See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Methodical Illusion: The 9/11 Con Begins to Crumble — Rebekah Roth (Flight Attendant)
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://sgtreport.com/2015/03/method ... egins-to-crumble-rebekah-roth/
Published: Mar 23, 2015
Author: Rebekah Roth
Post Date: 2015-03-23 10:33:47 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 18779
Comments: 557
Rebekah Roth has, in my opinion, blown the lid off of the lies surrounding the events on 9/11. Facts which are outlined in her recently released book, Methodical Illusion; a book, as of this writing, that is #1 on the Amazon Best Seller List for its category.--NorthWestLibertyNews Poster Comment: Roth’s research reveals ALL of the 911 cell phone calls from the passengers to their families and friends were actually made on the ground after the 4 planes landed at a remote military airfield and listen to what her research reveals about passenger 9B. This is a must listen. I agree with NorthWestLibertyNews's opinion that Rebekah has blown the lid off the 9/11 lies.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-44) not displayed.
.
.
.
#45. To: war (#44)
(Edited)
Have you never seen images of real wreckage from a real crash? Can you show me where the tail is in the Pentagon "debris"? I remember watching a live broadcast and seeing the second plane hit - how did the CIA manage to dub that in after the fact? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KYE4zViAAg 12 minute mark.
Planes are made of and transport materials that essentially disintegrate on impact... --Are you a *Jew*?
WTC attacks were drones, ie. airliners or tankers converted to appear as passenger aircraft yet were remotely controlled. There were at least tens of thousands of witnesses to the WTC attacks; I doubt they were all "CIA assets". Not to mention every single news agency was covering the event as it unfolded, I doubt all of them were reporting on non-existant events being staged from a central control center in real time. I think those who insist the no-plane tale is absolute fact are in reality actively involved in the obvious coverup, sowing discord amongst the "truthers", and "proving" to others who actually believe the official government lies concerning 9/11 that all "truthers" are stark raving lunatics. The Pentagon attack was most likely a drone as well, being substantially smaller than an actual airliner, yet painted to appear as one from a distance. Well...in real time, they certainly *dubbed* in something very large and very loud over my very head around 9:03AM 11th Sep 2001...
--Are you a *Jew*?
Oh my lord... --Are you a *Jew*?
Well Google "aircraft crashes' and view the images, you can see they don't vaporize or disintegrate on impact. So IF hypothetically there is SO much force and energy in an event to totally vaporize several tons of metal, where the wings of the aircraft don't even blow up as they hit a concrete wall, they simply vanish like they were beamed up from the Star Ship Enterprise, why would remnants of human bodies not disappear as well in your opinion? What better way to get rid of pesky evidence at the WTC than totally demolishing the evidence by way of demolition, and removal of any lingering debris to China? If those buildings HADN'T "fallen down", there'd have been NO way for their plan to have worked. That was the greedheads at work as they couldn't wait to rebuild...and there was nothing left to *demolish*...I looked down on that hole for three months before I couldn't take it any more... --Are you a *Jew*?
And they didn't preserve anything for any sort of investigation... One more very important question. What would be the rational for designing a passenger craft that would effectively be guaranteed to kill everyone on board if an accident were to occur? Hate to tell you this, but planes are made of extremely durable materials that can withstand hundred's of thousands of pounds of force in everyday use, such as the ability to safely lift over 220,000 pounds (757 take off weight unloaded) for round the clock use, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. Planes do not simply "vaporize" upon impact.
BTW, the evidence was demolished due to the "collapse" of the towers. If the towers had NOT collapsed, there would have been intact remains of the aircraft in each tower. If they were not the reported aircraft, well, we most likely would be living under a different government by now since the perps would have been hauled off in handcuffs. When a solid object directly and head on impacts a solid object there's not going to be much left... --Are you a *Jew*?
There were semi-intact remains of the aircraft outside of the towers. I saw some myself. --Are you a *Jew*?
It's apparent you've never studied physics. What you said is false. There's elastic and inelastic collisions. An example of an elastic collision is one where an object such as a baseball is impacted by a bat. The ball travels away from the point of impact and kinetic energy is conserved by way of the ball travelling through the air after being struck by the bat. An inelastic collision is one where kinetic energy is not conserved and the objects stick together, such as a plane crashing into the ground. The mass of the objects do not "disappear" just because they hit with high energy unless you're talking about something which can effectively turn to dust and dissipate. No aircraft will simply turn to dust, and its mass will remain after the collision, perhaps in many pieces, but it will ALL remain. Not saying there weren't, but I doubt they were taken into custody and properly analyzed, and I HIGHLY doubt any of that debris still remains under lock and key for future investigation. Much left that is *recognizable*...I should have said... --Are you a *Jew*?
Ah, losing the argument so now it's time to get down with the name calling, eh?
Analyzed for what? BTW, they are still finding debris... --Are you a *Jew*?
Yea...sorry...sometimes it's frustrating...apologies and edited...but we aren't arguing and I'm not losing...
--Are you a *Jew*?
BTW, they are still finding debris... Well unless you're able to obtain the item, analyze it's serial number(s), and verify it's authenticity, you don't have a leg to stand on. I'm just curious, were you NYFD or something? I'd think the site would be restricted after the crash/collapse. I'm not trying to pick a fight or anything, I don't care what really happened that day one way or another anymore. I guess my interest in this clusterfuck of a thread stems from me being a pilot before "Texting Woman" destroyed my life. Godfrey Smith: Mike, I wouldn't worry. Prosperity is just around the corner. What it comes down to war is that the tale of 9/11 as spun by the media and the government is physically impossible, besides being absolutely nonsensical and requires ignoring actual observed events to be even remotely believable to the non-scientifically minded common folk. Then again, why would our government want to start a WAR for no reason, right? And why would they allow guilty banksters to not only walk on criminal charges, but bail them out with TRILLIONS of tax payer dollars? And how could they simply forget that the DOD couldn't account for 2.3 TRILLION dollars, as reported the day prior to 9/11/2001? No. I worked at a company whose NY headquarters are at 1 Liberty Plaza (165 Broadway) and I sat right at the Northwest corner of the building... I do have a dozen or so NYFD friends and one relative as well as a few NYPD who were on site all day. That's why I know the WTC7 BS is just that. They all saw the South face of the building and knew that it was going to collapse... --Are you a *Jew*?
Thanks for your reply.
Godfrey Smith: Mike, I wouldn't worry. Prosperity is just around the corner. Now you've got my undivided attention. Tell us more.
Pure BS. A weak south face does NOT cause a total collapse across all four corners of a building resulting in a free fall as if there's nothing in the way. That's why I question your truthfullness in what you "report". You could well have been in Idaho on the morning of 9/11 and simply CLAIM to have been there in NYC and have all these "friends" who KNEW it was "going to collapse".. Could you provide a link which reports ANY other building on earth falling at free fall speed due to damage on one side of the building? Please don't imply that war is a liar. It'll set him off like a firecracker. He's not.
I don't know him personally, so I look at all possibilities and options.
WTC7 was indicative of a building that was demolished. It fell in free fall. This was done to destroy the computer hard drives that contained evidence that would show the true perpetrators of 9-11. It was the U.S., Israel, and Saudi Arabia that were in cahoots over the events of 9-11. Witness the "5 dancing Israelis". The dancing implied "foreknowledge" of the event. ;) "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
Chrissy posted two articles titled Esso. Long story, short, some woman who was so important, was texting and hit me head on. She was in a big van and I was in a Honda Fit. She bruised her knee, the doctors said I should've died & wish I would have. The doctors have been pretty much worthless. Closure was about 60MPH. Unfortunately, that day I forgot to wear my helmet, HANS device, hearing protection and everything else a NASCAR driver gears up with. The end can't come soon enough. Two weeks after the accident my wife of 33 years divorced me and took everything I worked for. Have a nice day. :) Godfrey Smith: Mike, I wouldn't worry. Prosperity is just around the corner. The building was supported primarily by its center core.
Nope. You're confusing the WTC towers with Bldg 7, which was a steel framed high rise. He's not. I agree, war does not lie.
Well if he's not lying then he's delusional and simply hears voices in his head.
And here's the rebuttal http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2056088/Footage-kills-conspiracy-theories-Rare-footage- shows-WTC-7-consumed-fire.html
No, not that either.
Oh jeez, do you think a solid building will fall into the path of MOST resistance in a symetrical manner? Even IF one side of the building was TOTALLY destroyed, there is NO POSSIBLE way for it to "fall" straightdown, ESPECIALLY at free fall speed as if there's nothing but air under it... And THAT is how the perps get away with stuff like this, the majority of Americans have NO understanding of basic physics, as seen by the poor performance in science (as well as a host of other subjects) of US students compared to other nations. Uh huh. Are you his GF perhaps?
Comments (86 - 557) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestYou do realize that your question is the answer?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#46. To: christine (#37)
The filmmakers and "eye witnesses" were CIA plants and the planes were dubbed in later. She has nothing about the complicity of the US political elite, media, CIA or military on 9-11.
#47. To: FormerLurker (#45)
Have you never seen images of real wreckage from a real crash? Can you show me where the tail is in the Pentagon "debris"?
#48. To: christine (#37)
Roth has a notion that dummy planes were flown into the Trade Center towers. I don't believe any planes crashed into the WTC or the Pentagon. The filmmakers and "eye witnesses" were CIA plants and the planes were dubbed in later.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#49. To: lucysmom (#46)
#50. To: FormerLurker (#48)
WTC attacks were drones, ie. airliners or tankers converted to appear as passenger aircraft yet were remotely controlled.
#51. To: war (#47)
Planes are made of and transport materials that essentially disintegrate on impact...
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#52. To: war (#50)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#53. To: FormerLurker (#52)
What better way to get rid of pesky evidence at the WTC than totally demolishing the evidence by way of demolition, and removal of any lingering debris to China?
#54. To: war (#53)
That was the greedheads at work as they couldn't wait to rebuild...and there was nothing left to *demolish*...
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#55. To: war (#47)
Planes are made of and transport materials that essentially disintegrate on impact...
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#56. To: FormerLurker (#54)
#57. To: war (#53)
there was nothing left to *demolish*...
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#58. To: FormerLurker (#51)
Well Google "aircraft crashes' and view the images, you can see they don't vaporize or disintegrate on impact.
#59. To: FormerLurker (#57)
If the towers had NOT collapsed, there would have been intact remains of the aircraft in each tower.
#60. To: war (#58)
(Edited)
When a solid object directly and head on impacts a solid object there's not going to be much left...
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#61. To: war (#59)
There were semi-intact remains of the aircraft outside of the towers. I saw some myself.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#62. To: FormerLurker (#60)
(Edited)
It's apparent you've never studied physics. What you said is false.
#63. To: war (#62)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#64. To: FormerLurker (#61)
Not saying there weren't, but I doubt they were taken into custody and properly analyzed, and I HIGHLY doubt any of that debris still remains under lock and key for future investigation.
#65. To: FormerLurker (#63)
(Edited)
#66. To: war (#64)
Analyzed for what?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#67. To: war (#59)
There were semi-intact remains of the aircraft outside of the towers. I saw some myself.
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)
#68. To: war (#65)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#69. To: Esso (#67)
#70. To: war (#69)
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)
#71. To: Esso (#67)
I guess my interest in this clusterfuck of a thread stems from me being a pilot before "Texting Woman" destroyed my life.
#72. To: war (#69)
(Edited)
That's why I know the WTC7 BS is just that. They all saw the South face of the building and knew that it was going to collapse...
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#73. To: FormerLurker (#72)
#74. To: Fred Mertz (#73)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#75. To: FormerLurker, war (#72)
a total collapse across all four corners of a building resulting in a free fall as if there's nothing in the way.
#76. To: Fred Mertz (#71)
(Edited)
Tell us more.
The woman had state minimum insurance coverage. That was burnt up in the first 20 minutes before the coverage covered it.
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)
#77. To: FormerLurker (#72)
Pure BS. A weak south face does NOT cause a total collapse across all four corners of a building resulting in a free fall as if there's nothing in the way.
#78. To: lucysmom (#77)
The building was supported primarily by its center core.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#79. To: lucysmom (#77)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#80. To: Fred Mertz (#73)
Please don't imply that war is a liar. It'll set him off like a firecracker.
#81. To: lucysmom (#80)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#82. To: FormerLurker (#79)
Remember Building 7.org
#83. To: FormerLurker (#81)
Well if he's not lying then he's delusional and simply hears voices in his head.
#84. To: lucysmom (#82)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#85. To: lucysmom (#83)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
.
.
.