See other Religion Articles
Title: Pope Francis Gives Illuminati Hand Signs To Start Historic Address Before Congress
Source:
nowtheendbegins
URL Source: http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=35818
Published: Sep 24, 2015
Author: now the end begins
Post Date: 2015-09-24 17:46:32 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 1451
Comments: 58
“And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.” Revelation 16:13 (KJV) Pope Francis speaking before Congress this morning did something highly unusual for a “man of God”, he didn’t open up in prayer. He did not invoke God in any way, shape or form. Instead, he jumped right into preaching the Laodicean gospel of social justice. What a phenomenal opportunity to bring Jesus Christ to the spotlight as the entire free world was watching! But no, Jesus never even got an ‘honorable mention” from the “vicar of Christ“. Wow. I preached in church this past Sunday, and we wouldn’t even begin until we had prayed and asked for the Lord’s blessing. How much more should the Pope have done this? Take a look at the photo below and see the Pope starting his remarks by giving the Satanic Illuminati “OK” sign, and you’ll know why he didn’t bother to pray to God before speaking, he was already talking with his god. And you wonder why we call him the False Prophet? In Satanism, when making this sign the three fingers not used to make the circle are considered symbolic of the unholy trinity — horned God, Goddess, and offspring (antichrist). The bent three fingers are shaped as three number six’s, or 666. Thus, we have 666, the sun deity (Lucifer), the Goddess (Mystery, Babylon the Great, Mother of Harlots), and the beast (antichrist, 666), all in one unitary hand sign. After that stunning spiritual flop, Pope Francis then spoke about how much he wished to “enter into a dialogue” with the American people. This is where the rambling started, and the audience in attendance began to grow confused, not sure where to applaud or even if to applaud. At the 15:00 mark, he began to talk about out of control capitalism, and the evils of money. In an ironic twist. he left out the fact that the Vatican is the world’s richest corporation and has incalculable riches within it’s vaults. No God, no Jesus, and certainly a spirit but not the Holy Spirit, Francis delivers a politician’s speech on social justice, illegal immigration and the evils of wealth. At the 24:00 mark, he started promoting illegal immigration, and chastising America for not letting more illegals in over our borders. He called it a sin to not allow more illegals in, and that we should “reject a mindset of hostility” towards them. What part of the word “illegal” does the Pope not grasp? At this point he invoked the “golden rule” and got the obligatory standing ovation. It’s now the 30:00 mark, and I am still semi-patiently waiting for the “vicar of Christ” to give Jesus a shout out. Crickets., nothing but crickets. “And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.” Revelation 17:4,5 (KJV) Pope Francis make a fogged reference to the Catholic church priest sex scandals, and spent nearly 23 seconds talking about it. He said there should be “hope, forgiveness and rehabilitation” for the gay pedophile bishops who committed decades of vile sex crimes. He said NOTHING to the victims and their families. Not one word. The message the Pope sent is that the Catholic church has no desire to do one bit more than the law will force them to do. If I was a Catholic, at this point and for this reason alone, I would instantly abandon the wicked Vatican institution known as the Catholic church. Shameful and disgusting. Francis talks incessantly about “healing the world”, and he won’t even help to heal the victims that his own church created. Spoken like the lying, hypocritical False Prophet that he is. At the 51:00 mark, Francis again invoked the memories of Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King, Jr. in an ongoing bid to call America to social justice. Still no references to God, Jesus Christ or to the Holy Spirit. The 4 Iranian hostages with one of them being a Christian pastor? Not a word. I guess they don’t count. He then closed his “sermon” by saying “God bless America”. Finally, the “vicar of Christ” mentioned God. Ugh. America, behold your False Prophet. Please step up and take the Mark. In an ironic twist. he left out the fact that the Vatican is the world’s richest corporation and has incalculable riches within it’s vaults.
Pope Francis Delivers Historic Speech to Congress:
(1 image)Pope Francis completely ignored the Catholic priest pedohile sex scandal victims
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 30.
#3. To: Itistoolate (#0)
What meatheads decided that we needed poppa over here in the first place?
Will somebody please explain why an independent Baptist preacher who points out that a Clinton or Bush type is satanic goes to jail, while poppa gets to preach policy at amerika from the White Hut and speaker's desk? WHAT IS HE DOING TALKING TO EVEN A SINGLE POLITICIAN if we have a "SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE" in this country? If he was in the least bit sincere, he'd be excoriating them for their massive larceny, genocide and blasphemy. I HATE HIM! I caught a little of this horror on a friends TV this evening. Boner looks glassy-eyed above, just as he did live. What's he on?? Bidet was clearly zoning out too, then caught himself.
Vatican City is a nation state and a government, with a worldwide assembly. As such, the Holy See has UN Observer diplomatic status. Hatred of Catholicism and Catholics, especially the Papacy, is a foundational doctrine of Protestantism. If nothing else was wrong in the world, there would still be that habitual malevolence of enmity.
It basically started when King Henry VIII wanted to marry his new sweetheart, Anne Boleyn, wanting a divorce from his first wife, Catherine of Aragon. The pope refused to grant him an annulment, so he made himself the head of his new church, the Church of England, and declared his own marriage annulled. Any uppity Catholics who would not acknowledge him to be the voice of God on Earth were executed for heresy. Not that the Catholics didn't do the same, nor was the papacy "pure". Ever see the TV mini-series "Borgia" or "The Tudors"?
The pope refused to grant him an annulment, so he made himself the head of his new church, the Church of England, and declared his own marriage annulled. Any uppity Catholics who would not acknowledge him to be the voice of God on Earth were executed for heresy. Not that the Catholics didn't do the same, nor was the papacy "pure". Ever see the TV mini-series "Borgia" or "The Tudors"? No, I haven't seen those programs but did watch the 1966 movie, A Man for All Seasons, about Sir Thomas More. He had opposed Martin Luther's 1517 Protestant "Reformation", was Chanellor of England from October 1529 to 16 May 1532, refused to endorse Henry VIII's divorce from Catherine of Aragon and re-marriage to Anne Boleyn, refused to sign the (1533) Succession Act (making their child, Elizabeth, the heir to the throne instead of her elder sister, Mary, from his first marriage) and was executed in 1535 for refusing the (1534) Oath of Supremacy (i.e. swearing of allegiance to the monarch as Supreme Governor of the Church of England. Failure to do so was to be treated as treasonable). Many years of catastrophic religious persecutions, bloodshed and devastating war were the result there of Henry VIII's establishment of the Church of England rather than simply converting to Lutheranism and proclaiming obligations to the Catholic Church as voluntary only (no longer enforceable by powers of the state), as he quite easily could have done without causing so much misery to others. I think, though, that it basically all started about a decade and a half or so earlier than Henry VIII's Churchianity with Martin Luther's secession from the Catholic Church in 1517. This proclamation of his so-called Protestant "Reformation" kick-off (but more like a Fragmentation of Christianity, imo) has been perpetuating hatred of Catholics for aggrieving centuries ever since:
If you were to look up some info on Pope Alexander VI (Rodrigo Borgia), you might get an idea of what led him to say that. The Netflix mini-series "Borgia" is a VERY graphic account of his reign. BTW, I've never seen the Showtime version of the story, which they named "The Borgias", but I hear it's not quite as descriptive as the Netflix series.
If you were to look up some info on Pope Alexander VI (Rodrigo Borgia), you might get an idea of what led him to say that. The Netflix mini-series "Borgia" is a VERY graphic account of his reign. BTW, I've never seen the Showtime versions of the story, which they named "The Borgias", but I hear it's not quite as descriptive as the Netflix series. I know some of the basic background issues and accusations on both sides but will try to do more study about it and even check the Hollywood versions, if I can find them. Thanks for your thoughts and suggestions. : )
I know some of the basic background issues and accusations on both sides but will try to do more study about it and even check the Hollywood versions, if I can find them. The Netflix version is an international production (French-German-Czech- Italian) and was actually made in the Czech Republic and in Italy, and is available online. If you don't mind signing up for Netflix, they have a free month trial offer at the moment. Thanks for your thoughts and suggestions. : ) My pleasure. :)
The Netflix version is an international production (French-German-Czech-Italian) and was actually made in the Czech Republic and in Italy, and is available online. If you don't mind signing up for Netflix, they have a free month trial offer at the moment. I've been thinking of trying Netflix, so thanks for the info about the free month trial offer. Have been doing more study, as I said I would, about the schismatic religious issues in question and such. Since we've been talking about the Borgias/Borjas, am going to note the obscure detail here that Martin Luther eventually married a former Catholic nun, Katharina von Bora, whose family name is of mysterious origin. For time-period context, am noting that there were two Popes between Alexander VI (Rodrigo Borgia, mentioned above at #17) and Leo X, who was the current Pope at the time of the Martin Luther conflict-developments: a Medici and the last Pope not of priestly orders at the time of his election. He had opposed the papal election of Cardinal Borgia/Pope Alexander VI. In the background of that timespan of several Popes is St. Francis Borgia, a relative of Alexander VI who became the 3rd Superior General of the Jesuit Society of Jesus (similar to the Knights Templar). In the background of the Leo X and Martin Luther precise-timeframe is: and 2. the War of Urbino, said to have wrecked the Vatican finances and for which Leo X had borrowed money from England's King Henry VIII. After Leo X was no longer Pope but very soon before Henry VIII moved to demolish the Catholic Church in England (not just become a Protestant), Martin Luther's allies were involved in the Sack of Rome (1527) which imprisoned Pope Clement VII (a Medici), killed many (including most of his Swiss Guards who were on-duty: 4um Ref.) and was the end of the Renaissance in Italy.
#37. To: Former Lurker, All (#30)
(Edited)
1. Pope Alexander VI - Rodrigo Borgia/Borja. Papacy: 11 August 1492 to 18 August 1503 [11 years]. 2. Pope Pius III - Papacy: 22 September 1503 to 18 October 1503 [26 days]. Not a Borgia or a Medici, afaik, but Borgia allied. 3. Pope Julius II - Papacy: 1 November 1503 to 21 February 1513 [9+ years]. A Borgia rival but, afaik, not a Medici. 4. Pope Leo X - Papacy: 9 March 1513 to 1 December 1521 [8+ years]. A Medici who had opposed the election of Pope Alexander VI, a Borgia. Borrowed money from King Henry VIII of England for the War of Urbino. Was Pope at the time of Martin Luther's opposition to the Church and his Protestant Reformation/Fragmentation of Christendom: Ref. The Ninety-Five Theses, 31 October 1517. 5. Pope Adrian VI - Papacy: 9 January 1522 to 14 September 1523 [less than 2 years]. Not a Medici or a Borgia, afaik, but had been made a Cardinal by Leo X who was a Medici. 6. Pope Clement VII - Papacy: 19 November 1523 to 25 September 1534 [10+ years]. A Medici. Pope who was imprisoned during the 1527 Sack of Rome, advanced by allies of Martin Luther. Was also Pope at the onset of King Henry VIII's so-called English Reformation/further fragmenting of European Christianity in England. I suspect there was an internecine (Church-internal) power-struggle/feud between the Borgia and the Medici factions that was likely Borgia-camouflaged/"Color Revolution" styled (first through Martin Luther and then through the royal court machinations of Henry VIII) as if spiritual-based "Reformations" (what the outsiders/"Commoners" would sketchily suppose of the embattling objectives) but intended to destroy the Catholic (Latin: Universal) Church and Rome, too -- most probably as something of collective punishments/Vendetta Ops over the two elected Medici Popes (listed as #4 and #6 above) and both of whom would then be infamously blamed as responsible for not having been more "Modernly Liberal".
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#4. To: Lod (#3)
(Edited)
#8. To: NeoconsNailed (#4)
(Edited)
WHAT IS HE DOING TALKING TO EVEN A SINGLE POLITICIAN ... in this country? ... I HATE HIM!
#15. To: GreyLmist (#8)
Hatred of Catholicism and Catholics, especially the Papacy, is a foundational doctrine of Protestantism.
#16. To: FormerLurker (#15)
(Edited)
It basically started when King Henry VIII wanted to marry his new sweetheart, Anne Boleyn, wanting a divorce from his first wife, Catherine of Aragon.
we shall all hold your [Papal] seat as possessed and oppressed by Satan, the damned seat of Antichrist
#17. To: GreyLmist (#16)
we shall all hold your [Papal] seat as possessed and oppressed by Satan, the damned seat of Antichrist
#21. To: FormerLurker (#17)
(Edited)
we shall all hold your [Papal] seat as possessed and oppressed by Satan, the damned seat of Antichrist
#26. To: GreyLmist (#21)
#30. To: FormerLurker (#26)
(Edited)
I know some of the basic background issues and accusations on both sides but will try to do more study about it and even check the Hollywood versions, if I can find them.
1. a Cardinal Controversy or more than one controversy of the sort (Thomas/Cardinal Wolsey of England somehow involved: here and here)
Replies to Comment # 30. Post #30 -- timeline summary of the Protestant "Reformations" of Martin Luther (Phase I: fragmentation of Christendom) and Henry VIII (Phase II: further fragmenting of European Christianity in England) + Notation of the possibility that the family of Martin Luther's wife may have been crypto-Borgias (who had made enemies of the Medicis, among others).
More detailed Papacy timeline with some info-annotations:
From the Wikipedia link for Martin Luther: in October 1518, ... Luther stated that he did not consider the papacy part of the biblical Church because [his] historistical interpretation of Bible prophecy concluded that the papacy was the Antichrist. The prophecies concerning the Antichrist soon became the center of controversy. The hearings degenerated into a shouting match. More than his writing the 95 Theses, Luther's confrontation with the church cast him as an enemy of the pope. ... On 15 June 1520, the Pope warned Luther with the papal bull (edict) Exsurge Domine that he risked excommunication unless he recanted 41 sentences drawn from his writings, including the 95 Theses, within 60 days. ... [Luther refused and] was excommunicated by Pope Leo X on 3 January 1521.
The much sensationalized issue of Indulgences (i.e. faith with demonstrable works/contributions as an option for:
1. absolution of penitent sins or 2. petitioning the absolving of sins for deceased souls -- and whatever other wrongful Church-conduct was alleged by Luther) doesn't seem to have been as alarming as his contention that the Papacy was the Antichrist. According to Christian belief and Church doctrine, the Papacy had been instituted with St. Peter by Christ to properly lead and govern His Church for Him here on Earth. Besides being blasphemous about that, Luther was evidently calling for not just a "Papal regime change", of sorts, because of mismanagements but dissolution of the Papal office itself as "evil". He apparently had himself in mind to become empowered authoritatively like a Pope but elevated even higher as an "immortalized Chief-shepherd" of the Christians he'd disorient and heretically coup-maneuver into his "New World Order flock", since that's basically what happened among those "Protestants" who defected from the Church along with him then and thereafter. However, he was not rightly endowed or justified (like he had accursedly suggested and threatened - Ref. Post #16) to redesign Christ's Papal Seat of St. Peter as the property of the Antichrist.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 30.