Title: jpegs Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Apr 4, 2015 Author:Ron and a few others Post Date:2015-04-04 00:30:09 by wakeup Keywords:None Views:1052 Comments:72
With the exception of Whites, the rule among the peoples of the world, whether residing in their homelands or settled in Western democracies, is ethnocentrism and moral particularism: they stick together and good means what is good for their ethnic group." -Alex Kurtagic
With the exception of Whites, the rule among the peoples of the world, whether residing in their homelands or settled in Western democracies, is ethnocentrism and moral particularism: they stick together and good means what is good for their ethnic group." -Alex Kurtagic
With the exception of Whites, the rule among the peoples of the world, whether residing in their homelands or settled in Western democracies, is ethnocentrism and moral particularism: they stick together and good means what is good for their ethnic group." -Alex Kurtagic
With the exception of Whites, the rule among the peoples of the world, whether residing in their homelands or settled in Western democracies, is ethnocentrism and moral particularism: they stick together and good means what is good for their ethnic group." -Alex Kurtagic
With the exception of Whites, the rule among the peoples of the world, whether residing in their homelands or settled in Western democracies, is ethnocentrism and moral particularism: they stick together and good means what is good for their ethnic group." -Alex Kurtagic
With the exception of Whites, the rule among the peoples of the world, whether residing in their homelands or settled in Western democracies, is ethnocentrism and moral particularism: they stick together and good means what is good for their ethnic group." -Alex Kurtagic
With the exception of Whites, the rule among the peoples of the world, whether residing in their homelands or settled in Western democracies, is ethnocentrism and moral particularism: they stick together and good means what is good for their ethnic group." -Alex Kurtagic
Israel tries to hit military targets. The Palestinians try to kill civilians.
The Islamist way of war
Israel sites its military facilities as far from civilians as it can. Palestinians and other Arabs could easily attack these and avoid civilian deaths. They choose not to. They choose to attack civilian areas instead. Why?
Because Palestinian and other Arab fighters are happy to kill enemy civilians of all ages. They are all infidels - it doesn't matter to them. Because Palestinian and Islamist fighters have no morality, no honour and no sense of shame. They do not have the code of morality that normal people have, such as avoiding the innocent in war.
Because attacking civilians is safer. Attacking an IDF base is extremely dangerous, and liable to get you killed without achieving anything. Much easier to attack defenceless women and children in homes and shops - if your morality allows you live with that.
Hezbollah (and Palestinians and other Arabs) could easily launch their military attacks far from their own civilians. They choose not to. They choose to embed their military in their own civilians. Why?
Because it will restrain the Israelis, because they are civilized. Israel doesn't want to kill enemy civilians, so they can be used as effective human shields. Hiding in civilians gives the Islamists a military advantage. This would not of course work in reverse. Israel embedding any target in civilians would not restrain Islamists attacking it in any way.
Because if enemy civilians are killed by Israel, it is good for the enemy. It may be the only thing that will stop Israel, if the (normally hopeless) Islamist military attacks can't. Why? Not so much because of international opinion as because Israeli domestic opinion will restrain their military. Again, this would not work in reverse. Israeli civilian deaths would encourage, not demoralise or slow down, their enemies.