See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Methodical Illusion: The 9/11 Con Begins to Crumble — Rebekah Roth (Flight Attendant)
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://sgtreport.com/2015/03/method ... egins-to-crumble-rebekah-roth/
Published: Mar 23, 2015
Author: Rebekah Roth
Post Date: 2015-03-23 10:33:47 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 18957
Comments: 557
Rebekah Roth has, in my opinion, blown the lid off of the lies surrounding the events on 9/11. Facts which are outlined in her recently released book, Methodical Illusion; a book, as of this writing, that is #1 on the Amazon Best Seller List for its category.--NorthWestLibertyNews Poster Comment: Roth’s research reveals ALL of the 911 cell phone calls from the passengers to their families and friends were actually made on the ground after the 4 planes landed at a remote military airfield and listen to what her research reveals about passenger 9B. This is a must listen. I agree with NorthWestLibertyNews's opinion that Rebekah has blown the lid off the 9/11 lies.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-157) not displayed.
.
.
.
#158. To: lucysmom (#152)
Because obviously they didn't wire the explosives to do so. Do you think that somehow "proves" something? Hijacking certainly does occur, but not the way it occured on 9/11. For instance, hijackers typically (in fact ALWAYS) force the pilot(s) to fly the aircraft to the desired destination. Heavy multi-engine aircraft can not be easily flown by individuals who could barely fly a single engine propeller driven plane, if at all. Isn't that why they went to flight school?
Why not? I'm curious - why do you want to believe the government did it?
Why did they *wire* WTC to fall straight down (even though they did not, in fact, fall straight down)? --Are you a *Jew*?
Extract from Why the No-757 Crowd is Making an Ass out of Itself: The amount of eye witnesses who reported seeing a plane and described it with words like: 'airliner', 'big', 'silver', 'roaring', etc.*** at least 45 The amount of eye witnesses who specifically said they saw an American Airlines jet. In all cases there's no indication the witnesses were talking about a small jet. at least 25 The amount of witnesses who reported the noise of the plane was very loud to deafening. at least 22 The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw a plane running down light poles when crossing the the highways. at least 19 The amount of eye witnesses who stated they saw and heard the plane went full throttle only at the last seconds. at least 12 There were so many people that saw the aircraft, the government stopped using their accounts because they all corroborated each other. They saw what they saw.
It's not a matter of what I want or don't want, it's a matter of looking over the available evidence and seeing the facts with a clear set of eyes. If I had more time, which I don't have at the moment, I could provide an essay as to the set of facts which prove the perps included highly placed US government officials, along with domestic and foreign intelligence assets, and certainly US military involvement. Perhaps if you truly cared about the matter you'd find all the relevent facts and evidence yourself. It's been almost 14 years since the event occured, certainly if you wanted to find the truth you would have done so by now. Uh, yes they DID fall straight down. In other words, the damaged top portions of the WTC towers did not simply slide off the building as it WOULD have if it were truly a collapse due to weakened sections of the towers failing to support the weight of the upper structure. All three buildings dropped straight into their own footprints, a physical impossibility without the help of controlled demolitions. To deny that fact indicates you have no notion of what direction down or sideways truly are. As far as to WHY they were wired that way, it was to prevent catastrophic destruction to adjacent buildings, and to ensure ALL of the important physical evidence was thoroughly destroyed. Which they flunked. The Pentagon "pilot", Hani Hanjour, could NOT even rent a Cessna due to failing the flight evalulation test. The flight instructor who went along with him on the evalulation flight before he rented the plane said he "could not fly at all". As far as the flight similuator school, he was told he was wasting his money, and he would not have passed if he had continued to attend. hi lucys mom. aerodynamiclly speaking , do you know what wake vortex is?
______________________________________ Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.
When metal is heated, it loses strength. (I used to love to watch the horseshoer work when I was a kid) Other than what happened on 9/11, show where in history any other skyscraper has come crashing down due to fire. And BTW, the jet fuel burnt out after the first 10 minutes. The remaining fires were simple office fires consisting of furniture, paper, and other low temperature fuel items. They saw what they saw. Michael Rivero agrees.
Uh...no...the top of the South tower tilted and landed squarely on the north face of the Banker's Trust Building and took a huge assed scoop put of it. The North Tower fell west and north and damaged 1 WFC, Verizon and, of course, WTC7. What you *believe* here is 100% false. --Are you a *Jew*?
So then, you're saying the remainder of the buildings did not collapse and are still there? Of course they're not there, and they did NOT lean to any side and topple over, contrary to your spin doctor tactics and comments. Rivero's point is that "no-planers" are "poisoning the well". He's wrong on what he claims concerning the aircraft that hit the Pentagon. If it had been a 757 we would have seen videos of it happening over, and over, and over, and over... That and it would have dove from the sky and hit downwards, it would NOT have flown in at ground level going 500 mph or so without so much as kissing the grass of the Pentagon lawn. Well the question probably doesn't apply to most people because most people on facebook already use their name, which makes this issue irrelevant. If someone users a monicker or pseudonym facebook apparently has an automated program which detects it and then they demand your real name. From what I've seen most folks use their real name but in political or activist circles many use monickers. I've got the screenshots of all these demands but I'm sure my descirption suffices. Not a big deal since they deemed my site "dangerous" anyway and forbid links to it. "Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
I'm not sure why he chose today to tweet this out, but as you can see he's concerned about the story being hijacked (pun intended).
None of the WTC skyscrapers fell due to *fire*. They fell because some sort of massive impact had compromised their structural integrity. It wasn't a matter of *if*; it was a matter of *when*... And BTW, the jet fuel burnt out after the first 10 minutes. The remaining fires were simple office fires consisting of furniture, paper Another outright lie. Were you in the building? And please don't bother posting the *reports* of NYFD 20odd floors below the main impact reporting what it was like on one or two floors as being indicative of the ENTIRE building... and other low temperature fuel items. Wha...chuckle...huh? --Are you a *Jew*?
Don't know either. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense. I didn't say that anywhere. Of course they're not there, and they did NOT lean to any side and topple over, contrary to your spin doctor tactics and comments. I never stated that they toppled over... --Are you a *Jew*?
I use two very fake names for gaming and have never been asked. Ever. It's currently 73 *No* and 0 *Yes*... --Are you a *Jew*?
You are obviously oblivious to the fact that they were designed to withstand a direct hit from an airliner. The designer said something like, "it'd be like sticking a pencil into a net", where the immediate area of the entrance hole would be damaged but the net itself would remain intact. Another outright lie. Were you in the building? And please don't bother posting the *reports* of NYFD 20odd floors below the main impact reporting what it was like on one or two floors as being indicative of the ENTIRE building... Coming from a pathological troll who twists, distorts, and ignores any REAL facts, that's pretty much a compliment. The NIST report states that the jet fuel was spent after the first few minutes after the initial impacts. Read it yourself, troll. In other words, it was IMPOSSIBLE for the office fires to have superheated the structure itself, thus the supporting steel structure did NOT weaken or fail, and the tale of it happening that way is a certifiable LIE. https://youtu.be/9SSS0DDqfm0 You can clearly see the top part of the building falling to the left,.,, --Are you a *Jew*?
That image doesn't show the UNDAMAGED 100 or so floors BELOW it. If ONLY the top of the towers had slid off, then we would not be arguing about it.
Before the remaining 100 or so UNDAMAGED floors simply decide to behave as if they're made of pixie dust. You are obviously oblivious to the fact that it was the *webbing* of the outside of the building that was so constructed. Not the interior core. The NIST report states that the jet fuel was spent after the first few minutes after the initial impacts. Read it yourself, troll. Can you point out where I stated otherwise. Anyone who uses charcoal lto barbecue knows that *fuel* burns off. In other words, it was IMPOSSIBLE for the office fires to have superheated the structure itself, thus the supporting steel structure did NOT weaken or fail... It was not *impossible*. IN fact, it happened. At 700degrees the trusses become compromised. --Are you a *Jew*?
100 undamaged floors? The planes took out between 15 and 20 floors of 106 floor buildings essentially detaching the upper floors, which weighed TONS, from the lower floors... --Are you a *Jew*?
Ok, lets say the undamaged 75 to 90 floors below. The undamaged floors had ALWAYS supported the upper structure above them since they were built, and were designed to do so. And YOU claim the top structures basically toppled over, which they didn't, but if they HAD then there would have been NO weight above the remaining structure at all after the upper structures slid off the undamaged sections. There's absolutely no reason for the UNDAMAGED 75 to 90 floors below to act as if they weren't there. You are obviously oblivious to the fact that it was the *webbing* of the outside of the building that was so constructed. Not the interior core. Wow. You're trying to say the architects designed only the OUTSIDE of the WTC towers to withstand a direct hit from an airliner, they didn't care what happened to the structure itself? It was not *impossible*. IN fact, it happened. At 700degrees the trusses become compromised. Pure BS. The WTC years earlier had office fires raging through them that lasted for HOURS. On 9/11 the towers collapsed in LESS than an hour. AND, there's no physical way for the steel to fail due to a simple office fire, the heat is not sufficient. BTW, was yukon your mentor? You have the same tired old arguments he had made. Uh...no...the building was constructed with an outer frame to which vertical trusses were attached and then connected to an inner cement core. And YOU claim the top structures basically toppled over No I did not. I stated that they did not fall STRAIGHT DOWN...which is not only clearly shown in the video I provided but is apparent from the damage caused to the surrounding structures. --Are you a *Jew*?
“The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door—this intense grid—and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting.” _Frank A. Demartini, on-site construction manager for the World Trade Center, January 25, 2001: --Are you a *Jew*?
Apparently you have a problem with facts and reality. The Murrah building certainly did NOT collapse, it was still standing after the bombing. It appears they selectively enforce their rules then. Happy gaming! If u ever are critical of israel or the police state on fb maybe they will revoke your very fake gaming name.
"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
_Frank A. Demartini, on-site construction manager for the World Trade Center, January 25, 2001: So there you go, the man said the building could withstand MULTIPLE impacts from airliners without failing. No, slim, there YOU go; he's talking about the *OUTSIDE* of the building... --Are you a *Jew*?
What's all that debris on the ground? What's the big gouge on the left side from which debris is cascading in the direction of *gravity*? --Are you a *Jew*?
You are the only person whom I have ever read state this. --Are you a *Jew*?
Are you REALLY that dumb? So you think when the man said the structure could withstand multiple impacts from airliners, he was only talking about the decorative outer sheathing? What's the big gouge on the left side from which debris is cascading in the direction of *gravity*? The structure did not collapse into its own footprint did it. And while the explosion blew an entire slice of the building outwards, the building itself was still standing afterwards. Can you point out which other part of the Twin Towers had *webbing* or *netting* like a *screen* on a screen *door*? Thanks in advance... --Are you a *Jew*?
Do you see any major debris field outside of its *footprint*? --Are you a *Jew*?
Comments (199 - 557) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestHow come its not falling straight down?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#159. To: lucysmom (#143)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#160. To: FormerLurker (#159)
#161. To: FormerLurker (#158)
#162. To: FormerLurker (#158)
Because obviously they didn't wire the explosives to do so. Do you think that somehow "proves" something?
#163. To: Jethro Tull (#155)
ash
#164. To: lucysmom (#161)
I'm curious - why do you want to believe the government did it?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#165. To: war (#162)
Why did they *wire* WTC to fall straight down (even though they did not, in fact, fall straight down)?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#166. To: lucysmom (#160)
(Edited)
Isn't that why they went to flight school?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#167. To: lucysmom (#143)
#168. To: lucysmom (#139)
(Edited)
Apparently controlled demolition isn't the only way a building with structural damage, and then further weakened by fire can come down.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#169. To: Cynicom (#163)
There were so many people that saw the aircraft, the government stopped using their accounts because they all corroborated each other.
#170. To: FormerLurker (#165)
Uh, yes they DID fall straight down.
#171. To: war (#170)
Uh...no...the top of the South tower tilted and landed squarely on the north face of the Banker's Trust Building and took a huge assed scoop put of it. The North Tower fell west and north and damaged 1 WFC, Verizon and, of course, WTC7.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#172. To: Jethro Tull (#169)
Michael Rivero agrees.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#173. To: war (#110)
#174. To: FormerLurker (#172)
He's wrong on what he claims concerning the aircraft that hit the Pentagon.
#175. To: FormerLurker (#168)
Other than what happened on 9/11, show where in history any other skyscraper has come crashing down due to fire.
#176. To: Jethro Tull (#174)
I'm not sure why he chose today to tweet this out, but as you can see he's concerned about the story being hijacked (pun intended).
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#177. To: FormerLurker (#171)
(Edited)
So then, you're saying the remainder of the buildings did not collapse and are still there?
#178. To: Artisan (#173)
(Edited)
Well the question probably doesn't apply to most people because most people on facebook already use their name, which makes this issue irrelevant.
#179. To: war (#175)
They fell because some sort of massive impact had compromised their structural integrity. It wasn't a matter of *if*; it was a matter of *when*...
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#180. To: FormerLurker (#172)
#181. To: war (#177)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#182. To: war (#180)
You can clearly see the top part of the building falling to the left,.,,
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#183. To: FormerLurker (#179)
You are obviously oblivious to the fact that they were designed to withstand a direct hit from an airliner.
#184. To: FormerLurker (#182)
Before the remaining 100 or so UNDAMAGED floors simply decide to behave as if they're made of pixie dust.
#185. To: war (#184)
The planes took out between 15 and 20 floors of 106 floor buildings essentially detaching the upper floors, which weighed TONS, from the lower floors...
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#186. To: war (#183)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#187. To: FormerLurker (#185)
The undamaged floors had ALWAYS supported the upper structure above them since they were built, and were designed to do so.
#188. To: FormerLurker (#186)
Wow. You're trying to say the architects designed only the OUTSIDE of the WTC towers to withstand a direct hit from an airliner, they didn't care what happened to the structure itself?
#189. To: war (#149)
But the more important reason is that most of the building did collapse...not just one side of it...
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#190. To: war (#178)
#191. To: war (#188)
“The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door—this intense grid—and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting.”
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#192. To: FormerLurker (#191)
So there you go...
#193. To: FormerLurker (#189)
#194. To: Artisan (#190)
If u ever are critical of israel or the police state on fb maybe they will revoke your very fake gaming name.
#195. To: war (#192)
No, slim, there YOU go; he's talking about the *OUTSIDE* of the building...
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#196. To: war (#193)
What's all that debris on the ground?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#197. To: FormerLurker (#195)
Are you REALLY that dumb? So you think when the man said the structure could withstand multiple impacts from airliners, he was only talking about the decorative outer sheathing?
#198. To: FormerLurker (#196)
The structure did not collapse into its own footprint did it.
.
.
.