[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Scott Ritter: Hezbollah OBLITERATES IDF, Netanyahu in deep legal trouble

Vivek Ramaswamy says he and Elon Musk are set up for 'mass deportations' of millions of 'unelected bureaucrats'

Evidence Points to Voter Fraud in 2024 Wisconsin Senate Race

Rickards: Your Trump Investment Guide

Pentagon 'Shocked' By Houthi Arsenal, Sophistication Is 'Getting Scary'

Cancer Starves When You Eat These Surprising Foods | Dr. William Li

Megyn Kelly Gets Fiery About Trump's Choice of Matt Gaetz for Attorney General

Over 100 leftist groups organize coalition to rebuild morale and resist MAGA after Trump win

Mainstream Media Cries Foul Over Musk Meeting With Iran Ambassador...On Peace

Vaccine Stocks Slide Further After Trump Taps RFK Jr. To Lead HHS; CNN Outraged

Do Trump’s picks Rubio, Huckabee signal his approval of West Bank annexation?

Pac-Man

Barron Trump

Big Pharma-Sponsored Vaccinologist Finally Admits mRNA Shots Are Killing Millions

US fiscal year 2025 opens with a staggering $257 billion October deficit$3 trillion annual pace.

His brain has been damaged by American processed food.

Iran willing to resolve doubts about its atomic programme with IAEA

FBI Official Who Oversaw J6 Pipe Bomb Probe Lied About Receiving 'Corrupted' Evidence “We have complete data. Not complete, because there’s some data that was corrupted by one of the providers—not purposely by them, right,” former FBI official Steven D’Antuono told the House Judiciary Committee in a

Musk’s DOGE Takes To X To Crowdsource Talent: ‘80+ Hours Per Week,’

Female Bodybuilders vs. 16 Year Old Farmers

Whoopi Goldberg announces she is joining women in their sex abstinence

Musk secretly met with Iran's UN envoy NYT

D.O.G.E. To have a leaderboard of most wasteful government spending

In Most U.S. Cities, Social Security Payments Last Married Couples Just 19 Days Or Less

Another major healthcare provider files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy

The Ukrainians have put Tulsi Gabbard on their Myrotvorets kill list

Sen. Johnson unveils photo of Biden-appointed crossdressers after reporters rage over Gaetz nomination

sted on: Nov 15 07:56 'WE WOULD LOSE' War with Iran: Col. Lawrence Wilkerson

Israeli minister says Palestinians should have no voting or land rights

The Case For Radical Changes In US National Defense: Col. Douglas Macgregor


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Sudden onset of ice loss in Antarctica so large it affects Earth's gravity field
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 25, 2015
Author: staff
Post Date: 2015-05-25 06:42:16 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 186
Comments: 8

ScienceDaily...

A group of scientists, led by a team from the University of Bristol, UK has observed a sudden increase of ice loss in a previously stable region of Antarctica. The research is published today in Science.

Using measurements of the elevation of the Antarctic ice sheet made by a suite of satellites, the researchers found that the Southern Antarctic Peninsula showed no signs of change up to 2009. Around 2009, multiple glaciers along a vast coastal expanse, measuring some 750km in length, suddenly started to shed ice into the ocean at a nearly constant rate of 60 cubic km, or about 55 trillion litres of water, each year.

This makes the region the second largest contributor to sea level rise in Antarctica and the ice loss shows no sign of waning.

Dr Bert Wouters, a Marie Curie Fellow at the University of Bristol, who lead the study said: "To date, the glaciers added roughly 300 cubic km of water to the ocean. That's the equivalent of the volume of nearly 350,000 Empire State Buildings combined."

The changes were observed using the CryoSat-2 satellite, a mission of the European Space Agency dedicated to remote-sensing of ice. From an altitude of about 700km, the satellite sends a radar pulse to Earth, which is reflected by the ice and subsequently received back at the satellite. From the time the pulse takes to travel, the elevation of the ice surface can retrieved with incredible accuracy. By analysing roughly 5 years of the data, the researchers found that the ice surface of some of the glaciers is currently going down by as much as 4m each year.

The ice loss in the region is so large that it causes small changes in the gravity field of the Earth, which can be detected by another satellite mission, the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE).

"The fact that so many glaciers in such a large region suddenly started to lose ice came as a surprise to us," continued Dr Wouters. "It shows a very fast response of the ice sheet: in just a few years the dynamic regime completely shifted."

Data from an Antarctic climate model shows that the sudden change cannot be explained by changes in snowfall or air temperature. Instead, the team attributes the rapid ice loss to warming oceans.

Many of the glaciers in the region feed into ice shelves that float on the surface of the ocean. They act as a buttress to the ice resting on bedrock inland, slowing down the flow of the glaciers into the ocean. The westerly winds that encircle Antarctica have become more vigorous in recent decades, in response to climate warming and ozone depletion. The stronger winds push warm waters from the Southern Ocean poleward, where they eat away at the glaciers and floating ice shelves from below.

Ice shelves in the region have lost almost one-fifth of their thickness in the last two decades, thereby reducing the resisting force on the glaciers. A key concern is that much of the ice of the Southern Antarctic Peninsula is grounded on bedrock below sea level, which gets deeper inland. This means that even if the glaciers retreat, the warm water will chase them inland and melt them even more.

Dr Wouters said: "It appears that sometime around 2009, the ice shelf thinning and the subsurface melting of the glaciers passed a critical threshold which triggered the sudden ice loss. However, compared to other regions in Antarctica, the Southern Peninsula is rather understudied, exactly because it did not show any changes in the past, ironically.

"To pinpoint the cause of the changes, more data need to be collected. A detailed knowledge of the geometry of the local ice shelves, the ocean floor topography, ice sheet thickness and glacier flow speeds are crucial to tell how much longer the thinning will continue."

Journal Reference:

B. Wouters, A. Martin-Español, V. Helm, T. Flament, J. M. Van Wessem, S. R. M. Ligtenberg, M. R. Van Den Broeke, J. L. Bamber. Dynamic thinning of glaciers on the Southern Antarctic Peninsula. Science, 2015 DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa5727

University of Bristol. "Sudden onset of ice loss in Antarctica so large it affects Earth's gravity field." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 21 May 2015. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/05/150521143926.htm

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)

60 cubic km, or about 55 trillion litres of water, each year

Why don't those two-digit numbers match? A liter is simply 10 cm cubed.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-05-25   12:56:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: NeoconsNailed (#1)

100,000 centimeters = 1 km?

cube each side: one trillion liters = one cubic km?

Tatarewicz  posted on  2015-05-26   0:01:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Tatarewicz (#2) (Edited)

Right, so why isn't 60 cubic km 60 trillion litres of water? I guess they're just saying 55 is approximately 60, which is true enough.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-05-26   0:08:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: NeoconsNailed (#3)

Maybe temperature and pressure become factors in large volume differences.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2015-05-26   0:19:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: NeoconsNailed, Tatarewicz (#3)

If they can't even convert cubic km to liters correctly, then how can we trust them to convert cubic km to Empire State Buildings?

StraitGate  posted on  2015-05-26   0:29:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Tatarewicz (#4)

It's glaciers melting into the ocean, ergo this process of "adding" those cubic km to the oceans could be only a slight gain, right? Most of a glacier is below the surface, I believe, and thawing water is shrinking water -- wicked pedia says about 9%.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-05-26   0:31:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: NeoconsNailed (#6)

According to wicked pedia, glaciers form on land, not on water. If that's right, then they're not underwater to start with, so when a chunk breaks off and falls into the ocean, it adds that amount of water to the ocean.

StraitGate  posted on  2015-05-26   0:59:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: StraitGate (#7)

Oh, duh, I was thinking icebergs!!! Yeah, glaciers would be a pretty bad deal, unless of course this is simply a natural process we have nothing to do with - - as is most likely the case.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-05-26   1:45:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]