See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Methodical Illusion: The 9/11 Con Begins to Crumble — Rebekah Roth (Flight Attendant)
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://sgtreport.com/2015/03/method ... egins-to-crumble-rebekah-roth/
Published: Mar 23, 2015
Author: Rebekah Roth
Post Date: 2015-03-23 10:33:47 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 18883
Comments: 557
Rebekah Roth has, in my opinion, blown the lid off of the lies surrounding the events on 9/11. Facts which are outlined in her recently released book, Methodical Illusion; a book, as of this writing, that is #1 on the Amazon Best Seller List for its category.--NorthWestLibertyNews Poster Comment: Roth’s research reveals ALL of the 911 cell phone calls from the passengers to their families and friends were actually made on the ground after the 4 planes landed at a remote military airfield and listen to what her research reveals about passenger 9B. This is a must listen. I agree with NorthWestLibertyNews's opinion that Rebekah has blown the lid off the 9/11 lies.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-103) not displayed.
.
.
.
#104. To: war (#103)
One of the *tricks* of the 'agent provocateurs' is to make fun of logical thinking people.
What's logical is to start with the explanation that has the fewest assumptions. You conspiracy theorists have so many assumptions and many of them are based upon either absolute falsehoods or gross distortions. --Are you a *Jew*?
Can you tell me where the tail section of the flight that just crashed in to the mountain is?
--Are you a *Jew*?
That's good. Maybe you can get away with stuff the goyim can't? :-)
"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
Has anyone published wide area images of the crash site, or are you just blowing smoke out your ass to show how "smart" you are? There have been TV images of the entire crash site...yes... --Are you a *Jew*?
You mean *other* goyim... As of now, 37 people have responded *No* when I put that* question up in my status. *Has FB assed anee a'yinz for yer full name and phone number an'at? --Are you a *Jew*?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kSq663m0G8 So you conjure up a government sponsored propaganda video. Do you think I haven't seen any these past 14 years (or before that even)? Look up "Physics, path of least resistance", and look up some controlled demolition videos to see what everyone else sees in terms of comparison. Also, while you're at it, look up Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, you'll find that it's members are all highly respected professionals who see the same problems most other educated people see. When I get a chance I'll check it out. Kewelio... Btw and fwiw, when I blow smoke out of my ass I'm being particularly *dumb*... --Are you a *Jew*?
Uh huh. Have you ever heard of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City? The entire side of the building was destroyed by explosives, yet the building didn't budge. Fires have raged in high rise buildings for a day or more, yet even THOSE buildings didn't fall as if someone kicked the bottom out. So go ahead and find ANY example other than WTC 1, 2, or 7 where such a thing has ever happened. BTW, did you ever play with Legos when you were a kid? Were you ever able to get a stack of them to fall straight down if you took some off one side? No, it would be impossible. If it WERE to fall (after giving it a push), it'd tilt sideways, then break up as hit the ground sideways. You don't even need to study physics to know that, all you need is common sense. Boy are you wrong... So war, would you care to elaborate why a team of men would be carrying large duffel bags filled to capacity as they approach the Pentagon lawn on 9/11? And please describe to us any instances you know of where a team of men in suits show up at other aircraft crash sites with duffel bags filled to the brim. Right. undamaged except for that hole in its side some 20-stories high. Or that the structure was further weakened by hours of fires let burn because the building was too unstable to send in firemen. "WTC Building 7 appears to have suffered significant damage at some point after the WTC Towers had collapsed, according to firefighters at the scene. Firefighter Butch Brandies tells other firefighters that nobody is to go into Building 7 because of creaking and noises coming out of there. [Firehouse Magazine, 8/02] Battalion Chief John Norman later recalls, "At the edge of the south face you could see that it is very heavily damaged." [Firehouse Magazine, 5/02] Heavy, thick smoke rises near 7 World Trade Center. Smoke is visible from the upper floors of the 47- story building. Firefighters using transits to determine whether there was any movement in the structure were surprised to discover that is was moving. The area was evacuated and the building collapsed later in the afternoon of Sept. 11."
Why would ANY structure fall straight down at free fall speed as if there's nothing under it? The ONLY way that can happen is through controlled demolition, no matter HOW you spin it. 5.11 Tactical Responder BLS 2900 Bag
Another missed reality is the fact that the shape of the building was actually a trapezoid and not a rectangle. The columns that were compromised were on the shorter side and when they failed the load shift was more massive. --Are you a *Jew*?
It didn't...the east side actually fell first... So much for trying to embed... https://youtu.be/VYNesSmwF7I --Are you a *Jew*?
Now please tell me what a team of suited individuals would be carrying in those bags.
This has all been so debunked so many years ago. I don't know why anyone should try anymore. The buildings did not fall at free fall speed. This is easily demonstrated by watching the beams that were flung out which fell much faster than the actual structure. You guys should just go try and get a girlfriend or at least a gerbil.
So it's apparent that you've never watched any video of the collapse, nor the analysis of said video in terms of rate of acceleration matching that of an object in free fall. I see why a lot of people view you as a troll. That was a medical team that was dispatched to the site. --Are you a *Jew*?
Bullshit. You are talking about the towers, WTC 7 did in fact fall STRAIGHT DOWNWARDS and did not disintegrate during collapse as WTC 1 and 2 did, the top is visible throughout and it DID drop at a rate of acceleration identical to an object in free fall. I you believe otherwise you're deluding yourself. Because they need something to carry their equipment in. Google "first responder duffle bags". There are duffle bags, backpack bags, bags on wheels - all kinds of bags on a wide variety of styles and colors.
I see why a lot of people view you as a troll. I tried to embed the video of the building collapsing but failed...if you go back to #120 I simply posted the link. As you can clearly see, the east side collapses first, the building twists as the stress load is distributed and then it collapses...and not at free fall speed, either... --Are you a *Jew*?
The video that I posted clearly shows otherwise... --Are you a *Jew*?
LOL!!! If they were a medical team they would have been acting with a bit more urgency, and they wouldn't be strolling about. In fact, if you were to fish the net for images of "debris" on the Pentagon lawn, you'd see these same suited individuals "finding" said debris. Hey, maybe they were bums who were digging through dumpsters for their meals, and they hit the motherlode prior to hitching a rid on that bus, eh? You're quite the stooge for the government aren't you.. Hey let's see what a NYC firefighter REALLY has to say. I'll have to assume it's worth listening to, as I don't have audio here at the current time. What proffer can you make that the videos capture the onset of the collapse? In fact, one of them is part of the video that I posted with the initial collapse edited out...
--Are you a *Jew*?
That video is useless...
--Are you a *Jew*?
No it did not as its fall damaged buildings on other blocks such as the Borough of Manhattan Community College's Fiterman Hall building. I'm done with this nonsense. I'm going back to supporting Ted Cruz.
You're speculating...and not very well. In fact, if you were to fish the net for images of "debris" on the Pentagon lawn, you'd see these same suited individuals "finding" said debris. Are you saying that I should be surprised and thus suspicious because US military personnel were both at and dispatched to the Pentagon? --Are you a *Jew*?
And the US post office...
--Are you a *Jew*?
You may as well be supporting Hillary Clinton or John McCaine. No wonder our nation is doomed. What it comes down to war is that it doesn't matter how many facts you ignore, and how much you distort reality, the facts and the truth WILL remain the same. And it does not matter to me one bit if you continue to live in a fantasy world where science doesn't exist and a handful of bad men with beards can overwhelm our multi-trillion dollar defense and intelligence networks with box cutters. Those who committed the deeds, and those such as you who continue to aid and abet them, will continue to do so no matter what you or I think. The ONLY way that can happen is through controlled demolition, no matter HOW you spin it. Apparently controlled demolition isn't the only way a building with structural damage, and then further weakened by fire can come down. When metal is heated, it loses strength. (I used to love to watch the horseshoer work when I was a kid)
I think you mean farrier...
"Footage of the site showed a remote and craggy landscape dominated by imposing mountains. The French newspaper Le Monde noted that the impact of the crash was so severe that the plane had been reduced to 'confetti,' creating a serious challenge for search teams and investigators." What it comes down to war is that it doesn't matter how many facts you ignore, and how much you distort reality, the facts and the truth WILL remain the same. A fact is something that cannot be falsified. What you have presented most certainly can be and has been falsified, Thus, referring to them as *facts* is quite incongruous. I'll also note that you made no proffer that the videos showed the ENITRE collapse. --Are you a *Jew*?
Unfortunately, those multi-trillion dollars aren't spent on the men actually in the field...airport screeners prior to 9/11 made minimum wage and I carried my Swiss Army knife on just about every flight that I took prior to 9/11...including 5 days before from West Palm to NYC... And then there are the numerous, documented cases of people just not paying attention...including DumbDumb and The Big Dick... --Are you a *Jew*?
Why is that so hard to believe? Hijacking planes is nothing new. Here's a list: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_hija ckings The idea of crashing a hijacked plane into a building isn't even new: June 20, 1979: Nikola Kavaja, a Serbian nationalist and anti-communist hijacked American Airlines Flight 293. During the hijacking, Kavaja demanded and received another airplane with the intent of crashing it into the headquarters of the Yugoslav Communist Party. His lawyer convinced him to surrender after landing at Shannon Airport, Ireland.
Damn Fred, you're right. Its been a long time since I was a kid.
Comments (145 - 557) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#105. To: Neo TryingtoWarnYou (#104)
One of the *tricks* of the 'agent provocateurs' is to make fun of logical thinking people.
#106. To: FormerLurker (#84)
#107. To: war (#102)
#108. To: war (#106)
Can you tell me where the tail section of the flight that just crashed in to the mountain is?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#109. To: FormerLurker (#108)
Has anyone published wide area images of the crash site, or are you just blowing smoke out your ass to show how "smart" you are?
#110. To: Artisan (#107)
That's good. Maybe you can get away with stuff the goyim can't? :-)
#111. To: lucysmom (#95)
Here's another video:
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#112. To: war (#109)
There have been TV images of the entire crash site...yes...
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#113. To: FormerLurker (#112)
When I get a chance I'll check it out.
#114. To: war (#98)
The entire South Face was gone from the ground about half way up. And the collapse started on the east side of the building...
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#115. To: war, Lod (#100)
First responders do not arrive with loaded bags. Period.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#116. To: war (#103)
One of the *tricks* of the CTs is to try to pass off the North Face of WTC7 as *proof* that it was undamaged...
#117. To: lucysmom (#116)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#118. To: FormerLurker (#115)
#119. To: lucysmom (#116)
Heavy, thick smoke rises near 7 World Trade Center. Smoke is visible from the upper floors of the 47- story building. Firefighters using transits to determine whether there was any movement in the structure were surprised to discover that is was moving. The area was evacuated and the building collapsed later in the afternoon of Sept. 11."
#120. To: FormerLurker (#117)
(Edited)
#121. To: Abraham (#118)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#122. To: FormerLurker (#117)
Why would ANY structure fall straight down at free fall speed as if there's nothing under it?
#123. To: war (#120)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#124. To: FormerLurker (#121)
Now please tell me what a team of suited individuals would be carrying in those bags.
#125. To: Abraham (#122)
The buildings did not fall at free fall speed. This is easily demonstrated by watching the beams that were flung out which fell much faster than the actual structure.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#126. To: FormerLurker (#115)
So war, would you care to elaborate why a team of men would be carrying large duffel bags filled to capacity as they approach the Pentagon lawn on 9/11?
#127. To: FormerLurker (#123)
So it's apparent that you've never watched any video of the collapse, nor the analysis of said video in terms of rate of acceleration matching that of an object in free fall.
#128. To: FormerLurker (#125)
WTC 7 did in fact fall STRAIGHT DOWNWARDS
#129. To: war (#124)
That was a medical team that was dispatched to the site.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#130. To: war (#128)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#131. To: war (#127)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#132. To: FormerLurker (#130)
#133. To: FormerLurker (#131)
#134. To: FormerLurker (#125)
WTC 7 did in fact fall STRAIGHT DOWNWARDS
#135. To: FormerLurker (#129)
If they were a medical team they would have been acting with a bit more urgency
#136. To: Abraham (#134)
#137. To: Abraham (#134)
I'm done with this nonsense. I'm going back to supporting Ted Cruz.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#138. To: war (#132)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#139. To: FormerLurker (#117)
Why would ANY structure fall straight down at free fall speed as if there's nothing under it?
#140. To: lucysmom (#139)
#141. To: FormerLurker (#138)
(Edited)
#142. To: FormerLurker (#138)
And it does not matter to me one bit if you continue to live in a fantasy world where science doesn't exist and a handful of bad men with beards can overwhelm our multi-trillion dollar defense and intelligence networks with box cutters.
#143. To: FormerLurker (#138)
And it does not matter to me one bit if you continue to live in a fantasy world where science doesn't exist and a handful of bad men with beards can overwhelm our multi-trillion dollar defense and intelligence networks with box cutters.
#144. To: Fred Mertz (#140)
I think you mean farrier...
.
.
.