[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Targeted by the mind control programs of the evil ones (Pedos)

Ex-CIA agent gives his take on some of America's biggest historical events...

Asheville N.C. hit again. May 9th 2025

"No One is Prepared for What’s Happening in EUROPE

"This loss is permanent"

Daniela Cambone: The Great Taking Author Interview

Polar ice rebounds confound alarmist predictions: New studies highlight climates unpredictable dance

NBC: The United States, Europe and Ukraine have made a list of 22 conditions for ending the conflict

President Trumps Proposal to Eliminate Income Taxes: Can It Be Done?

Trump Still Does Not Understand What Russia Wants and Demands

Borrell: Half of bombs dropped on Gaza supplied by Europe

Surprise, Surprise: Bibi Discovers "Secret Iranian Nuclear Weapons Facility" in Iran

Report: Trump Delinks Saudi Nuclear Deal from Israeli Normalization

Lebanon's war-wounded and pregnant women face deepening healthcare crisis

Hordes of NATO military and elite PMCs suddenly went to the Kursk region

The Ukrainian Armed Forces will receive missiles for attacks on the rear, headquarters, airports of Russia

Minister o Defense Thousands of corpses on the border - a French breeding ground near Kiev was destroyed

Ivermectin Reverses Alzheimer's Disease

80% Of 'Liberal' Americans Want Elon Musk Thrown In Prison

Why Silver is Lagging Gold

Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver verbally and physically assaulted federal agents in New Jersey

Diana Ross & The Supremes - Reflections [Spain TV] [1967]

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Introduces Bill to REPEAL the USA PATRIOT Act Declares War on Surveillance State

Car Followed Home. Quick Thinking Driver Saved Himself

Woody Harrelson Couldn't Hold Back

Burkina Faso leaders visit to Moscow for Victory Day carries HUGE strategic significance: heres why

Pope Francis Donated Funds for Drones for the Armed Forces of Ukraine - Historian Zinchenko

President Trump Signs Executive Order to Establish National Center for Homeless Veterans

Report:: Trump plans to announce US recognition of Palestinian state at upcoming Middle East conference

With US mediation, POTUS DJT announces that India and Pakistan have agreed to a ceasefire


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: How it could happen: The candidacy of Donald Trump
Source: TOO
URL Source: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.ne ... the-candidacy-of-donald-trump/
Published: Jul 10, 2015
Author: Kevin MacDonald
Post Date: 2015-07-11 23:26:36 by X-15
Keywords: None
Views: 916
Comments: 24

We all rack our brains every day trying how to break through in a system that is completely stacked against us. How could it happen—a political movement that would ignite the imaginations of White America, depose the corrupt donor class in the Republican Party, and begin to really take the country back?

Right now, doing so is a huge uphill battle. The oppressive mainstream media environment is closed to obviously true messages that Whites have interests just like everybody else. Indeed, it is busy tearing down what’s left of traditional American culture. And despite the internet, the mainstream media, including outlets such as Fox News, continues to wield enormous power, and the vast majority of Americans, including educated Americans, accept its legitimacy and moral authority. Despite the First Amendment, we all know that there are a variety of very powerful social sanctions against anyone who contravenes the racial consensus.

Further, it is extremely difficult for a grass roots political process to gain traction in the U.S. where there are two entrenched political parties and winner-take-all elections, with no proportional representation. Political parties need money—big money, billionaire-type money, and they need highly recognizable names — neither of which is typically available to a grass roots movement. Such movements have a hard time getting traction or a sense of legitimacy, and it’s very difficult to get their word out, especially if it contravenes what our media elites want to hear.

But political celebrities have an enormous ability to shape public debate because the media cannot ignore them. The media can and will do all it can to destroy celebrities that err on the side of political incorrectness, but they can’t prevent the message from getting out.

Which brings me to Donald Trump. I have to admit that I have always thought of Trump as a lightweight — just another guy with an outsize ego whose main goal was to become rich and famous. When he announced his candidacy for the Republican nomination, I thought it was just more of the same—another chance to get his name out there, promote his brand (he seems to name all his enterprises after himself, so running for president seemed likely to help his clothing line, golf courses, media enterprises, etc. — except that’s a difficult explanation in light of what happened after his comments on Mexican immigrants). It seemed like the ultimate vanity candidacy. That may still turn out to be the case.

But maybe not. Trump’s statements on the criminal tendencies and generally low functioning of Mexican and Central American immigrants have struck a chord with White America. And he certainly did not fall in my estimation when he attacked two prominent operatives of the Republican Party/Israel Lobby nexus hostile to his candidacy, Charles Krauthammer and Jonah Goldberg. Then there’s the Twitter incident: “I promise you that I’m much smarter than Jonathan Leibowitz — I mean Jon Stewart @TheDailyShow,” tweeted Trump, adding, “Who, by the way, is totally overrated.” It is, of course, considered “anti-Semitic” to ever call attention to the fact that someone is Jewish because of the absolutely outrageous suggestion that the Jewish identity of someone like Stewart/Leibowitz might influence his opinions. As we all know, Jews are just like everybody else.

These are perhaps the first shots in what will become a raging conflagration between the Jewish media establishment and Trump if he continues to gain traction.

Suddenly, Trump is #1 in the polls for the nomination. You can’t turn on a Fox News talking head show without seeing a discussion of the vicious murder in San Francisco, with routine references to Trump’s candidacy. Doubtless great for Fox ratings because it taps into White anger and insecurity in the face of all the changes being unleashed by our hostile elites, from gay marriage, to removing traditional American symbols, to the new housing regulations that will make it more difficult for Whites to get away from diversity. There is outrage at the San Francisco City Council’s lack of action to change their policies. And there is outrage that the Obama White House, which went all in on Michael Brown, Trayvon Martin, et al. (Obama: “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon,” not to mention family visits to meet the president) — the same White House that can’t even express its condolences to Kathryn Steinle’s family and sees fit to blame it on the Republicans because they didn’t pass a bill that would have “solved” the immigration problem by massively increasing immigration of the poor, uneducated, and criminality prone, add yet more “border enforcement” that would be unenforced (just like current immigration laws), and by giving amnesty to people like Steinle’s murderer, Francisco Lopez-Sanchez. And of course, even some Republicans are making the same argument, notably Marco Rubio.

But none of this sudden publicity about illegal alien criminality would have happened without Donald Trump. Horrifying crimes by legal and illegal immigrants against Whites and other traditional American people happen all the time. But like Black-on-White crimes, they get no national coverage. (Breitbart reports that “Thanks in part to deadly ‘sanctuary city’ policies, 347,000 convicted criminal immigrants remain at large in the U.S. — and illegal immigrants accounted for 37 percent of all federal sentences handed down in 2014.”) There is local coverage of illegal alien crime (typically without mentioning immigration status or race of offender) and there are notices on a few conservative-oriented websites that are outside the mainstream and have minuscule readership compared to the mainstream media. And while illegal immigrant crime has sporadically been discussed on Fox News (here’s a Fox story from 2014 on two Sacramento policemen killed by a twice-deported illegal alien—a story that probably very few remember), they are unable to ignite a national discussion to the point of influencing electoral politics. The same for the wonderful book, ¡Adios America!, by Ann Coulter.

But because of his celebrity status, Trump managed to get the criminality of illegal aliens on the national agenda. Even the New York Times covered it. And because of his wealth, he could run a viable presidential campaign without tapping into the billions of Sheldon Adelson, Larry Ellison, Norman Braman or the rest of the Republican Jewish Coalition as Marco Rubio (among others) is doing and by making war with Iran the most important question for Americans to decide in the 2016 election. Incidentally, Rubio agrees with the Democrats that passing the Gang of Eight immigration amnesty/surge bill would have prevented the Steinle murder (despite the fact that that bill would have lavishly funded sanctuary cities).

Which means that Trump could attempt to run as an independent on issues like displacement-level immigration, opposition to free trade, and national sovereignty. Such a campaign would resonate with a very large segment of White America, and it would certainly dash the hopes for anyone else the Republican money decides to nominate (including the despicable Jeb Bush who said that he took Trump’s comments personally because of his Mexican wife and Mestizo children).

What the establishment fears most is a highly visible, personally attractive, honest, populist candidate who cannot be shut out of the media and with enough money to run a viable campaign. It happened in 1992 with the candidacy of Ross Perot, and it is quite possible that such a candidacy would just make it easier for Hillary (adjectives for Hilary fail me) to win. But the choice between Jeb et al. and Hillary is really no choice at all given that the neocons have pretty much all of them in their thrall, and they basically agree on key issues for Whites like immigration (with the possible exception of Scott Walker). And that would pave the way for a new political party after 2016 that would begin to address the interests of the traditional American people.

In any case, the Republican Party, the party of big business and the Israel Lobby, richly deserves to die unless it can appeal to the legitimate interests of its base—White America of all social classes, both sexes, and all age groups — all of which voted for Romney even though he hardly represented their interests.

Obviously, Trump may be a false hope. But there certainly are other Whites who could undergo a conversion experience and use their celebrity status, and their money (or could attract enough money—a Charles Lindbergh-like figure comes to mind) to make it happen. It’s not over until it’s over.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11.

#6. To: X-15 (#0)

Donald Trump = Ross Perot redux, so Hillary can win.

If you think I'm wrong, you are either too young to remember the 1992 election, or are too optimistic.

This is EXACTLY the same thing that happened when Bill ran against Bob Dole.

Just wait.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2015-07-12   13:40:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: TommyTheMadArtist, The Donald (#6)

Donald Trump = Ross Perot redux, so Hillary can win.

As if Hillary isn't/couldn't beat Bush anyway? And, btw, who gives a rat's which one of those two win? It's too bad some can't enjoy the heartburn Trump is giving both parties & the media. I'm loving it!

Jethro Tull  posted on  2015-07-12   15:09:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Jethro Tull, Trump, 4 (#7)

...who gives a rat's which one of those two win? It's too bad some can't enjoy the heartburn Trump is giving both parties & the media. I'm loving it!

Amen, and same here.

Lod  posted on  2015-07-12   15:11:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: All (#8)

By Kevin “Coach” Collins

The large turnout Donald Trump was able to draw on Saturday in Arizona is a sign of something; but what?

Is it a sign that a showman can draw a crowd on any given day? Is it a sign that the Republicans are now split in such a way that the Democrats can coast into the White House next year? Is it a sign that we, as a people, are moving closer to the “enough!” tipping point necessary to move us to action?

I favor the latter. Yes Trump has been, and remains a man who is primarily for Trump. He carried on a charade four years ago that I must admit fooled me into thinking he was more than he actually is. Nevertheless, soon he will formerly announce his candidacy for the Republican nomination for president and maybe even believe what he says for a while. That is actually immaterial because what he is doing now has started a fire that is burning away the tall grass that so many – well almost every other – Republican pretender to the throne has been hiding behind.

If Donald Trump continues to talk about immigration as he has thus far it will defeat the combined efforts of both wings of the Uniparty that has captured control of our lives and made election results meaningless. Both the Republican and Democrat wings of the Uniparty really wants open borders. The Republican wing supports open borders because they have been bought and paid for by the US Chamber of Commerce. The Democrat wing wants illegal aliens because their votes will keep them in power for generations. Neither wing cares about us.

They are joined in their contempt for America’s future by the media and the Court. The average American knows this and has grown increasingly frustrated that not even one candidate is articulating our fears and dread about the future, let alone proposing to do something about them.

Donald Trump has recognized this. He is pointing his finger at the power structure and saying out loud, “You have lost the support of the governed.” By doing this he has pushed the wave of “enough!” closer to critical mass.

How long Trump stays around is not as important as his having started a conversation that will only become more urgent when the rest of the fakes and frauds try to ignore it.

We are a great and resilient people. We are just waiting to get back to the America we know will guarantee our children’s future. We know that, regardless of “push poll” results to the contrary, illegal immigration is the number one impediment to that dream.

Donald Trump is talking about illegal immigration. He will force others to expose themselves on this issue; and for this we should be grateful. He is helping us get to “enough!”

Lod  posted on  2015-07-13   12:30:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 11.

        There are no replies to Comment # 11.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 11.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]