[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Israeli Strikes On Iran Ongoing Through Friday As Death Toll Surpasses 100

From Torah to trauma: A Satanic child abuse scandal blows up in Israel

MAGA Influencer Calls to Deploy Palantir on LA Streets

Egypt detains nearly 200 foreigners who flew in to join Gaza march

FLASHBACK - How Mayor Daley dealt with looters!

Scammers Use AI Bots to Impersonate Students, Stealing Millions in Financial Aid

Bilderberg 2025 begins. Global elites gather in Stockholm. AI, migration, and national security dominate

I Wish We All Could Leave California (Beach Boys Parody)

Exclusive: US slams UN conference on Israel-Palestinian issue, warns of consequences

Brilliant & Critical Insight!

Legal Immigrants Shift to GOP on Immigration, Shows 40-Point Swing from Democrats

American fuel tankers were spotted REFUELING ISRAELI JETS over Syria.

Does Western Civilization Have Enough Belief to Continue to Exist?

Trump CLEARLY KNEW of Israel's Plan To STRIKE IRAN

Trump Warns 'Even More Brutal' Attacks Coming Without Nuclear Deal

10 Supplements That Fight Inflammation

CNN Security Analyst Defends Agents Who Removed Senator Padilla From Kristi Noem Presser

Florida sheriff warns rioters: 'We will kill you graveyard dead'

DEMOCRATS' NIGHTMARE: Viral Video Shows Why They LOST The Election!

Israeli strikes on Iran. Five Waves. Might last 2 weeks?

Images Emerge Of Tehran Destruction After Major Israeli 'Preemptive Attack'

This Is What Happens Next After Israel Bombs Iran’s Nuclear Facilities…

Smartmatic accused of deleting evidence in 27 Billion Fox News Defamation Case Court Docs

White House Fears Iranian Response To An Attack Could Overwhelm Israel's Air Defenses

The Money and Power Behind the Riots: This is No Grass-Roots Movement

D.C. Judge Sides With Trump In Lawsuit Over Control Of Corrupt Foreign Aid Agency

Israel Iran Double Standard

Soros Funneled $8.3M into Leftist Group Trying to Turn Lone Star State Blue

California Democrats Under Fire for Buying Bricks During Protests

ICE Launches Campaign to Crack Down on Marriage Fraud Could Ilhan Omar Finally Face Justice?


Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: Is Your Smart TV a Little Too Smart?
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.uncommonwisdomdaily.com/ ... rt-tv-a-little-too-smart-21299
Published: Aug 4, 2015
Author: Brad Hoppmann
Post Date: 2015-08-06 18:19:31 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 269
Comments: 1

Is Your Smart TV a Little Too Smart?

Posted on August 4, 2015 by Brad Hoppmann

The great George Orwell’s dystopian masterpiece “1984” proves prescient far too frequently these days.

From Edward Snowden’s NSA spying revelations, to the “Doublespeak” of the “Patriot Act,” to hacks of our personal data from China — it certainly seems as if Big Brother is watching us all.

Yet did you ever think your TV would be spying on you?

Orwell predicted just that, via a device he called the “telescreen.”

Image credit: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios

Here’s the chilling, fear-engendering quote directly from the seminal anti-statist novel:

It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away.

A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of muttering to yourself — anything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide.

The telescreen wasn’t just for you to watch. It was watching you — all the time.

And, if you have a smart TV, you’re pretty close to having a real-life telescreen in your home.

***

Earlier this year, online news site The Daily Beast broke a story about a clause in South Korean-firm Samsung’s (SSNLF) Internet-connected smart TV privacy policy that we should probably be very afraid of.

Here’s how the Samsung policy reads:

Please be aware that if your spoken words include personal or other sensitive information, that information will be among the data captured and transmitted to a third party.

Hmmm.

Basically, Samsung is telling you it can, and will, harvest any of the conversations picked up over the telescreen — oh, I mean, the smart TV — and send them to a third party.

The third party here is a company called Nuance Communications (NUAN), the speech-recognition firm that designed the technology in Apple’s (AAPL) Siri function.

Now, if all of this comes as a surprise to you, it really shouldn’t.

In today’s constantly connected world of Facebook (FB), Twitter (TWTR), smart TVs, smartphones, Internet webcams, etc., just about everyone is under some sort of surveillance nearly all of the time.

The Samsung spying is particularly troublesome, however. Not just because it reminds us of the horrors of “1984,” but because most of us want to feel like we are free to speak our minds inside our own homes without prying eyes sending our data out into “the cloud.”

The rash of recent high-profile corporate and government hacks, which have stolen personal data from millions of Americans, proves that no data is ever really safe.

Knowing how vulnerable we all are to having our private lives revealed, is it any wonder why the Samsung smart TV spying is troubling to so many?

***

To combat what could be the misuse of the Samsung smart TV information collection, California Assemblyman Mike Gatto (D-Los Angeles) authored AB1116.

The bill would essentially force smart TV makers to give customers the ability to opt out of features that could spy on their private conversations.

Here’s the language straight from AB1116:

This bill would prohibit the manufacturer of a connected television and specified third parties from using or selling for an advertising purpose sounds that were collected by a connected television for the purpose of improving the function, operation, or features of the television.

The bill actually goes even further, and much to my welcomed surprise, it actually addresses prying government eyes, too:

This bill would also prohibit a person from compelling another who offers features that allow for the collection and recording of spoken words through a connected television to build in specific features that allow an investigative or law enforcement officer to monitor communications through that feature, and would limit the liability of manufacturers of connected televisions, as specified.

The latest on AB1116 is that as of July 16, the bill is currently being reread and amended in the California State Senate.

While this bill does have a narrow focus on smart TVs, it’s easy to extrapolate out and speculate about laws governing other Internet-enabled devices with recording and voice-recognition features.

The aforementioned smartphones being the most-logical next target; but then there are also devices such as game consoles, smart watches, smart appliances and our “connected cars.”

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

"1984" in spades.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

I don't know if they are still available, but several months back, I bought a stupid TV from Amazon. At that time, the Smart TVs were clearly labeled as such.

I've not checked it lately as to the labeling.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2015-08-06   19:06:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]