[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

‘I Smell CIA/Deep State All Over This’ — RFK Jr. VP Nicole Shanahan Blasts Sanctuary Cities,

we see peaceful protests launching in Los Angeles” - Democrat Senator Cory Booke

We have no legal framework for designating domestic terror organizations

Los Angeles Braces For Another Day Of Chaos As Newsom Pits Marxist Color Revolution Against Trump Admin

Methylene Blue Benefits

Another Mossad War Crime

80 served arrest warrants at 'cartel afterparty' in South Carolina

When Ideas Become Too Dangerous To Platform

The silent bloodbath that's tearing through the middle-class

Kiev Postponed Exchange With Russia, Leaves Bodies Of 6,000 Slain Ukrainian Troops In Trucks

Iranian Intelligence Stole Trove Of Sensitive Israeli Nuclear Files

In the USA, the identity of Musk's abuser, who gave him a black eye, was revealed

Return of 6,000 Soldiers' Bodies Will Cost Ukraine Extra $2.1Bln

Palantir's Secret War: Inside the Plot to Cripple WikiLeaks

Digital Prison in the Making?

In France we're horrified by spending money on Ukraine

Russia has patented technology for launching drones from the space station

Kill ICE: Foreign Flags And Fires Sweep LA

6,000-year-old skeletons with never-before-seen DNA rewrites human history

First Close Look at China’s Ultra-Long Range Sixth Generation J-36Jet

I'm Caitlin Clark, and I refuse to return to the WNBA

Border Czar Tom Homan: “We Are Going to Bring National Guard in Tonight” to Los Angeles

These Are The U.S. States With The Most Drug Use

Chabria: ICE arrested a California union leader. Does Trump understand what that means?Anita Chabria

White House Staffer Responsible for ‘Fanning Flames’ Between Trump and Musk ID’d

Texas Yanks Major Perk From Illegal Aliens - After Pioneering It 24 Years Ago

Dozens detained during Los Angeles ICE raids

Russian army suffers massive losses as Kremlin feigns interest in peace talks — ISW

Russia’s Defense Collapse Exposed by Ukraine Strike

I heard libs might block some streets. 🤣


Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: He'd Let Them Swarm In, Now He'd kick Them Out: Trump Does Drastic 180 on Syrian Immigrants In less Than A Month, His Desperate, Starry-Eyed Supporters Don't Even Notice
Source: .
URL Source: http://libertyfight.com/2015/trump_ ... ic_180_on_Syrian_refugees.html
Published: Oct 6, 2015
Author: .
Post Date: 2015-10-06 14:00:35 by Artisan
Keywords: None
Views: 5825
Comments: 87

"I hate the concept of it, but on a humanitarian basis, with what's happening, you have to." - Donald Trump on Syrian refugees into the United States, less than 30 days ago

Look, everyone knows we need a real game-changer in this country, someone who cares about America. But let's not be so naive, gullible and desperate as to so easily fall for yet another one of these shysters. Just like his sudden, drastic "about-faces" on gun rights and illegal immigration, Donald "I'm A Big Fan Of Israel" Trump said less than 25 days ago that we must let Syrian immigrants in because it's a "humanitarian disaster" and the poor migrants were "in a living hell." This was reported worldwide including on CNN, Breitbart, Politico, Fox news and everywhere else. This week he's saying the exact opposite, that he would send them back, (presumably send back the same ones he promised to let in?) Where I come from theres an old saying which applies in this case. Trump's "so full of shit his eyes are brown." Also, here are his quotes supporting the assault weapons ban, longer 'waiting lists' and as well as his promotion of amnesty for the "good" illegal aliens who have not "broken the law." Yes his lines are good, (depending on which way the wind is blowing) but savvy political observers who know about gun rights, immigration and pro-life issues know that this Clinton and Harry Reid donor is as trustworthy as a used car salesman.

This week, it was reported: Donald Trump says he'd send back Syrian refugees taken in by the US

But less than a month ago, he said what he would really do, the exact opposite! It was widely reported worldwide:

On guns, Trump has openly called for gun bans, and to this day supports longer waiting lists and 'background checks.' And in a recent interview with a gun rights group, he did not retract his position on assault weapons ban, but rather quibbled about the defintion of what's considered an assault weapon.

Here are some of the priceless comments from the gun rights forum from people who don't fall for Trump's b.s.:

Here is Trump's waffling on immigration, backing away from his support of amnesty now that he's pretending to be a 'conservative.'

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

#1. To: Artisan (#0)

As long as BOTH parties and FedGov hate and despise Donald Trump then he is still marginally better than any other candidate for POTUS in 2016. I don't see anybody better on the horizon, especially with Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren about to jump into it against Hitlery Clinton.

X-15  posted on  2015-10-06   14:39:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: X-15 (#1)

As long as BOTH parties and FedGov hate and despise Donald Trump then he is still marginally better than any other candidate for POTUS in 2016.

Have to agree. I'm still not sure I'm going to vote at all, but at least for now I'm rooting for him.

PnbC  posted on  2015-10-06   14:49:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: PnbC (#3)

If Trump's on your ballot, go for him.

Lod  posted on  2015-10-06   14:54:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Lod (#4)

If Trump's on your ballot, go for him.

I presume he will be, although in CA the primaries are about 5 or 6 months away. I also have no faith in the honesty of electronic voting machines, so when I have voted in the last few years it has always been absentee since it preserves the paper document. But you can see my hesitancy to even participate. I've been disappointed too many times already with numerous reports of voter fraud and other non-prosecuted shenanigans.

I guess I could vote for Trump in the primary. In the general election it will probably come down to either a third-party candidate (as usual), not voting (or only local issues), or voting for whichever major candidate is less likely to get us into (or escalate) war with Russia.

PnbC  posted on  2015-10-06   15:20:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: PnbC (#7)

did you vote for scwarzenegger for ca governor?

Artisan  posted on  2015-10-06   15:21:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Artisan (#8)

did you vote for scwarzenegger for ca governor?

Nope. I was never that desperate in my home state.

PnbC  posted on  2015-10-06   15:43:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: PnbC (#9)

Nope. I was never that desperate in my home state.

glad to hear it,. i was a big supporter of senator mcclintock at that time, he would ahve made a good governor,. as a congressman, however, he sucks, because is a zionist loon.

just like tom tancredo, a lot of these guys with otherwise good principles, bow when it comes to the jew.

by the way i didnt know there was anyone here from CA. if you ever geta traffic ticket check out my traffic ticket archive, we have had a great deal of success and i get emails regularly from people who have beaten their tickets and wanted to say thanks. its a lot of fun. libertyfight.com/traffic.html

Artisan  posted on  2015-10-06   15:48:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Artisan (#11)

Since we have nothing/no one to pin our hope on, Trump, for me, is pure entertainment. I won't be voting for him or anyone. Matt Drudge fears that hillary is the chosen. I caught a little of his interview on AJ's show while driving.

christine  posted on  2015-10-06   17:01:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: christine (#12)

Matt Drudge fears that hillary is the chosen. I caught a little of his interview on AJ's show while driving.

I think Hilarity will only continue to go down in the polls in the months ahead. A year ago I would've said she is a shoo in, but things aren't that bright for her these days. The other day I read about how getting assigned to guard Hillary was considered punishment by the SS during Bill's presidency. And more news coming out about her awful personality in private. If the media is being run by the PTB, then I'm inclined to think that the bigwigs are already starting to jettison her as a bad bet.

Her best chance to win is if she is running against Carly Fiorina. Pray it doesn't come to that.

PnbC  posted on  2015-10-06   17:13:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: PnbC (#13)

Polls don't matter. Israel wants their woman in there. All these scandals will be ignored or swept under the rug. They won't matter. Barring some kind of divine intervention, you'll soon be calling Hillary "madame president".

Obnoxicated  posted on  2015-10-06   21:01:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Obnoxicated, pnbc (#15)

Her best chance to win is if she is running against Carly Fiorina. Pray it doesn't come to that.

Ok, so I understand that trump wouldbe preferable to clinton, although I don't think that the general policy, practice or direction of the country would change either way.

Aside from that, I don't think a woman should ever be president. Or senator for that matter, or any elected office. Is that a rare stance nowadays?

Women should stick to their natural roles and not try to be men.

Artisan  posted on  2015-10-07   8:56:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Artisan (#17)

Ok, so I understand that trump wouldbe preferable to clinton, although I don't think that the general policy, practice or direction of the country would change either way.

Supreme Court nominations and the Military are two reasons why Presidential elections aren't supposed to be popularity contests. A Democrat stacked both with Cultural Marxist idealogues, which resulted in the obliteration of Marriage and Freedom of Religion by SCOTUS and America's national security being jeopardized Militarily, too, by the Commie Culturati of "Political Correctness". If it really doesn't make much difference to you either way and you don't even intend to vote for anyone (as I read here somewhere recently), why are you once again (for the 2nd Presidential election in a row) campaigning so much against the very best option of the Republican candidates running? It's not like America is going to get perfect choices from any party but Democrats are the most Pro-Abortion party and to the point of denying Freedom of Religion to doctors and hospitals about it.

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-10-08   9:14:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: GreyLmist (#20)

which resulted in the obliteration of Marriage and Freedom of Religion by SCOTUS an

No court or devil wearing a black robed costume has any authority to destroy marriage. Marriage is a sacred indissoluble bond created by God & entered into by a man & woman. Anyone who believes that govt can end or change marriage is wrong. People who afvocate sodomy, promiscuity, adultery, fornication, or any mortal sin will learn the truth the moment they die, and if they don't repentt before that moment then they will be damned to hell for all eternity.

Artisan  posted on  2015-10-08   11:31:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Artisan (#25) (Edited)

People who advocate sodomy, promiscuity, adultery, fornication, or any mortal sin will learn the truth the moment they die, and if they don't repent before that moment then they will be damned to hell for all eternity.

Matthew 12:31

Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men.

EDIT: Your statement above is catholic doctrine. Matthew 12:31 is Bible !

noone222  posted on  2015-10-08   12:25:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: noone222 (#36)

This is actually an interesting convo. Id like to reply to three of your points, but can't right now. Ill be back later, have a good day.

Artisan  posted on  2015-10-08   12:53:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: neoconsnailed (#38)

Please for your own sake click "ignore thread" & don't read any of this. I wouldn't want you to have a stroke. ;-)

Artisan  posted on  2015-10-08   12:55:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 39.

#42. To: Artisan (#39) (Edited)

Too late :-) but thanks for the ping. I'm having a real dry spell :-(

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-10-08 13:04:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]