[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Why it's called the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Feb 11, 2015
Author: .
Post Date: 2015-02-11 09:34:47 by James Deffenbach
Keywords: None
Views: 210
Comments: 9


Poster Comment:

Some moron said this about that picture: Wei-in Low "No civilian needs such a murderous weapon."

To which I replied: "It isn't your place to tell anyone, other than your children if you have any, what they "need." Just none of your business. Whether you or any of the gun grabbers in the government like it or not, it is a RIGHT. If you don't want one, don't buy one. But don't presume to tell others what they need or don't need."(1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.

#1. To: James Deffenbach (#0)

Weapons are NOT murderous, people are.

Lod  posted on  2015-02-11   9:53:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 1.

#2. To: Lod (#1)

True dat. I left my 357 fully loaded and just left it to its own devices all day and at the end of the day it still hadn't jumped up and shot anyone. Reckon it's defective?

James Deffenbach  posted on  2015-02-11 10:01:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Lod (#1)

Weapons are NOT murderous, people governments are.

Katniss  posted on  2015-02-11 10:15:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]