See other Resistance Articles
Title: DOUBLE, TRIPLE, QUADRUPLE CHAINS ON THE WHITE MAN - RACISM IN AMERICA WHERE DOES IT THRIVE?
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.tpath.org/racism-in-america.html
Published: Jul 13, 2015
Author: Mr. Richard Matrisciano
Post Date: 2015-07-13 21:38:27 by HAPPY2BME-4UM
Keywords: RACISM, REVERSE RACISM, AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
Views: 112
Comments: 5
July 13, 2015 - TPATH~ On college campuses across this nation secular progressives are running “White Privilege” programs and conferences as well as programs on racism.
Surprise, surprise! They teach racism is alive and well in America, and whites promote it. Under the guise of “improving” race relations these elitists brainwash our youth while promoting their radical progressive agenda. It’s the same secular humanist ideology that has successfully taken God out of our society.
If you open your eyes and ears, and do a little research, you will see those in control of governments, schools and media across America have been using Saul Alinsky’s “Rules For Radicals” as their manifesto. If you don’t know Alinsky or his anarchist views it’s easy to do an online search for him and his book – which by the way is dedicated to Satan. That certainly explains a lot.
It is my contention America was well on its way to putting racism aside until Barack Obama became president. Because of this one man, racism has once more reared its ugly head. Former AG Eric Holder told us America is still a racist nation. President Obama himself continually uses the bully pulpit of his office to evoke the politics of racial divide.
He condemns entire police departments for their racist actions, regardless of facts. In a case involving Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. who was arrested for confronting police during an investigation, Obama admitted the professor "is a friend, so I may be a little biased here. I don't know all the facts." That didn’t stop him from playing the race card concluding, “the Cambridge police acted stupidly.”
The president routinely calls those who have lost a family member to gun violence offering condolences. But not all families. He was available to tell us if he had a son he would look like Travon Martin. However, he was apparently too busy to call the family of Kate Steinle, the young woman murdered on a San Francisco pier July 1st. Of course she was white and the confessed killer is a five time deported illegal alien from Mexico.
To be fair, we need to ask if there’s any truth to the assertion America is a racist nation. After a little research I found there just may be – but not how Obama, Holder and the rest of the Alinskyites would have us beieve.
My findings begin with the 2012 presidential election. CNN reported these exit poll numbers:
39% of whites voted for Obama, down from 43% in ‘08. Racism or the president’s failed policies?
93% of blacks voted for Obama, up from 91% in ‘08. Racism or the president’s successful policies?
Did blacks vote for Obama primarily because he’s black? Is it possible race was a determining factor in their votes? I believe this is the case which makes it a form of racism. Ironically, President Obama spent the first 9 months of his life in the womb of a white woman so he’s not exactly “black.”
It is important to ask if our nation has progressed away from racism over the past decades. Segregation is against the law and no US college or university is segregated – but we still have over 40 black universities and colleges. Why?
No one can be discriminated against based on race – but we still have Affirmative Action which uses race as criteria for hiring and advancement. Why?
We have Black Chambers of Commerce, Hispanic Chambers of Commerce and the National Association for Advancement of Colored People. Why?
Race even reaches entertainment. Even though eight African American women have been crowned Miss America, we have Black Miss America, Miss Black America and Miss Black USA pageants. Why?
There are many other examples; even a National Black Catholic Congress. Really?
If we are all truly born in the image of God, and I believe we are, we must end this godless attempt to divide and conquer us by color. Dr. Martin Luther King dreamed of a world where we would be judged not by the color of our skin, but by the content of our character. President Obama, a follower of Alinsky and unlike Dr. King, divides us by the color of our skin while exhibiting little or no moral character.
In the bible Jesus says, "May those who have eyes, see; and those who have ears, hear." But then, I can’t quote the bible. The government has squelched freedom of religion and freedom of speech in the public arena.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: LOD, JETHRO TULL (#0)
Donald Trump could save America if he were willing to be truly bold and brash instead of being the sort of docile, predictable milquetoast that we have seen so far this year. First, consider the path that Trump has taken in his quest to save America: he has joined the large cattle call for the Republican nomination. How very ordinary! Although we conservatives like to complain about the danger of RINOs – and that danger is real – the greater danger is the Democratic Party now utterly in thrall to an anti-religious, anti-American, anti-liberty animus. When Democrats win half of the presidential elections and when Democrats in the White House appoint radical hacks to the Supreme Court and pursue utterly unconstitutional executive actions, then America as we know it is doomed. The real and desperate need is to liberate the Democratic Party from the clutches of totalitarians. Donald Trump could do that, or at least begin to wage that war, which must be won. If he wants to seek the Republican nomination, fine, but at the same time he ought to seek the Democrat nomination. There is nothing improper about seeking multiple party nominations at the same time. Consider that in her Senate elections in 2000, Hillary sought and received the nomination of both the Democratic Party and also the Liberal Party, and in her 2006 re-election bid, Hillary sought and received the nomination of the Democratic Party, the Independence Party, and the Working Families Party. Or consider who is pressing Hillary hard right now: Senator Bernie Sanders, who is not a Democrat, but a Socialist formally registered as an independent. Is anyone suggesting that Sanders lacks the right to seek the Democratic Party nomination for president? If Sanders, by some miracle, wins the Democrat nomination, is there any doubt that he will also receive the Socialist Party nomination? Indeed, the Social Party of America is already urging Sanders to run for president even if he loses the Democrat nomination. Trump himself sought the Reform Party presidential nomination in 2000, and he has contributed money to candidates of both major political parties. When he sought that party's nomination in 2000, he told America: "It's not so much the Reform Party, it's really the fact that I'd want to make that if I ran and spent a lot of money I could actually win, I could beat that Democrat-Republican apparatus." Trump, then, is on record as believing that the problem is the "Democrat-Republican apparatus" and that his wealth uniquely enables him to challenge that apparatus because he does not need to raise campaign funds and so can defy the establishment. Why, then, run for only one of the two parties' nomination, the Republican nomination, if the problem involves both major political parties? Moreover, which of the two parties today has a candidate whose nomination is much more like a coronation? Hillary, specifically because of all of the insider money she can command, can violate ethical rules, circumvent the law, and arrogantly disregard even the media because she and her husband are right at the nexus of shadowy political machinations. Surely a true political revolutionary who wished to challenge the hegemony of both political parties would do so by explicitly taking on both parties. And if he felt the need to seek the nomination of just one of the two parties, why not seek the nomination of that party that seems most pathetically subordinate to Washington insiders? If Trump sought the Democrat nomination, too, then he could insure that Hillary face a well-funded and well-organized campaign in caucus and primary states. He could press her relentlessly on the Clinton Foundation, her use of private e-mail servers for official business, and all the many lies and contradictions in her public career. The same arguments Trump is making in the Republican Party – he is so rich that no one can buy him – would apply to the Democratic Party as well, and through this appeal, Trump might win Democrat primaries by attracting a substantial number independents and cross-over voters. Might Trump actually win the Democrat nomination? Hillary is so pathetically weak even against a geriatric socialist that nips at her heels. Yes, Trump might do just that – and if that happened, as titular head of the Democratic Party, he could push a rational agenda for real reform in Washington that Democrats could not publicly oppose. The drift of Democrats into a sort of Orwellian totalitarianism is the great threat to our nation today. Trump, and perhaps Trump alone, could halt that drift with money, pizzazz, and guts. If he succeeded in that mission, Donald Trump could save America. Donald Trump could save America if he were willing to be truly bold and brash instead of being the sort of docile, predictable milquetoast that we have seen so far this year. First, consider the path that Trump has taken in his quest to save America: he has joined the large cattle call for the Republican nomination. How very ordinary! Although we conservatives like to complain about the danger of RINOs – and that danger is real – the greater danger is the Democratic Party now utterly in thrall to an anti-religious, anti-American, anti-liberty animus. When Democrats win half of the presidential elections and when Democrats in the White House appoint radical hacks to the Supreme Court and pursue utterly unconstitutional executive actions, then America as we know it is doomed. The real and desperate need is to liberate the Democratic Party from the clutches of totalitarians. Donald Trump could do that, or at least begin to wage that war, which must be won. If he wants to seek the Republican nomination, fine, but at the same time he ought to seek the Democrat nomination. There is nothing improper about seeking multiple party nominations at the same time. Consider that in her Senate elections in 2000, Hillary sought and received the nomination of both the Democratic Party and also the Liberal Party, and in her 2006 re-election bid, Hillary sought and received the nomination of the Democratic Party, the Independence Party, and the Working Families Party. Or consider who is pressing Hillary hard right now: Senator Bernie Sanders, who is not a Democrat, but a Socialist formally registered as an independent. Is anyone suggesting that Sanders lacks the right to seek the Democratic Party nomination for president? If Sanders, by some miracle, wins the Democrat nomination, is there any doubt that he will also receive the Socialist Party nomination? Indeed, the Social Party of America is already urging Sanders to run for president even if he loses the Democrat nomination. Trump himself sought the Reform Party presidential nomination in 2000, and he has contributed money to candidates of both major political parties. When he sought that party's nomination in 2000, he told America: "It's not so much the Reform Party, it's really the fact that I'd want to make that if I ran and spent a lot of money I could actually win, I could beat that Democrat-Republican apparatus." Trump, then, is on record as believing that the problem is the "Democrat-Republican apparatus" and that his wealth uniquely enables him to challenge that apparatus because he does not need to raise campaign funds and so can defy the establishment. Why, then, run for only one of the two parties' nomination, the Republican nomination, if the problem involves both major political parties? Moreover, which of the two parties today has a candidate whose nomination is much more like a coronation? Hillary, specifically because of all of the insider money she can command, can violate ethical rules, circumvent the law, and arrogantly disregard even the media because she and her husband are right at the nexus of shadowy political machinations. Surely a true political revolutionary who wished to challenge the hegemony of both political parties would do so by explicitly taking on both parties. And if he felt the need to seek the nomination of just one of the two parties, why not seek the nomination of that party that seems most pathetically subordinate to Washington insiders? If Trump sought the Democrat nomination, too, then he could insure that Hillary face a well-funded and well-organized campaign in caucus and primary states. He could press her relentlessly on the Clinton Foundation, her use of private e-mail servers for official business, and all the many lies and contradictions in her public career. The same arguments Trump is making in the Republican Party – he is so rich that no one can buy him – would apply to the Democratic Party as well, and through this appeal, Trump might win Democrat primaries by attracting a substantial number independents and cross-over voters. Might Trump actually win the Democrat nomination? Hillary is so pathetically weak even against a geriatric socialist that nips at her heels. Yes, Trump might do just that – and if that happened, as titular head of the Democratic Party, he could push a rational agenda for real reform in Washington that Democrats could not publicly oppose. The drift of Democrats into a sort of Orwellian totalitarianism is the great threat to our nation today. Trump, and perhaps Trump alone, could halt that drift with money, pizzazz, and guts. If he succeeded in that mission, Donald Trump could save America. http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/07/how_trump_could_save_america.html U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
Why not? Run, Don, run. “The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
What a great graphic! Appropriately and cleverly, his face is covered in ghoulishly dingy rainbow colors. For some reason today, when I try to steal an image it only gets the URL.
How Trump Could Save America
#2. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#1)
#3. To: Lod (#2)
#4. To: Lod (#2)
#5. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest