See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Methodical Illusion: The 9/11 Con Begins to Crumble — Rebekah Roth (Flight Attendant)
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://sgtreport.com/2015/03/method ... egins-to-crumble-rebekah-roth/
Published: Mar 23, 2015
Author: Rebekah Roth
Post Date: 2015-03-23 10:33:47 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 19226
Comments: 557
Rebekah Roth has, in my opinion, blown the lid off of the lies surrounding the events on 9/11. Facts which are outlined in her recently released book, Methodical Illusion; a book, as of this writing, that is #1 on the Amazon Best Seller List for its category.--NorthWestLibertyNews Poster Comment: Roth’s research reveals ALL of the 911 cell phone calls from the passengers to their families and friends were actually made on the ground after the 4 planes landed at a remote military airfield and listen to what her research reveals about passenger 9B. This is a must listen. I agree with NorthWestLibertyNews's opinion that Rebekah has blown the lid off the 9/11 lies.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-355) not displayed.
.
.
.
#356. To: war (#351)
If you look with your eyes open, you can in fact see the penthouse drop prior to the main collapse in the animated GIF I recently posted.
That flexible reality again. What, exactly, do you *think* I'm *pretending* never happened? Be specific please... --Are you a *Jew*?
Flat out lie. In terms of rate of drop, the time is measured in relation to distance traveled from the top corners of the building which fall together with the REST of the structure. The penthouse collapse indicates the top of the building was imploded immediately prior to the main charges on the lower floors to help weaken the structural integrity of the building, assisting in its demolition. In some circles that might be called a flip flop.
Do you shill for the 9/11 perps for fun, or for profit?
An animated GIF versus what? The video that I posted yesterday and it's taken you and entire 24 hours to admit that the collapse began earlier than you've been promoting? --Are you a *Jew*?
A dropping penthouse is not the same as a total structural failure, where the ENTIRE BUILDING DROPS, you little con man you.
I lost over 50 friends and business associates that day, sir. Trust me when I tell you I am quite confident that I am blaming the correct people. --Are you a *Jew*?
Are you actually a real human, a bot, or perhaps there's more than one of you using the same handle where you can all respond within seconds of a post?
Well if you cared anything at all about those people you would be interested in finding out who was responsible, rather than helping them get away with murder.
Yea so? Something had to happen prior to total structural failure...in the case of WTC7, it was the failure of columns in the SE corner (indicated by the Penthouse collapse) which caused a load shift (seen in the shudder of the building in the seconds after the Penthouse collapse) which then resulted in the total structural failure. --Are you a *Jew*?
I have found out. --Are you a *Jew*?
Those who are responsible died on impact.
According to your government fairy tale which is neither possible nor plausible. Unlike the two of you, I actually have some important matters to attend to, so you can scream and kick all you want, but I think the facts speak for themselves for anyone who truly seeks the truth. Have fun. It's your claim that, in 2001, it was impossible for a plane to be hijacked? But it was entirely possible and plausible for an UNKNOWN NUMBER OF people to sneak in to the World Trade Center buildings some time before 9/11 and, undiscovered, plant enough explosives, again undiscovered, to bring about their collapse. That to cover this up, several planes were diverted to unknown locations, (except for one which crash landed before reaching where it was being diverted to) and then drones were substituted which crashed in to the WTC buildings to cover up the previously planted and undiscovered explosives. --Are you a *Jew*?
Ok, one last response from me for the day. The fact that rules of physics would need to be violated, the fact that individuals who are still alive are claimed to have piloted the planes, the fact that those "pilots" couldn't even fly a Cessna yet performed impossible aerial feats such as flying at 500 mph at ground level with a 757, the fact that military assets were confused due to wargames simulating the actual (or alleged) events of that morning taking place at the same time, the fact that there was obvious Mossad and Pakistani ISI involvement in the events, the fact that the cell phone calls were impossible thus HAD to have been faked, and MANY other facts too numerous to list which disprove the "official story" exist, well, THAT'S why it's impossible for the 9/11 attacks to have occured the way it's described by the government. Now either go read up and use your head, or go have some coffee and take the rest of the day off from your government sponsored job, as I'm done here for the day. The problem with your version is the complexity. The number of people who would need to be involved, the time it would take to set up, and then bring off without a hitch. For people who believe government can't do anything right, that takes a real leap of faith.
The more that I *think* about this the more frightening it would have been for the Towers to have simply been blown up and collapsed on the spot...it would have killed tens of thousands more people and the shock would have been exponentially more than simply flying planes in at different times...
--Are you a *Jew*?
That by itself... --Are you a *Jew*?
A building in NYC just collapsed...after being on fire for an hour... abcnews.go.com/US/wireSto...-scene-reported-building- collapse-nyc-29931754 --Are you a *Jew*?
Ok, I'll bite on this last one. There would have been a massive criminal investigation if it had happened that way, and the population wouldn't have swallowed any claims that 19 arabs did it with box cutters. That and they couldn't have created the TSA, and would have to explain how terrorists planted bombs in the Pentagon exactly in the right location to blow up the office where investigators were looking into the missing 2.3 TRILLION dollars. So sorry.
This is a serious discussion, you should be sorry!
They didn't do it with box cutters, they did it with planes.
some incredible dogs in the new york times.
______________________________________ Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.
I doubt it...the shock would have been greater and the clamor for war would have been more so... Your scenario is simply too ludicrously incredulous to dwell anywhere near the Realm o' Actuality... --Are you a *Jew*?
No idea. But, the NYC Emergency Command Post was in that building. You KNOW they had some computers there. How many other companies? Here is a link to Wikipedia that shows the list of tenants. ;) "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
Your scenario is simply too ludicrously incredulous to dwell anywhere near the Realm o' Actuality... Your comments illustrate just how short sighted you are, and explain why you can't see any further than your nose in terms of uncovering actual truth. WHO would we have gone to war against IF they had admitted the towers were blown up? Blown up by WHO, and HOW, and WHY? Certainly there'd be an investigation, to think otherwise is ridiculous. Your simple scenario wouldn't have accomplished the attack on the Pentagon, which was worth 2.3 trillion dollars to those involved. An explosion rocked New York City's East Village neighborhood Thursday afternoon and after the blast two buildings were engulfed in flames and and at least a partial building collapse has been reported. You obviously either read the story too quickly, or were hoping I wasn't going to check the facts. It wasn't just on fire, it EXPLODED, yet only PARTIALLY collapsed. So how would that be different than what actually happened?
Do you really need to have me explain it to you? Why don't you think long and hard about it, you might be able to figure it out.
Yeah, actually I do need you to explain it to me.
I doubt that you'll take the time to watch this, but I'm posting it anyway. On January, 28th, 2015, a small private lecture was held in the Los Angeles area that featured author and investigative journalist Christopher Bollyn. The audience members were a supportive group of enlightened individuals and activists who are already familiar with the events of September 11th, 2001 and the aftermath that this deliberate PsyOp has created. Each of the Q & A sessions which are featured after every set of opening comments Bollyn makes (at his various appearances) are extremely unique and informative and give him a chance to offer greater details and historical background about the various "Cast of Conspiracy Characters" involved in the cover up. A video well worth your time. Video by SANCHEZ Truth is still truth even if no one believes it. A lie is still a lie even if everyone believes it.
City of NY has offices in several buildings in that area. City Hall is two blocks away from WTC7 The company that I worked for, despite having empty office space @ 67 Wall, had its disaster recovery in WTC2. Why would the plan to destroy the WTC complex be kept on computers of private companies? Or is NYC part of the conspiracy? Can you give me your best guestimate as to how many people were involved in this conspiracy? Do you know why the *books* in the Mafia have been closed for 11 years? --Are you a *Jew*?
The success of any plot has always been rooted in the dynamic between simplicity and complexity. The more complex the plot, the less likely it will succeed. The hundreds, nearly thousands of people, who had to be involved to pull your 9/11 scenario off, is the easiest falsification of the plot. --Are you a *Jew*?
What's this look like to you? --Are you a *Jew*?
You are ridiculous. Tell me (and others) that you really believe 19 A-Rabs with box cutters boarded commercial aircraft (without a single arab name on the manifests) took over the planes and flew them into the 9-11 targets (the Pentagon being hit an hour and a half after take-off), the buildings in New York being turned into dust and falling into their own footprint - and building 7 falling belatedly at 5:30 PM .. the others in the early morning hours. And what about those dancing Israeli Mossad agents ??? What about Condi Rice's statement that "we never thought the terrorists would use commercial aircraft as missiles when in fact there were around 15 drills taking place to prepare for exactly that scenario ??? Again - get the fuck out ! "We're all on death row, only the execution date is uncertain". Doug Scheidt 2015
https://youtu.be/VYNesSmwF7I Start watching around 11:30...pay attention to the Upper left...do you see anything that looks like an explosion? --Are you a *Jew*?
Nope. Don't believe that at all. Their names do appear on the manifests. --Are you a *Jew*?
Comments (396 - 557) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#357. To: FormerLurker (#354)
Thanks for admitting that you are TOTALLY ignoring the MAIN collapse of WTC7, and pretending that it never happened.
#358. To: war (#342)
Because it adds seconds on to the collapse...that is why,,,
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#359. To: war (#352)
Must be nice enjoying the benefits of a *flexible* reality...
#360. To: war (#357)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#361. To: FormerLurker (#356)
If you look with your eyes open, you can in fact see the penthouse drop prior to the main collapse in the animated GIF I recently posted.
#362. To: war (#361)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#363. To: FormerLurker (#360)
Do you shill for the 9/11 perps for fun, or for profit?
#364. To: war (#363)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#365. To: war (#363)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#366. To: FormerLurker (#362)
A dropping penthouse is not the same as a total structural failure
#367. To: FormerLurker (#365)
Well if you cared anything at all about those people you would be interested in finding out who was responsible, rather than helping them get away with murder.
#368. To: FormerLurker (#365)
Well if you cared anything at all about those people you would be interested in finding out who was responsible, rather than helping them get away with murder.
#369. To: lucysmom (#368)
Those who are responsible died on impact.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#370. To: war, lucysmom (#367)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#371. To: FormerLurker (#369)
(Edited)
According to your government fairy tale which is neither possible nor plausible.
#372. To: war (#371)
It's your claim that, in 2001, it was impossible for a plane to be hijacked?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#373. To: FormerLurker (#370)
Unlike the two of you, I actually have some important matters to attend to, so you can scream and kick all you want, but I think the facts speak for themselves for anyone who truly seeks the truth.
#374. To: FormerLurker (#370)
#375. To: lucysmom (#373)
For people who believe government can't do anything right, that takes a real leap of faith.
#376. To: FormerLurker (#372)
#377. To: war (#374)
The more that I *think* about this the more frightening it would have been for the Towers to have simply been blown up and collapsed on the spot...it would have killed tens of thousands more people and the shock would have been exponentially more than simply flying planes in at different times...
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#378. To: lucysmom (#288)
(Edited)
#379. To: Fred Mertz (#378)
#380. To: FormerLurker (#377)
(Edited)
There would have been a massive criminal investigation if it had happened that way, and the population wouldn't have swallowed any claims that 19 arabs did it with box cutters.
#381. To: Fred Mertz (#378)
#382. To: FormerLurker (#377)
There would have been a massive criminal investigation...
#383. To: war (#208)
(Edited)
How many did they need?
#384. To: war (#382)
I doubt it...the shock would have been greater and the clamor for war would have been more so...
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#385. To: war (#376)
A building in NYC just collapsed...after being on fire for an hour...
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#386. To: FormerLurker (#384)
WHO would we have gone to war against IF they had admitted the towers were blown up? Blown up by WHO, and HOW, and WHY?
#387. To: lucysmom (#386)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#388. To: FormerLurker (#387)
Do you really need to have me explain it to you? Why don't you think long and hard about it, you might be able to figure it out.
#389. To: lucysmom (#373)
The problem with your version is the complexity. The number of people who would need to be involved, the time it would take to set up, and then bring off without a hitch.
#390. To: BTP Holdings (#383)
#391. To: FormerLurker (#384)
Your comments illustrate just how short sighted you are...
#392. To: FormerLurker (#385)
(Edited)
It wasn't just on fire, it EXPLODED...
#393. To: war (#391)
The hundreds, nearly thousands of people, who had to be involved to pull your 9/11 scenario off, is the easiest falsification of the plot.
#394. To: FormerLurker (#387)
#395. To: noone222 (#393)
(Edited)
Tell me (and others) that you really believe 19 A-Rabs with box cutters boarded commercial aircraft (without a single arab name on the manifests)
.
.
.