See other Editorial Articles
Title: LEGISLATING FROM THE BENCH - Supreme Court disasters
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.onenewsnow.com/perspecti ... /06/30/supreme-court-disasters
Published: Jul 1, 2015
Author: Thomas Sowell
Post Date: 2015-07-01 01:00:36 by HAPPY2BME-4UM
Keywords: supreme court
Views: 170
Comments: 1
Many people are looking at the recent Supreme Court decisions about ObamaCare and same-sex marriage in terms of whether they think these are good or bad policies. That is certainly a legitimate concern, for both those who favor those policies and those who oppose them. But there is a deeper and more long-lasting impact of these decisions that raise the question whether we are still living in America, where "we the people" are supposed to decide what kind of society we want, not have our betters impose their notions on us. The Constitution of the United States says that the federal government has only those powers specifically granted to it by the Constitution -- and that all other powers belong either to the states or to the people themselves. That is the foundation of our freedom, and that is what is being dismantled by both this year's ObamaCare decision and last year's ObamaCare decision, as well as by the Supreme Court's decision imposing a redefinition of marriage. The Constitution gave the federal government no such power, but the Supreme Court did. It did so by citing the government's power to tax, even though the ObamaCare law did not claim to be taxing. This year's ObamaCare decision likewise ignored the actual words of the law, and decided that the decisions of 34 states not to participate in ObamaCare Exchanges, even to get federal subsidies, would not prevent those federal subsidies to be paid anyway, to Exchanges up by the federal government itself. When any branch of government can exercise powers not authorized by either statutes or the Constitution, "we the people" are no longer free citizens but subjects, and our "public servants" are really our public masters. And America is no longer America. The freedom for which whole generations of Americans have fought and died is gradually but increasingly being taken away from us with smooth and slippery words. This decision makes next year's choice of the next President of the United States more crucial than ever, because with that office goes the power to nominate justices of the Supreme Court. Democrats have consistently nominated people who shared their social vision and imposed their policy preferences, too often in disregard of the Constitution. Republicans have complained about it but, when the power of judicial appointment was in the hands of Republican presidents, they have too often appointed justices who participated in the dismantling of the Constitution -- and usually for the kinds of social policies preferred by Democrats. Chief Justices appointed by Republican presidents have made landmark decisions for which there was neither Constitutional authority nor either evidence or logic. The first was Earl Warren. When Chief Justice Warren said that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal," he was within walking distance of an all-black public high school that sent a higher percentage of its graduates on to college than any white public high school in Washington. As far back as 1899, that school's students scored higher on tests than two of the city's three white academic public high schools. Nevertheless, Chief Justice Warren's unsubstantiated assumption led to years of school busing across the country that was as racially divisive as it was educationally futile. Chief Justice Warren Burger, also appointed by a Republican president, gave us the "disparate impact" notion that statistical disparities imply discrimination. That notion has created a whole statistical shakedown racket, practiced by government itself and by private race hustlers alike. And now Chief Justice John Roberts, appointed by George W. Bush, gives the federal government the power to order us to buy whatever insurance they want us to buy. With that entering wedge, is there anything they cannot force us to do, regardless of the Constitution? Can the Republicans -- or the country -- afford to put another mushy moderate in the White House, who can appoint more mushy moderates to the Supreme Court? The highest court in America has once again demonstrated that the freedom for which whole generations have fought and died is gradually but increasingly being taken away from us with smooth and slippery words.
Last year's Supreme Court decision declaring ObamaCare constitutional says that the federal government can order individual citizens to buy the kind of insurance the government wants them to buy, regardless of what the citizens themselves prefer.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
By Anugrah Kumar , Christian Post Contributor Christian minister John Piper is seen in this photo shared publicly in 2012 by his Desiring God ministry on Facebook. Theologian John Piper responded to the Supreme Court decision that states cannot ban same-sex marriage, saying it approves and institutionalizes the sin of homosexual intercourse. "Jesus died so that heterosexual and homosexual sinners might be saved," Piper, chancellor of Bethlehem College & Seminary, wrote on his desiringGod blog, adding that this salvation from sinful sexual acts "was not embraced," as the highest court's ruling shows. "Instead there was massive institutionalization of sin," Piper said. "Alongside its clearest explanation of the sin of homosexual intercourse (Romans 1:24–27) stands the indictment of the approval and institutionalization of it," he added, explaining that though people know intuitively that homosexual acts – along with gossip, slander, insolence, haughtiness, boasting, faithlessness, heartlessness, ruthlessness – are sin, "they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them." (Romans 1:29–32). "This is what the highest court in our land did today — knowing these deeds are wrong, 'yet approving those who practice them,'" Piper wrote. Homosexuality is not new for America or history, he said. "That brokenness has been here since we were all broken in the fall of man." What's new is not even the celebration and approval of homosexual sin, he explained. "Homosexual behavior has been exploited, and reveled in, and celebrated in art, for millennia. What's new is normalization and institutionalization. This is the new calamity." Piper said he is writing this reaction to the court ruling "to help the church feel the sorrow of these days ... the magnitude of the assault on God and his image in man." The theologian added that, as Christians, we weep over our sins. "We don't celebrate them. We don't institutionalize them. We turn to Jesus for forgiveness and help. We cry to Jesus … And in our best moments, we weep for the world, and for our own nation." He concluded his article with Psalm 119:136: "My eyes shed streams of tears, because people do not keep your law." The Supreme Court ruled Friday by a 5-to-4 vote that the Constitution guarantees a right to gay marriage. "No longer may this liberty be denied," Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote for the majority in the decision. "No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were." Obama called the decision a "victory for America." "When all Americans are treated as equal we are all more free," he said. The Rev. Franklin Graham, who leads the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, warned that Obama is leading America on a "sinful course" and that "God will judge him and us as a nation if we don't repent." http://www.christianpost.com/news/john-piper-celebrating-homosexual-sin-isnt-new-but-institutionalization-of-it-is-140928/ U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
(Photo: Facebook/Desiring God)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest