[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Problem of the Bitcoin Billionaires

Biden: “We’re leaving America in a better place today than when we came into office four years ago … "

Candace Owens: Gaetz out, Bondi in. There's more to this than you think.

OMG!!! Could Jill Biden Be Any MORE Embarrassing??? - Anyone NOTICE This???

Sudden death COVID vaccine paper published, then censored, by The Lancet now republished with peer review

Russian children returned from Syria

Donald Trump Indirectly Exposes the Jewish Neocons Behind Joe Biden's Nuclear War

Key European NATO Bases in Reach of Russia's Oreshnik Hypersonic Missile

Supervolcano Alert in Europe: Phlegraean Fields Activity Sparks Scientists Attention (Mass Starvation)

France reacted to the words of a US senator on sanctions against allies

Trump nominates former Soros executive for Treasury chief

SCOTUS asked to review if Illinois can keep counting mail-in ballots 2 weeks after election day

The Real Reason Government Workers Are Panicking About ElonÂ’s New Tracking System

THEY DON'T CARE ANYMORE!

Young Americans Are Turning Off The TV

Taxpayer Funded Censorship: How Government Is Using Your Tax Dollars To Silence Your Voice

"Terminator" Robot Dog Now Equipped With Amphibious Capabilities

Trump Plans To Use Impoundment To Cut Spending - What Is It?

Mass job losses as major factory owner moves business overseas

Israel kills IDF soldiers in Lebanon to prevent their kidnap

46% of those deaths were occurring on the day of vaccination or within two days

In 2002 the US signed the Hague Invasion Act into law

MUSK is going after WOKE DISNEY!!!

Bondi: Zuckerberg Colluded with Fauci So "They're Not Immune Anymore" from 1st Amendment Lawsuits

Ukrainian eyewitnesses claim factory was annihilated to dust by Putin's superweapon

FBI Director Wray and DHS Secretary Mayorkas have just refused to testify before the Senate...

Government adds 50K jobs monthly for two years. Half were Biden's attempt to mask a market collapse with debt.

You’ve Never Seen THIS Side Of Donald Trump

President Donald Trump Nominates Former Florida Rep. Dr. Dave Weldon as CDC Director

Joe Rogan Tells Josh Brolin His Recent Bell’s Palsy Diagnosis Could Be Linked to mRNA Vaccine


National News
See other National News Articles

Title: (Dallas) Police Deny Excessive Force In Bloody Arrest (black cop, white girl)
Source: NBC5i.com
URL Source: http://www.nbc5i.com/news/6158812/detail.html
Published: Jan 16, 2006
Author: NBC5
Post Date: 2006-01-16 20:18:09 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: Excessive, (Dallas), Police
Views: 15192
Comments: 855

Police Deny Excessive Force In Bloody Arrest

Dramatic Pictures, Rumors Circulate Online

POSTED: 5:16 pm CST January 16, 2006
UPDATED: 6:11 pm CST January 16, 2006

DALLAS -- E-mails and pictures circulating the Internet tell the tale of a Dallas woman's bloody run-in with police after a roller-skating outing escalated into an arrest with excessive force, but officers and some witnesses Monday told a different story.

The incident happened early Saturday morning in Deep Ellum after police attempted to speak with Michelle Metzinger, 25, who, according to a police report, was intoxicated and weaving through traffic on roller skates.

NBC5i Video

Images: The Arrest & Other Slideshows

The pictures that stemmed from the events that followed are dramatic. They show an officer arresting Metzinger. Her face is covered in blood and there is a puddle of blood on the sidewalk.

"Very excessive. Uncalled for, you know. We're talking about a 250-pound guy and a 100-pound girl. It was just over the top," witness "D.C." said. "All I saw were her feet in the air and disappearing behind a cop car."

However, Dallas police and other witnesses tell a totally different story.

They said Metzinger was drunk and that she not only ignored officers who asked her to stop skating in the street, but also shouted profanities.

According to reports, an officer then tried to arrest Metzinger for public intoxication.

She resisted and attacked the officer, Lt. Rick Watson said.

"The officer attempted to turn her around, at which time the suspect then reached up and grabbed the officer's -- right part of his face -- trying to gouge the officer's eye," Watson said.

Despite the interest that the story has generated online and in the media, Metzinger said she would not comment on the incident until she had consulted with a lawyer.

Metzinger also had not filed a complaint report, so Dallas police were not conducting an internal investigation.


Poster Comment: Pictures taken by a witness clearly show the cops are LIARS!

When I worked concert security and someone got bloodied, it was always proper for us to "get our stories straight." Or, as Eddie Murphy said in that movie, "You were lying your asses off." That LT is a lying piece of shit and so is the black cop who LIED in his report.

I'll tell you one thing for certain, this bastard needs to be caught and given a damn hard ball-batting. And then a WHITE magic marker taken to his forehead and the words BAD COP inscribed thereon. What was done was brutal, inexcusable and unjustified.

http://www.helpmichelle.org/ (8 images)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-30) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#31. To: Jethro Tull (#26)

he mother's pulled down the pics!!!!

Hate us cause we're free.

"Our country is now geared to an arms economy bred in an artificially-induced psychosis of war hysteria and an incessant propaganda of fear." -- General Douglas MacArthur

tom007  posted on  2006-01-16   22:38:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Jethro Tull (#29)

Translate, BTP? WIll they be back up?

I think so. There is a daily bandwidth limit on many of these hosting sites. The first place he had them only lasted a few hours and he reposted them to the new venue. Now it seems that has run out also. Maybe after midnight or some time tomorrow they will be up again. Best thing is to copy the properties links and try to get them later on by linking to them directly and copying them to your HD.

My experience in working crowd control tells me this incident stinks to high heaven. I've seen it happen, it's sort of like a gang situation. And what is worse, these thugs are heavily armed.

The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic State itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism -- ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or any controlling private power. Franklin Delano Roosevelt

BTP Holdings  posted on  2006-01-16   22:40:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Dakmar (#22)

Cops made us stop stop racing ten-speed bikes in empty (abandoned) parking lot one time

Back about 15 years ago when I used to bicycle race two of us got pulled over for speeding in a residential speed zone (clocked 31 in a 25). I about lost my mind. True, the town we were in was pretty quiet, but no place is so quiet to warrant pulling two cyclists over for speeding. Cars in the area commonly go faster than that. The cop told us that we were doing well (but not any longer, standing still with heartbeat still at like 160 beats per minute), but that traffic laws applied to us too.

historian1944  posted on  2006-01-16   22:43:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Jethro Tull (#24)

If the colors of these two were reversed, Sharpton, Jackson and the other racial scumbags would light the town up. Yes, hang the porker.

Jethro Tull posted on 2006-01-16 21:47:06 ET

Can you imagine the uproar if it were a 240 lb white idiot cop and a 120 lb black fox on roller skates ........................

This beast need to be sent back to Brazzeville, Congo and be eaten by his bros. Sorry if I offened anyone. (Not really).

"Our country is now geared to an arms economy bred in an artificially-induced psychosis of war hysteria and an incessant propaganda of fear." -- General Douglas MacArthur

tom007  posted on  2006-01-16   22:43:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: historian1944, TommyTheMadArtist (#33)

that's one of those *you gotta be shitting me* stories.

christine  posted on  2006-01-16   22:47:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

All I see is some chick with her face bloodied. I'd be the first one to rail on this situation, but after reading the article, and seeing the pictures, it can go either way as far as I can tell.

I'm pretty sure she'll be making money off of this with her lawyer, and the cop will likely get a slap on the wrist if anything else happens. People should be less concerned about a black cop and a white idiot getting roughed up, and be more concerned that so many stupid people live in this world and wreck it for the rest of us.

What's that Mr. Nipples? You want me to ask the nice lady about her rack?.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2006-01-16   22:56:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Dakmar (#14)

the level of force used to subdue her appears to have been disproportionate.

I agree that does appear to be the case.

BTW: I have a better name for the software .... Microsoft Internet Exploder.
-- George Bonser

Neil McIver  posted on  2006-01-17   3:37:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: christine (#15)

looks to me like a head laceration that bled down her face. look at the amount of blood on the pavement.

That much blood doesn't come from mere scrapes.

BTW: I have a better name for the software .... Microsoft Internet Exploder.
-- George Bonser

Neil McIver  posted on  2006-01-17   3:43:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: All (#38)

The account given by the police was given by a "Lt. Rick Watson". But I wonder how likely it is that any loftey Lt. was out on patrol doing grunt work. Watson was more likely giving a pro-police version of the event rather than giving any kind of testimony of what HE saw happen, and if he didn't see it but speaks as though he did, then that's pretty incriminating as well. It's likely his version of the events is mere heresay, at best.

The girl is smart to consult a lawyer before making any public comments.

BTW: I have a better name for the software .... Microsoft Internet Exploder.
-- George Bonser

Neil McIver  posted on  2006-01-17   3:56:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

Maybe he was just getting some practice in on smacking white girls around, as he hasn't had the chance to get some licks in since his white girlfriend told him to get lost.

I wonder if this fat pig would have been so brave had the "subject" been a "banger"...

FormerLurker  posted on  2006-01-17   18:16:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Neil McIver (#39)

The account given by the police was given by a "Lt. Rick Watson". But I wonder how likely it is that any loftey Lt. was out on patrol doing grunt work. Watson was more likely giving a pro-police version of the event

“I can not comment on his state of mind,” said Lt. Rick Watson, a Dallas PD spokesman.

http://cbs11tv.com/lo cal/local_story_357073029.html

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-01-17   18:30:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: Jethro Tull (#41)

“I can not comment on his state of mind,” said Lt. Rick Watson, a Dallas PD spokesman.

Of course he can't. Why would he undercut one of his own people?

I'll tell ya, I've wrapped up guys, lean 'n' mean and 15 years younger than me, without giving them so much as a bruise. And this creep thumps this little girl so hard the blood is all over her face. And then his knee on her throat and her spine.

I hope these pics really hang him. He went way overboard and now it's time to pay the fiddler. The head hunters will have some fun looking into his record and sending him for new psych tests. ;0)

The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic State itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism -- ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or any controlling private power. Franklin Delano Roosevelt

BTP Holdings  posted on  2006-01-17   19:15:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: All (#42)

“I can not comment on his state of mind,” said Lt. Rick Watson, a Dallas PD spokesman.

Of course he can't. Why would he undercut one of his own people?

Oh, damn, that's from a different story. Oh, it looks as it this Lt. is just a mouthpiece they roll out to make sound bites. Yeah, well, he can bite me too. ;0)

The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic State itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism -- ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or any controlling private power. Franklin Delano Roosevelt

BTP Holdings  posted on  2006-01-17   19:17:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: ALL (#43)

I was there that night and saw the situation as well. They also took my info as a witness. I side with the police on this one, sorry.

The girl who got arrested was stoned out of her mind, argumentative and clearly off her nut. I had seen her and her friend earlier skating on Main Street. They were skating on the sidewalk at that time, and they fell down numerous times as well as nearly crashed drunkenly into lines of people waiting to get into clubs. She had been warned by the police on Main Street about her conduct before she was finally ticketed and arrested on Elm Street.

The "tiny girl" on skates had been told before not to skate in the street by the police, and as you said, was arrested and in the process of being ticketed for her conduct.

She was breaking the law.

Right now, the most common arrest in Deep Ellum is NOT assault, breaking and entering, or any other violent crime; it is PUBLIC INTOXICATION.

Michelle was a prime object lesson for this.

She was arrested, and not only failed to follow the instructions of the police, she was an ass about it. She was skating in the middle of a BUSY street, if she had been hit by a car, you would all be crawling up the butt of the police asking why they DIDN'T stop her from skating in the street. Or are you now advocating that people go roller skating in the middle of a busy street on a weekend night? Perhaps we should have a skating party on the 75 next Saturday?

As civillians, we need to respect the police. Even if we disagree with them. There are structures in place to dispute the actions of the police. The middle of Elm Street is NOT a place to do this. Also, you NEVER have a right to swing at a police officer, even if you are drunk. It is their job to protect us from harm, even when that harm is coming from our own actions (like a drunken girl who wants to rollerskate in the MIDDLE OF A BUSY STREET). You laughingly play it down as she gave "a little attitude" when in fact she was extremely disrespectful and got what she deserved. She was intoxicated, breaking the law and endangering her life and the lives of the drivers in the area, I really don't see how her weight comes into play there. She resisted arrest, and fell to the ground in the scuffle, so what? I would be FAR more concerned if the officer was NOT able to control her. So she got cut... big deal. She resisted arrest. She should not have done that.

The officer has been on the force for 12 years and has been written up 3 times. That is immaterial. It does not show a "pattern" of abusive behavior. Clearly each incident was addressed or he would not be serving on the force presently. It is hack journalism to try to paint the police officer as being in the wrong for doing his job because of 3 write ups over a 12 YEAR SPAN. She was drunk and under arrest, she should not have resisted. Had she not resisted, she would have been ticketed and relased... unharmed. It is amazing that you all are trying to portray this idiotic, offensive and drunken female as a victim...

The cops did their job, and did it well.

She got what she deserved. Perhaps you all will learn a little respect the police from this lesson.

Richard  posted on  2006-01-19   14:12:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: Richard (#44)

Hi Richard,

First, welcome to 4um. I'm sure your account will inspire a lot of commentary.

A few questions:

Did you see her "swing" at the police officer?

She wasn't simply "cut" as you suggest. Her face was badly scraped up and there is enough blood in the street to form a small puddle. How can you suggest the officer used sufficient minimal force, as police are supposed to be trained to do, with that kind of harm inflicted?

I for one don't defend reckless behavior that endangers others. But being drunk and/or stoned and argumentative does not justify overwhelming crushing force. Even if she did take a swing at the officer, it does not justify scraping her face against the road and cutting her so badly.

BTW: I have a better name for the software .... Microsoft Internet Exploder.
-- George Bonser

Neil McIver  posted on  2006-01-19   14:31:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: Richard (#44)

The cops did their job, and did it well.

She got what she deserved. Perhaps you all will learn a little respect the police from this lesson.

You were doing pretty good until the last couple of lines. Saying that "she got what she deserved" and "perhaps you all will learn a little respect" is where you went over the high side. I remember my stepfather and the discussions we had concerning things like liberty and privacy, and his big answer was always "if you're not doing anything wrong, you don't have anything to worry about". Trying to explain why that was wrong to him was like trying to explain calculus to a chimpanzee, he simply had no facility to be able to understand the concept, it was utterly beyond him, and sadly that proved true about all of his cop friends as well.

Some people understand liberty, most people don't. Those who spout sayings like "she got what she deserved" and "perhaps you will learn a little respect" fall into the camp of those who don't.

Gold and silver are real money, paper is but a promise.

Elliott Jackalope  posted on  2006-01-19   15:08:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: Neil McIver (#45)

"Even if she did take a swing at the officer, it does not justify scraping her face against the road and cutting her so badly."

Neil,

Yes, I did see her swing at the officer.

She was cut on the face, and facial lacerations bleed a lot. She was not severly harmed.

The bottom line is simple: If she had not resisted, she would not have been harmed, nor taken into custody. She would have been cited and released.

If you are trying to say that it is "ok" for her to take a swing at a police officer, then you lose from the start.

In whose world is it "ok" to swing on the people who are here to protect us from the kinds of people who have such disregard for our society that they would swing on the police?

She got what she deserved.

Richard  posted on  2006-01-19   15:14:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: Richard (#44)

As civillians, we need to respect the police.

Hi Richard, and welcome. About the above comment, no, we don't have to respect the police. I don't and I was a member for years. Today they've become nothing more that revenue collectors for local government - heavy handed ones at that. What they did to this girl is the real crime, imo. Having spent nearly 15 years on the NYPD, beginning in the late 60's, I saw lots of serious criminal activity. Roller skating, even under the influence, isn't one of them. I can think of countless ways a 250 pound, trained police officer could have handled this, but this guy seemingly chose the least civilian friendly method. I believe a Dallas PD spokesman (Watson) was interviewed for the article? Well, let the spin begin. This goof is going to need spin. Those pictures paint an ugly picture. If this were my daughter that cop would have one pissed off ex cop all over his butt. Lets see how this all shakes out. At the very least the guy should be fired, sued and possibly jailed.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-01-19   15:15:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Elliott Jackalope (#46)

Elliot,

She did get what she deserved, and you all are showing a great amount of disrespect for the police.

Your stepfather was right, if you are not doing anything wrong, then you don't have anything to worry about.

Michelle WAS doing things wrong, MANY things.

She was intoxicated in public. She was rollerskating in the middle of a busy street. She was NOT listening respectfully to the police when they tried to peacefully resolve the matter. She was resisting arrest.

So...

The cops did their job, and they did it well.

If you don't respect the police, then you don't respect society, Elliot.

The police are put in place by society to keep us safe from people like Michelle.

If I had been driving down Elm and hit her because she was rollerskating in the street because the police saw her and did nothing, you would be screaming at the police for their inaction.

Can't have it both ways, Elliot. The police did their job, they stopped someone who was breaking the law.

She got what she deserved and perhaps will learn NOT to resist arrest next time.

Richard  posted on  2006-01-19   15:21:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: Richard (#49)

We are going to have to agree to disagree, Richard. I don't respect the police, not any longer, not when they say things like "ignorance of the law is no excuse" but then cannot even tell me how many laws there are that I have no right to be ignorant of. The line is drawn, you are on one side and I am on the other. At least you are honorable enough to have a clear position and the will to defend it, but I will never agree with those who believe that "if you are doing nothing wrong, then you have nothing to worry about".

Gold and silver are real money, paper is but a promise.

Elliott Jackalope  posted on  2006-01-19   15:24:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: Jethro Tull (#48)

Hi Jethro,

First off, I appreciate and acknowledge your service to this country.

That said, in this instance, you were not present at the scene, I was.

The girl was rollerskating in the middle of a busy street and the police asked her nicely to stop. She did not. Then, when they were going to give her a ticket for her actions, she got violent.

The police begain with a civillain friendly method - Michelle chose to take Door #2.

Are you suggesting, as a 15 year vet of the NYPD, that if a woman took a swing at you that you would simply laugh it off and release her?

I don't think so.

The officer in question subdued his attacker, plain and simple.

He should not be fired, sued nor jailed for his actions.

You were not there, Jethro, I was.

Richard  posted on  2006-01-19   15:26:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: Richard (#49)

The police are put in place by society to keep us safe from people like Michelle.

I'd feel safer with Michelle keeping me safe from your cop

Sonovademocrat  posted on  2006-01-19   15:26:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: Jethro Tull, Richard, Neil McIver (#48)

we don't have to respect the police

I agree with you JT.

I'm sure there's a lot of fine police fellows, just as there are in any profession. even among drug smugglers there's some fine people. but the police in this country have done so many horrible things. How can we respect them any more!

As far as Richard's commentary - I am skeptical of it. an eye-witness - how convenient. there's no excuse for drawing all that blood from someone, especially a woman.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-01-19   15:27:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: Elliott Jackalope (#50)

Elliot,

I am not sure how your discussion of the concept "if you are doing nothing wrong, then you have nothing to worry about" comes into play in this matter.

What we have here is a woman who was first told by the police nicely that her actions were unlawful and asked to stop.

When she continued to do the actions that she was just TOLD were unlawful, she was arrested and given a ticket for her actions.

She was NOT doing nothing wrong. She was KNOWINGLY doing wrong.

Then, while under arrest, she assaulted the police officer.

Now, I acknowledge that there are many laws and we don't know them all... but come on... we ALL know that you can't take a swing at a police officer when you are under arrest.

How are you saying that Michelle was ignorant of the law? She was warned first, so she was NOT ignorant of the law.

If she had obeyed the law at that point, none of this would have happened.

Richard  posted on  2006-01-19   15:30:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Richard (#51)

First off, I appreciate and acknowledge your service to this country.

LOL - Thanks, but I didn't serve the country. For me it was the NYPD or Vietnam. I chose the paycheck, over an illegal war.

If she took a swing at me, I'd have grabbed her arm and cuffed her. No takedown, complete with a knee in the back, was necessary. I realize you were there, and I think your testimony will be invaluable in the civil portion of this matter. Just repeat exactly what you have in this post. It reeks of excessive force.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-01-19   15:34:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Red Jones (#53)

Red,

Wow, you are quite the conspiracy theorist to presume that I am lying about being an eye-witness to this idiotic woman's behavior.

What would I possibly stand to gain? The police have my information and I told them I would be happy to testify if needed. Perhaps you think they are paying me? Sorry... I live in Deep Ellum and am sick to death of the drunken idiots that think that "the man" is there to keep them down. The police are there to protect the law abiding citizens from the rest of you. Michelle was drunk and skating in the middle of the street. She was told not to skate in the street and chose to do so anyway.

You are upset because the police arrested a woman? How incredibly sexist of you. Would you have felt better if she had successfully managed to gouge out the officers eye as she was trying to do? Then would his actions be justified?

Sorry, Red, but you really don't have much ground to stand on here if you are trying to introduce the sex of the criminal as justification for her actions.

Richard  posted on  2006-01-19   15:36:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: Red Jones (#53)

When we stop respecting them Red, they might start behaving. Same goes for most forms of government that I can think of. None are worthy of my respect.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-01-19   15:37:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: Richard (#54)

Here's the problem: It simply doesn't matter what the circumstances were leading up to this incident, the result was a 250 lb black officer beating a 100 lb white woman bloody. Now, imagine if this situation were turned around, and it was a 250 lb white officer beating a 100 lb black woman bloody.

When rule of law becomes rule of force, facts cease to matter and appearances become everything. Yes, it's unfair, but it is also the way things are. Where are the victims of this woman's actions? Is there a single person who was harmed by what she was doing? I don't see anyone else lying broken and bloodied by her actions, but I see a lot of blood on the ground from what the cop did to her. My stepfather used to practice his "take-down" moves they taught him at the CHP academy on me, and I know for a fact that cops have a lot of ways to deal with people that don't involve cracking their heads open. This woman stupidly chose to take a drunken swing at a cop, for that she should be prosecuted in a court of law. But this officer had a lot of different ways to deal with the situation, he chose a method that spilled a fair amount of blood, and that's going to cause problems.

Gold and silver are real money, paper is but a promise.

Elliott Jackalope  posted on  2006-01-19   15:37:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: Jethro Tull (#55)

Jethro,

Yes, in fact, you DID serve your country by serving the city of New York.

Perhaps you don't see the bigger picture, but in any event, your work is appreciated.

So you would have grabber her arm and cuffed her? Simple as that, eh? And it always goes smoothly, because the criminal does not continue to resist?

LOL

This was not a "little girl" but a professional rollerderby skater.

She knew how to fight and chose to do so at her own peril.

She lost.

As she should.

I will be happy to testify to her illegal and violent behavior in court if asked to do so.

Richard  posted on  2006-01-19   15:39:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: Elliott Jackalope (#58)

Elliot.

Here is where you lose all credibility.

Race does not enter into this matter at all. It is offensive of you to even suggest that they do.

Also, to assert that the events preceeding her arrest do not factor into things is ridiculous.

Furthermore, she was not "BEATEN" as you try to portray, she was simply taken to the ground and handcuffed. The cut she got came because she was resisting arrest (which, by the by, is a CRIME) and was taken to the ground.

And FINALLY "Where are the victims of this woman's actions? Is there a single person who was harmed by what she was doing?"

SO... you assert that if NO ONE IS HARMED THERE IS NO CRIME?

Ok, so when I go to rob a bank, and shove a gun in the face of the teller, but DON'T pull the trigger because she gives me the money...

ACCORDING TO YOU I HAVE NOT COMMITTED A CRIME BECAUSE NO ONE WAS HURT???

What a frightening world you live in, Elliot.

"This woman stupidly chose to take a drunken swing at a cop, for that she should be prosecuted in a court of law. But this officer had a lot of different ways to deal with the situation, he chose a method that spilled a fair amount of blood, and that's going to cause problems. "

YES, this woman stupidly chose to RESIST ARREST and ASSAULT A POLICE OFFICER. The officer did his job by subding the violent offender.

He did have lots of different ways to do this. He could have maced her. He could have used his baton on her. He could have used his tazer. He could have shot her.

BUT... he didn't, because those methods were excessive given the circumstances.

He took her to the ground and handcuffed her.

He did not beat her, he simply subdued her.

Richard  posted on  2006-01-19   15:48:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: Jethro Tull (#57)

Jethro,

Perhaps you should consider leaving the country if you are not willing to respect the laws of this one.

Richard  posted on  2006-01-19   15:50:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: Richard (#60)

SO... you assert that if NO ONE IS HARMED THERE IS NO CRIME?

Ok, so when I go to rob a bank, and shove a gun in the face of the teller, but DON'T pull the trigger because she gives me the money...

ACCORDING TO YOU I HAVE NOT COMMITTED A CRIME BECAUSE NO ONE WAS HURT???

What a frightening world you live in, Elliot.

That argument is sophomoric beyond belief. You're a good little boot-licker, I'll give you that much...

Gold and silver are real money, paper is but a promise.

Elliott Jackalope  posted on  2006-01-19   15:51:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: Richard (#59)

Yes, in fact, you DID serve your country by serving the city of New York.

Richard, trust me, I didn't. I'm not entirely sure if the statute of limitations are expired on.....oh, never mind....(g)

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-01-19   15:51:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: Elliott Jackalope (#62)

Elliot,

You are saying that because she had no visible victim, because no one got hurt as a result of her actions then she should not have been arrested.

Fine.

Then I should be able to go 140 down the middle of downtown Dallas, or in a school zone in the afternoon, provided I don't actually HIT anyone with my car, correct?

It just does not work that way.

You don't have to have a visible "victim" to be breaking the law.

What you are suggesting is beyond idiotic and bordering on the surreal, Elliot.

Richard  posted on  2006-01-19   15:55:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: Richard, Jethro Tull (#61)

Jethro,

Perhaps you should consider leaving the country if you are not willing to respect the laws of this one.

Yeah, JT, you hate America. Where have we heard this tripe before? ROTFLOL!

The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic State itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism -- ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or any controlling private power. Franklin Delano Roosevelt

BTP Holdings  posted on  2006-01-19   15:58:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: BTP Holdings (#65)

I never suggest that he hated America.

I was simply offering him an alternative to living in a country that he does not hold in high esteem.

You read far too much into things, BTP

Richard  posted on  2006-01-19   16:00:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: Richard (#64)

Then I should be able to go 140 down the middle of downtown Dallas, or in a school zone in the afternoon, provided I don't actually HIT anyone with my car, correct?

Richard, you are being sophomoric again. ;0)

The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic State itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism -- ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or any controlling private power. Franklin Delano Roosevelt

BTP Holdings  posted on  2006-01-19   16:01:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: Richard (#66)

You read far too much into things, BTP

No, I'm not.

Unfortunately, I have to step out for a few hours. I'll expand on this later if you will be around.

The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic State itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism -- ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or any controlling private power. Franklin Delano Roosevelt

BTP Holdings  posted on  2006-01-19   16:02:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: BTP Holdings (#67)

BTP

I am simply dumbing down my game to the level of my comrade....

He suggested that if there is no visible victim, then there is no crime.

That opens the door to a lot of things.

Richard  posted on  2006-01-19   16:03:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: Richard (#69)

He suggested that if there is no visible victim, then there is no crime.

That opens the door to a lot of things.

Suggesting that there are crimes where there are no visible victims opens the door to a whole lot of things as well, Richard.

Gold and silver are real money, paper is but a promise.

Elliott Jackalope  posted on  2006-01-19   16:05:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (71 - 855) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]