Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Airline whistleblower solves 9/11
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/31/airline911/
Published: Feb 2, 2015
Author: Kevin Barrett
Post Date: 2015-02-02 18:45:43 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 3734
Comments: 84

The truth-seeking community – and the airline industry – are abuzz over Rebekah Roth’s new book Methodical Illusion. It’s poised to break into the top 1,000 worldwide, selling so fast that Amazon may even have tried to stop its rise to bestseller status by falsely claiming “sorry, out of stock.”

We’ve seen this situation before…such as on September 8th, 2013, when the RT documentary 9/11 and Operation Gladio started to go viral and suddenly disappeared from search engines – as emails containing its url began falling into a big black hole in cyberspace.

So what’s all the excitement about? Why would the people whose job is to “disable the purveyors of conspiracy theories” try to limit sales of a potboiler novel by a former stewardess?

hqdefaultHint: It isn’t literary quality they’re afraid of. If you want a 9/11 truth novel by a literary genius, read Thomas Pynchon’s Bleeding Edge. Pynchon’s book has lots of great writing and a modest amount of 9/11 truth, packaged in such a way as not to offend the Tribe that dominates American media.

But if you want a rough-hewn page-turner with more 9/11 truth than anything you’re likely to read this side of David Ray Griffin or Christopher Bollyn (or Veterans Today for that matter) check out Methodical Illusion. Roth boldly goes where no stewardess or novelist has gone before, pinning 9/11 squarely on the Israelis and their American assets, and providing a convincing explanation of how the planes were “hijacked,” by whom, where they went, and what happened to the passengers.

Roth’s book has set off a stampede by her former colleagues in the aviation industry, who are rushing to provide details supporting her revelations. They are confirming the installation of FTS (Flight Termination System) equipment on the models “hijacked” on 9/11, which allowed those planes to be taken over remotely and flown from the ground. When FTS takes over a plane, it completely shuts down that plane’s communications with the outside world. That explains why not one of the four pilots on any of the 9/11 planes managed to flip a toggle switch and squawk the hijack code. Had the aircraft been hijacked in a normal manner, the pilots, who are trained to instantly squawk “hijack” in such an emergency, all would have done so.

The failure of any of the 9/11 planes to squawk the “we are hijacked” message is absolute, conclusive proof that the official story of hijackings by Arabs armed with box cutters is false.

According to the author’s hypothesis, the FTS-captured-and-silenced planes landed at a nearby Air Force base with gigantic hangars, which Roth identifies and a colleague who was there confirms happened, less than 20 minutes after takeoff. Once on the ground, selected flight attendants and passengers were guided (or forced) to place cell phone calls, during which they read from scripts prepared by the perpetrators.

This scenario is very similar to one planned by the entire Joint Chiefs of Staff in 1962: the infamous Operation Northwoods. And it is entirely plausible. The main counter-argument – that the FAA tracked the two Boston aircraft from takeoff to crashes – has been disproven, since we now know that the 9/11 perpetrators were inserting false blips onto FAA controllers screens and thereby controlling what they saw.

According to this scenario, the Twin Towers would have been hit by military aircraft and/or missiles, not passenger jets.

Roth’s hypothesis is compelling, for several reasons. First, it explains why the perpetrators would invent such a ridiculously implausible scenario as “hijacked suicide attack planes fly all over the Eastern half of the USA before finally hitting their targets or being taken down by heroic passengers.” They needed this palpably absurd scheme to allow for time to covertly land the planes and stage the dramas via scripted cell phone calls. And the dramas – which would brainwash Americans into hating Israel’s Muslim enemies and killing them by the millions – were (alongside the horrific images broadcast from New York) the key part of the psy-op. Without the “cell phone calls,” nobody would have “known” what happened on those planes.

Were there such a thing as al-Qaeda suicide hijackers, they would take over the plane immediately after takeoff and fly straight for their targets, thereby minimizing the possibility of things going wrong, such as FTS being activated by the good guys or NORAD interceptors showing up in around 10 minutes – the normal procedure every time a plane deviates significantly from course.

But since there have been no successful hijackings in the USA since the 1970s, the whole idea that even one plane would be successfully hijacked on 9/11 is ludicrous. The preposterous claim that four planes with military-trained pilots were commandeered by 130 pound “muscle hijackers” with box cutters and flown with consummate skill and impossible speed by pilots who couldn’t even fly Cessnas is one of history’s most bizarre delusions.

Roth’s hypothesis also explains why so many of the people who received phone calls from the “hijacked passengers” insisted that the calls came from the person’s cell phone, positively identified through caller ID. In 2001, cell phones did not work at altitude. The calls must have been made from the ground.

Additionally, this scenario explains why many of the cell phone calls went on so long; were often placed to improbable recipients; had none of the correct background sounds; and were full of bizarre glitches revealing that they were scripted and/or coerced, not actual emergency calls from in-flight aircraft.

Roth’s explanation sheds light on the role of Rabbi Dov Zakheim, a US-Israeli dual citizen who served as Comptroller of the Pentagon on 9/11 and managed to abscond with $2.3 trillion dollars, as Rumsfeld announced the day before.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 51.

#1. To: christine (#0)

Nonsense...

Cynicom  posted on  2015-02-02   18:51:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Cynicom (#1)

Nonsense...

The author may not have the scenario of that day precisely accurate but I'd bet my life it's much closer to the truth than the fabrication offered by Uncle Sambo.

noone222  posted on  2015-02-03   8:05:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: noone222, All (#23)

According to the author’s hypothesis, the FTS-captured-and-silenced planes landed at a nearby Air Force base with gigantic hangars, which Roth identifies and a colleague who was there confirms happened, less than 20 minutes after takeoff. Once on the ground, selected flight attendants and passengers were guided (or forced) to place cell phone calls, during which they read from scripts prepared by the perpetrators.

This scenario is very similar to one planned by the entire Joint Chiefs of Staff in 1962: the infamous Operation Northwoods. And it is entirely plausible. The main counter-argument – that the FAA tracked the two Boston aircraft from takeoff to crashes – has been disproven,... since we now know that the 9/11 perpetrators were inserting false blips onto FAA controllers screens and thereby controlling what they saw. .....

... since we now know that the 9/11 perpetrators were inserting false blips onto FAA controllers screens and thereby controlling what they saw. .....

And we KNOW this how?????

There is a transcript available of what was happening in the FAA operations center that day. I have perused it several times, finding nothing but confusion, indecision and lack of command.

In it you will read that in the center they were watching the aircraft approaching Washington, make turns etc etc, with mileage being called out as it nears D.C. All in the room assumed the target was the White House, but it turned away toward the Pentagon.

It is all there, minute by minute.

Primary radar CANNOT be controlled by anyone except the controllers, plus the aircraft was being watched by MULTIPLE radars, not just one.

This work of hype is for the gullible, TO MAKE MONEY.

It is no wonder that the conspirators have gotten away.

By the way, in the past, I and other misfits use to jam American and Russian radars for practice, the sneaky controllers would shift frequency on us and be watching us naked.

It is a shame anyone here on 4um would ever buy into this money making book.

If anyone maintains all the people in the control center in Washington were in on this affair, I quit. Ignorance gets us all, stupidity is terminal.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-02-03   9:10:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Cynicom (#24)

It is a shame anyone here on 4um would ever buy into this money making book.

I do not intend to buy the book ... I do think the planes were likely remote controlled, that Dov Zakheim was involved, and that we have been lied into war wherein innocent people are being slaughtered for the advancement of the global elite.

Gnosis is impossible for the general public regarding 9-11.

noone222  posted on  2015-02-03   9:28:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: noone222 (#25)

Take time to read the transcript of the FAA control center.

Mind you the people in charge and on line were the vice president and his advisers, untold generals at NORAD in CO, untold military and civilian power people, however NO ONE WAS MAKING ANY DECISIONS..IT WAS MASS CONFUSION...THE AIRCRAFT IS FAST APPROACHING WASHINGTON AND WE HAD ONLY INERTIA.

Finally a mid level FAA control manager, takes charge, to stop the insanity, he orders all aircraft to land at once, no aircraft to depart within US air space. Incoming overseas flights were turned back if not at PNR, no exceptions.

There were over 4000 aircraft under control at that time, all were brought down without incidents.

Some political hack said the pilots should have the discretion to continue or not...These are the managers words...FUCK THE PILOTS, all aircraft down now no exceptions.

MIND YOU, ALL OF THIS WHILE THE RADAR SHOWED THE AIRCRAFT NEARING, CLOSER AND CLOSER TO WASHINGTON. A missile does not make turns and all this while the radar was compromised by an unseen hand?

It does make one ill to read the transcript, to see that NO ONE OF POWER WAS IN CHARGE. It took a low level FAA manager to stop the insanity. He made the decision, the power people said and did nothing.

That SOB Cheney was worthless.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-02-03   10:00:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Cynicom (#28)

That SOB Cheney was worthless.

Transportation Director Norman Mineta has stated on crisp video that Vice President Cheney called off the fighters assigned to protect the Pentagon, ordering them to "stand down" before the plane struck it. This he heard via a courier giving orders in the command center.

Deasy  posted on  2015-02-03   10:27:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Deasy (#31)

PS...I forgot to add this, something little mentioned in media.

Prior to FAA grounding all aircraft, American Airlines had already taken action by grounding many or all of their aircraft.

Private industry always leads the way with decision making, government is always in inertia mode.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-02-03   11:01:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Cynicom (#36)

But does the transcript mention Dick Cheney's stand-down command?

Deasy  posted on  2015-02-03   11:04:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: Deasy (#37)

But does the transcript mention Dick Cheney's stand-down command?

That I do not recall.

Would have to review.

It is apparent from the transcript that no one is in charge.

It is readily apparent as to radar coverage as the controller is calling out the position, heading and ETA Washington.

In DC area there are at least a half dozen different radar units, ability to over ride any or all was an impossibility.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-02-03   12:01:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: Cynicom (#46)

It is apparent from the transcript that no one is in charge.

I have offered you strong evidence that someone was in charge. This would not be on the transcript.

Deasy  posted on  2015-02-03   12:03:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Deasy (#47)

I have offered you strong evidence that someone was in charge. This would not be on the transcript.

Of course not.

We are discussing two different situations.

You are viewing from the conspirators standpoint, indeed they were in charge, everything going to plan.

I am viewing from low level non conspiratorial level, peons if you will. I stated, there was NOTHING coming down from high levels, anywhere.

Action was taken by airlines and low level FAA, on their own.

There was never any command to solve the problem from the top.

Somewhere there is transcript of Cheney being nasty to low level Navy person, I believe.

There were hundreds of FAA slugs involved, doing their work, I would hope no one is gullible enough to believe they also were in on the fix.

As the audio displays and transcript reads, they were calling the approaching aircraft mile by mile.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-02-03   12:18:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: Cynicom (#49)

You are viewing from the conspirators standpoint, indeed they were in charge, everything going to plan.

Incorrect. I'm merely reporting that the Vice President stood down the Pentagon's defenses before the attack. Someone at the top stood down our nation's defenses which were protecting one of its most sensitive military resources, the Pentagon.

Deasy  posted on  2015-02-03   12:28:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: Deasy (#50)

Incorrect.

That is first I have heard from anyone that the government was not involved.

It has always been my opinion that government was involved, of course I have no proof, just opinion.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-02-03   12:37:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 51.

#53. To: Cynicom (#51)

That is first I have heard from anyone that the government was not involved.

Could you clarify that remark?

Deasy  posted on  2015-02-03 13:09:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 51.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest