[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

16 Things That Everyone Needs To Know About Violent Far-Left Revolution In Los Angeles

Undercover video in Arizona alleges ongoing consumer fraud by Fairlife

Dozens arrested after San Francisco protest turns violent Sunday

Looking for the toughest badasses in the city (Los Angeles)

Democrat Civil War Explodes: DNC Chair Threatens to Quit Over David Hogg

Invaders waving Mexican flags, pour onto the 101 Freeway in Los Angeles

Australian Fake News Journo Hit By Rubber Bullet In L.A. Riot

22-year-old dies after being unable to afford asthma inhaler

North Korean Bulsae-4 Long-Range ATGM Spotted Again In Russian Operation Zone

Alexander Dugin: A real Maidan has begun in Los Angeles

State Department Weighing $500 Million Grant to Controversial Gaza Aid Group: Report

LA Mayor Karen Bass ordered LAPD to stand down, blocked aid to federal officers during riots.

Russia Has a Titanium Submarine That Can ‘Deep Dive’ 19,700 Feet

Shocking scene as DC preps for Tr*mp's military birthday parade.

Earth is being Pulled Apart by Crazy Space Weather! Volcanoes go NUTS as Plasma RUNS OUT

Gavin, feel free to use this as a campaign ad in 2028.

US To Formalize Military Presence in Syria in Deal With al-Qaeda-Linked Govt

GOP Rep Introduces Resolution Labeling Free Palestine Slogan as Anti-Semitism

Two-thirds of troops who left the military in 2023 were at risk for mental health conditions

UK and France abandon plans to recognise Palestinian state at conference

Kamala Backs LA Protests After Rioters Attack Federal Officers

Netanyahu's ultra-Orthodox partners move ahead with Knesset dissolution plan

Former Prime Minister of Ukraine: Zelensky will leave the country

Man protesting Paramount ICE raid added to FBI's Most Wanted

JUAN O SAVIN- The Plan to Capture America

US Manufacturing By State: Who Gains Most From 'Made In America'?

Rickards: The Truth About Fort Knox And Gold Leasing

Los Angeles Warzone: "Insurrectionist Mobs" Attack Cops, Set Fires, Block 101 Freeway

The Attack on the USS Liberty (June 8, 1967) - Speech by Survivor Phillip Tourney At the Revisionist History of War Conference (Video)

‘I Smell CIA/Deep State All Over This’ — RFK Jr. VP Nicole Shanahan Blasts Sanctuary Cities,


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Field McConnell - Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot Used On 9/11 Planes, Impossible To Hijack!
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5NnBQJ5at4
Published: Jan 24, 2015
Author: staff
Post Date: 2015-01-24 14:13:06 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 30201
Comments: 402

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 244.

#2. To: Horse (#0) (Edited)

Nothing is uninterruptible, expect maybe a nuclear reaction. They definitely were "hijacked" in a sense because they never reached their destinations and they most definitely didn't hit the towers due to not physically being able to stay together at the recorded speeds the planes were flying at when they hit the towers at basically sea level.

RickyJ  posted on  2015-01-24   16:18:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: RickyJ (#2)

They definitely were "hijacked" in a sense because they never reached their destinations...

CTers usually prefer to state that the planes were *diverted* to a place or places *unknown*...congrats...you may be on the road to recovery...

war  posted on  2015-04-01   9:20:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: war (#81) (Edited)

CTers

The official story is a ridiculous Conspiracy Theory, war, that admittedly would be unacceptable by court standards of integrity and is why the invasion of Afghanistan was launched instead -- which makes you and others arrogantly promoting it fanatic Conspiracy Theorists in denial.

Edited for capitalization and punctuation + word insert.

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-04-01   14:39:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: GreyLmist (#83) (Edited)

The official story is a ridiculous conspiracy theory...

Yea...never have planes been hijacked...nor been used as missiles...a massive explosion and collision don't result in massive damage...10's of thousands of gallons of a volatile accelerant doesn't cause significant fires when introduced, ignited, in to a fuel rich environment doesn't result in fires of any significance and, my personal favorite, gravity doesn't *work* in a direct fashion but in a circuitous one...i.e. a falling object doesn't fall straight down...

PS: If we were going to bomb any nation over a pipeline in that region it would have been Russia...

war  posted on  2015-04-01   15:03:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: war, GreyLmist (#84)

10's of thousands of gallons of a volatile accelerant doesn't cause significant fires when introduced,

MOST of which burnt up OUTSIDE the towers, and what was left burned for only several minutes before being spent.

ignited, in to a fuel rich environment doesn't result in fires of any significance

Sure there were OFFICE fires, but they burned for less than an hour, and as the towers acted as HUGE heatsinks, there's no possible way for temperatures to have reached anywhere close enough to weaken steel.

and, my personal favorite, gravity doesn't *work* in a direct fashion but in a circuitous one...i.e. a falling object doesn't fall straight down...

Gravity doesn't pull you through the floor you're standing on now does it? Are you travelling through the core of the earth as we speak, or is the floor you're standing on remaining in place?

FormerLurker  posted on  2015-04-01   15:28:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: FormerLurker (#85)

Sure there were OFFICE fires, but they burned for less than an hour

Duh...

South Tower hit @ 9:03 AM...collapses @ 9:59 AM...56 minutes...less than an hour...

Congrats...you finally stated something *truthful*...

war  posted on  2015-04-01   15:44:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: war (#88)

how come the.tower that was hit second fell first?

titorite  posted on  2015-04-01   16:12:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: titorite (#91)

how come the.tower that was hit second fell first?

Greater weight of the upper floors...

war  posted on  2015-04-01   16:18:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#98. To: war (#92) (Edited)

how come the.tower that was hit second fell first?

Greater weight of the upper floors...

Didn't you say elsewhere that the upper floors angularly toppled over rather than falling directly downward? -- which would be less weight on the floors below.

Comparing the Towers to steel box beams and the alleged impact zones as similar to the first deconstruction dismantling-step of material removal to make segments of a beam topple over, a welder could take out triangular parts on each side of that space, pointed towards the back like this: < > and it likely still wouldn't slant forward that far up and topple off until they stepped around to the back area and blowtorched it across from one triangular point to the other.

Edited for a word replacement.

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-04-01   18:18:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#102. To: GreyLmist, FormerLurker (#98) (Edited)

Didn't you say elsewhere that the upper floors angularly toppled over rather than falling directly downward? -- which would be less weight on the floors below.

No. As they fell they began to tilt....as is clearly indicated on the videos...

Here's a pic from a CT site so it will have credibility in your *mind*:

In fact, it tilted for a number of reasons not the least of which was because the damage to the supporting columns was not uniformly horizontal...another annoying fact that the controlled demolition crowd cannot accept...

Note also the visible fire...which FormerLurker claims were *out*....

war  posted on  2015-04-02   7:24:51 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#189. To: war (#102) (Edited)

Didn't you say elsewhere that the upper floors angularly toppled over rather than falling directly downward? -- which would be less weight on the floors below.

No. As they fell they began to tilt....as is clearly indicated on the videos...

Here's a pic from a CT site so it will have credibility in your *mind*:

Tower tilt pic

In fact, it tilted for a number of reasons not the least of which was because the damage to the supporting columns was not uniformly horizontal...another annoying fact that the controlled demolition crowd cannot accept...

Note also the visible fire...which FormerLurker claims were *out*....

You at #139: "referring to a source as proof of *fact* is illogical...it's called *circular*"

...unless it's posted by you and then it's merely more like...loopy. A 9/11 CT [Conspiracy Theory] site, imo, would be an official story dispensary -- i.e. the most illogical sort. I didn't ask about why the floors tilted or the visiblity of fire, which is questionable as such in your pic and is better evidence of the much huger absence of raging fires. Tilted...toppled, either way it would be less weight on the floors below, as I said. So, since you didn't have a counterpoint to speak of, how about you try to explain other things of gravitas for us like the lack of significantly visible smoke damage to the Towers from the blasts and sooty burnings. Were their exterior surfaces made of teflon or something like that, do you think? And the first Tower that fell without significanly damaging the one next to it, as it did others farther away. How'd that happen? What of all that indestructible paper debris which didn't spontaneously combust in the high-temperatures you claim weakened the steel? Shouldn't WTC 7 have fallen quicker than the Towers, smaller as it was with less steel to heat up -- or what's the difference between WTC 7 steel and the Towers? That'll do for now as my short-list presently re: 9/11 Laws of Physics anomalies. Awaiting your input.

Edited spelling + comment sentences 2 and 6.

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-04-03   9:14:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#193. To: GreyLmist (#189) (Edited)

Tilted...toppled, either way it would be less weight on the floors below, as I said..

...and ignoring the direct effect of gravity as you did so...

So, since you didn't have a counterpoint to speak of, how about you try to explain other things of gravitas for us like the lack of significantly visible smoke damage to the Towers from the blasts and sooty burnings.

Stipulating, for the moment, that is true...

So freakin' what if there were no stains on the aluminum?

Is it your claim that there was no visible smoke?

And the first Tower that fell without (significantly) damaging the one next to it, as it did others farther away.

A) Where's your evidence for that?

B) The South Tower was closer to the Banker's Trust building which, was directly across Liberty Street, than it was to the North Tower...IIRC, the South Tower actually collapsed in the direction of the SW and took out the Banker's Trust Building and the Winter Garden of the WFC.

What of all that indestructible paper debris which didn't spontaneously combust in the high-temperatures you claim weakened the steel?

When the North Tower was impacted and I looked out the window from my vantage point in the northwest corner of 1 Liberty, it was like a ticker tape parade and some of the papers that were fluttering were singed...I remember one piece of paper hitting the window right before my nose that had a FUJI BANK letterhead.

As for your question...unless you were in the tower in the very area of the fire, you have no way of telling me what was or wasn't on fire...

Shouldn't WTC 7 have fallen quicker than the Towers...

Gravity affects all objects equally...the construction of WTC7 and WTC1 and 2 were not the same.

war  posted on  2015-04-03   9:48:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#241. To: war, FormerLurker (#193)

Me at #189: What of all that indestructible paper debris which didn't spontaneously combust in the high-temperatures you claim weakened the steel?

You at #193: When the North Tower was impacted and I looked out the window from my vantage point in the northwest corner of 1 Liberty, it was like a ticker tape parade and some of the papers that were fluttering were singed...I remember one piece of paper hitting the window right before my nose that had a FUJI BANK letterhead.

As for your question...unless you were in the tower in the very area of the fire, you have no way of telling me what was or wasn't on fire...

Autoignition temperature - Wikipedia

Paper: Autoignition Celsius 218–246 °C | Autoignition Fahrenheit 424–475 °F

You #129 above to FormerLurker at #121:

FormerLurker: The FEMA report states...
war: ...on 2-22 that the temps were as high as 1100c [My note: 2012 °F] at ceiling level and 400c [My note: 752 °F] to 800c [My note: 1472 °F] elsewhere...

Those temps are well capable of compromising the strength of steel...

...and spontaneously combusting paper. You're not presuming to tell me that all of the paper seen in the first two videos at 4um Title: NIST FOIA: William Cirone, Clips 01-49 (WTC Complex & WTC7 after 10:28am) would have fluttered out of the Towers before they fell, are you? -- because news footage doesn't support that.

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-04-07   14:29:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#243. To: GreyLmist (#241)

Did I miss something somewhere? The part where the floors which were on fire were the only floors with paper, maybe?

war  posted on  2015-04-07   14:36:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#244. To: war (#243)

Did I miss something somewhere? The part where the floors which were on fire were the only floors with paper, maybe?

What point are you trying to make? Only the floors with steel compromising fire had paper that somehow withstood those temps?

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-04-07   14:40:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 244.

#245. To: GreyLmist (#244)

What point are you trying to make? Only the floors with steel compromising fire had paper that somehow withstood those temps?

Not all the floors were on fire...not all of the paper in the WTCs burned...

Is there a reason you're not *getting* this?

war  posted on  2015-04-07 14:47:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 244.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]