4um: San Francisco murder is proof of 'unsafe border' with Mexico, says Donald Trump

Title: San Francisco murder is proof of 'unsafe border' with Mexico, says Donald Trump
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 3, 2015
Author: NY Daily News
Post Date: 2015-07-03 19:26:29 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 139
Comments: 13

Don’t say Donald Trump didn’t warn you about Mexican immigrants, says... Donald Trump.

The Republican presidential hopeful on Friday latched onto the fatal shooting of a woman in San Francisco as proof that he’s right in saying violent criminals are entering the U.S. from the south and must be stopped.

“This senseless and totally preventable act of violence committed by an illegal immigrant is yet another example of why we must secure our border immediately,” Trump said in the wake of news reports that Francisco Sanchez, the man accused of murdering 32-year-old Kathryn Steinle on a pier in San Francisco, is a career criminal who had previously been deported to Mexico five times.

Later, he tweeted: “Where are the other candidates now that this tragic murder has taken place b/c of our unsafe border,” adding: “We need a wall.”

Sanchez should have been turned over to immigration authorities, not released, after being jailed four months ago for selling pot, officials said.

“This is an absolutely disgraceful situation and I am the only one that can fix it,” Trump said in his campaign statement.

“Nobody else has the guts to even talk about it. That won’t happen if I become President.”

Trump has lost a number of business deals and fielded accusations of bigotry — but has also enjoyed considerable success in polls of the 2016 GOP pack — since saying Mexico isn’t “sending its best” to the United States.

“They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us,” Trump said in his June kickoff speech.

“They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”

The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it away-Thomas Jefferson

He was on the street as part of sanctioned federal immigration policy. Yes, kill Sanchez but the head of the snake needs to be stomped.

Hope Donald has plenty of big men with metal in their pockets surrounding him 24/7.

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Kathryn Steinle must have used her White privilege to provoke that poor migrant who was only looking for his share of the American Dream.......

I actually tried to research Kathryn Steinle. I found nothing but her FB page suggests what I suspected; she appears to have been a San Fran lib who knew full well she lived in a "Sanctuary City." Her death is tragic but liberalism is indeed a mental disorder.

So far THEY seem to have bit into the wrong ass. If he continues on (and that is a big if), he could totally fracture the Republican party leaving behind a remnant that is unified regarding illegals. That would have potential.

Awake citizens of all colors could support protecting whatever we have left here.

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

Putting forward establishment candidates, which dampens voter turn out, doesn't indicate a split, IMO. Where Trump differs, and where the split could occur, is that his illegal immigration issue is causing a split among the current field of candidates, with him (and Cruz tacitly) agreeing on the severity of the problem.

The USSC's sodomy decision will throw an ice-cold blanket of apathy on any 'conservative' unity left with the strong possibility that voters who would otherwise vote against HILLARY CLINTON now realize 'the system' will never be fixed.

President Bush and his open-border cheap labor policies have managed quite well to split the GOP wide open. Expect wide rebellion in the GOP ranks in 2006 and 2008.

(Note how the Libertarians have finally found something they can agree with President Bush and the OBL on: GUEST WORKERS.)

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,148380,00.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Poll: Americans disapprove of all political parties - GOP 60 - 38 DISAPPROVAL

Casey Cheap, Rare Contributor
Posted on March 28

The Democratic Party as least unfavorable with a 54-43 disapproval-approval rating. The Republican Party did not fare much worse, with a 60-38 disapproval rating.

Poll: Americans disapprove of all political parties

Both major political parties and the Tea Party movement are viewed unfavorably, according to a Mar. 24 poll conducted by the Associated Press and GfK Public Affairs and Corporate Communications.

The growing disenchantment with the American people and their legislators see the Democratic Party as least unfavorable with a 54-43 disapproval-approval rating. The Republican Party did not fare much worse, with a 60-38 disapproval rating.

The Tea Party showed the most unfavorable rating with 66-31 percent of respondents disapproving.

However, despite the pessimistic mood of respondents, when asked “which party you would rather see win control of Congress,” Republicans and Democrats were nearly evenly split with 37 percent favoring Republicans and 36 percent for Democrats.

More than one-quarter of respondents said it “doesn’t matter” who wins control of Congress, at 26 percent.
The poll was conducted from Mar. 20-24 and included 1,012 adults.

http://rare.us/story/poll-americans-...tical-parties/

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

KUHNER: GOP’s amnesty suicide - Will Split GOP Wide Open

Amnesty is a poisoned chalice. Republicans drink it at their peril. The issue will split the GOP in half. Nationalists, such as myself, will leave and join a third party. Many on the right will follow. Republicans be warned: Comprehensive immigration reform is the path to oblivion.

Immigration reform is path to oblivion

The Washington Times
Jeffrey T. Kuhner
Thursday, November 15, 2012

Republicans are on the verge of committing suicide. In the wake of President Obama's re-election, many conservatives are demanding the GOP embrace amnesty for illegal aliens. The official term is "comprehensive immigration reform."

Sean Hannity has now "evolved" on the issue. Others, such as Dick Morris and Charles Krauthammer, are ringing the alarm bells: Get in front on amnesty before the GOP is swamped by the surging Latino vote. House Speaker John A. Boehner said last week that comprehensive immigration reform is "long overdue." Translation: Beltway Republicans are ready to wave the white flag of surrender.

The pro-amnesty crowd argues that the GOP lost the election because it failed to court the Hispanic vote. The party's supposed harsh rhetoric against illegal aliens is said to have driven millions of Latinos into the Democratic camp. This supposedly explains why Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney lost Nevada, Ohio, Iowa and Florida. A more flexible GOP, one embracing immigration reform -- so the argument goes -- is the key to a return to national power and electoral viability. Plus, they stress that ignoring the 12 million to 20 million illegal immigrants in the country is no longer feasible -- this growing subpopulation must be taken out of the shadows.

The very opposite, however, is true: Granting amnesty is not an option, either practically or politically. Polls consistently show that a strong majority of Americans reject providing illegal aliens with a path to citizenship. The reason is simple: Such a policy would reward criminal behavior. It would eradicate America's national sovereignty, telling the world that our borders exist in name only. Come and stay here long enough, and in big enough numbers, and amnesty is inevitable.

Moreover, the rule of law would be undermined -- shattered. Illegal immigrants are not "undocumented workers." They broke our laws to enter America. This is why amnesty -- no matter how it's dressed up -- would inevitably trigger a furious public backlash. Granting amnesty threatens to further splinter our already-fractured nation.

Politically, it is disastrous for the GOP. Republicans have been down this failed road before. In 1986, then-President Reagan passed amnesty for roughly 3 million illegal immigrants. The results? A border fence was never built. The decision became a magnet, an incentive, for millions more to come. The electoral benefits redounded not to the GOP but the Democrats. California -- once Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan country -- became solid blue. The Southwest turned increasingly Democratic.

The Republicans are unwilling to confront the stark but sad reality that the overwhelming majority of Hispanics vote for Democrats because they are the party of big government. Many Latinos, especially lower-income, lower-skilled ones rely on public housing, free education, Medicare, the earned income tax credit and food stamps. Amnesty is not the primary reason most Latinos vote Democratic. Rather, it is support for the welfare state.

Otherwise, the GOP would be making massive inroads into the Hispanic community. Following Reagan's amnesty, George H.W. Bush received fewer Hispanic votes than the Gipper did. George W. Bush, who championed open borders and comprehensive immigration reform, barely received 40 percent of the Latino vote. Sen. John McCain, who spearheaded the push for amnesty in Congress, got just over 30 percent in 2008. Hence, the facts are clear -- and damning: Pro-amnesty Republicans have not and cannot attract massive chunks of the Hispanic electorate. There is no potential Latino GOP majority -- at least for the foreseeable future. To think otherwise is fantasy masquerading as strategy.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, Mr. Romney did not lose because of his weakness with Hispanics, blacks, feminists, unions, homosexuals or any other primarily Democratic constituency. These blocs are part of the liberal coalition.

Mr. Romney lost because he was unable to galvanize the GOP base. He received nearly 3 million fewer votes than Mr. McCain did in 2008. That difference proved to be Mr. Obama's margin of victory. Had Mr. Romney garnered the same popular vote total as Mr. McCain, the former Massachusetts governor would be president-elect today. No one would be talking about the Republicans' supposed Hispanic problem. Hence, it wasn't Mr. Romney's stance on immigration that cost him the election. Instead, the party establishment put forth a GOP moderate, and millions of conservatives stayed home.

Amnesty is a poisoned chalice. Republicans drink it at their peril. The issue will split the GOP in half. Nationalists, such as myself, will leave and join a third party. Many on the right will follow. Republicans be warned: Comprehensive immigration reform is the path to oblivion.

source: KUHNER: GOP's amnesty suicide - Washington Times

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

Yeah! And thank you Anne Coulter for writing a book that made it safe for rough, tough Donald to mention the subject :-)

Donald Trump says the fatal shooting of a woman in San Francisco is proof that he’s right in saying violent criminals are entering the U.S. from Mexico.

Francisco Sanchez was arrested in connection with the shooting death of a woman in San Francisco.

Officials said Sanchez should have been turned over to immigration authorities, not released, after being jailed four months ago for selling pot.

Kathryn Steinle, 32, was gunned down Wednesday on a pier in San Francisco.

KUHNER: GOP’s amnesty suicide - Will Split GOP Wide Open