Mary Holland
February 10th, 2015
Reader Views: 3,150
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Science/Tech See other Science/Tech Articles Title: BREAKING: U.S. Media Blackout — Italian Courts Rule Vaccines Cause Autism (Originally published at Age of Autism, via The Daily Coin) On September 23, 2014, an Italian court in Milan award compensation to a boy for vaccine-induced autism. (See the Italian document here.) A childhood vaccine against six childhood diseases caused the boys permanent autism and brain damage. While the Italian press has devoted considerable attention to this decision and its public health implications, the U.S. press has been silent. Like the U.S., Italy has a national vaccine injury compensation program to give some financial support to those people who are injured by compulsory and recommended vaccinations. The Italian infant plaintiff received three doses of GlaxoSmithKlines Infanrix Hexa, a hexavalent vaccine administered in the first year of life. These doses occurred from March to October 2006. The vaccine is to protect children from polio, diphtheria, tetanus, hepatitis B, pertussis and Haemophilus influenza type B. In addition to these antigens, however, the vaccine then contained thimerosal, the mercury-containing preservative, aluminum, an adjuvant, as well as other toxic ingredients. The child regressed into autism shortly after receiving the three doses. When the parents presented their claim for compensation first to the Ministry of Health, as they were required to do, the Ministry rejected it. Therefore, the family sued the Ministry in a court of general jurisdiction, an option which does not exist in the same form in the U.S. Based on expert medical testimony, the court concluded that the child more likely than not suffered autism and brain damage because of the neurotoxic mercury, aluminum and his particular susceptibility from a genetic mutation. The Court also noted that Infanrix Hexa contained thimerosal, now banned in Italy because of its neurotoxicity, in concentrations greatly exceeding the maximum recommended levels for infants weighing only a few kilograms. Presiding Judge Nicola Di Leo considered another piece of damning evidence: a 1271-page confidential GlaxoSmithKline report (now available on the Internet). This industry document provided ample evidence of adverse events from the vaccine, including five known cases of autism resulting from the vaccines administration during its clinical trials (see table at page 626, excerpt below). As in many other developed countries, government, not industry, compensates families in the event of vaccine injury. Thus GSKs apparent lack of concern for the vaccines adverse effects is notable and perhaps not surprising. In the final assessment, the report states that: [t]he benefit/risk profile of Infanrix hexa continues to be favourable, despite GSKs acknowledgement that the vaccine causes side effects including anaemia haemolytic autoimmune,thrombocytopenia, thrombocytopenic purpura, autoimmune thrombocytopenia, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, haemolytic anemia, cyanosis, injection site nodule, abcess and injection site abscess, Kawasakis disease, important neurological events (including encephalitis and encephalopathy), Henoch-Schonlein purpura, petechiae, purpura, haematochezia, allergic reactions (including anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions), and death (see page 9). The Milan decision is sober, informed and well-reasoned. The Ministry of Health has stated that it has appealed the Courts decision, but that appeal will likely take several years, and its outcome is uncertain. Two years earlier, on May 23, 2012, Judge Lucio Ardigo of an Italian court in Rimini presided over a similar judgment, finding that a different vaccine, the Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine (MMR), had caused a childs autism. As in the Milan case, the Ministry of Healths compensation program had denied compensation to the family, yet after a presentation of medical evidence, a court granted compensation. There, too, the Italian press covered the story; the U.S. press did not. In that case, a 15-month old boy received his MMR vaccine on March 26, 2004. He then immediately developed bowel and eating problems and received an autism diagnosis with cognitive delay within a year. The court found that the boy had been damaged by irreversible complications due to vaccination (with trivalent MMR). The decision flew in the face of the conventional mainstream medical wisdom that an MMR-autism link has been debunked. Both these Italian court decisions break new ground in the roiling debate over vaccines and autism. These courts, like all courts, are intended to function as impartial, unbiased decision makers. The courts decisions are striking because they not only find a vaccine-autism causal link, but they also overrule the decisions of Italys Ministry of Health. And taken together, the court decisions found that both the MMR and a hexavalent thimerosal- and aluminum-containing vaccine can trigger autism. These court decisions flatly contradict the decisions from the so-called U.S. vaccine court, the Court of Federal Claims Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. There, from 2007 to 2010, in the Omnibus Autism Proceeding, three decision makers, called Special Masters, found that vaccines did not cause autism in any of the six test cases, and one Special Master even went so far as to compare the theory of vaccine-induced autism to Lewis Carrolls Alice in Wonderland. The Italian court decisions contrast starkly with these U.S. cases based on similar claims. Read the full story at Age of Autism. About the Author Mary Holland is Research Scholar and Director of the Graduate Legal Skills Program at NYU Law School. She has published articles on vaccine law and policy, and is the co-editor of Vaccine Epidemic: How Corporate Greed, Biased Science and Coercive Government Threaten Our Human Rights, Our Health and Our Children (Skyhorse Publishing, 2012). Delivered by The Daily Sheeple Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
#3. To: Jethro Tull, Dakmar (#0)
(Edited)
Every time a vaccine is administered, billions of times a year, it causes a microscopic stroke. The symptoms of the damage range from insignificant to complete paralysis. These symptoms include Swelling at injection site Rash Fatigue Headache Nausea Chills Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Fever Seizures Autism Guillaine-Barre Syndrome Parkinson's Multiple sclerosis Polio Lou Gehrig's Brain swelling Shock Anaphylaxis Cardiac arrest Ataxia Drowsiness Insomnia Narcolepsy Myalgia Arthralgia Urticarial Edema Upper respiratory tract infection Diarrhea Fibromyalgia Lupus Paralysis Infertility Death. Except for "Death" these are all fake, made-up "diseases" or "disorders" when in fact vaccines are causing this. Vaccines, should be considered an epic crime against humanity. It's nothing less than evil. He was suicided at a healthy 49.
The government wants to make sure you are safe. Are you up-to-date?
One of the most dreadful memories of my life is being vaccinated as a small child, probably kindergarten age. I even ran out to the hallway and hid under a bench, gripping a spindly leg like my life depended on not being taken out from under there but I was and it took several of the staff persons to hold me down for that while yelling for help as loud as I could. Years later I was given a sugar cube vaccination and thought then that it was a great idea -- that it should be done by that method every time and still don't quite know why it isn't other than to harmfully inject us with mercury and whatever else they add to those concoctions.
#8. To: GreyLmist (#7)
(Edited)
Honestly, there is not really any benefit to eating a sugar cube. Ingesting anything other than vegetation, water and maybe meat is detrimental to one's health. If there was any benefit to vaccinations then having a vaccine administered orally might be a good idea, but the only benefit to vaccines is to the shareholders and those on the payroll. living amongst ignorant, misinformed intellectual cowards can be challenging but it has it's benefits. Maybe the eugenicists are right after all.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
[Register]
|