See other Editorial Articles
Title: Why it's called the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Feb 11, 2015
Author: .
Post Date: 2015-02-11 09:34:47 by James Deffenbach
Keywords: None
Views: 345
Comments: 9
Poster Comment: Some moron said this about that picture: Wei-in Low "No civilian needs such a murderous weapon." To which I replied: "It isn't your place to tell anyone, other than your children if you have any, what they "need." Just none of your business. Whether you or any of the gun grabbers in the government like it or not, it is a RIGHT. If you don't want one, don't buy one. But don't presume to tell others what they need or don't need."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
#1. To: James Deffenbach (#0)
Weapons are NOT murderous, people are.
True dat. I left my 357 fully loaded and just left it to its own devices all day and at the end of the day it still hadn't jumped up and shot anyone. Reckon it's defective?
Too amazing. Same here...
Same here... Yours is defective too? Who woulda thunk it?
There are no replies to Comment # 7. End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: Lod (#1)
#3. To: James Deffenbach (#2)
I left my 357 fully loaded and just left it to its own devices all day and at the end of the day it still hadn't jumped up and shot anyone.
#7. To: Lod (#3)
Too amazing.
Replies to Comment # 7.