that by accident - has withstood scrutiny...nothing...

I've heard all of this crap almost from the get go...in fact, the FEMA report that you are promoting here is what started all the CT bullshit...

Here's a helpful hint...planes that are deliberately commandeered and do not reach their destination are hijacked. Saying that the planes on 9/11 were NOT hijacked when they fully fit the above definition - regardless of who did it and why - is pretty freakin' *dumb*...

war  posted on  2015-04-02   12:36:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Here's a helpful hint...planes that are deliberately commandeered and do not reach their destination are hijacked. Saying that the planes on 9/11 were NOT hijacked when they fully fit the above definition - regardless of who did it and why - is pretty freakin' *dumb*...

Please point out any post I've made here where I've said the planes were NOT hijacked. Of course they were hijacked, the big question is by WHOM, and HOW.

We know they weren't hijacked by those claimed by the US government, since more than a few of them have publically appeared and stated they were obviously not the ones who hijacked those aircraft.

We also know that the cell phone calls were faked, since it was impossible for cell phone calls to be made from cruising altitude back in 2001.

So WHY were those calls faked, and WHO would have the ability to do such a thing?

FormerLurker  posted on  2015-04-02   13:19:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

We know they weren't hijacked by those claimed by the US government...

You've offered no proof that anyone other than the 19 identified as hijackers,. regardless of what names they used, did not hijack those planes.

We also know that the cell phone calls were faked, since it was impossible for cell phone calls to be made from cruising altitude back in 2001.

You need to stop claiming *we know*...you've offered no proof of anything...

war  posted on  2015-04-02   13:37:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You've offered no proof that anyone other than the 19 identified as hijackers,. regardless of what names they used, did not hijack those planes.

You've offered no proof that there were ANY individuals sent by bin Laden to fly those aircraft into the WTC or the Pentagon.

Besides, the Pentagon attack as claimed by the media and the government is absolutely physically impossible.

FormerLurker  posted on  2015-04-02   14:01:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You've offered no proof that there were ANY individuals sent by bin Laden to fly those aircraft into the WTC or the Pentagon.

I have the words of Bin Laden himself...

www.foxnews.com/story/200...ms-responsibility-for- 11/

I also have the lack of any other plausible scenario...

war  posted on  2015-04-02   14:16:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I have the words of Bin Laden himself...

The REAL bin Laden denied involement in the attacks immediately after they occured.

There have been more than a few obviously FAKE bin Ladens since then.

From Bin Laden says he wasn't behind attacks - CNN

In a statement issued to the Arabic satellite channel Al Jazeera, based in Qatar, bin Laden said, "The U.S. government has consistently blamed me for being behind every occasion its enemies attack it.

"I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been planned by people for personal reasons," bin Laden's statement said.

From Bin-Ladin Denies Involvement in the 9/11 Attacks

The countries which do not agree to become the U.S. slaves are China, Iran, Libya, Cuba, Syria [Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iraq, Sudan, Indonesia, Malaysia] and Russia. Whoever committed the act of 11 September are not the friends of the American people. I have already said that we are against the American system, not against its people, whereas in these attacks, the common American people have been killed. According to my information, the death toll is much higher than what the U.S. Government has stated. But the Bush Administration does not want the panic to spread. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the U.S. system, but are dissenting against it. Or those who are working for some other system; persons who want to make the present century as a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity so that their own civilization, nation, country, or ideology could survive. They can be anyone, from Russia to Israel and from India to Serbia. In the U.S. itself, there are dozens of well-organized and well-equipped groups, which are capable of causing a large-scale destruction. Then you cannot forget the American-Jews, who are annoyed with President Bush ever since the elections in Florida and want to avenge him.

FormerLurker  posted on  2015-04-02   14:28:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Oh...Bin Laden says that he didn't do it...

That seals it...he says he didn't do it...

Okay...

I'm convinced...

(snicker)

war  posted on  2015-04-02   14:37:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Oh...Bin Laden says that he didn't do it...

That seals it...he says he didn't do it...

Okay...

I'm convinced...

You were trying to "prove" he did it by posting some bogus material about him claiming credit, but when he TWICE denied he was involved, then what he says doesn't make a difference.

He's guilty simply because YOU say it, right?

FormerLurker  posted on  2015-04-02   15:33:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

He's guilty simply because YOU say it, right?

He's innocent simply because he said it, right?

war  posted on  2015-04-02   16:25:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

He's innocent simply because he said it, right?

As I said, YOU tried to paint him as confessing to being involved in the attacks, where he had actually said he was NOT involved.

So that shows how you like to toss out propaganda as if it's fact.

And what it comes down to is that there is NO evidence that bin Laden was involved one bit whatsoever.

FormerLurker  posted on  2015-04-02   16:48:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#181. To: FormerLurker (#170)

As I said, YOU tried to paint him as confessing to being involved in the attacks, where he had actually said he was NOT involved.

And then he actually said that he was involved in the attacks.

And what it comes down to is that there is NO evidence that bin Laden was involved one bit whatsoever.

His own confession notwithstanding.

war  posted on  2015-04-03 07:51:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]