[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
(s)Elections See other (s)Elections Articles Title: John McCain is no war hero – he has covered up POW’s left behind in Vietnam for years (INTELLIHUB) In the last week there has been a tremendous amount of mainstream media coverage over comments made by Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump that Senator and Vietnam vet John McCain is not a war hero. While one can endlessly debate whether or not Trump should have made the comment, the fact remains that John McCain has a long history of covering up and suppressing evidence of left behind POWs in Vietnam. In 2008, award-winning career journalist Sydney Schanberg published a detailed and convincing account that proved that Senator McCain had quietly pushed into federal law a set of prohibitions that keep the most revealing information about these men buried as classified documents. The article, as well as subsequent reports by Schanberg that detailed how the mainstream press had purposefully covered up the story, should be read by all Americans. Key portions of the article are quoted below: By Sydney Schanberg John McCain, who has risen to political prominence on his image as a Vietnam POW war hero, has, inexplicably, worked very hard to hide from the public stunning information about American prisoners in Vietnam who, unlike him, didnt return home. Throughout his Senate career, McCain has quietly sponsored and pushed into federal law a set of prohibitions that keep the most revealing information about these men buried as classified documents. Thus the war hero who people would logically imagine as a determined crusader for the interests of POWs and their families became instead the strange champion of hiding the evidence and closing the books. [
] McCains Role An early and critical McCain secrecy move involved 1990 legislation that started in the House of Representatives. A brief and simple document, it was called the Truth Bill and would have compelled complete transparency about prisoners and missing men. Its core sentence reads: [The] head of each department or agency which holds or receives any records and information, including live-sighting reports, which have been correlated or possibly correlated to United States personnel listed as prisoner of war or missing in action from World War II, the Korean conflict and the Vietnam conflict, shall make available to the public all such records held or received by that department or agency. Bitterly opposed by the Pentagon (and thus McCain), the bill went nowhere. Reintroduced the following year, it again disappeared. But a few months later, a new measure, known as the McCain Bill,suddenly appeared. By creating a bureaucratic maze from which only a fraction of the documents could emergeonly records that revealed no POW secretsit turned the Truth Bill on its head. The McCain bill became law in 1991 and remains so today. So crushing to transparency are its provisions that it actually spells out for the Pentagon and other agencies several rationales, scenarios, and justifications for not releasing any information at alleven about prisoners discovered alive in captivity. Later that year, the Senate Select Committee was created, where Kerry and McCain ultimately worked together to bury evidence. McCain was also instrumental in amending the Missing Service Personnel Act, which had been strengthened in 1995 by POW advocates to include criminal penalties, saying, Any government official who knowingly and willfully withholds from the file of a missing person any information relating to the disappearance or whereabouts and status of a missing person shall be fined as provided in Title 18 or imprisoned not more than one year or both. A year later, in a closed House-Senate conference on an unrelated military bill, McCain, at the behest of the Pentagon, attached a crippling amendment to the act, stripping out its only enforcement teeth, the criminal penalties, and reducing the obligations of commanders in the field to speedily search for missing men and to report the incidents to the Pentagon. About the relaxation of POW/MIA obligations on commanders in the field, a public McCain memo said, This transfers the bureaucracy involved out of the [battle] field to Washington. He wrote that the original legislation, if left intact, would accomplish nothing but create new jobs for lawyers and turn military commanders into clerks. McCain argued that keeping the criminal penalties would have made it impossible for the Pentagon to find staffers willing to work on POW/MIA matters. Thats an odd argument to make. Were staffers only willing to work if they were allowed to conceal POW records? By eviscerating the law, McCain gave his stamp of approval to the government policy of debunking the existence of live POWs. McCain has insisted again and again that all the evidencedocuments, witnesses, satellite photos, two Pentagon chiefs sworn testimony, aborted rescue missions, ransom offers apparently scornedhas been woven together by unscrupulous deceivers to create an insidious and unpatriotic myth. He calls it the bizarre rantings of the MIA hobbyists. He has regularly vilified those who keep trying to pry out classified documents as hoaxers, charlatans, conspiracy theorists, and dime-store Rambos. Read the entire article here [
] In another article written by Schanberg he details how almost the entire mainstream media has knowingly covered up the fact that prisoners of war were left behind in Vietnam. Remember this written in 2010, the press has covered this up for another five years and are now ignoring it while attacking Trump for his controversial comments. In recent years, I have offered my POW stories to a long list of editors of leading newspapers, magazines, and significant websites that do original reporting. And when they decline my offerings, I have urged them to do their own POW investigation with their own staff under their own supervision. The list of these news organizations includes the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, New York magazine, The Atlantic, The New Yorker, Harpers, Rolling Stone, Mother Jones, Vanity Fair, Salon, Slate, Talking Points Memo, ProPublica, Politico, and others. To my knowledge, none have attempted or produced a piece. Their explanations for avoiding the story have never rung true. I have chosen not to use the names of the editors or the texts of their rejection messages, which could embarrass some of them. This is not a personal difference, but a professional one. I have decided instead to summarize their comments. Some said they didnt have enough staff to do the story. Others said the story was oldeven though we have never found out what happened to the missing prisoners. I sensed often that these news people were afraidthat the story was too hot for them to handle because it could cause too many repercussions. Arent journalists supposed to look into difficult stories and the wrongdoings of important people? Arent they also supposed to expect blowback? I asked these editors about the mountain of hard evidence attesting to the existence of abandoned men. In particular, I asked about the witness evidence, the 1,600 firsthand live sightings of American prisoners after the war. Did these journalists believe that every last one of the 1,600 witnesses was lying or mistaken? Many of these Vietnamese witnesses were interrogated by U.S. intelligence officers. Many were given lie-detector tests. They passed. The interrogators reports graded the bulk of the witnesses credible. A few of the journalists I have nudged to go after the story acknowledged that their paper or magazine or TV network had blind spots. But again and again, the vast majority have hemmed and hawed and said they had doubts about the POW information. Isnt doing the reporting the best way to confirm or dispel doubts? I would run through the long gamut of known intelligenceofficial radio intercepts of prisoners being moved to and from labor camps in Laos, satellite photos, conversations overheard by Secret Service agents inside the White House, ransom offers from Hanoi through third parties, sworn public testimony by three U.S. defense secretaries who served during the Vietnam era that men were left behind. The press wasnt and isnt interested. And the evidence is still in plain sight. The evidence that POWs were left behind in both Vietnam and Cambodia is by no means limited to one investigative report. Dozens of books and research papers have been written on the topic as well as numerous documentaries including a mostly unknown video report released in the late 1980s. The documentary, We Can Keep You Forever is a must see despite its lower quality video. So as the mainstream press continues to endlessly debate Trumps comments, it is important to remember that John McCain is no hero. In fact, evidence shows him to be the exact opposite. Additional Sources How I met the real John McCain Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
[Register]
|