See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Field McConnell - Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot Used On 9/11 Planes, Impossible To Hijack!
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5NnBQJ5at4
Published: Jan 24, 2015
Author: staff
Post Date: 2015-01-24 14:13:06 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 17985
Comments: 402
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-29) not displayed.
.
.
.
#30. To: Lod (#5)
Ditto !!! "Honest, April 15th is April Fools Day".
This statement is the only honest one that can be made. "Honest, April 15th is April Fools Day".
no time to change clothes. the trusted lackeys who were told to hurry up and go get that sh!t before anyone could see what it was. Truth is still truth even if no one believes it. A lie is still a lie even if everyone believes it.
Meanwhile, broken shit all over the lawn but not a divot in sight.
A) The people who were behind the 9/11 attacks. B) From anywhere, be it submarine, land, or from the air. C) MANY reasons. War, profit, control, money, power, destruction of criminal evidence. D) Blackmail, money, and/or "neutralization". There may have been less than 100 people who were actively engaged in the operation, some of whom may not even have known they were part of it. Heck, they may have been the ones PLANTING that stuff all over the lawn. Note the guys getting out of the bus at approximately 41 seconds into the following video, and note the fact they have duffel bags full of SOMETHING as they walk towards the lawn. Great catch - thanks.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
The why is simple. They needed a new Pearl Harbor. Officially and formally on record. Of course the masses still think that that verifiable fact, along with thousands of others, is just a tin-foil hat conspiracy theory. How could that many people keep their mouths shut? LOL Who says it was that many? Most were fooled by the TV and statements of proof sans any evidence. How come they play it off like the collapse occurred upon impact when that's also on record as not being the case? Or 7 having collapsed in the news before it did? Or all of the cops' and firemens' statements swept under the rug. These questions as posed are posed by a novice that clearly has done no independent research on the topic. As such, it's a waste of time to continue.
I've mentioned it before here or on LP. Surprised that no one else has brought it up or focused on it more. To me, it's clear evidence that they planted "debris", in clear sight of news cameras in fact. Prolly had the "body parts" in there also.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
Maybe, or they could have been inserted into the mix after the fact.
Thanks! I don't remember seeing that back then.
Truth is still truth even if no one believes it. A lie is still a lie even if everyone believes it.
Did you ever see this? It was posted on 4um years ago. Truth is still truth even if no one believes it. A lie is still a lie even if everyone believes it.
What I stated was a fact that Boeing itself says about their planes. What you posted was some videos of planes flying at undetermined speeds that proves nothing. I am surprised there are still any people on this forum that believe the government's lies about 9/11.
God is always good!
You seriously think the speed of this plane was anywhere near 500 MPH? It most definitely was not! God is always good!
Whoever titled that vid was either a fool or a liar; the speed looked around 150MPH to me.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
I'm surprised that anybody thinks that missiles-disguised-as-airliners (cloaking devices right out of Star Trek!!!!!) hit buildings, that's just pot-smoking sci-fi bullshit.
Dov S. Zakheim and I don't believe that planes cannot be remote controlled.
#31. To: christine (#21)
I can't say what happened, but I can say with certainty that what the government says happened didn't and couldn't have.
#32. To: Katniss (#29)
#33. To: christine (#32)
#34. To: Katniss (#33)
#35. To: X-15, Katniss (#16)
As always: who launched a missile? Where from? Why? How could that many people involved keep their mouths shut??
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#36. To: christine (#32)
no time to change clothes. the trusted lackeys who were told to hurry up and go get that sh!t before anyone could see what it was.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#37. To: FormerLurker (#36)
#38. To: FormerLurker (#35)
As always: who launched a missile? Where from? Why? How could that many people involved keep their mouths shut??
#39. To: Lod (#37)
Great catch - thanks.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#40. To: FormerLurker (#39)
#41. To: Lod (#40)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#42. To: FormerLurker (#36)
#43. To: X-15 (#28)
killtown.911review.org/911smokingguns.html
#44. To: X-15 (#4)
#45. To: X-15 (#4)
#46. To: RickyJ (#45)
#47. To: RickyJ (#44)
-Alex Kurtagic
#48. To: X-15 (#47)
Good heavens... How dare you question "proven facts" that everyone knows to be true? I have a mutual friend that worked in the Pentagon, was there that fateful day. She said it was a damned airplane that went in, was found there, was removed from there. We all KNOW that those people that WERE THERE IN THE BUILDING were in on this whole thing, dont we????????? I'm surprised that anybody thinks that missiles-disguised-as-airliners (cloaking devices right out of Star Trek!!!!!) hit buildings, that's just pot-smoking sci-fi bullshit.
#49. To: Cynicom (#48)
Too bad she didn't take any pictures and no one else bothered to either of that "damn" plane. You are entitled to believe whatever you want to believe though. She said it was a damned airplane that went in, was found there, was removed from there.
God is always good!
#50. To: Cynicom (#48)
And you know your friend saw the damn plane because she said so, or was she told it was a plane and never saw it herself? We all KNOW that those people that WERE THERE IN THE BUILDING were in on this whole thing, dont we?????????
God is always good!
#51. To: Cynicom (#48) (Edited)
We all KNOW that those people that WERE THERE IN THE BUILDING were in on this whole thing, dont we????????? Did she happen to say anything about the Pentagon not being in high alert mode enough to even point some of the many surveillance cameras there in the direction(s) of an alleged incoming plane claimed to have been wandering around long after the WTC was reportedly struck twice? It would not have been necessary for many people in the building to have been in on a staged strike. It wasn't evacuated in that direction, which was burning and billowing with smoke. That section was sparsely populated due to the renovations there that had been ongoing since Clinton's administration, during which the Rumsfeld-spotlighted trillions of dollars in transactions had gone missing/unaccounted for -- some of it, perhaps, black-budgeted to pre-rig that section for inward exploding and imploding FX/effects. Some interesting YouTube videos, imo: 911 Pentagon - 1 minute 911 Evacuation of Pentagon ordered [a few minutes before the strike and had barely started?], but [ordered] by whom? 911 Washington Monument - less than 1 minute The Washington Monument blows up on live TV. Or does it? C-Span; 9/11 Live Coverage - 10 minutes At 8:48, a fire at the State Department is reported ... a fireball was reportedly witnessed at the Pentagon ... a helicopter explosion was reportedly witnessed at the Pentagon ... Edited to add video time-data + bracketed insert notations. I have a mutual friend that worked in the Pentagon, was there that fateful day. She said it was a damned airplane that went in, was found there, was removed from there.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#52. To: GreyLmist, Horse, RickyJ, Jethro Tull, x-15, christine, wakeup, Lod, Bush is a moonie (#51)
#53. To: Neo TryingtoWarnYou, GreyLmist, Horse, RickyJ, Jethro Tull, x-15, christine, wakeup, Lod, Bush is a moonie (#52)
ABELDANGER. Getting close to the whole ball of wax on 911.
"If ignorance is truly bliss, then why do so many Americans need Prozac?" - Dave McGowan
#54. To: randge (#53)
Thanks randge you got it!
#55. To: GreyLmist, Katniss (#51)
Of course not. Ask Katniss about that. He worked at the Pentagon. Did she happen to say anything about the Pentagon not being in high alert mode enough to even point some of the many surveillance cameras there in the direction(s) of an alleged incoming plane claimed to have been wandering around long after the WTC was reportedly struck twice?
Truth is still truth even if no one believes it. A lie is still a lie even if everyone believes it.
#56. To: X-15, Katniss (#10)
I concur with X-15. All airplanes are built as light as reasonably possible, as any and all weight works against the whole concept of flight. There is no practical need for any non-combat airplane to be built to withstand any abuse, much less impact into a mountain. Compared to any average car, airplanes are relatively fragile.
#57. To: randge (#53)
Long, needed editing, but most worthwhile - thanks.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
#58. To: Pinguinite (#56)
Compared to any average car, airplanes are relatively fragile. IDK about that, watch some of those risky landing videos sometime on youtube. Planes need to be built to withstand much higher wind sheer than autos to start. They're less compact to be sure, but given that I'm not sure I can agree with planes being relatively fragile. I'm not sure what the point is this far down the thread, so take that comment in isolation. I'm not necessarily agreeing or disagreeing with anything that I'm aware of. I concur with X-15. All airplanes are built as light as reasonably possible, as any and all weight works against the whole concept of flight. There is no practical need for any non-combat airplane to be built to withstand any abuse, much less impact into a mountain.
#59. To: christine (#55)
Ask Katniss about that. He worked at the Pentagon. That's interesting, I always thought Katniss was a female. Of course not.
God is always good!
#60. To: christine, Katniss (#55)
christine at #55: Of course not. Ask Katniss about that. He worked at the Pentagon. Ok. Am asking, Katniss, what your Pentagon-insights might be in assessment of the issues at #51. Me at #51: Did she [an alleged Pentagon employee and 9/11 plane claimant] happen to say anything about the Pentagon not being in high alert mode enough to even point some of the many surveillance cameras there in the direction(s) of an alleged incoming plane claimed to have been wandering around long after the WTC was reportedly struck twice?
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#61. To: Neo TryingtoWarnYou (#52) (Edited)
At 2:12-3:09 of the 2nd video in the playlist, Field McConnell talks about the UK's mega-corporation, SERCO, controlling America's nuclear codes. That's worrisome and essentially treasonous at the highest levels here. Edited formatting.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#62. To: X-15, Katniss, christine (#23)
It would have been simple enough to introduce a knockout gas or something more lethal into the ventilation system onboard the aircraft. These people (passengers/crew) had cellphones, why didn't anybody call and say that they were being lined up to be shot or were being held captive somewhere???? To go from the accepted to the unorthodox requires lots of questions to be answered beyond mere dismissal "oh, they were shot somewhere or are living with Elvis Presley on a deserted island". Just sayin'....
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#63. To: GreyLmist (#60)
Several years prior to that date there were multiple cameras of the entrance and entrance areas, the views of which one could see at the guard desk upon entering. The same was true of all sides of the building and property. It's pure gullibility to believe the Fed's account of this and the people that have ever worked there know this. There was also a VDOT camera that pans that entire skyline that time of day. One could access it online despite the internet having been in its infancy. VDOT has always kept footage for a certain amount of time. There was also a gas station for military members only right in the flight path that I gassed up at numerous times that had video yet had it stolen along with 31 other known videos within 3 hours of the event. I have to believe that the VDOT footage was also taken or destroyed as a part of that. There is an entrance/exit to the building on the helipad side, which is the side in question. It's pure assinitity for anyone to attempt to tell you that there were no cameras with 24/7 surveillance of any and all exits to that building. Even once in, people could only access certain areas of the building pending their levels of access. Generally speaking the further in in the rings one went, with five "rings," the greater clearances one needed. Anyone without those clearances could not access nor be permitted entry into those areas. Areas were also segregated by military brand, dept., etc. with permissions only being given to those needing access. Again, to think that the exterior doors were not well covered via cameras is nothing but pure gullibility. In other words, don't believe for a second that the only available footage was that joke of three frames, or whatever it was, that the Feds finally released years after the actual occurrence. There was no national interest that could not have been removed from that film to have it released within days if not hours of that event. Frankly, I cannot imagine anything sensitive at all in it, never say never though. Either way, the fact that footage from 32 private cameras in that immediate area were stolen, all within 3 hours, tells us all that we need to know. They wouldn't even have been able to figure out where all of those 32 were in three hours much less have them all confiscated during that time. Clearly the due diligence thereof was done well prior to that day. The tours of the building more or less simply "feel good" tours. You really don't see much of any real value, it's mostly museum type stuff with a tremendously limited amount of access to the actual building. I'm not even sure that they run the tours anymore although I'd guess that they do. Ok. Am asking, Katniss, what your Pentagon-insights might be in assessment of the issues at #51.
#64. To: GreyLmist, Christine (#60)
BTW, if you're ever in the area, let me know. I'll take you down there and show you where everything used to be, where that 'cab' was, the flight path, where I was run off by an abusive and brainless LEO for publicly taking pics in public a day later, where gas station used to be, which IMO is no a coincidence that it's no longer there, i.e., part of the ongoing coverup. I can tell you how to find the camera view on the VDOT camera. If you look at it in the a.m., when this happened, in between 9 and 10 a.m., that camera is always pointed towards the northwestern skyline to capture the inbound commuting traffic, as it's a traffic camera, and from it you can see the highways as well as the entire skyline which easily would have captured no less than 10 seconds of the last part of that flight.
#65. To: FormerLurker (#62)
Who says that the calls weren't staged? That would be incredibly easy to do. It would have been simple enough to introduce a knockout gas or something more lethal into the ventilation system onboard the aircraft.
#66. To: Katniss (#63) (Edited)
the really real stuff would be ubderground. patagon pentalawn.., when one studies crash physics one can not help to.wonder. "how come a plane cane crash through.a.building like the pentacon(sarc) ... but fail to blow away.wooden spools." from 7 to the lawn the epa failed to act upon, ive disected 911 completly and what i discovered is that even among those who care, we seem to discombulated to effect meaningful change... even when irrefutable proof is given before ones eyes... we are still left with a majority of ignorant docille IGNORANT sheeple.... and i hate the word sheeple. with a passion... yet what can be done when the majority think dual wielding gun slingers can target with accuracy.... sandy hook, ft hood, bosron etc etc.. the propaganda matrix.relies on. propaganda. to definded ones mi.d is to learn their tech.iques. and share with others that they might be equally well armed.
______________________________________
Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.
#67. To: Horse (#0)
i have bitched about this subject for years. the hard.ware software issue.. it is as in conteovertable as low alltitude friction. .. f1 racing and 911 ..... i dont get why so few care and i can only attribute it to our propaganda matrix.
______________________________________
Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.
#68. To: Katniss (#65)
That goes without saying, and is especially true since cell phone calls from cruising altitude were impossible back in 2001. I was simply using X-15's comment to bring up the notion that the passengers and crew could have been killed off onboard the plane with a lethal agent introduced into the ventilation system, allowing the plane to be flown remotely without any interference. Of course with the crew and passengers deceased, those calls would need to come from someone else. Perhaps someone onboard (who had a gas mask stuffed in their carry on bag) could have taken some of the passenger's phones, taken out the SIM cards, stuck them into a reader which would have transmitted the specifics to a radio center with the proper equipment to emulate the owner's voice. Now exactly how they obtained samples of the correct voices, hmmm, NSA perhaps? Who says that the calls weren't staged? That would be incredibly easy to do.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#69. To: titorite (#66)
911 is a complete ruse, we're on the same sheet there. That hole in the Pentagon wall quite clearly isn't big enough to have a medium sized commmercial airliner go into it. Then when we're expected to believe that the wings folded up and followed the fuselage into the hole, and as you say with no marks on the lawn, all the lamposts undisturbed, the spools fine, etc., people have to a trained monkey not to see through that. Unfortunately we have a nation full of trained monkeys. Untrained monkeys are brighter.
#70. To: FormerLurker (#68)
Yeah, agree. A minor issue for anyone that would carry this out.
.
.
.
Comments (71 - 402) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest