See other National News Articles
Title: Dallas Police Shooting, the False Flag Set to Justify Jade Helm, Militarism
Source:
Resistance Journals
URL Source: http://resistancejournals.com/2015/ ... ustifies-martial-law/#more-635
Published: Jun 13, 2015
Author: Andrew Pontbriand
Post Date: 2015-06-14 14:44:07 by Bill D Berger
Keywords: None
Views: 139
Comments: 7
The Resistance Journals, has been covering this story since early Saturday morning. As the events started to quickly unfold, reports began to conflict between news agencies and the Local police department. Then, eyewitnesses released video of the shootings as they occurred, which showed a black (armored) van driving erratically and firing dozens upon dozens of gun shots at police. (HERE IS THE FIRST REPORT WE DID OF A FALSE FLAG, WE BROKE) Early this morning, I began to realize patterns I have seen before, and reported inconsistencies about this story. Unfortunately it seems as though the active shooter event unfolded too perfectly, to be a naturally occurring event. In fact it had several earmarks of a false flag attack.— What are some of the year marks of a false flag attack? A False Flag attack is used when a government or an organization does something to somebody or itself, and blames it on another organization or country, usually in the form of an attack. An example of a false flag would be if France burned down a building in England, and England was their Allie, and England’s enemy was Germany. France would then say they had proof that Germany committed the attack and the English and French we’re both in agreement, that Germany had to be punished even though Germany did not commit the attack in the first place. This is similar to the shooting that occurred in Dallas Texas. Since there is all of this confusion, we still do not know who the shooter is, although police did mention earlier this morning that they suspect it is a man named James Boulware. With the media seemingly confused, reports changed rapidly and conflicted with eyewitness reports that seemed to not support a story that could be blamed or used as an excuse to fit the narrative. Logically, the next question would be, what is the narrative? Mugshot of James Boulware, potential patsy for Dallas shooting The government needs events to unfold that they can use to have SWAT teams, police, and all of the militarized weapons used either to prevent or stop the attacks that they “fear” are coming. Freedom for security, the usual context for domestic use of a militarized and federalized police force. Strangely, even though the suspect or suspect obviously came very prepared, and somehow even managed to plant several bombs outside of police headquarters – without anybody noticing; nobody was injured or killed, except for the subject. This is interesting considering the van was driving around the street erratically firing off shots in any direction, and even rammed a police car. Several windows of the Dallas Police Station are littered with bullet holes. Amazingly, somehow the police were able to disable the van, which , let’s not forget, was an armored van (where would one stumble upon upon an armored vehicle? Maybe..SWAT?). For this reason, police got to show off they’re high-powered .50 caliber rifles and were able to disable the armored vehicle. Could this be the lie? Could this be the narrative? Was this 2 – 3 block area usually empty at this time of night, completely devoid of traffic? Henceforth, the police could use the area knowing there would be almost no pedestrians, except up in surrounding buildings or high rises? With that information they knew that if they staged the event, it was highly unlikely any civilians or pedestrians would become innocent bystander’s. So which is it, is the suspect alive or dead? Did he die earlier this morning from a gunshot wound as it was first reported? Or was he killed by a hero sniper later on in the day as the event dragged out and the hero police were able to negotiate and prevent the lone gunman from setting off anyone of the other bombs that he supposedly had in the area. These are all questions that should be asked considering the history of known liars. This is something that has ear marks of a false flag, considering the similarities of the offense that took place today, and in the past that were later proven to be false flag attacks. In the coming days it would not surprise me if there is a copy cat attack, even though the media is claiming this was a personal attack James made on police because they “kidnapped” his child. It’s an ingenious storyline and cover to use because it triggers an emotional response and lead people to believe this was just a guy who “went mad,” because he lost his child. We will continue to watch the story and continue to try to decipher what the police and media report. To be clear, we are not saying this is definitely a false flag, but it certainly looks like it will be found to be. Not every shooting like this is a false flag, but it is our responsibility to question known liars, and expose them when they stage a shooting with live weapons out in the open, on the streets of america. This article may be re-posted with full attribution to the author, and leaving all links in tact.
Andrew Pontbriand
June 13, 2015
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Bill D Berger (#0)
Although there are still some holes in the narrative, this doesn't seem like a FFop to me. Who knows? “The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
Perhaps not. My default position whenever something like this occurs is to presume the corporate media is lying and the event is possibly orchestrated. During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
I agree with your default position; same here. Some events, like the Garland TX shootings, just are what they are prima facie. We'll see how Dallas plays out. “The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
At the time that this event unfolded, my very first thought was false flag. It struck me as some sort of idiot that couldn't hit water from a boat using a submachine gun. Secondly, "ordinary looking" white guy, no hair, classic "mug shot" that seems typical of the types that are prepared in this country. But here's the kicker, anything, ... ANYTHING, that happens in this country that furthers the goals of a tyrannical establishment must automatically be assumed to have been a false flag. Well over a decade later the TSA has still not stopped or prevented a single terrorist incident, the only attempts have been aided by "men in suits" that circumvented the TSA. Meanwhile, in several studies over the years the TSA are about as competent as drunk drivers navigating a cone course in the tests that have been run. In short, the TSA is beyond worthless, literally. Practically speaking it's nothing but a jobs program, an agitation to the good American people, and a ruse to use as an umbrella for further establishment subversion and oppression. It was at the forefront of the acceleration of an endless string of efforts and actions to limit the liberties of people. The "right hand" are deeds/action/compliance, the forehead are thoughts, pretty soon those that do no comply will not be able to participate in this quickly developing hell of a society and world. I will not be among those that comply whatever the cost. My primary and ever-increasingly mutually exclusive loyalty is to Jesus Christ and God's Word. This is the same one that tempted Christ, that oversaw his persecution and death, that has perpetually sought to control mankind via money (1 Tim. 6:10 - For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil), and the one that will attempt to put the kibosh on God's plans, which will not be thwarted. Either way, I may start believing some of these false flags when the departments and offices of the tyranny are actually obliterated. We won't see that because one too many of those will begin to cause the agents themselves to start questioning whether or not they're next on the altar of sacrifice in America's religion of wealth, mammon, and psychotic and satanic control, and the establishment's executive arm would be in jeopardy.
good lord..... “You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe” - Carl Sagan
Was he referring to global warming? Whoops, he was the one that predicted nuclear winter.
"Billions and billions......." He sucked but I like this quote. “You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe” - Carl Sagan
#2. To: Lod (#1)
(Edited)
Although there are still some holes in the narrative, this doesn't seem like a FFop to me.
#3. To: Bill D Berger (#2)
#4. To: Bill D Berger (#0)
16 And he causeth all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free and the bond, that there be given them a mark on their right hand, or upon their forehead; 17 and that no man should be able to buy or to sell, save he that hath the mark, even the name of the beast or the number of his name.
#5. To: Katniss (#4)
This is the same one that tempted Christ, that oversaw his persecution and death, that has perpetually sought to control mankind via money (1 Tim. 6:10 - For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil), and the one that will attempt to put the kibosh on God's plans, which will not be thwarted.
#6. To: Jethro Tull (#5)
“You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe” - Carl Sagan
#7. To: NeoconsNailed (#6)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest