See other Editorial Articles
Title: Brilliant letter to the editor
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Feb 1, 2015
Author: .
Post Date: 2015-02-01 20:57:41 by James Deffenbach
Keywords: None
Views: 401
Comments: 7
(1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.
#1. To: James Deffenbach (#0)
Not so funny historical pic on the gun control agenda of the UN's Small Arms Conference, currently featured at Rense.com: Published: 07/10/2006 at wnd.com NEW YORK – On the entrance path to the United Nations, it’s hard to miss the large statue of a handgun whose barrel has been twisted into a knot – symbolizing eloquently the U.N.’s attitude toward the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
I hate the UN and always have. Or at least as far back as I can remember.
It's ludicrous, imo. to refer at all to any countries in subservience to the UN's Commie agendas as "The Free World" or leaders of it. Communistic people who want to be citizen-serfs of the UN probably should be able to make that choice for themselves individually, if they want to, but our nation should not be an adjunct party to its encroachments of our rights or those of others who don't want to be commandeered by it and its feudalistic World Government totalitarianisms. It ought to just call itself a landless, united nation (singular) of voluntary serfdom -- sort of how various religions and ideologies have members worldwide in their belief-system unification-pacts but apart from the nationhoods and the unbelievers wherein they reside being so syndicated along with them and into the UN.
I disagree with the concept of the UN and I especially disagree with it being hosted in the US and having almost all of its bills paid by Americans.
I agree too that we shouldn't be hosting the UN here and paying its bills. Countries of the world could probably manage better without it to reach agreements in conference on international issues like navigational rules of the sea, for example, much as they long did before it was ever installed Post-WWII.
Yeah, the UN was just a step in the scheme of the one worlders to eventually create a one world government.
#7. To: James Deffenbach (#6)
You surely are right about that. : ]
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: GreyLmist (#1)
#3. To: James Deffenbach (#2)
I hate the UN and always have. Or at least as far back as I can remember.
#4. To: GreyLmist (#3)
#5. To: James Deffenbach (#4)
I disagree with the concept of the UN and I especially disagree with it being hosted in the US and having almost all of its bills paid by Americans.
#6. To: GreyLmist (#5)
Replies to Comment # 6. the UN was just a step in the scheme of the one worlders to eventually create a one world government.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.