See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Field McConnell - Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot Used On 9/11 Planes, Impossible To Hijack!
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5NnBQJ5at4
Published: Jan 24, 2015
Author: staff
Post Date: 2015-01-24 14:13:06 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 18146
Comments: 402
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Horse (#0)
Someone else watch this and tell us that it's totally bogus, thanks much.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
Nothing is uninterruptible, expect maybe a nuclear reaction. They definitely were "hijacked" in a sense because they never reached their destinations and they most definitely didn't hit the towers due to not physically being able to stay together at the recorded speeds the planes were flying at when they hit the towers at basically sea level.
God is always good!
Boeing wins patent on uninterruptible autopilot system Boeing’s is, of course, not the first autopilot technology in existence, but this one has been designed with counterterrorism first and foremost in mind. Not only is it “uninterruptible” — so that even a tortured pilot cannot turn it off — but it can be activated remotely via radio or satellite by government agencies.
#2. To: Horse (#0)
(Edited)
#3. To: Horse (#0)
#4. To: RickyJ (#2)
not physically being able to stay together at the recorded speeds the planes were flying at when they hit the towers at basically sea level.
-Alex Kurtagic
#5. To: X-15 (#4)
Dov S. Zakheim and I don't believe that planes cannot be remote controlled.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
#6. To: Lod, Cynicom (#5)
The capability will exist in the future, but the reality is that it takes at least two officers to fly the jet due to in-flight decisions (weather, course corrections, in-flight emergencies requiring diversion to another airport, etc.) that can only be made on-deck. That will never change. Would you fly on an airliner without a human being at the controls??
-Alex Kurtagic
#7. To: X-15 (#6)
Well gee, why not? The Joogle dude wants to take the controls out of cars. Lends a whole new meaning to computer crash, which I should add, never happens to me more than once per hour. Would you fly on an airliner without a human being at the controls?
Godfrey Smith: Mike, I wouldn't worry. Prosperity is just around the corner.
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)
#8. To: X-15 (#6)
Nothing man makes is flawless. Every contingency cannot be built into any machine, ever. Would you fly on an airliner without a human being at the controls??
#9. To: X-15 (#4)
Interesting, while watching those two 757 videos it becomes impossible to envision an entire plane simply vaporizing into a hole that's not even fully the circumference of the fuselage, much less to accommodate the components that are not part of the fuselage.
#10. To: Katniss (#9)
Don't let the JEW in Hollywood dictate what you perceive a 'crash' should look like. The airliners were basically aluminum beer-cans pile-driving into a building, NOT some Spielberg/Cecile B. DeMille/Irwin Allen/et al 'drama', in my opinion. It will be several decades until the whole 9/11 commission report becomes public knowledge, much like the MLK files sealed until 2027.
-Alex Kurtagic
#11. To: RickyJ (#2)
Likewise: Lockheed U-2 - Wikipedia Nothing is uninterruptible, expect maybe a nuclear reaction. They definitely were "hijacked" in a sense because they never reached their destinations and they most definitely didn't hit the towers due to not physically being able to stay together at the recorded speeds the planes were flying at when they hit the towers at basically sea level.
the early U-2A and U-2C models had to fly very near their never exceed speed (VNE). The margin between that maximum speed and the stall speed at that altitude was only 10 knots (12 mph; 19 km/h) below its maximum speed. This narrow window was referred to by the pilots as the "coffin corner", because breaching either limit would likely cause the wings or tail to separate. For 90% of the time on a typical mission the U-2 was flying less than five knots above stall speed. A stall would cause a decrease in altitude, possibly leading to detection and overstress of the airframe.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#12. To: X-15 (#10)
They might have been lightened up some since I was a child but I remember an airplane park where we could climb onto the wings and go inside. Considerably sturdier than a beer can by my recollection. The airliners were basically aluminum beer-cans pile-driving into a building, NOT some Spielberg/Cecile B. DeMille/Irwin Allen/et al 'drama', in my opinion.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#13. To: X-15 (#10)
So you actually believe that a 757 hit the Pentagon?
#14. To: Katniss (#13)
I'll be 100% convinced when the security-camera footage from surrounding areas is released for public viewing. Nobody has successfully documented an alleged "missile" or documented who launched it, and from where.
-Alex Kurtagic
#15. To: X-15 (#14)
photo 001g.gif Perhaps not, but there's a whole lot of other info that makes it having been "something other than a plane," not to mention day-of eye-witness testimonials that are on record, not to mention a slew of other evidence, far more plausible than a plane for which there existed nothing but token pieces that were reported not even to have been from an aircraft of that nature. Other people, many, have done a very good job of detailing this. I used to work in the Pentagon and saw pretty much all of the views from the varying camera angles at all of the entry doors there, only a few at the time, and I'm telling you, not as an opinion, as a fact, that there would have been all the evidence that you could ever ask for if things were on the level. That time of day the VDOT cameras also would have provided a movie-like wide angle of it too that time of day. Not to mention the camera footage of the 32 locations that were rounded up within a few hours of the event including a gas station that I used to buy gas at that was all but right in the flight path. I'll be 100% convinced when the security-camera footage from surrounding areas is released for public viewing. Nobody has successfully documented an alleged "missile" or documented who launched it, and from where.
#16. To: Katniss (#15)
Yes, that's what I was thinking about. As always: who launched a missile? Where from? Why? How could that many people involved keep their mouths shut?? a gas station that I used to buy gas at that was all but right in the flight path.
-Alex Kurtagic
#17. To: X-15 (#16)
They didn't keep their mouths shut, many were silenced. Why 32 cameras having had the film taken from them within hours? How is this even possible without prior planning? But consider this, in answer to your own question, explain and reconcile the following: with the notion that he has since then insisted that a large aircraft hit the Pentagon. Otherwise, look, this is all out there. I've spent hundreds of hours of my time over the years satisfying my curiosity in all of this and have come to the conclusion that there are so many ludicrous loose ends for the official story to make any sense whatsoever. You seem to be struggling with the most basic element of "How could that many people involved keep their mouths shut??" which to me is trivial. I can't help you then except to, for example, to ask you how they can get all but unanimous belief that the Federal Reserve is part of the US Government as merely one example. The truth regarding that is a few mouse clicks away on the internet, yet 99%+ of Americans believe that nonsense which is even more easily disproven.
#18. To: RickyJ (#2)
The planes were electronically hijacked by Command Transmitter system. Flight 93 was shot down because the crew was able to regain control.
The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie
#19. To: Katniss (#17)
Who did the silencing, and why are they not talking?? Where are the passengers and crew from all these jets that Were Not Involved? Can't just say that "oh, they were shot and their bodies dumped somewhere". Dumped where? Who dumped the bodies and why don't they talk?? It goes on and on :) I'm don't disagree that their are some inconsistencies, but I remain a sceptic :) They didn't keep their mouths shut, many were silenced.
-Alex Kurtagic
#20. To: Katniss, X-15 (#13)
This video says that a commercial airliner cannot take the G force of that power dive. That is why I believe either a military jet or bombs were used to take out the Pentagon auditors. We need crime scene photos and evidence from the Pentagon to be released.
The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie
#21. To: X-15 (#16)
I can't say what happened, but I can say with certainty that what the government says happened didn't and couldn't have.
#22. To: X-15 (#19)
I've seen more than enough that suggests to me that I'd have to be a fool to believe what's been pitched as being official. I'm don't disagree that their are some inconsistencies, but I remain a sceptic :)
#23. To: Katniss, christine (#22)
These people (passengers/crew) had cellphones, why didn't anybody call and say that they were being lined up to be shot or were being held captive somewhere???? To go from the accepted to the unorthodox requires lots of questions to be answered beyond mere dismissal "oh, they were shot somewhere or are living with Elvis Presley on a deserted island". Just sayin'.... :)
-Alex Kurtagic
#24. To: christine (#21)
Yes, lots of questions require more thorough answers from the government, too many holes in their stories as it is. Witholding evidence is just as abhorrent as letting people rot in Cuba/Club Gitmo for years without their day in court (speedy trial and all that).
-Alex Kurtagic
#25. To: X-15, Katniss, christine (#23)
Cell phones did not work in flight at that time. Cell phones can be electronically blocked on ground level. Gas could have been used to kill the pilots and the crew before being electronically hijacked. Won't know until we get control of the government.
The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie
#26. To: X-15 (#23)
Again, that's all out there.
#27. To: X-15 (#23)
By the way, you're hanging up on tremendously trivial stuff if that's what's where you're hung up.
#28. To: Katniss (#27)
I call for evidence of the bodies of the crew and passengers, just like I call for evidence of the bodies of six million jews in the alleged Holocaust. It's not "trivial", it's crucial to not dismiss evidence/facts that might interfere with a foregone conclusion (no jets involved).
-Alex Kurtagic
#29. To: X-15 (#28) (Edited)
You brought up a great point and something just hit me in pondering my response. They did in fact claim to have found body parts, particularly bone fragments, at the Pentagon site. Isn't it odd though that very few plane parts were found because steel, titanium, and other very expensive and durable metals used in building aircraft were for all intents and purposes completely incinerated, but that bone fragments and body parts, something that incinerate even more readily than metals of varying sorts including steel, and which were encased in said plane, were found? So in essence, the plane and its metals was/were largely incinerated, in an instant, but like the passport in NYC, the body parts which were contained within that same plane managed to make it through the ordeal and were all left out in the field, well before where the initial impact even was, to be discovered later. Does that really make sense to you? It's rhetorical, I don't care if it does or not. As I said, believe what you want on this. There's tons of evidence out there, largely dealing with a cover-up, that says that this doesn't even come close to passing the smell test. I call for evidence of the bodies of the crew and passengers, just like I call for evidence of the bodies of six million jews in the alleged Holocaust. It's not "trivial", it's crucial to not dismiss evidence/facts that might interfere with a foregone conclusion (no jets involved).
#30. To: Lod (#5)
Ditto !!! Dov S. Zakheim and I don't believe that planes cannot be remote controlled.
"Honest, April 15th is April Fools Day".
#31. To: christine (#21)
This statement is the only honest one that can be made. I can't say what happened, but I can say with certainty that what the government says happened didn't and couldn't have.
"Honest, April 15th is April Fools Day".
#32. To: Katniss (#29)
no time to change clothes. the trusted lackeys who were told to hurry up and go get that sh!t before anyone could see what it was. 
Truth is still truth even if no one believes it. A lie is still a lie even if everyone believes it.
#33. To: christine (#32)
Meanwhile, broken shit all over the lawn but not a divot in sight.
#34. To: Katniss (#33)
#35. To: X-15, Katniss (#16)
A) The people who were behind the 9/11 attacks. B) From anywhere, be it submarine, land, or from the air. C) MANY reasons. War, profit, control, money, power, destruction of criminal evidence. D) Blackmail, money, and/or "neutralization". There may have been less than 100 people who were actively engaged in the operation, some of whom may not even have known they were part of it. As always: who launched a missile? Where from? Why? How could that many people involved keep their mouths shut??
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#36. To: christine (#32)
Heck, they may have been the ones PLANTING that stuff all over the lawn. Note the guys getting out of the bus at approximately 41 seconds into the following video, and note the fact they have duffel bags full of SOMETHING as they walk towards the lawn. no time to change clothes. the trusted lackeys who were told to hurry up and go get that sh!t before anyone could see what it was.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#37. To: FormerLurker (#36)
Great catch - thanks.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
#38. To: FormerLurker (#35)
The why is simple. They needed a new Pearl Harbor. Officially and formally on record. Of course the masses still think that that verifiable fact, along with thousands of others, is just a tin-foil hat conspiracy theory. How could that many people keep their mouths shut? LOL Who says it was that many? Most were fooled by the TV and statements of proof sans any evidence. How come they play it off like the collapse occurred upon impact when that's also on record as not being the case? Or 7 having collapsed in the news before it did? Or all of the cops' and firemens' statements swept under the rug. These questions as posed are posed by a novice that clearly has done no independent research on the topic. As such, it's a waste of time to continue. As always: who launched a missile? Where from? Why? How could that many people involved keep their mouths shut??
#39. To: Lod (#37)
I've mentioned it before here or on LP. Surprised that no one else has brought it up or focused on it more. To me, it's clear evidence that they planted "debris", in clear sight of news cameras in fact. Great catch - thanks.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#40. To: FormerLurker (#39)
Prolly had the "body parts" in there also.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
.
.
.
Comments (41 - 402) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest