[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists

Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out

It’s REALLY Happening! The Australian Continent Is Drifting Towards Asia

Broken Germany Discovers BRUTAL Reality

Nuclear War, Trump's New $500 dollar note: Armstrong says gold is going much higher

Scientists unlock 30-year mystery: Rare micronutrient holds key to brain health and cancer defense

City of Fort Wayne proposing changes to food, alcohol requirements for Riverfront Liquor Licenses

Cash Jordan: Migrant MOB BLOCKS Whitehouse… Demands ‘11 Million Illegals’ Stay

Not much going on that I can find today

In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths

These Are The Best And Worst Countries For Work (US Last Place)-Life Balance

These Are The World's Most Powerful Cars

Doctor: Trump has 6 to 8 Months TO LIVE?!

Whatever Happened to Robert E. Lee's 7 Children

Is the Wailing Wall Actually a Roman Fort?

Israelis Persecute Americans

Israelis SHOCKED The World Hates Them

Ghost Dancers and Democracy: Tucker Carlson

Amalek (Enemies of Israel) 100,000 Views on Bitchute

ICE agents pull screaming illegal immigrant influencer from car after resisting arrest

Aaron Lewis on Being Blacklisted & Why Record Labels Promote Terrible Music

Connecticut Democratic Party Holds Presser To Cry About Libs of TikTok

Trump wants concealed carry in DC.

Chinese 108m Steel Bridge Collapses in 3s, 16 Workers Fall 130m into Yellow River

COVID-19 mRNA-Induced TURBO CANCERS.

Think Tank Urges Dems To Drop These 45 Terms That Turn Off Normies

Man attempts to carjack a New Yorker

Test post re: IRS

How Managers Are Using AI To Hire And Fire People

Israel's Biggest US Donor Now Owns CBS


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Two people just played 20 questions by reading each other’s thoughts
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.sciencealert.com/two-hum ... -the-other-person-is-thinking/
Published: Sep 24, 2015
Author: FIONA MACDONALD
Post Date: 2015-09-24 02:05:20 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 926
Comments: 29

ScienceAlert...

Scientists in the US have linked up the brains of participants almost 1.5 km apart, allowing them to play a 20 questions-style game using nothing but their thoughts.

This is the first experiment to demonstrate that two brains can be linked up directly to allow one person to accurately guess what's on the other's mind, and it's a pretty huge deal.

The experiment involved a question-and-answer game, but instead of asking each other questions in person, the participants were put in separate buildings and were not allowed to talk to each other or communicate using anything but thoughts transmitted over the Internet.

Using this system, participants were able to correctly guess the object that their partner was thinking of 72 percent of the time.

"This is the most complex brain-to-brain experiment, I think, that's been done to date in humans," lead researcher Andrea Stocco from the University of Washington said in a press release. "It uses conscious experiences through signals that are experienced visually, and it requires two people to collaborate."

During the experiment, one participant - "the respondent" - was hooked up to an electroencephalography (EEG) cap, which recorded all their brain activity. Meanwhile, their partner - "the inquirer" - was sitting in a room around 1.5 km away, and had a magnetic coil positioned around their head.

Each round, the respondent would think of an object, say a dog, and the inquirer would then click on a yes or no question like, "Is the object an animal?" which would appear on a screen in front of their partner. Depending on the answer, the respondent would concentrate on one of two LED lights in front of them.

And this is where things get really cool. When the respondent concentrated on the "yes" light, their brain pattern activated the magnetic coil over the inquirer's head, causing them to see a visual hallucination called a 'phosphene'. This most commonly takes the form of a flash or a thin line of light, and it would let the inquirer know that the answer was yes. No flash of light meant no. From there, they could ask more questions before identifying what they thought the item was.

The researchers repeated the experiment over 20 rounds - 10 control games where the brain-to-brain link wasn't working and 10 proper rounds - and took strict precautions to make sure no one could cheat.

The participants were able to guess the objects correctly in 72 percent of the real rounds, compared to only 18 percent of the control rounds. And the team believes many of those incorrect guesses were caused by the inquirers not being able to recognise the phosphene, or visual hallucination, that signalled a 'yes' response.

"They have to interpret something they're seeing with their brains," said one of the researchers, Chantel Prat. "It's not something they've ever seen before."

The team hopes that their research will one day allow them to directly transfer signals from one person's brain into another, helping to effectively 'upload' knowledge.

It could even allow healthy brains to 'tutor' ones that are impaired - for example, the technology could transfer signals from a healthy person's brain directly into the brain of someone in a coma, or someone with a neurodegenerative disorder such as Alzheimer's disease.

"Imagine having someone with ADHD and a neurotypical student," said Prat. "When the non-ADHD student is paying attention, the ADHD student's brain gets put into a state of greater attention automatically."

There's a long way to go before we're at that stage, but in the two years since the first direct brain-to-brain connection was established - by the same research team, incidentally, back in 2013 - we've already made some pretty exciting progress. We're looking forward to seeing what happens next.

The results have been published in PLOS ONE.

Read these next:

World-first experiment achieves direct brain-to-brain communication in human subjects Researchers have worked out how to mind control cockroaches Your brain is still 30 times more powerful than the best supercomputers

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 23.

#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)

Mamma mia, I wish they'd stop this.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-09-24   4:42:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: NeoconsNailed (#1)

It's really nothing new. Probably was the usual form of communication among primitives, preschoolers can do it, dogs, witches, Most of us lose it after shifting to prefrontal cortex.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2015-09-25   1:10:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Tatarewicz (#2)

What are you basing all that on? Sounds like literal fairy tales.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-09-25   5:15:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: NeoconsNailed (#3)

What are you basing all that on?

Experience, inference.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2015-09-25   23:15:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Tatarewicz (#5)

You've witnessed telepathy among primitives, preschoolers, dogs or witches?

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-09-26   1:58:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: NeoconsNailed (#6)

Primitives (our ancestors), witches} inferred; preschoolers, dogs: yes.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2015-09-26   22:13:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Tatarewicz (#7)

Please go on.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-09-27   2:46:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: NeoconsNailed (#8)

It's referred to as natural communication.

purplerose  posted on  2015-09-27   14:40:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: purplerose, NeoconsNailed (#9)

It's referred to as natural communication.

How were you able to determine the preschoolers and dogs were communicating naturally?

StraitGate  posted on  2015-09-27   22:20:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: StraitGate (#15)

How were you able to determine the preschoolers and dogs were communicating naturally?

Kids, because they're not yet contaminated.

Dogs, and other animals, because they cannot be contaminated, imo

Lod  posted on  2015-09-27   22:31:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Lod, StraitGate (#16)

Your response said it best!

purplerose  posted on  2015-09-27   22:50:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: purplerose (#18)

You still haven't explained HOW you were you able to determine that the preschoolers and dogs were communicating naturally.

May we know?

StraitGate  posted on  2015-09-27   23:01:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: StraitGate (#19)

I really don't need to explain something that is already given. And yes, children and animals do have that ability to communicate. It is why they tend to shun adults because in the adult sense such forms of communication are non-existence and instead delusional thinking. But some of us know way better than that. :)

purplerose  posted on  2015-09-28   14:41:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 23.

#24. To: purplerose (#23)

I really don't need to explain something that is already given.

OK, I note your unwillingness to explain how you were able to determine that the preschoolers and dogs were communicating "naturally". But frankly, your being unwilling to explain how you came to that determination makes me suspect that you are UNABLE to explain how.

If the how had been to me "already given", I would not have asked.

StraitGate  posted on  2015-09-28 22:08:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 23.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]