See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Field McConnell - Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot Used On 9/11 Planes, Impossible To Hijack!
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5NnBQJ5at4
Published: Jan 24, 2015
Author: staff
Post Date: 2015-01-24 14:13:06 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 18390
Comments: 402
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-44) not displayed.
.
.
.
#45. To: X-15 (#4)
You seriously think the speed of this plane was anywhere near 500 MPH? It most definitely was not! God is always good!
Whoever titled that vid was either a fool or a liar; the speed looked around 150MPH to me.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
I'm surprised that anybody thinks that missiles-disguised-as-airliners (cloaking devices right out of Star Trek!!!!!) hit buildings, that's just pot-smoking sci-fi bullshit.
#46. To: RickyJ (#45)
#47. To: RickyJ (#44)
-Alex Kurtagic
#48. To: X-15 (#47)
Good heavens... How dare you question "proven facts" that everyone knows to be true? I have a mutual friend that worked in the Pentagon, was there that fateful day. She said it was a damned airplane that went in, was found there, was removed from there. We all KNOW that those people that WERE THERE IN THE BUILDING were in on this whole thing, dont we????????? I'm surprised that anybody thinks that missiles-disguised-as-airliners (cloaking devices right out of Star Trek!!!!!) hit buildings, that's just pot-smoking sci-fi bullshit.
#49. To: Cynicom (#48)
Too bad she didn't take any pictures and no one else bothered to either of that "damn" plane. You are entitled to believe whatever you want to believe though. She said it was a damned airplane that went in, was found there, was removed from there.
God is always good!
#50. To: Cynicom (#48)
And you know your friend saw the damn plane because she said so, or was she told it was a plane and never saw it herself? We all KNOW that those people that WERE THERE IN THE BUILDING were in on this whole thing, dont we?????????
God is always good!
#51. To: Cynicom (#48) (Edited)
We all KNOW that those people that WERE THERE IN THE BUILDING were in on this whole thing, dont we????????? Did she happen to say anything about the Pentagon not being in high alert mode enough to even point some of the many surveillance cameras there in the direction(s) of an alleged incoming plane claimed to have been wandering around long after the WTC was reportedly struck twice? It would not have been necessary for many people in the building to have been in on a staged strike. It wasn't evacuated in that direction, which was burning and billowing with smoke. That section was sparsely populated due to the renovations there that had been ongoing since Clinton's administration, during which the Rumsfeld-spotlighted trillions of dollars in transactions had gone missing/unaccounted for -- some of it, perhaps, black-budgeted to pre-rig that section for inward exploding and imploding FX/effects. Some interesting YouTube videos, imo: 911 Pentagon - 1 minute 911 Evacuation of Pentagon ordered [a few minutes before the strike and had barely started?], but [ordered] by whom? 911 Washington Monument - less than 1 minute The Washington Monument blows up on live TV. Or does it? C-Span; 9/11 Live Coverage - 10 minutes At 8:48, a fire at the State Department is reported ... a fireball was reportedly witnessed at the Pentagon ... a helicopter explosion was reportedly witnessed at the Pentagon ... Edited to add video time-data + bracketed insert notations. I have a mutual friend that worked in the Pentagon, was there that fateful day. She said it was a damned airplane that went in, was found there, was removed from there.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#52. To: GreyLmist, Horse, RickyJ, Jethro Tull, x-15, christine, wakeup, Lod, Bush is a moonie (#51)
#53. To: Neo TryingtoWarnYou, GreyLmist, Horse, RickyJ, Jethro Tull, x-15, christine, wakeup, Lod, Bush is a moonie (#52)
ABELDANGER. Getting close to the whole ball of wax on 911.
"If ignorance is truly bliss, then why do so many Americans need Prozac?" - Dave McGowan
#54. To: randge (#53)
Thanks randge you got it!
#55. To: GreyLmist, Katniss (#51)
Of course not. Ask Katniss about that. He worked at the Pentagon. Did she happen to say anything about the Pentagon not being in high alert mode enough to even point some of the many surveillance cameras there in the direction(s) of an alleged incoming plane claimed to have been wandering around long after the WTC was reportedly struck twice?
Truth is still truth even if no one believes it. A lie is still a lie even if everyone believes it.
#56. To: X-15, Katniss (#10)
I concur with X-15. All airplanes are built as light as reasonably possible, as any and all weight works against the whole concept of flight. There is no practical need for any non-combat airplane to be built to withstand any abuse, much less impact into a mountain. Compared to any average car, airplanes are relatively fragile.
#57. To: randge (#53)
Long, needed editing, but most worthwhile - thanks.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
#58. To: Pinguinite (#56)
Compared to any average car, airplanes are relatively fragile. IDK about that, watch some of those risky landing videos sometime on youtube. Planes need to be built to withstand much higher wind sheer than autos to start. They're less compact to be sure, but given that I'm not sure I can agree with planes being relatively fragile. I'm not sure what the point is this far down the thread, so take that comment in isolation. I'm not necessarily agreeing or disagreeing with anything that I'm aware of. I concur with X-15. All airplanes are built as light as reasonably possible, as any and all weight works against the whole concept of flight. There is no practical need for any non-combat airplane to be built to withstand any abuse, much less impact into a mountain.
#59. To: christine (#55)
Ask Katniss about that. He worked at the Pentagon. That's interesting, I always thought Katniss was a female. Of course not.
God is always good!
#60. To: christine, Katniss (#55)
christine at #55: Of course not. Ask Katniss about that. He worked at the Pentagon. Ok. Am asking, Katniss, what your Pentagon-insights might be in assessment of the issues at #51. Me at #51: Did she [an alleged Pentagon employee and 9/11 plane claimant] happen to say anything about the Pentagon not being in high alert mode enough to even point some of the many surveillance cameras there in the direction(s) of an alleged incoming plane claimed to have been wandering around long after the WTC was reportedly struck twice?
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#61. To: Neo TryingtoWarnYou (#52) (Edited)
At 2:12-3:09 of the 2nd video in the playlist, Field McConnell talks about the UK's mega-corporation, SERCO, controlling America's nuclear codes. That's worrisome and essentially treasonous at the highest levels here. Edited formatting.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#62. To: X-15, Katniss, christine (#23)
It would have been simple enough to introduce a knockout gas or something more lethal into the ventilation system onboard the aircraft. These people (passengers/crew) had cellphones, why didn't anybody call and say that they were being lined up to be shot or were being held captive somewhere???? To go from the accepted to the unorthodox requires lots of questions to be answered beyond mere dismissal "oh, they were shot somewhere or are living with Elvis Presley on a deserted island". Just sayin'....
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#63. To: GreyLmist (#60)
Several years prior to that date there were multiple cameras of the entrance and entrance areas, the views of which one could see at the guard desk upon entering. The same was true of all sides of the building and property. It's pure gullibility to believe the Fed's account of this and the people that have ever worked there know this. There was also a VDOT camera that pans that entire skyline that time of day. One could access it online despite the internet having been in its infancy. VDOT has always kept footage for a certain amount of time. There was also a gas station for military members only right in the flight path that I gassed up at numerous times that had video yet had it stolen along with 31 other known videos within 3 hours of the event. I have to believe that the VDOT footage was also taken or destroyed as a part of that. There is an entrance/exit to the building on the helipad side, which is the side in question. It's pure assinitity for anyone to attempt to tell you that there were no cameras with 24/7 surveillance of any and all exits to that building. Even once in, people could only access certain areas of the building pending their levels of access. Generally speaking the further in in the rings one went, with five "rings," the greater clearances one needed. Anyone without those clearances could not access nor be permitted entry into those areas. Areas were also segregated by military brand, dept., etc. with permissions only being given to those needing access. Again, to think that the exterior doors were not well covered via cameras is nothing but pure gullibility. In other words, don't believe for a second that the only available footage was that joke of three frames, or whatever it was, that the Feds finally released years after the actual occurrence. There was no national interest that could not have been removed from that film to have it released within days if not hours of that event. Frankly, I cannot imagine anything sensitive at all in it, never say never though. Either way, the fact that footage from 32 private cameras in that immediate area were stolen, all within 3 hours, tells us all that we need to know. They wouldn't even have been able to figure out where all of those 32 were in three hours much less have them all confiscated during that time. Clearly the due diligence thereof was done well prior to that day. The tours of the building more or less simply "feel good" tours. You really don't see much of any real value, it's mostly museum type stuff with a tremendously limited amount of access to the actual building. I'm not even sure that they run the tours anymore although I'd guess that they do. Ok. Am asking, Katniss, what your Pentagon-insights might be in assessment of the issues at #51.
#64. To: GreyLmist, Christine (#60)
BTW, if you're ever in the area, let me know. I'll take you down there and show you where everything used to be, where that 'cab' was, the flight path, where I was run off by an abusive and brainless LEO for publicly taking pics in public a day later, where gas station used to be, which IMO is no a coincidence that it's no longer there, i.e., part of the ongoing coverup. I can tell you how to find the camera view on the VDOT camera. If you look at it in the a.m., when this happened, in between 9 and 10 a.m., that camera is always pointed towards the northwestern skyline to capture the inbound commuting traffic, as it's a traffic camera, and from it you can see the highways as well as the entire skyline which easily would have captured no less than 10 seconds of the last part of that flight.
#65. To: FormerLurker (#62)
Who says that the calls weren't staged? That would be incredibly easy to do. It would have been simple enough to introduce a knockout gas or something more lethal into the ventilation system onboard the aircraft.
#66. To: Katniss (#63) (Edited)
the really real stuff would be ubderground. patagon pentalawn.., when one studies crash physics one can not help to.wonder. "how come a plane cane crash through.a.building like the pentacon(sarc) ... but fail to blow away.wooden spools." from 7 to the lawn the epa failed to act upon, ive disected 911 completly and what i discovered is that even among those who care, we seem to discombulated to effect meaningful change... even when irrefutable proof is given before ones eyes... we are still left with a majority of ignorant docille IGNORANT sheeple.... and i hate the word sheeple. with a passion... yet what can be done when the majority think dual wielding gun slingers can target with accuracy.... sandy hook, ft hood, bosron etc etc.. the propaganda matrix.relies on. propaganda. to definded ones mi.d is to learn their tech.iques. and share with others that they might be equally well armed.
______________________________________
Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.
#67. To: Horse (#0)
i have bitched about this subject for years. the hard.ware software issue.. it is as in conteovertable as low alltitude friction. .. f1 racing and 911 ..... i dont get why so few care and i can only attribute it to our propaganda matrix.
______________________________________
Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.
#68. To: Katniss (#65)
That goes without saying, and is especially true since cell phone calls from cruising altitude were impossible back in 2001. I was simply using X-15's comment to bring up the notion that the passengers and crew could have been killed off onboard the plane with a lethal agent introduced into the ventilation system, allowing the plane to be flown remotely without any interference. Of course with the crew and passengers deceased, those calls would need to come from someone else. Perhaps someone onboard (who had a gas mask stuffed in their carry on bag) could have taken some of the passenger's phones, taken out the SIM cards, stuck them into a reader which would have transmitted the specifics to a radio center with the proper equipment to emulate the owner's voice. Now exactly how they obtained samples of the correct voices, hmmm, NSA perhaps? Who says that the calls weren't staged? That would be incredibly easy to do.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#69. To: titorite (#66)
911 is a complete ruse, we're on the same sheet there. That hole in the Pentagon wall quite clearly isn't big enough to have a medium sized commmercial airliner go into it. Then when we're expected to believe that the wings folded up and followed the fuselage into the hole, and as you say with no marks on the lawn, all the lamposts undisturbed, the spools fine, etc., people have to a trained monkey not to see through that. Unfortunately we have a nation full of trained monkeys. Untrained monkeys are brighter.
#70. To: FormerLurker (#68)
Yeah, agree. A minor issue for anyone that would carry this out.
#71. To: Horse (#0) (Edited)
People who want to take the mass media version of things at face value are desperately fighting off the inevitable conclusion that we are chumped and swindled about every large subject. To accept that 9/11 is an inside job is to admit the people running society are vicious beasts that will do absolutely anything to keep themselves in power.... except go straight and give people what they actually want and need, of course. This site has got two big big threads going on 9/11. People done a valiant job laying out everything it should take to convince the hardest skeptic in both. Bear in mind that there are Jews and their clones crawling all over cyberspace throwing monkey wrenches into forums strictly to gum up the progress of truth. This rot gets intelligent, dedicated people mired in strategic brawls that will never end if these gremlins have anything to do with it. I’m not accusing anybody here of being one, but it sure looks that way sometimes. I tried searching this and the 400+ reply thread for any mention of Dr. Judy Wood or the possibility that the planes that hit the towers were unmanned drones. There aren’t any such mentions, right? Dr. Wood makes a brilliant case for 9/11 having been done by some kind of directed energy deal. Was it Dave vonKleist who posited the drones? Come on, the USG has all the top state-of-the-art technology at all times, and the science is advancing so fast that renowned Thinkers are warning of singularity. If they’re developing materials that can make a person or object invisible they can make it look like planes are hitting the towers and Pentacon when there really aren’t any – and exactly that type thing is reportedly in their toybox as well. FreedomsPhoenix.com does a great job of keeping up with wild tech breakthroughs among other things. I’m no scientist, but I know it’s absolutely impossible for a plane to hit the Pentacon and leave no real evidence on the ground. For my money the whole 9/11 caper was prepared detonations including Shanksville, or a mixture of them and Judy Wood’s thesis. Believe she was fired from her university job for it. She doesn’t actually present conclusions but by the end of her presentation they’re all but inevitable. Either scenario cancels out the issue of so many people keeping silent.... but anybody who has trouble believing legions of people would shut up about something this major doesn’t know human nature very well. Everywhere Jew world order evil is going on, you’ve got cleaning crew, bartenders, tons of office staff ad inf. witnessing it and keeping mum, if nothing else just to remain employed. Sometimes they’re threatened, lots of the time it’s not necessary – that’s the worst part. A term for this is needed – it’s similar to Stockholm Syndrome except that the victims don’t love their tormentors, they only fear them or simply do what everybody else does on a thinkless herd basis. The major subjects on which the truth is MIA could take up the dark side of the moon. Even when witnesses to something like 9/11 do speak up, the mentality of the sheeple at large (with the media, schools, churches and politicians pounding establishment BS into their heads 24/7) makes for an uphill battle. There are videos of numerous US presidents and other top officials calling ex cathedra for a new world order. In PNAC, the Jew power mafia openly called for a “new Pearl Harbor event” to put the next big scare on the sheeple. Wouldn’t brazen stuff like that mean a 9/11 is logically to be expected? Cui bono? The result of such offensives isn’t fired or hanged officials, it’s huge advances for them – in this case the instantaneous creation of the Department of Home Insecurity, with TSA and how much else springing up right in its footsteps. As the establishment cracks the whip and millions of new suckers tremble with each episode, the perps plan their next move for when the current fairy tale wears off.
#72. To: Katniss (#64)
I would like that. Thanks. I'll be in Maryland mid May for my niece's wedding, but only for a weekend and won't have time for anything or anyone other than family. I was actually born and raised in the Silver Spring/Wheaton area.
Truth is still truth even if no one believes it. A lie is still a lie even if everyone believes it.
#73. To: randge (#53)
Am only a few minutes into Part II but wanted to note an interesting section in Part I on the American Revolution for independence from Britain and what's described there, at 13:04-14:38, as the Fake Peace Talk of 9/11/1776. Additional reference: Staten Island Peace Conference - Wikipedia Also, at 2:09-2:31, footage is shown of the 1st tower coming down -- strangely, without noticably damaging the other one next to it, even though buildings farther away were reportedly destructed from flying debris and projectiles. ABELDANGER. Getting close to the whole ball of wax on 911.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#74. To: NeoconsNailed (#71)
So well reasoned and I agree with everything you wrote. Think about all who were involved with the Kennedy assassination and how many had to have been silenced either forcibly or willingly. I liken 9/11 to the assassination as I believe that once that was accomplished, the controllers knew they could do whatever they wished. Both events were coups.
Truth is still truth even if no one believes it. A lie is still a lie even if everyone believes it.
#75. To: christine, NeoconsNailed (#74)
WTC insurance fraud? Silverstein “trial” runs Monday through Wednesday World Trade Center owner Larry Silverstein – who confessed on national television to “pulling” World Trade Center Building 7 – will appear in the courtroom of Judge Alvin Hellerstein at 500 Pearl St. in New York City. The non-jury trial,
#76. To: christine (#74)
Truer words were never spoken. The threat of murder is a huge factor. The Clinton body count is a long established presence online and there's an equivalent for each president as he emerges and racks up kills. The bodies strewn in the wake of the JFK hit are sobering to say the least, starting with Oswald and Ruby. Neither of them is particularly missed, but it's the principle of the thing. The wink -- and the smiles: http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01743/johnson_1743537c.jpg http://www.rense.com/1.imagesE/thewink.jpg Including Jackie's?
#77. To: Neo TryingtoWarnYou (#75)
Fantastic news -- I had no idea!! Alas, he's got the dough to buy any judge. Would love to know why it took them 14 years. Yeah, the insurance fraud and his "pull it" speech are among the painfully obvious smoking guns. The day the brass claimed to find one of the Ayrabs' passport in the WTC wreckage was surely the lowest point in public intelligence in history.
#78. To: NeoconsNailed (#77)
Silverstein Hellerstein
#79. To: Katniss (#63) (Edited)
Interesting point that the various cameras in the immediate area were probably pinpointed sometime prior for quick film-confiscations (for security purposes or whatever). The Pentagon brass didn't seem to have a security issue with the grounds being filmed by those cameras on other days. Likely, the footage was seized because of what it wouldn't have recorded -- a plane strike. I'd expect there were more than door-cameras at the Pentagon that would have been pointed towards a long-derelict, incoming plane on a trajectory with it, if there had been one. The apparent lackadaisicalness about that is anomalous, imo, or even purposely appearing to be so off-guard for reasons unknown. YouTube comment at Pentagon Attack Footage - 'Missile' and(or) 'Plane'?: "There are at least 5 nice closed circuit security cameras atop the pentagon roof's edge on this side of the building. The President was due to land on that helicopter pad in about 3 hours in which, the plane supposedly nearly flew over. This was a very 'High Security Area'" Another comment there: "the only thing hijacked on 9/11 was the US Government!" Two film-analysis discussion points at truthandshadows.wordpress.com: "Does it not strike people as odd that we get to see footage of the WTC plane crashes over and over, but not for the pentagon?" ... "The government has no pride to wound. It has pushed the 'incompetence' theory from the beginning to distract us" Pentagon 9/11 still images - YouTube - 29 seconds; the 5-frame "drive-in movie" originally released in 2002 Five frames of footage taken by a security camera at the Pentagon on 9/11. The frames were released on March 7, 2002. Relevant event in the History Commons database: March 7, 2002: Plane Crashing into Pentagon Is Shown in Photos. Link: http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/co... [2003 Wayback Machine archive copy -- pics show that the film was date stamped as Sep. 12, 2001] These two short videos were released years later in 2006 after Judicial Watch made a FOIA/Freedom of Information Act request. They both show small "UFOs"/unidentified flying objects moving fast from the left side of the screen towards the strike zone. The [ This is previously unreleased footage of American Airlines Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon obtained by public interest group, Judicial Watch. For more info, visit JudicialWatch.org Judicial Watch September 11 Pentagon Video -- 1 of 2 - YouTube - 3.25 minutes Judicial Watch September 11 Pentagon Video -- 2 of 2 - YouTube - less than 3.5 minutes Edited punctuation, stikethrough, last 2 video paths + last sentence of paragraph 1. You: In other words, don't believe for a second that the only available footage was that joke of three frames, or whatever it was, that the Feds finally released years after the actual occurrence. There was no national interest that could not have been removed from that film to have it released within days if not hours of that event. Frankly, I cannot imagine anything sensitive at all in it, never say never though.
Uploaded on Jan 27, 2008 by History Commons Groups
second first] video looks more Sci-Fi due to lens glare seeming to be something shiny on the ground until a vehicle passes by and, also, something that looks to be hovering in mid-air, probably from a lens smudge: Uploaded on May 16, 2006 by Judicial Watch
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#80. To: Katniss (#64)
I can tell you how to find the camera view on the VDOT camera. If you look at it in the a.m., when this happened, in between 9 and 10 a.m., that camera is always pointed towards the northwestern skyline to capture the inbound commuting traffic, as it's a traffic camera, and from it you can see the highways as well as the entire skyline which easily would have captured no less than 10 seconds of the last part of that flight. Thanks for the kindly invite. I'd like to be able to visit there but chances are slim to none. I think you're the third person, afaik, to report having been prevented from taking pictures there soon after. Maybe Judicial Watch could file a Freedom of Information Act request for the Virginia Department of Transportation footage during the time period in question that day. It managed to get 2 additional films released by the Pentagon in 2006. BTW, if you're ever in the area, let me know. I'll take you down there and show you where everything used to be, where that 'cab' was, the flight path, where I was run off by an abusive and brainless LEO for publicly taking pics in public a day later, where gas station used to be, which IMO is no a coincidence that it's no longer there, i.e., part of the ongoing coverup.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#81. To: RickyJ (#2)
CTers usually prefer to state that the planes were *diverted* to a place or places *unknown*...congrats...you may be on the road to recovery... They definitely were "hijacked" in a sense because they never reached their destinations...
--Are you a *Jew*?
#82. To: NeoconsNailed (#77)
Snowden Probably Knows About 911 - Daily Squib www.dailysquib.co.uk/world/4167-snowden-probably-knows-about-911.html
#83. To: war (#81) (Edited)
The official story is a ridiculous Conspiracy Theory, war, that admittedly would be unacceptable by court standards of integrity and is why the invasion of Afghanistan was launched instead -- which makes you and others arrogantly promoting it fanatic Conspiracy Theorists in denial. Edited for capitalization and punctuation + word insert. CTers
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#84. To: GreyLmist (#83) (Edited)
Yea...never have planes been hijacked...nor been used as missiles...a massive explosion and collision don't result in massive damage...10's of thousands of gallons of a volatile accelerant doesn't cause significant fires when introduced, ignited, in to a fuel rich environment doesn't result in fires of any significance and, my personal favorite, gravity doesn't *work* in a direct fashion but in a circuitous one...i.e. a falling object doesn't fall straight down... PS: If we were going to bomb any nation over a pipeline in that region it would have been Russia... The official story is a ridiculous conspiracy theory...
--Are you a *Jew*?
.
.
.
Comments (85 - 402) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest