See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Methodical Illusion: The 9/11 Con Begins to Crumble — Rebekah Roth (Flight Attendant)
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://sgtreport.com/2015/03/method ... egins-to-crumble-rebekah-roth/
Published: Mar 23, 2015
Author: Rebekah Roth
Post Date: 2015-03-23 10:33:47 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 19199
Comments: 557
Rebekah Roth has, in my opinion, blown the lid off of the lies surrounding the events on 9/11. Facts which are outlined in her recently released book, Methodical Illusion; a book, as of this writing, that is #1 on the Amazon Best Seller List for its category.--NorthWestLibertyNews Poster Comment: Roth’s research reveals ALL of the 911 cell phone calls from the passengers to their families and friends were actually made on the ground after the 4 planes landed at a remote military airfield and listen to what her research reveals about passenger 9B. This is a must listen. I agree with NorthWestLibertyNews's opinion that Rebekah has blown the lid off the 9/11 lies.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-298) not displayed.
.
.
.
#299. To: titorite (#294)
How so?
No no no LM...NYers by the hundreds are dying the streets even as I type this...all from asbestiosis... --Are you a *Jew*?
Oh you mean the folks who picked up the WTC rubble and helped ship it off to China? The same folks who were involved with the demolition of what remained of the Murrah Building in OKC? You mean Mark Loizeaux, who flip flopped on his comments concerning what happened on the morning of 9/11? The man who is president of Controlled Demolition Inc., a company heavily dependent on government contracts? And BTW, controlled demolition techniques have been around long before either of the Loizeaux brothers were ever born. Would you at least look in to *stuff* before revealing to us what it is that you don't know about things? --Are you a *Jew*?
Yeah, you'd kinda expect the company with far and away the most experience to get government contracts.
Doesn't sound like much of a flip flop to me, but then what do I know.
She never stated that. --Are you a *Jew*?
Reminds me of a Mark Twain quote.
Perhaps they're the ones who wired the explosives to begin with... She mentioned it to deflect attention from the collapse. So I addressed her comment. It is also HIGHLY interesting that they were involved with the Murrah Building in OKC, since there is strong evidence that cutting charges were used to maximize the damage, as the ANFO bomb that McVeigh had allegedly detonated didn't have anywhere near the power needed to do the damage that actually occured. Nice to have "team players" on your side when you need something overlooked as well. only with people like you and war. so if i have no crediblity with liars then i shall rejoice in the refrain from bad company. ______________________________________ Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.
Perhaps there were no explosives to begin with. Again, I am curious to know why you choose to believe the US government blew up the WTC.
oh i am far from.anonymous. but you seem mad right now. what with the vulgarities and all. ill let you play with your friends without out any further.interuption. you cyber super heros have fun playing pretend with each other. who knows maybe abraham will come over.and play with you too after awhile. im sure.ted.cruz hates conspiracy theroists as much as you and george bush. ______________________________________ Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.
If there wasn't enough evidence of their involvement, there's CERTAINLY enough evidence of their role in the coverup. And there IS plenty of evidence of their involvement, foreknowledge, and logistical support. Well perhaps the Easter Bunny got mad and chewed the bottom out of WTC7 with the help of the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus. What? It is clear from the video that the Penthouse was the first to go - are we not supposed to notice that and ask why?
Quite the opposite...she mentioned it to point out that if it was a CT then the Penthouse would not have been the first thing to collapse and she is 100% correct. --Are you a *Jew*?
Well it's an interesting observation that there were additional explosives at the top floor of the building, but the fact is, the ENTIRE structure dropped at free fall speed, not just the top floor or structure on top of it. Don't kid yourself. It's a perpetual state. but you seem mad right now. All is not as it *seems*. --Are you a *Jew*?
titorite - that's unusual, is it a family name?
Chuckles...yea...in case the building fails to come down you could always claim...well...hmmm...what is it you could claim? --Are you a *Jew*?
So why did the lower floors give out all at once where the building dropped as one structure if the ADDITIONAL penthouse collapse was connected to it in any way, shape, or form? You see, it's quite apparent what the both of you are doing, and that is to pull every trick out of your bag of tricks you can conjure up, while ignoring the simple and clear questions, such as HOW A STRUCTURE CAN DROP STRAIGHT DOWN INTO ITS OWN FOOTPRINT AT FREE FALL SPEED WITHOUT EXPLOSIVES. Oh boy is that a *layup*... --Are you a *Jew*?
A) They were sure the building would come down. B) If every bit of planning failed, they could always claim it was due to "fire". C) They had people such as you on their "team" who would think of other nonsensical explanations when and if they were needed. First the penthouse collapsed, then there was a pause before the rest of the building fell. What is free fall speed?
They didn't...the video that I posted clearly shows the building begin to fall, pause and twist slightly and then continue on down... You see, it's quite apparent what the both of you are doing, and that is to pull every trick out of your bag of tricks you can conjure up, while ignoring the simple and clear questions, as to HOW A STRUCTURE CAN DROP STRAIGHT DOWN INTO ITS OWN FOOTPRINT AT FREE FALL SPEED WITHOUT EXPLOSIVES. It has been shown to you in both video and photographs that it did neither. --Are you a *Jew*?
BTW, why do you think they faked the cell phone calls? I wonder how they were so sure that people would be so dumb as to believe that was possible to use cell phones at crusising altitude back in 2001, where it's well known by engineers involved with such matters that it was impossible? Can you point to any building that he been felled via controlled demolition that was done so by placing charges on the TOP floor? B) If every bit of planning failed, they could always claim it was due to "fire". That statement makes 0 sense... C) They had people such as you on their "team" who would think of other nonsensical explanations when and if they were needed. Since when is *gravity* nonsensical? --Are you a *Jew*?
You didn't answer that question... --Are you a *Jew*?
So the building didn't fall down into it's footprint all at once, eh? Get your eyes checked. Your denial of plainly visible facts doesn't help your case. Here is it again: https://youtu.be/VYNesSmwF7I Why is it that none of the WTC7 videos you post show the penthouse collapsing? --Are you a *Jew*?
In terms of WTC7, theft of gold, destruction of CIA investigation records, SEC investigative reports on Enron and other such criminals, desire to have carte blanche to wage war whenever and whereever, huge increases in defense spending, surveilence society, erosion of rights, police state, etc., etc., etc., That's just the motives I can think of off the top of my head. You see the government is not of the people, for the people, or by the people; it's for the corporations, of the corporations, and by the corporations, many of whom are multi-national in nature. WE as a People have not had control of our own government for the past 5 decades, if not MUCH longer than that, if ever. Why is it you can't explain how WTC7 dropped straight down into its footprint at free fall speed?
Because what never happened doesn't require an explanation. You should stop and *think* about why that needed to be *explained* to you... The reason that none of your videos show the penthouse and rooftop caving down and the building twisting is because it blows the freefall speed nonsense out of the water...doing so reveals that WTC7 collapsed at 40% less than freefall speed... --Are you a *Jew*?
Why did you never respond to this post?
--Are you a *Jew*?
You and your GF are the ones diverting attention to the penthouse, and are making a big stink about it. It's a side topic, not the primary matter. It is YOU and your side kick who are claiming the penthouse collapse has something to do with the MAIN collapse which caused the ENTIRE structure to drop at free fall speed, not I. I thought we were discussing Building 7… Are you deflecting? But since you bright it up, do you think Ted Olson had his wife, Barbara, bumped off?
Well no shit Sherlock, WTC 1 and 2 made a bit of a mess as they collapsed. So what is your point?
The Penthouse is what spikes the controlled demolition nonsense. --Are you a *Jew*?
Comments (339 - 557) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latestarent you confused about the dogs?
#300. To: lucysmom (#287)
It is too early to be looking for instances of mesothemola due to exposure on 911.
#301. To: lucysmom (#283)
He and his brother literally wrote the book on controlled demolitions, claiming to have conducted more demolitions than all other companies combined.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#302. To: titorite (#291)
amazing that these.dogs got trained so.fast. normal search and rescue dogs arent.ready.so young.... they must of (sic) gotten intensive.inutero training.
#303. To: FormerLurker (#301)
Oh you mean the folks who picked up the WTC rubble and helped ship it off to China? The same folks who were involved with the demolition of what remained of the Murrah Building in OKC?
#304. To: FormerLurker (#301)
(Edited)
#305. To: FormerLurker (#292)
Not as much as you, since the penthouse did not initiate the collapse of the entire structure from the bottom.
#306. To: war (#302)
Would you at least look in to *stuff* before revealing to us what it is that you don't know about things?
#307. To: lucysmom (#303)
Yeah, you'd kinda expect the company with far and away the most experience to get government contracts.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#308. To: war (#305)
She never stated that.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#309. To: lucysmom (#303)
(Edited)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#310. To: lucysmom (#296)
In fact so good, you are destroying your own credibility.
#311. To: FormerLurker (#307)
Perhaps they're the ones who wired the explosives to begin with...
#312. To: war (#295)
some anonymous dickhead, i.e., *you*, on the internet finds believable...
#313. To: lucysmom (#311)
Again, I am curious to know why you choose to believe the US government blew up the WTC.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#314. To: lucysmom (#311)
Perhaps there were no explosives to begin with.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#315. To: FormerLurker (#308)
She mentioned it to deflect attention from the collapse. So I addressed her comment.
#316. To: FormerLurker (#308)
She mentioned it to deflect attention from the collapse.
#317. To: lucysmom (#315)
It is clear from the video that the Penthouse was the first to go - are we not supposed to notice that and ask why?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#318. To: titorite (#312)
oh i am far from.anonymous
#319. To: titorite (#312)
oh i am far from.anonymous
#320. To: FormerLurker (#317)
Well it's an interesting observation that there were additional explosives at the top floor of the building
#321. To: war (#316)
(Edited)
Quite the opposite...she mentioned it to point out that if it was a CT then the Penthouse would not have been the first thing to collapse and she is 100% correct.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#322. To: lucysmom (#319)
titorite - that's unusual, is it a family name?
#323. To: war (#320)
Chuckles...yea...in case the building fails to come down you could always claim...well...hmmm...what is it you could claim?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#324. To: FormerLurker (#317)
Well it's an interesting observation that there were additional explosives at the top floor of the building, but the fact is, the ENTIRE structure dropped at free fall speed, not just the top floor or structure on top of it.
#325. To: FormerLurker (#321)
So why did the lower floors give out all at once...
#326. To: lucysmom (#311)
Again, I am curious to know why you choose to believe the US government blew up the WTC.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#327. To: FormerLurker (#323)
A) They were sure the building would come down.
#328. To: FormerLurker (#326)
Again, I am curious to know why you choose to believe the US government blew up the WTC.
#329. To: war (#325)
They didn't...the video that I posted clearly shows the building begin to fall, pause and twist slightly and then continue on down...
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#330. To: FormerLurker (#329)
#331. To: war (#328)
You didn't answer that question...
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#332. To: war (#330)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#333. To: FormerLurker (#332)
Why is it you can't explain how WTC7 dropped straight down into its footprint at free fall speed?
#334. To: FormerLurker (#332)
#335. To: war (#327)
Can you point to any building that he been felled via controlled demolition that was done so by placing charges on the TOP floor?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#336. To: FormerLurker (#326)
BTW, why do you think they faked the cell phone calls? I wonder how they were so sure that people would be so dumb as to believe that was possible to use cell phones at crusising altitude back in 2001, where it's well known by engineers involved with such matters that it was impossible?
#337. To: war (#209)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#338. To: FormerLurker (#335)
You and your GF are the ones diverting attention to the penthouse, and are making a big stink about it. It's a side topic, not the primary matter.
.
.
.