[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Ron Paul See other Ron Paul Articles Title: Academic: Constitution Is ‘Confederate Symbol,’ Censor It A political scientist and former professor has penned an article calling for the U.S. Constitution to be censored in order to conceal older parts that are offensive. South Carolinas battle flag may soon come down from the capitol flagpole, but other symbols of the Confederacys ideology remain in place, writes political scientist and former University of Maryland professor Henry Bain in an editorial that has appeared in several newspapers around the country. For example, consider the U. S. Constitution. Bain isnt calling for the creation of a new Constitution, but rather says the current one should simply be edited to remove parts he considers immoral and outdated. All copies of the Constitution promulgate detailed instructions for the recapture of slaves who have run away from their owners, he says. They also specify that slaves are to be counted as three-fifths of a person in the Census, giving a boost to the slave-owning states in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College. Bain is referring, of course, to the parts of the Constitution which reflect the fact slavery was legal until after the Civil War, when the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments were ratified. Slavery isnt his only problem, as he believes in removing any other text that references embarrassing parts of American history, like Prohibition. Modern copies of the Constitution (such as that at Archive.gov) typically show the text as it originally was, while also including a note that such clauses have been superseded by later amendments. That may seem reasonable, but Bain says that kind of approach is the reason nine people found themselves brutally gunned down in Charleston. One might justify this presentation of our national charter by saying that it commemorates an earlier time or instructs students on the nations political history, says Bain. That kind of thinking has prevailed for a long time in Charleston, only recently yielding in the face of an atrocity. And so, Bain says, the Constitution needs to be reorganiz[ed] to suit the modern era, with offensive text excised and moved to a separate back section, where it belongs. Such a move would create a Constitution that deserves to be read aloud each year when the House of Representatives begins its session, unlike the undeserving current one, which Republicans have read aloud at the opening of Congress for the last three congresses. And who does Bain view as a good candidate to carry out this reorganization? For starters, himself. Bain is promoting his book, The Constitution of the United States of America Modern Edition, which he says makes the tired old document at last readable to the modern citizen. Follow Blake on Twitter Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org. Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/07/academic-constitution-is- confederate-symbol-censor-it/#ixzz3fItv2LL9 Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Ada (#0)
I love to ask people like him what's the point of having a Constitution if govt is going to just make things up as it goes along. Is the govt master of the document, or vice versa? The document or some major ruling says that anything added or changed in the USCon that conflicts with the original body of it, it's null and void ab initio. So whatever anybody wants to try, the document is like some modern robot programmed to eat them alive if they try to mess it over.
The Constitution has no enforcing mechanism, so now its whatever the executive branch wants to do.
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|