See other National News Articles
Title: (Dallas) Police Deny Excessive Force In Bloody Arrest (black cop, white girl)
Source:
NBC5i.com
URL Source: http://www.nbc5i.com/news/6158812/detail.html
Published: Jan 16, 2006
Author: NBC5
Post Date: 2006-01-16 20:18:09 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: Excessive, (Dallas), Police
Views: 15177
Comments: 855
POSTED: 5:16 pm CST January 16, 2006
DALLAS -- E-mails and pictures circulating the Internet tell the tale of a Dallas woman's bloody run-in with police after a roller-skating outing escalated into an arrest with excessive force, but officers and some witnesses Monday told a different story.
The incident happened early Saturday morning in Deep Ellum after police attempted to speak with Michelle Metzinger, 25, who, according to a police report, was intoxicated and weaving through traffic on roller skates.
Images: The Arrest & Other Slideshows
The pictures that stemmed from the events that followed are dramatic. They show an officer arresting Metzinger. Her face is covered in blood and there is a puddle of blood on the sidewalk.
"Very excessive. Uncalled for, you know. We're talking about a 250-pound guy and a 100-pound girl. It was just over the top," witness "D.C." said. "All I saw were her feet in the air and disappearing behind a cop car."
However, Dallas police and other witnesses tell a totally different story.
They said Metzinger was drunk and that she not only ignored officers who asked her to stop skating in the street, but also shouted profanities.
According to reports, an officer then tried to arrest Metzinger for public intoxication.
She resisted and attacked the officer, Lt. Rick Watson said.
"The officer attempted to turn her around, at which time the suspect then reached up and grabbed the officer's -- right part of his face -- trying to gouge the officer's eye," Watson said.
Despite the interest that the story has generated online and in the media, Metzinger said she would not comment on the incident until she had consulted with a lawyer.
Metzinger also had not filed a complaint report, so Dallas police were not conducting an internal investigation.
When I worked concert security and someone got bloodied, it was always proper for us to "get our stories straight." Or, as Eddie Murphy said in that movie, "You were lying your asses off." That LT is a lying piece of shit and so is the black cop who LIED in his report.
I'll tell you one thing for certain, this bastard needs to be caught and given a damn hard ball-batting. And then a WHITE magic marker taken to his forehead and the words BAD COP inscribed thereon. What was done was brutal, inexcusable and unjustified.
Police Deny Excessive Force In Bloody Arrest
Dramatic Pictures, Rumors Circulate Online
UPDATED: 6:11 pm CST January 16, 2006
Poster Comment:
Pictures taken by a witness clearly show the cops are LIARS!
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-113) not displayed.
.
.
.
#114. To: Red Jones (#112)
Well stated, Red. Although I am hostile to religion I do very much believe in God, although I have problems with how God is conceptualized by most people. However, I believe in the concept of "God-given" rights, which is something that I know you also believe strongly in as well. You go Yahweh, I'll go mine, but I'm willing to bet dollars to doughnuts that we'll both meet again somewhere in a better place than this...
 | Gold and silver are real money, paper is but a promise. |
#115. To: Neil McIver (#110)
Neil, Yes, I do consider myself neutral. It was EASY to see what happened. Drunk girl asked to stop skating in the street. She does not stop. She was arrested. She was not pleased with being arrested. She displayed a lot of "attitude." She took swipe at officer. She got put on the ground and handcuffed. Michelle screwed up and paid the price. Pretty simple.
#116. To: Elliott Jackalope (#114)
I appreciate that Elliott. We can argue endlessly on religion as you say. and the bible says that god's the judge, not us. I can't stand a lot of the christians myself, and I am christian (allegedly anyway).
#117. To: Richard (#115)
She got put on the ground and handcuffed. And in the process ended up getting beaten bloody. A little 100 lb girl beaten bloody by a 250 lb cop. Some of us have a problem with that. Apparently you don't, and that is the difference between you and the rest of us on this forum.
| Gold and silver are real money, paper is but a promise. |
#118. To: Neil McIver (#113)
There are, in fact, people who have already done such a thing. See: Belize, Costa Rica, British Columbia, Switzerland, Chile, and so on...
There are, in fact, people considering just such a thing.
#119. To: Red Jones (#116)
You're a good man, Red. A little stubborn sometimes, but a good man to the core. You got a lot of heart...
| Gold and silver are real money, paper is but a promise. |
#120. To: Elliott Jackalope (#111)
Elliot, Pull your head out of your ass and stop trying to sensationalize this. SHE WAS NOT BEATEN BLOODY. She resisted arrest, was forced to the ground and placed in handcuffs. She was NOT beaten. Being drunk does not mean that you deserve to get beaten. However, assaulting a police officer would certainly put you in that category, even though, in this case, it did not occur. Your viewpoint does not take into account her actions. A person attacked a police officer and got put on the ground and handcuffed. As a result of their struggling with the police the got a cut on their face from the ground. This was NOT excessive force by ANY stretch of the imagination. He could have used his baton, his mace or his tazer... or even shot her.... but he did not, because THAT would have been excessive force for the situation.
#121. To: Richard (#120)
Gosh, who am I going to believe, you or my lying eyes?
SHE WAS NOT BEATEN BLOODY.
| Gold and silver are real money, paper is but a promise. |
#122. To: Richard (#88)
Roads are designed to for cars to use a certain way and up to a certain speed. Road engineers know all about this. Driving a car on a road inconsistant with it's design, such as going too fast or straying into the opposite lane, is reckless endangerment. That's when the line is crossed (so to speak). It may be that somewhere, 120 MPH on main street is consistant with it's design. If so, then it's okay to go that fast. But otherwise, the victims are the locals who are put at unreasonable risk by the excessive speed. Uhhh... the bank owner? Customers with deposits you steal? Perhaps you think stealing money from someone doesn't hurt them. If so, would you mind if I steal $50,000 from you? I promise it won't hurt. Many of the 20,000 unconstitutional gun laws say you're wrong. (as an aside).
Driving Drunk has NO VICTIM as long as I don't hit anyone or cause an accident.
Driving fast has NO VICTIM as long as I don't hit anyone or cause an accident.
If I rob a bank and don't harm anyone, there is NO VICTIM.
Simply holding a gun is not a crime, nor should it be. If I don't fire it... it is just something in my hand.
BTW: I have a better name for the software .... Microsoft Internet Exploder.
-- George Bonser
#123. To: Red Jones (#112)
Red, Wow, you really paint with a broad brush. I have no desire to maliciously punish ANYONE. I do believe that there are laws on the books, and there are people in place to enforce those laws. Those people should be listened to, and should not be attacked. Those who choose to attack the police are in effect, attacking the law. The law was created by society, so they are attacking society as well. Apparently you and your Boogeyman have a lot of room for people to disrespect the law... But wait... not according to your god.... your god also says that homosexuals should be killed and that I can sell my daughter into slavery, and that all football players should be killed for touching pigskin. Your god is a deep thinker...
#124. To: Elliott Jackalope (#117)
Elliot, A 100lb girl who was NOT BEATEN BLOODY. She was ASSAULTING A POLICE OFFICER and was taken to the ground. She was not BEATEN in any way. You were NOT there. I WAS. I saw what happened and what both parties did. She was fighting with a cop and got subdued. The pictures simply show the result of her fighting with the police. Are you now advocating that anyone who is a woman weighing less than the arresting officer be allowed to attack that police officer? Her weight does not come into play here.
#125. To: Elliott Jackalope (#121)
Elliot I was THERE. I know the actions surrounding those photos. You were not there. You just see pictures but don't know what happened.
#126. To: Richard, christine (#93)
This is the common notion that people use to disregard general libertarian thinking that people should be free to do what they want as long as they hurt no one. "What about children?" I agree that libertarians who believe children/minors should have full right to choose their own destinies in all matters of life are wrong, though I don't know any who say that. That right applies only to adults. As a libertarian, I believe children/minors need to be bound from such decisions until they reach the age of consent.
Elliot asserted that because there was no "victim" to Michelle's actions, that this should not have happened in the first place. He is proposing a "No Victim, No Crime" system of law.
According to that law, if my daughter wants to have sex with me, then I should be free to do so.
BTW: I have a better name for the software .... Microsoft Internet Exploder.
-- George Bonser
#127. To: Neil McIver (#122)
If I am driving fast or drunk, and no one gets hurt, there is no victim. Show me the victim. If I walk into a bank, point my handgun at the teller and ask for $50,000, and she kindly gives it to me with out my having to discharge my firearm, then there is no victim. She gave me the money willingly. Any supposed "threat" was imagined because I did not harm her. The bank has the money insured, so they are not victims. The insurance company gets paid premiums for exactly these kinds of occurances, so they are not victims. If I rob a bank and don't harm anyone... according to Elliot... I have not committed a crime. We are not looking at the existing laws, Neil.... We are looking at the world thru ELLIOT'S eyes.... Neil,
#128. To: Neil McIver (#126)
The "age of consent" varies in cultures from 12 to 18.
#129. To: Elliott Jackalope (#121)
Elliot, All your pictures show is the police arresting a woman who happens to be bleeding. I see no evidence of police brutality in those photos. A woman who is bleeding is sitting on the ground, and being handcuffed in one photo.
#130. To: Richard (#125)
You just see pictures but don't know what happened. You're right, I wasn't there and I didn't see what happened first hand, all I have to go with is the pictures. But you have to admit that these pictures look bad. You asserted that she was not beaten bloody, well, from what I can see of the pictures it sure looks like she was. That's not makeup spilled on the ground..
You were not there.
| Gold and silver are real money, paper is but a promise. |
#131. To: Richard (#107)
If it's an unlawful arrest, then the officer is not acting as a police officer but merely as his own person under color of law. It *IS* lawful to resist an unlawful arrest, and there has been at least one case where the courts agreed. Granted, courts won't decide until well after the fact whether the arrest was lawful or not, so the consciencious resister does take the chance of a favorable outcome upon choosing to resist. True, but it's not the only course open. And circumstances may well make resisting arrest the preferred moral response, such as to take immediate action to save a life that the police will not save for whatever reason. For the second time, I did not say this, nor did I imply it. After you....
If you have been arrested by the police, you do not have the right to resist.
If you feel your arrest is unlawful, you have the courts sytem as your point of recourse.
If you are NOT saying that it is "Ok" for Michelle to attack the police officer, then this entire conversation is moot. The only reason she was taken into custody was because she resisted arrest.
Care to try again?
BTW: I have a better name for the software .... Microsoft Internet Exploder.
-- George Bonser
#132. To: Elliott Jackalope (#130)
Elliot, You are being reactionary again... Accoring to the PICTURES... there is no evidence that she was beaten at all. She may have simply fallen. There is nothing in those photos to suggest that the police caused her injuries.
#133. To: Richard (#115)
You may well be a witness as you say, but you lose credibility by saying you are sick of drunk people on your street, and yet claim to be unbiased in this incident. I consider everything you said after this statement to be hogwash, whether it's accurate or not. If you do get to the witness stand, you can bet the girl's attorney will be questioning your credibility as an unbiased witness before the jury, and rightly so.
Yes, I do consider myself neutral.
BTW: I have a better name for the software .... Microsoft Internet Exploder.
-- George Bonser
#134. To: Richard (#132)
There are also statements by witnesses who claim to have seen excessive force. Here's the bottom line: This looks bad. Now, if we all lived in Mayberry and knew that good ol' Sheriff Andy and deputy Barney were on the job, we'd all be more inclined to give the police the benefit of the doubt. However, we live in the USA of 2005, a place populated by fear-biting cops who hand out 10k DUI citations to people who had one drink, who practice "testalying" and who have largely turned themselves into black-clad robocops who shoot first and ask questions later. Being as this is the ugly reality of our times, don't be surprised when incidents like this result in a whole lot of pissed off citizens screaming for cop heads on a platter. That's what one gets when one's profession becomes taken over by fear-biting robocops.
"Very excessive. Uncalled for, you know. We're talking about a 250-pound guy and a 100-pound girl. It was just over the top," witness "D.C." said. "All I saw were her feet in the air and disappearing behind a cop car."
| Gold and silver are real money, paper is but a promise. |
#135. To: who knows what evil (#118)
Quite a few, in fact. I remember watching cspan some 10 years ago and it was a hearing before a congressional committee where IRS guys were essentially lobbying for an increase in penalties for people who expatriated to avoid taxes. Apparently they figured these guys should get some kind of expatriation tax. I thought perhaps putting up a wall & barbed wire fence and machine-gunned guard towers around the USA would be a good way to keep people IN who wanted to leave. Hey, one form of coersion is as good as another, right? So much for "if you don't like this country, why don't you leave?"
There are, in fact, people who have already done such a thing. See: Belize, Costa Rica, British Columbia, Switzerland, Chile, and so on...
BTW: I have a better name for the software .... Microsoft Internet Exploder.
-- George Bonser
#136. To: Neil McIver (#131)
Neil, Let me be more clear for you. WHAT NOT TO DO IF ARRESTED Any law enforcement officer such as a policeman, sheriff, deputy sheriff or state trooper can make a lawful arrest. The arrest may be made with a warrant or, under certain circumstances, without a warrant. Do not resist a law enforcement officer who attempts to arrest you - even if you are innocent. The fact that you are innocent will not make the arrest illegal if the officer’s action conformed to the requirements of a legal arrest as stated above. If the arrest is legal and you resist, you may be guilty of the crime of resisting lawful arrest. If the arrest is illegal, you are entitled to bring an action against the law enforcement officer for false arrest. Do not resist a law officer’s attempt to search or "frisk" you. It is legal for an arresting officer to search your person and the area in your immediate presence. Even if he does not arrest you, an officer - after identifying himself - may stop you in any public place if he has reason to believe that you have committed, are committing or are about to commit a crime. He may demand your name and address and an explanation of your actions. If he reasonably suspects that he or another is in danger of being attacked, he may search you for weapons. Now... Getting back to the matter at hand... We can clearly see where Michelle screwed up and got herself promoted from "Simple Citation" to "Arrested and Jailed."
#137. To: Elliott Jackalope (#134)
Elliot, So, now that you have conceded that Michelle was in the wrong, now you go with IT LOOKS BAD? Tough. She broke the law. If she had been hit by a car after the police had warned her against skating in the streets, you would be first in line asking for the cops who DIDN'T stop her to be fired. If you fear your safety in this city so much, perhaps you should move.
#138. To: Richard (#137)
I have had no problem with the idea that she was in the wrong, my problem is with her being beaten in the streets by a cop. As far as the whole "she broke the law" argument, hell, that can be applied to everybody in this country. There are so many things "against the law" nowadays that everybody is always guilty of something. As far as if she had been hit by a car, my response would have been "tough titty", she gets drunk and rollerskates in traffic, then she's a grown girl and she takes her chances. And no, I don't live in Texas, and I wouldn't live in that state for any reason. I visited there once for about a month twenty years ago, and got my fill of it in that time. Once again, there is a difference between deserving to be arrested and deserving to be beaten. If this girl had instead been a 250 lb guy, we would not be having this discussion. But officer FearBiter decided to smack around a little girl, and now he's all upset because people like me are pissed off about it. Tough. If he can't take the heat, he should get out of the kitchen.
| Gold and silver are real money, paper is but a promise. |
#139. To: Richard (#136)
WHAT NOT TO DO IF ARRESTED All well and fine. Nonetheless, it is lawful to resist an unlawful arrest.
BTW: I have a better name for the software .... Microsoft Internet Exploder.
-- George Bonser
#140. To: Elliott Jackalope (#138)
Elliot, She broke the law. MORE IMPORTANLTY. She RESISTED ARREST AND ATTACKED A POLICE OFFICER. She was NEVER beaten. NEVER BEATEN. Get it thru your head. I was there. She was wrestled to the ground, and other than cutting her face on the ground while she was struggling, she was not harmed. SHE WAS NOT BEATEN. Being as how YOU were not there and I was, you have no business even suggesting such a thing.
#141. To: Neil McIver (#139)
Neil, How does one determine an "unlawful arrest?" Do you have a law degree and have you passed the bar in every state in the union? You are free to fight with the cops all you want, just be prepared to get your head handed to you for your troubles, and rightfully so.
#142. To: Richard (#100)
There ARE laws against INCEST ya know. BTW, how long have you been screwing your 17 year old daughter? 10 weeks, 10 months, 10 years?
she is of the age of consent and can have sex with whomever she pleases
#143. To: FormerLurker (#142)
Lurker, You need to read the whole thread before you go of on your little rant. The comment you read was made inside of "Elliot's World." In Elliot's World, if there is No Victim, there is No Crime. Keep things in context.
#144. To: Richard, Red Jones (#56)
Wow, you must be quite a dolt if you think anyone believes that some witness to this incident just happened to find 4um in order to "relate" his side of the story. Is this the sort of piss poor quality psy-op that our tax money buys these days? Sheesh.
Wow, you are quite the conspiracy theorist to presume that I am lying about being an eye-witness to this idiotic woman's behavior.
#145. To: Richard (#140)
Oh yes, the ever popular "s(he) fell" argument. That used to work all of the time back in the day, but you are missing the larger issue here, which is that too many of us have seen too much abuse of authority by too many cops, and we are no longer inclined to give the benefit of the doubt to the police any longer. If the robocops had shown some restraint over the last twenty years they would have a lot more support from the community, but since they have largely acted like aggressive jerks too many times to too many people they can no longer count on that support. Maybe it's not fair, but it is reality.
| Gold and silver are real money, paper is but a promise. |
#146. To: Elliott Jackalope (#145)
Elliot, You don't live in the city, much less the state. You were NOT there. You are going off of photographs that tell you NOTHING. If you go by the photos, there is NO evidence that she was harmed by anyone. You can't tell if she inflicted the wounds herself or not. Just because you have seen abuse of authority does not mean it existed in this incident. Being an eyewitness observer, I can tell you that it there was no abuse of authority in this case. Being as how you have no clue what happened, all you can do is try to stir the pot when you don't actually know squat.
#147. To: Richard (#143)
That's odd, as from looking over the thread, I saw you making a lot of comments about screwing your daughter, so to me, it was more of a "Richard's World" sort of thing.
The comment you read was made inside of "Elliot's World."
#148. To: FormerLurker (#144)
Lurker, I was a witness to the event. Then I saw the news report on TV and was upset by the biased and unbalanced coverage. I searched the web to see if people were talking about it. I found this site and joined it. Why is that so hard to believe?
#149. To: Richard (#146)
You have repeatedly proven incapable of understanding the larger issues at stake here, and so I am done trying to convince you of anything. However, you might consider that every single other person here disagrees with you. Perhaps that might tell you something?
| Gold and silver are real money, paper is but a promise. |
#150. To: FormerLurker (#147)
Lurker, Again with your ignorance. I was illustrating how Elliot's concept of No Victim No Crime just does not work in the real world. Too bad you are not bright enough to grasp that concept.
#151. To: Richard (#146)
I doubt you were either. Why don't you tell us the name of the officer that interviewed you, and what time of the evening it was when the interview was conducted.
You were NOT there.
#152. To: Richard (#150)
Too bad you are not bright enough to grasp that concept. Too bad you're too dumb to realize that a man screwing his daughter is not a victimless crime. So how long have you been banging her?
I was illustrating how Elliot's concept of No Victim No Crime just does not work in the real world.
#153. To: Elliott Jackalope (#149)
Larger Issue At Stake? What we have is a woman who broke the law and fought with the police. She was not beaten. The police used reasonable restraint. They did not mace, tazer, shoot or use their batons on her. You don't like the police. That is fine. But to immediately presume that the police are wrong when you weren't there... that is ignorance. I was there. You disagree with me because you weren't there. You know the 'myth.' I know the Facts.
.
.
.
Comments (154 - 855) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest