Joshua Krause
June 30th, 2015
1,839 views
See other Resistance Articles
Title: HAVE NO FEAR AMERICA. OUR NEW TRANSGENDER ARMY WILL CRUSH THE RUSSIANS AND CHINESE IN TOTAL VICTORY! - The US Is Woefully Unprepared for a War with Russia
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/the- ... d-for-a-war-with-russia_062015
Published: Jul 1, 2015
Author: oshua Krause
Post Date: 2015-07-01 10:12:08 by HAPPY2BME-4UM
Keywords: RUSSIA, WORLD WAR III, MILITARY, NATO
Views: 229
Comments: 21
At this point, it seems like a war between NATO and Russia is practically a foregone conclusion. There’s certainly a lot of bluster and threats going back and forth between both sides, and they’re both run by tyrannical, power-hungry regimes that want the world to themselves. Those kinds of governments always come to blows at some point. However, the US government may want to consider holding its tongue for the foreseeable future. Unlike Russia, which has been building up its military prowess since the end of the Cold War, our military has spent the past 15 years bogged down in quagmires involving insurgencies. And by their nature, insurgencies have completely different tactics, equipment, organizational structures, and goals, that are often diametrically opposed to those of a nation-state. That means our military has spent more than a decade training and equipping its personnel for fighting decentralized, low-budget enemies. One must wonder if they’re still prepared to go toe to toe with an effective conventional military. To answer that question, you only have to take a look at the state of our air power to see that our politicians are in way over their heads when it comes to fighting the Russians. U.S. military power often is measured by the number of combat aircraft and ships in the inventory. While the United States has by far the largest air force and navy, that size advantage could eventually be negated by enemy air defenses and electronic warfare technologies that are now available in the open market. The solution is not to buy more fighter jets, stealth bombers or aircraft carriers, but to arm existing Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps combat aircraft with high-tech bombs and missiles that can be dropped in large quantities from hundreds of miles away, suggest military analysts in a new study. The military for decades has invested in an arsenal of short-range “direct attack” weapons on the assumption that they will be able to get close to targets. It also has acquired a large inventory of highly sophisticated autonomous cruise missiles that can travel more than a thousand miles to a target. Today’s standoff weapons keep aircraft out of harm’s way but, at a million dollars apiece, are too expensive to be able to fire in large numbers in a protracted conflict. There is clearly a gap between today’s short-range and long-range weapons that needs to be filled, says Mark Gunzinger, of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. “Our combat air forces are short-range and not capable of penetrating contested areas. If we use standoff munitions, those weapons are too large and expensive. The size restricts the number you can carry. We don’t have enough aircraft.” In other words, our air power is only equipped to deal with third world countries like Iraq, as well as insurgents, both of which don’t have advanced air defenses. We have a massive supply of short-range missiles, but those are obviously useless if you can’t get close to enemy targets. That means that any war with Russia would leave us without air superiority. And that’s a pretty serious problem, because air superiority is supposedly our greatest asset. It’s been that way since at least the Gulf War, where we demonstrated the frightening capabilities of our air power against the Iraqi’s and their antiquated, Soviet built war machines. But Russia is a totally different beast. Since we probably won’t have any air superiority against their military, then any future conflict with Russia would force us into a protracted ground war with them. And as Hitler and Napoleon can attest, the Russians absolutely dominate when it comes to ground warfare. We could re-equip our military for a conventional war with Russia, but it may take many years, and many dollars that we don’t have. Perhaps the blowhards in Washington should think about that before they commit our blood and treasure to World War Three. The US Is Woefully Unprepared for a War with Russia
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 15.
#4. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)
If the US gets into a war with Russia it will be entirely by choice. The US deserves to lose. Seriously, if I survive an initial nuclear attack, I'll know who to blame. And it won't be Russia.
Seriously, if I survive an initial nuclear attack, I'll know who to blame. And it won't be Russia. =================================================== You'll note WHERE obama began his main 'thrust' of legitimizing open homosexuality (now wants the same for transgenders). Namely: THE UNITED STATES MILITARY In fact, obamination gave executive orders to TARGET HOMOSEXUALS for PRIORITY RECRUITING - beginning with the USMC. What that means is that the US military was directly singled out to VALIDATE HOMOSEXUALITY (gay marriage) not just into the military, but most importantly MAINSTREAM SOCIETY. No way in a thousands hells would I recommend ANYONE joining this shitfit of a military wearing the current uniform under the current (twisted beyond a million clusterf*cks) regime. In speaking with REAL RUSSIANS, they are elated beyond measure what is happening in our military and country because they know the USA is no longer a threat, but a laughing stock. Ditto China.
This is all the proof you could want that standing militaries are trouble, as are those kept in constant commotion for dialectic and crassly greedy empire purposes. The USSA is DC's psychiatric lab, the military is a psych lab operating on the big psych lab. WASN'T THE MILITARY WHERE DESEG WAS FIRST PUSHED ON US -- BY ELEANOR, THROUGH FDR???? That's what a vet told me who witnessed it. Talk about the nuts running the asylum, every utterance these overlords of ours makes merely shows anew what frightening psychopaths and golems they are.
=================================================== Eleanor was a carpet muncher. One of the main reason Franklin had a mistress. Hillary WORSHIPS Eleanor Roosevelt. Reverse discrimination is RAMPANT within the US forces, both racial and now sexual. Male rapes in the US military are now at an ALL-TIME-HIGH. The gov has used the military for everything from testing nuclear radiation damage on humans (at close range), to biological agents, transgender manipulation. Definitely the sweetheart of socialist engineers.
So, is anybody here willing to admit that the best thing to do would be bring the troops home for good and disband the forces? HOW BAD does it have to get before it's unequivocally bringing/embodying more harm than good?
Hell no. We need you fix the deficit in our military forces considering how dangerous the Russians are these days.
Hey, Mike - Thanks for weighing in here.
My pleasure Lod. Good to see you.
Like your Gandhi -- icon of peace and moderation.
#17. To: NeoconsNailed (#15)
Nonviolent civil disobedience is a philosophy full of principle and is built on ethical confrontation. I don't see it as as something very moderate all all. I'm surprised you would think of Gandhi in that way. Mahatmas Gandhi was the leader of India's independence movement and also the architect of a form of civil disobedience that would change the world. Peaceful confrontation took s great deal of courage.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#7. To: PnbC, NeoconsNailed, Lod, (#4)
(Edited)
If the US gets into a war with Russia it will be entirely by choice. The US deserves to lose.
#8. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#7)
#9. To: NeoconsNailed (#8)
WASN'T THE MILITARY WHERE DESEG WAS FIRST PUSHED ON US -- BY ELEANOR, THROUGH FDR???? That's what a vet told me who witnessed it.
#10. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#9)
#11. To: NeoconsNailed (#10)
#12. To: Ferret (#11)
#14. To: Lod (#12)
#15. To: Ferret (#14)
Replies to Comment # 15.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 15.