[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Dead Constitution See other Dead Constitution Articles Title: The Rise Of The Inhumanes Americas descent into totalitarian violence is accelerating. Like the Bush regime, the Obama regime has a penchant for rewarding Justice (sic) Department officials who trample all over the US Constitution. Last year Americas First Black President nominated David Barron to be a judge on the First US Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston. Barron is responsible for the Justice (sic) Department memo that gave the legal OK for Obama to murder a US citizen with a missile fired from a drone. The execution took place without charges presented to a court, trial, and conviction. The target was a religious man whose sermons were believed by the paranoid Obama regime to encourage jihadism. Apparently, it never occurred to Obama or the Justice (sic) Department that Washingtons mass murder and displacement of millions of Muslims in seven countries was all that was needed to encourage jihadism. Sermons would be redundant and would comprise little else but moral outrage after years of mass murder by Washington in pursuit of hegemony in the Middle East. Barrons confirmation ran into opposition from some Republicans, some Democrats, and the American Civil Liberties Union, but the US Senate confirmed Barron by a vote of 53-45 in May 2014. Just think, you could be judged in freedom and democracy America by a fiend who legalized extra-judicial murder. While awaiting his reward, Barron had a post on the faculty of the Harvard Law School, which tells you all you need to know about law schools. His wife ran for governor of Massachusetts. Elites are busy at work replacing law with power. America now has as an appeals court judge, no doubt being groomed for the Supreme Court, who established the precedent in US law that, the Constitution not withstanding, American citizens can be executed without a trial. Did law school faculties object? Not Georgetown law professor David Cole, who enthusiastically endorsed the new legal principle of execution without trial. Professor Cole put himself on the DOJs list of possible federal judicial appointees by declaring his support for Barron, whom he described as thoughtful, considerate, open-minded, and brilliant. Once a country descends into evil, it doesnt emerge. The precedent for Obamas appointment of Barron was George W. Bushs appointment of Jay Scott Bybee to the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Bybee was John Yoos Justice (sic) Department colleague who co-authored the legal memos justifying torture despite US federal statutory law and international law prohibiting torture. Everyone knew that torture was illegal, including those practicing it, but these two fiends provided a legal pass for the practitioners of torture. Not even Pinochet in Chile went this far. Bybee and Yoo got rid of torture by calling it enhanced interrogation techniques. As Wikipedia reports, these techniques are considered to be torture by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, medical experts who treat torture victims, intelligence officials, Americas allies, and even by the Justice (sic) Department. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jay_Bybee Others who objected to the pass given to torture by Bybee and Yoo were Secretary of State Colin Powell, US Navy General Counsel Alberto Mora, and even Philip Zelikow, who orchestrated the 9/11 Commission coverup for the Bush regime. After five years of foot-dragging, the Justice (sic) Departments Office of Professional Responsibility concluded that Bybee and his deputy John Yoo committed professional misconduct by providing legal advice that was in violation of international and federal laws. The DOJs office of Professional Responsibility recommended that Bybee and Yoo be referred to the bar associations of the states where they were licensed for further disciplinary action and possible disbarment. But Bybee and Yoo were saved by a regime-compliant Justice (sic) Department official, David Margolis, who concluded that Bybee and Yoo had used poor judgement but had not provided wrong legal advice. So, today, instead of being disbarred, Bybee sits on a federal court just below the Supreme Court. John Yoo teaches constitutional law at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, Boalt Hall. Try to imagine what has happened to America when Harvard and Berkeley law professors create legal justifications for torture and extra-judicial murder, and when US presidents engage in these heinous crimes. Clearly America is exceptional in its immorality, lack of human compassion, and disrespect for law and its founding document. Hitler and Stalin would be astonished at the ease with which totalitarianism has marched through American institutions. Now we have a West Point professor of law teaching the US military justifications for murdering American critics of war and the police state. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/aug/29/west-point- professor-target-legal-critics-war-on-terror Also here: www.informationcle aringhouse.info/article42758.htm The professors article is here: warisacrime.org/sites/aft...iles/westpointfascism.pdf William C. Bradford, the professor teaching our future military officers to regard moral Americans as threats to national security, blames Walter Cronkite for loosing the Tet Offensive in the Vietnam War by reporting the offensive as an American defeat. Tet was an American defeat in the sense that the offensive proved that the defeated enemy was capable of a massive offensive against US forces. The offensive succeeded in the sense that it demonstrated to Americans that the war was far from over. The implication of Bradfords argument is that Cronkite should have been killed for his broadcasts that added to the doubts about American success. The professor claims to have a list of 40 people who tell the truth who must be exterminated, or our country is lost. Here we have the full confession that Washingtons agenda cannot survive truth. I am unaware of any report that the professor has been censored or fired for his disrespect for the constitutionally protected right of freedom of expression. However, I have seen reports of professors destroyed because they criticized Israels war crimes, or used a word or term prohibited by political correctness, or were insufficiently appreciative of the privileges of preferred minorities. What this tells us is that morality is sidetracked into self-serving agendas while evil overwhelms the morality of society. Welcome to America today. It is a land in which facts have been redefined as enemy propaganda, a land in which legally protected whistleblowers are redefined as fifth columns or foreign agents subject to extermination, a land in which America is immune from criticism and all crimes are blamed on those whom Washington intends to rule. Barron, Bybee, Yoo, and Bradford are members of a new speciesthe Inhumanesthat has risen from the poisonous American environment of arrogance, hubris, and paranoia. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: Ada (#0)
(Edited)
William C. Bradford, the professor teaching our future military officers to regard moral Americans as threats to national security, blames Walter Cronkite for loosing the Tet Offensive in the Vietnam War by reporting the offensive as an American defeat. Tet was an American defeat in the sense that the offensive proved that the defeated enemy was capable of a massive offensive against US forces. The offensive succeeded in the sense that it demonstrated to Americans that the war was far from over. The implication of Bradfords argument is that Cronkite should have been killed for his broadcasts that added to the doubts about American success. The professor claims to have a list of 40 people who tell the truth who must be exterminated, or our country is lost. Activated theguardian.com link in brackets that was broken. I read that about Walter Cronkite and the Tet Offensive of the Vietnam War many years ago. Am fairly certain that it wasn't claimed to have been written by some warmonger of West Point professorship-status named William C. Bradford but a Military Veteran (and maybe more than just one) speaking as having been there at the time. Jane Fonda and her husband were also mentioned, iirc, in the context of Communist ideological infiltration of the media, overt and covert celebrity Commies spinning defeatism-demoralization and so on. There is much documented of Communist media tactics in that period and others. It is still a terrible problem here. I generally agree with PCR but see no good purpose in downplaying that. The pdf file of Bradford's "discourse" is 95 pages long and Walter Cronkite is only mentioned once -- in the last sentence of paragraph 2 on page 8. Surely there is much else PCR could have better focused on than shielding Cronkite from criticism. I didn't get the impression that Bradford would have wanted him put on a kill list for his broadcasts and couldn't even find any reference to an extermination list of 40 people in the pdf doc. Not saying it might not be there somewhere but I didn't find it, if it is, and I couldn't find a link to it at PCR's page either. That's something he should have been more locationally specific about, imo, instead of painting Cronkite as groundlessly besmirched, like he's a PR agent for him or something.
#2. To: GreyLmist (#1)
I think Bradford has been fired.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
[Register]
|