See other Editorial Articles
Title: Sorry CopBlockers, But Sometimes a Police Shooting Is Justified
Source:
.
URL Source: http://libertyfight.com/2015/photos ... than_Frost_Deven_Guilford.html
Published: Jun 22, 2015
Author: .
Post Date: 2015-06-22 16:36:20 by Artisan
Keywords: None
Views: 1465
Comments: 50
There is a right and wrong way to assert your rights during encounters with police. Deven Guilford chose the very wrong way, and ended up dead, shot seven times by a county sheriff. If you look at these photos of Sgt. Jonathan Frost after the Deven Guilford shooting, you can see the officer suffered a savage beating. Judge for yourself if you think lethal force was justified. I'm far from a police state apologist or cop bootlicker, but not every police shooting is unjustified. Regardless of how this altercation began, if you beat a man like that, cop or not, he has a right to defend himself. I agree with the prosecutors report which states "law enforcement officers have the same privilege of self defense as anyone else." The recent story of 17-year old Deven Guilford brings up the issue of police abuse once again. There seems to be a never-ending stream of cases where cops gun an unarmed person down. But the tendency for civil rights advocates seems to be to blindly condemn the cops every time, even before all the facts are in. This is not sensible, nor does it lend credibility to the cause of liberty or civil rights. The shooting of the 'unarmed 17-year old white youth' in Michigan appears by all evidence to be very well justified. Deven may have been trying to 'flex his rights.' but he did it in a very unwise and irrational way. His choice of actions are what led to his death. I'll preface this by conveying the facts, very clearly, that I am not a police bootlicker or police state apologist. With that said, look at this latest case, this is an absurd case of crying wolf, CopBlock.org's recent article 17 Year-Old Boy Dead After Traffic Stop in Mulliken, MI states, in part, "What I see here is a young boy trying to take a step and possibly flex his rights for the first time. Sure, he wasn't perfect at it, but he was learning and I give him an applaud for this. What a shame it had to end in a death of a young child. The officer could have avoided such a horrific situation like this if he just let this young boy flex his rights. Nobody, especially unarmed, deserves to die for the rights we have as Americans. Justice needs to be served." Applauded?? Justice needs to be served? Try not acting like a belligerent maniac who refuses to show a license during a traffic stop and don't attacks the cop, and you most likely won't get shot. The video of this tragic exchange on a dark roadside is below. Look at the pictures below, of 'innocent looking' Deven and Officer Frost, after the obviously savage beatdown he suffered at the hands of the 17-year-old "boy." 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 12.
#7. To: Artisan (#0)
(Edited)
Try not acting like a belligerent maniac who refuses to show a license during a traffic stop and don't attacks the cop, and you most likely won't get shot. The video of this tragic exchange on a dark roadside is below. X-rays showed the officer had no fractures -- just a cut on his nose and a bruised eye, which could have been self-inflicted, for all anyone really knows, because video showed no physical fight with the officer, despite his allegation of being assaulted/punched. It showed Guilford on the ground trying to film the officer who had refused to provide his own ID#. Guilford wasn't acting like a belligerent maniac but was told at gunpoint anyway to get out of the car and was made to lay down on the edge of the road near traffic. He told the officer that he wasn't armed but was shot with a stun gun, then shot to death 7 times: in the head, twice in the chest, in the stomach, armpit, forearm and wrist. Guilford had simply flashed his lights at the officer's vehicle out of concern for traffic safety because it seemed the headlight high-beams were on and the officer stated on camera that others had done the same. The officer had called for backup and wasn't being threatened at all, so he didn't have to open the door of the car and forcefully pull the teen from it before that help arrived or draw his weapon for his own safety -- all of which he did while obviously not having any cause to be in fear for his life. That this wasn't a racial issue is not enough grounds, imo, to presume the killing was justified.
You really reached far for that one.
#18. To: X-15 (#12)
You really reached far for that one. Glad to see you didn't type "over-reached" since it was the fairest conclusion that I could reach, under the evidentiary circumstances, that wasn't entirely faith-based per whatever the officer alleged about it.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestIf you look at these photos of Sgt. Jonathan Frost after the Deven Guilford shooting, you can see the officer suffered a savage beating.
#12. To: GreyLmist (#7)
just a cut on his nose and a bruised eye, which could have been self-inflicted, for all anyone really knows
Replies to Comment # 12. just a cut on his nose and a bruised eye, which could have been self-inflicted, for all anyone really knows
End Trace Mode for Comment # 12.