See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Methodical Illusion: The 9/11 Con Begins to Crumble — Rebekah Roth (Flight Attendant)
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://sgtreport.com/2015/03/method ... egins-to-crumble-rebekah-roth/
Published: Mar 23, 2015
Author: Rebekah Roth
Post Date: 2015-03-23 10:33:47 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 24798
Comments: 557
Rebekah Roth has, in my opinion, blown the lid off of the lies surrounding the events on 9/11. Facts which are outlined in her recently released book, Methodical Illusion; a book, as of this writing, that is #1 on the Amazon Best Seller List for its category.--NorthWestLibertyNews Poster Comment: Roth’s research reveals ALL of the 911 cell phone calls from the passengers to their families and friends were actually made on the ground after the 4 planes landed at a remote military airfield and listen to what her research reveals about passenger 9B. This is a must listen. I agree with NorthWestLibertyNews's opinion that Rebekah has blown the lid off the 9/11 lies.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 539.
#1. To: X-15 (#0)
Please listen to this!
I don't disagree with the manipulation to get America into endless war in the ME after 9/11, but I still want to know what happened to the passengers if they didn't die in the aircraft.
Not only were the numbers of alleged passengers unusually low, there are multiple discrepencies in the reported passenger lists -- some names in particular that appear in one place...disappear in another...duplicate in morphed forms. Some names might be on the list as an exit strategy for witness protection program identity changes. Some may have been killed prior and their names included for insurance and disaster charity fraud. People who were close to them would tend to think they did die as 9/11 victims. Some names may even be entirely fictitous, also for insurance and disaster charity fraud amongst the insiders. Reportedly, the wife of one of the air traffic controllers that day was on one the alleged hijacks. iirc, he might have been the ATC who reportedly had been involved in the Egypt Air disaster and another too. As for alleged Flt. 93 "officially" claimed to have crashed deep into the ground at Shanksville, PA, anyone of the opinion that was a real airliner with real people aboard should at least question why no attempt to excavate said impact zone for any possible survivors. Edited last sentence.
!!!!!!!! I can't believe you typed those words.
There's a lot of words that I cannot believe get typed including the most recent ones that state that when a building's support columns are destroyed that it isn't gravity that brings them down...
Whoever said that, you?
You.
Go ahead and find the post and link it, otherwise admit that you are a liar.
Your whole narrative is that. Support columns were destroyed when the planes hit the towers...structural support was further compromised by the combination of stress and fire... But the buildings had to be blown up to fall...
Support columns were destroyed when the planes hit the towers...structural support was further compromised by the combination of stress and fire... But the buildings had to be blown up to fall... Pure BS. The CENTRAL CORES of the towers were NOT destroyed prior to the collapse. Only a relatively small SECTION of the outer wall was damaged in the impact areas of the towers. Thus, the SUPPORTING STRUCTURE UNDER the damaged areas were INTACT snd STABLE, contrary to your smoke and mirrors carnival show, and contrary to your wild claims.
Again... Look at the North Tower...3/4 of the outer columns of the north face are severed... Look at the South Tower...nearly the entire columns on the east face as well as and nearly half on the north are severed... So, please, stop telling me that what I can see with my own eyes is not what I'm seeing with my own eyes.
#540. To: war (#539)
Yet there is NO damage to the floors below the damaged area, so explain to me why THEY would suddenly fail to support the upper structure. As far as WTC2, the plane hit on an angle and did not damage the central core, which was the predominate load bearing component of the structure. The outer wall columns were chiefly there for horizontal loads, such as for providing stablity against winds. Trusses supported the actual lightweight cement of the floors themselves, but they did not support the actual structure other than the immediate floor which rested on them.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#522. To: christine (#1)
#523. To: X-15 (#522)
(Edited)
I don't disagree with the manipulation to get America into endless war in the ME after 9/11, but I still want to know what happened to the passengers if they didn't die in the aircraft.
#525. To: GreyLmist (#523)
question why no attempt to excavate said impact zone for any possible survivors.
#526. To: X-15 (#525)
I can't believe you typed those words.
#527. To: war (#526)
I cannot believe get typed including the most recent ones that state that when a building's support columns are destroyed that it isn't gravity that brings them down...
#528. To: FormerLurker (#527)
#529. To: war (#528)
You.
#531. To: FormerLurker (#529)
Go ahead and find the post and link it, otherwise admit that you are a liar.
#533. To: war (#531)
Your whole narrative is that.
#539. To: FormerLurker (#533)
Only a relatively small SECTION of the outer wall was damaged in the impact areas of the towers.
Replies to Comment # 539.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 539.