See other National News Articles
Title: Dallas Police Shooting, the False Flag Set to Justify Jade Helm, Militarism
Source:
Resistance Journals
URL Source: http://resistancejournals.com/2015/ ... ustifies-martial-law/#more-635
Published: Jun 13, 2015
Author: Andrew Pontbriand
Post Date: 2015-06-14 14:44:07 by Bill D Berger
Keywords: None
Views: 112
Comments: 7
The Resistance Journals, has been covering this story since early Saturday morning. As the events started to quickly unfold, reports began to conflict between news agencies and the Local police department. Then, eyewitnesses released video of the shootings as they occurred, which showed a black (armored) van driving erratically and firing dozens upon dozens of gun shots at police. (HERE IS THE FIRST REPORT WE DID OF A FALSE FLAG, WE BROKE) Early this morning, I began to realize patterns I have seen before, and reported inconsistencies about this story. Unfortunately it seems as though the active shooter event unfolded too perfectly, to be a naturally occurring event. In fact it had several earmarks of a false flag attack.— What are some of the year marks of a false flag attack? A False Flag attack is used when a government or an organization does something to somebody or itself, and blames it on another organization or country, usually in the form of an attack. An example of a false flag would be if France burned down a building in England, and England was their Allie, and England’s enemy was Germany. France would then say they had proof that Germany committed the attack and the English and French we’re both in agreement, that Germany had to be punished even though Germany did not commit the attack in the first place. This is similar to the shooting that occurred in Dallas Texas. Since there is all of this confusion, we still do not know who the shooter is, although police did mention earlier this morning that they suspect it is a man named James Boulware. With the media seemingly confused, reports changed rapidly and conflicted with eyewitness reports that seemed to not support a story that could be blamed or used as an excuse to fit the narrative. Logically, the next question would be, what is the narrative? Mugshot of James Boulware, potential patsy for Dallas shooting The government needs events to unfold that they can use to have SWAT teams, police, and all of the militarized weapons used either to prevent or stop the attacks that they “fear” are coming. Freedom for security, the usual context for domestic use of a militarized and federalized police force. Strangely, even though the suspect or suspect obviously came very prepared, and somehow even managed to plant several bombs outside of police headquarters – without anybody noticing; nobody was injured or killed, except for the subject. This is interesting considering the van was driving around the street erratically firing off shots in any direction, and even rammed a police car. Several windows of the Dallas Police Station are littered with bullet holes. Amazingly, somehow the police were able to disable the van, which , let’s not forget, was an armored van (where would one stumble upon upon an armored vehicle? Maybe..SWAT?). For this reason, police got to show off they’re high-powered .50 caliber rifles and were able to disable the armored vehicle. Could this be the lie? Could this be the narrative? Was this 2 – 3 block area usually empty at this time of night, completely devoid of traffic? Henceforth, the police could use the area knowing there would be almost no pedestrians, except up in surrounding buildings or high rises? With that information they knew that if they staged the event, it was highly unlikely any civilians or pedestrians would become innocent bystander’s. So which is it, is the suspect alive or dead? Did he die earlier this morning from a gunshot wound as it was first reported? Or was he killed by a hero sniper later on in the day as the event dragged out and the hero police were able to negotiate and prevent the lone gunman from setting off anyone of the other bombs that he supposedly had in the area. These are all questions that should be asked considering the history of known liars. This is something that has ear marks of a false flag, considering the similarities of the offense that took place today, and in the past that were later proven to be false flag attacks. In the coming days it would not surprise me if there is a copy cat attack, even though the media is claiming this was a personal attack James made on police because they “kidnapped” his child. It’s an ingenious storyline and cover to use because it triggers an emotional response and lead people to believe this was just a guy who “went mad,” because he lost his child. We will continue to watch the story and continue to try to decipher what the police and media report. To be clear, we are not saying this is definitely a false flag, but it certainly looks like it will be found to be. Not every shooting like this is a false flag, but it is our responsibility to question known liars, and expose them when they stage a shooting with live weapons out in the open, on the streets of america. This article may be re-posted with full attribution to the author, and leaving all links in tact.
Andrew Pontbriand
June 13, 2015
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: Bill D Berger (#0)
Although there are still some holes in the narrative, this doesn't seem like a FFop to me. Who knows?
#2. To: Lod (#1)
(Edited)
Perhaps not. My default position whenever something like this occurs is to presume the corporate media is lying and the event is possibly orchestrated.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Replies to Comment # 1. Although there are still some holes in the narrative, this doesn't seem like a FFop to me.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.