Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Airline whistleblower solves 9/11
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/31/airline911/
Published: Feb 2, 2015
Author: Kevin Barrett
Post Date: 2015-02-02 18:45:43 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 3737
Comments: 84

The truth-seeking community – and the airline industry – are abuzz over Rebekah Roth’s new book Methodical Illusion. It’s poised to break into the top 1,000 worldwide, selling so fast that Amazon may even have tried to stop its rise to bestseller status by falsely claiming “sorry, out of stock.”

We’ve seen this situation before…such as on September 8th, 2013, when the RT documentary 9/11 and Operation Gladio started to go viral and suddenly disappeared from search engines – as emails containing its url began falling into a big black hole in cyberspace.

So what’s all the excitement about? Why would the people whose job is to “disable the purveyors of conspiracy theories” try to limit sales of a potboiler novel by a former stewardess?

hqdefaultHint: It isn’t literary quality they’re afraid of. If you want a 9/11 truth novel by a literary genius, read Thomas Pynchon’s Bleeding Edge. Pynchon’s book has lots of great writing and a modest amount of 9/11 truth, packaged in such a way as not to offend the Tribe that dominates American media.

But if you want a rough-hewn page-turner with more 9/11 truth than anything you’re likely to read this side of David Ray Griffin or Christopher Bollyn (or Veterans Today for that matter) check out Methodical Illusion. Roth boldly goes where no stewardess or novelist has gone before, pinning 9/11 squarely on the Israelis and their American assets, and providing a convincing explanation of how the planes were “hijacked,” by whom, where they went, and what happened to the passengers.

Roth’s book has set off a stampede by her former colleagues in the aviation industry, who are rushing to provide details supporting her revelations. They are confirming the installation of FTS (Flight Termination System) equipment on the models “hijacked” on 9/11, which allowed those planes to be taken over remotely and flown from the ground. When FTS takes over a plane, it completely shuts down that plane’s communications with the outside world. That explains why not one of the four pilots on any of the 9/11 planes managed to flip a toggle switch and squawk the hijack code. Had the aircraft been hijacked in a normal manner, the pilots, who are trained to instantly squawk “hijack” in such an emergency, all would have done so.

The failure of any of the 9/11 planes to squawk the “we are hijacked” message is absolute, conclusive proof that the official story of hijackings by Arabs armed with box cutters is false.

According to the author’s hypothesis, the FTS-captured-and-silenced planes landed at a nearby Air Force base with gigantic hangars, which Roth identifies and a colleague who was there confirms happened, less than 20 minutes after takeoff. Once on the ground, selected flight attendants and passengers were guided (or forced) to place cell phone calls, during which they read from scripts prepared by the perpetrators.

This scenario is very similar to one planned by the entire Joint Chiefs of Staff in 1962: the infamous Operation Northwoods. And it is entirely plausible. The main counter-argument – that the FAA tracked the two Boston aircraft from takeoff to crashes – has been disproven, since we now know that the 9/11 perpetrators were inserting false blips onto FAA controllers screens and thereby controlling what they saw.

According to this scenario, the Twin Towers would have been hit by military aircraft and/or missiles, not passenger jets.

Roth’s hypothesis is compelling, for several reasons. First, it explains why the perpetrators would invent such a ridiculously implausible scenario as “hijacked suicide attack planes fly all over the Eastern half of the USA before finally hitting their targets or being taken down by heroic passengers.” They needed this palpably absurd scheme to allow for time to covertly land the planes and stage the dramas via scripted cell phone calls. And the dramas – which would brainwash Americans into hating Israel’s Muslim enemies and killing them by the millions – were (alongside the horrific images broadcast from New York) the key part of the psy-op. Without the “cell phone calls,” nobody would have “known” what happened on those planes.

Were there such a thing as al-Qaeda suicide hijackers, they would take over the plane immediately after takeoff and fly straight for their targets, thereby minimizing the possibility of things going wrong, such as FTS being activated by the good guys or NORAD interceptors showing up in around 10 minutes – the normal procedure every time a plane deviates significantly from course.

But since there have been no successful hijackings in the USA since the 1970s, the whole idea that even one plane would be successfully hijacked on 9/11 is ludicrous. The preposterous claim that four planes with military-trained pilots were commandeered by 130 pound “muscle hijackers” with box cutters and flown with consummate skill and impossible speed by pilots who couldn’t even fly Cessnas is one of history’s most bizarre delusions.

Roth’s hypothesis also explains why so many of the people who received phone calls from the “hijacked passengers” insisted that the calls came from the person’s cell phone, positively identified through caller ID. In 2001, cell phones did not work at altitude. The calls must have been made from the ground.

Additionally, this scenario explains why many of the cell phone calls went on so long; were often placed to improbable recipients; had none of the correct background sounds; and were full of bizarre glitches revealing that they were scripted and/or coerced, not actual emergency calls from in-flight aircraft.

Roth’s explanation sheds light on the role of Rabbi Dov Zakheim, a US-Israeli dual citizen who served as Comptroller of the Pentagon on 9/11 and managed to abscond with $2.3 trillion dollars, as Rumsfeld announced the day before.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 62.

#1. To: christine (#0)

Nonsense...

Cynicom  posted on  2015-02-02   18:51:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Cynicom (#1)

really, Cyni? what do YOU know that none of the rest of us do?

christine  posted on  2015-02-02   20:06:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: christine, All (#8)

really, Cyni? what do YOU know that none of the rest of us do?

Know?

Nothing but what everyone else knows.

There is a difference of belief triggered firstly by common sense, secondly by a professional life involved with aviation, military, manufacturing and government.

I must say, common sense is the most important denominator.

Olde adage, the truth is easy to tell, a lie will trip you up eventually. For dozens, perhaps hundreds of people to be intrusted with a lie is an impossibility.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-02-02   21:04:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: Cynicom (#11)

Olde adage, the truth is easy to tell, a lie will trip you up eventually. For dozens, perhaps hundreds of people to be intrusted with a lie is an impossibility.

Cyni, how would that apply to the Kennedy assassination. Surely, you don't believe the Warren Commission Report? How many people had to have known and have been silent or silenced?

Further, when people are controlled (and threatened) and at the mercy of those who give them a paycheck, they shut their mouths faster than a steel trap.

christine  posted on  2015-02-03   14:45:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: christine (#57) (Edited)

Surely, you don't believe the Warren Commission Report?

Never believed a word of it.

Never believed the 9/11 report either.

My "OPINION" based on intellect alone says "someone" in government orchestrated both affairs.

However, common sense tells me the guilty are busy helping to fuel the flames of conspiracy, that covers their tracks.

Involving hundreds if not thousands, lessens the danger of the few ever being brought to justice.

Remember the Liberty affair that almost started WWIII. The navy people were threatened to lie and never tell what happened.

It did not work then nor now.

My own opinion is that a very few high level people set things in motion, using foreign operatives that never knew who they were working for. In the dirty tricks business, that is called having a "disconnect" so that the top people can never be outed.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-02-03   15:44:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: Cynicom (#60)

Well said; I completely agree.

Lod  posted on  2015-02-03   15:54:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: Lod, Christine (#61)

Recall the Reagan Iran/Contra affair?

Friend of mine, that had flown in Central and South America for years, use to fly cargo jets as a contract pilot into that area.

The pay was handsome, fly jet from US South with cargo, land in remote area, fly cargo back to the US.

What was odd???? Never clear any authority outbound,, never clear customs in bound. Just land, walk away, check in mail few days later.

He was former Air Force, top secret clearance, so not a liability to whomever paid the bill.

Total disconnect, he never knew but the answer was simple.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-02-03   16:07:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 62.

#64. To: Cynicom (#62)

Total disconnect, he never knew but the answer was simple.

He never asked, and they never told.

No W-2s or any of that silly business.

Lod  posted on  2015-02-03 17:53:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 62.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest