See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Field McConnell - Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot Used On 9/11 Planes, Impossible To Hijack!
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5NnBQJ5at4
Published: Jan 24, 2015
Author: staff
Post Date: 2015-01-24 14:13:06 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 18090
Comments: 402
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 33.
#2. To: Horse (#0)
(Edited)
Nothing is uninterruptible, expect maybe a nuclear reaction. They definitely were "hijacked" in a sense because they never reached their destinations and they most definitely didn't hit the towers due to not physically being able to stay together at the recorded speeds the planes were flying at when they hit the towers at basically sea level.
Interesting, while watching those two 757 videos it becomes impossible to envision an entire plane simply vaporizing into a hole that's not even fully the circumference of the fuselage, much less to accommodate the components that are not part of the fuselage.
Don't let the JEW in Hollywood dictate what you perceive a 'crash' should look like. The airliners were basically aluminum beer-cans pile-driving into a building, NOT some Spielberg/Cecile B. DeMille/Irwin Allen/et al 'drama', in my opinion. It will be several decades until the whole 9/11 commission report becomes public knowledge, much like the MLK files sealed until 2027.
So you actually believe that a 757 hit the Pentagon?
I'll be 100% convinced when the security-camera footage from surrounding areas is released for public viewing. Nobody has successfully documented an alleged "missile" or documented who launched it, and from where.
photo 001g.gif Perhaps not, but there's a whole lot of other info that makes it having been "something other than a plane," not to mention day-of eye-witness testimonials that are on record, not to mention a slew of other evidence, far more plausible than a plane for which there existed nothing but token pieces that were reported not even to have been from an aircraft of that nature. Other people, many, have done a very good job of detailing this. I used to work in the Pentagon and saw pretty much all of the views from the varying camera angles at all of the entry doors there, only a few at the time, and I'm telling you, not as an opinion, as a fact, that there would have been all the evidence that you could ever ask for if things were on the level. That time of day the VDOT cameras also would have provided a movie-like wide angle of it too that time of day. Not to mention the camera footage of the 32 locations that were rounded up within a few hours of the event including a gas station that I used to buy gas at that was all but right in the flight path.
Yes, that's what I was thinking about. As always: who launched a missile? Where from? Why? How could that many people involved keep their mouths shut??
They didn't keep their mouths shut, many were silenced. Why 32 cameras having had the film taken from them within hours? How is this even possible without prior planning? But consider this, in answer to your own question, explain and reconcile the following: with the notion that he has since then insisted that a large aircraft hit the Pentagon. Otherwise, look, this is all out there. I've spent hundreds of hours of my time over the years satisfying my curiosity in all of this and have come to the conclusion that there are so many ludicrous loose ends for the official story to make any sense whatsoever. You seem to be struggling with the most basic element of "How could that many people involved keep their mouths shut??" which to me is trivial. I can't help you then except to, for example, to ask you how they can get all but unanimous belief that the Federal Reserve is part of the US Government as merely one example. The truth regarding that is a few mouse clicks away on the internet, yet 99%+ of Americans believe that nonsense which is even more easily disproven.
Who did the silencing, and why are they not talking?? Where are the passengers and crew from all these jets that Were Not Involved? Can't just say that "oh, they were shot and their bodies dumped somewhere". Dumped where? Who dumped the bodies and why don't they talk?? It goes on and on :) I'm don't disagree that their are some inconsistencies, but I remain a sceptic :)
I've seen more than enough that suggests to me that I'd have to be a fool to believe what's been pitched as being official.
These people (passengers/crew) had cellphones, why didn't anybody call and say that they were being lined up to be shot or were being held captive somewhere???? To go from the accepted to the unorthodox requires lots of questions to be answered beyond mere dismissal "oh, they were shot somewhere or are living with Elvis Presley on a deserted island". Just sayin'.... :)
By the way, you're hanging up on tremendously trivial stuff if that's what's where you're hung up.
I call for evidence of the bodies of the crew and passengers, just like I call for evidence of the bodies of six million jews in the alleged Holocaust. It's not "trivial", it's crucial to not dismiss evidence/facts that might interfere with a foregone conclusion (no jets involved).
You brought up a great point and something just hit me in pondering my response. They did in fact claim to have found body parts, particularly bone fragments, at the Pentagon site. Isn't it odd though that very few plane parts were found because steel, titanium, and other very expensive and durable metals used in building aircraft were for all intents and purposes completely incinerated, but that bone fragments and body parts, something that incinerate even more readily than metals of varying sorts including steel, and which were encased in said plane, were found? So in essence, the plane and its metals was/were largely incinerated, in an instant, but like the passport in NYC, the body parts which were contained within that same plane managed to make it through the ordeal and were all left out in the field, well before where the initial impact even was, to be discovered later. Does that really make sense to you? It's rhetorical, I don't care if it does or not. As I said, believe what you want on this. There's tons of evidence out there, largely dealing with a cover-up, that says that this doesn't even come close to passing the smell test.
no time to change clothes. the trusted lackeys who were told to hurry up and go get that sh!t before anyone could see what it was.
Meanwhile, broken shit all over the lawn but not a divot in sight.
#34. To: Katniss (#33)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#4. To: RickyJ (#2)
not physically being able to stay together at the recorded speeds the planes were flying at when they hit the towers at basically sea level.
#9. To: X-15 (#4)
#10. To: Katniss (#9)
#13. To: X-15 (#10)
#14. To: Katniss (#13)
#15. To: X-15 (#14)
I'll be 100% convinced when the security-camera footage from surrounding areas is released for public viewing. Nobody has successfully documented an alleged "missile" or documented who launched it, and from where.
#16. To: Katniss (#15)
a gas station that I used to buy gas at that was all but right in the flight path.
#17. To: X-15 (#16)
#19. To: Katniss (#17)
They didn't keep their mouths shut, many were silenced.
#22. To: X-15 (#19)
I'm don't disagree that their are some inconsistencies, but I remain a sceptic :)
#23. To: Katniss, christine (#22)
#27. To: X-15 (#23)
#28. To: Katniss (#27)
#29. To: X-15 (#28)
(Edited)
I call for evidence of the bodies of the crew and passengers, just like I call for evidence of the bodies of six million jews in the alleged Holocaust. It's not "trivial", it's crucial to not dismiss evidence/facts that might interfere with a foregone conclusion (no jets involved).
#32. To: Katniss (#29)
#33. To: christine (#32)
Replies to Comment # 33.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 33.