[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

You’ve Never Seen THIS Side Of Donald Trump

President Donald Trump Nominates Former Florida Rep. Dr. Dave Weldon as CDC Director

Joe Rogan Tells Josh Brolin His Recent Bell’s Palsy Diagnosis Could Be Linked to mRNA Vaccine

President-elect Donald Trump Nominates Brooke Rollins as Secretary of Agriculture

Trump Taps COVID-Contrarian, Staunch Public Health Critic Makary For FDA

F-35's Cooling Crisis: Design Flaws Fuel $2 Trillion Dilemma For Pentagon

Joe Rogan on Tucker Carlson and Ukraine Aid

Joe Rogan on 62 year-old soldier with one arm, one eye

Jordan Peterson On China's Social Credit Controls

Senator Kennedy Exposes Bad Jusge

Jewish Land Grab

Trump Taps Dr. Marty Makary, Fierce Opponent of COVID Vaccine Mandates, as New FDA Commissioner

Recovering J6 Prisoner James Grant, Tells-All About Bidens J6 Torture Chamber, Needs Immediate Help After Release

AOC: Keeping Men Out Of Womens Bathrooms Is Endangering Women

What Donald Trump Has Said About JFK's Assassination

Horse steals content from Sara Fischer and Sophia Cai and pretends he is the author

Horse steals content from Jonas E. Alexis and claims it as his own.

Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room

Ukrainians have stolen up to half of US aid ex-Polish deputy minister

Gaza doctor raped, tortured to death in Israeli custody, new report reveals

German Lutheran Church Bans AfD Members From Committees, Calls Party 'Anti-Human'

Berlin Teachers Sound Alarm Over Educational Crisis Caused By Multiculturalism

Trump Hosts Secret Global Peace Summit at Mar-a-Lago!

Heat Is Radiating From A Huge Mass Under The Moon

Elon Musk Delivers a Telling Response When Donald Trump Jr. Suggests

FBI recovers funds for victims of scammed banker

Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain?

Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish'

Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow?

Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest
Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: He'd Let Them Swarm In, Now He'd kick Them Out: Trump Does Drastic 180 on Syrian Immigrants In less Than A Month, His Desperate, Starry-Eyed Supporters Don't Even Notice
Source: .
URL Source: http://libertyfight.com/2015/trump_ ... ic_180_on_Syrian_refugees.html
Published: Oct 6, 2015
Author: .
Post Date: 2015-10-06 14:00:35 by Artisan
Keywords: None
Views: 4108
Comments: 87

"I hate the concept of it, but on a humanitarian basis, with what's happening, you have to." - Donald Trump on Syrian refugees into the United States, less than 30 days ago

Look, everyone knows we need a real game-changer in this country, someone who cares about America. But let's not be so naive, gullible and desperate as to so easily fall for yet another one of these shysters. Just like his sudden, drastic "about-faces" on gun rights and illegal immigration, Donald "I'm A Big Fan Of Israel" Trump said less than 25 days ago that we must let Syrian immigrants in because it's a "humanitarian disaster" and the poor migrants were "in a living hell." This was reported worldwide including on CNN, Breitbart, Politico, Fox news and everywhere else. This week he's saying the exact opposite, that he would send them back, (presumably send back the same ones he promised to let in?) Where I come from theres an old saying which applies in this case. Trump's "so full of shit his eyes are brown." Also, here are his quotes supporting the assault weapons ban, longer 'waiting lists' and as well as his promotion of amnesty for the "good" illegal aliens who have not "broken the law." Yes his lines are good, (depending on which way the wind is blowing) but savvy political observers who know about gun rights, immigration and pro-life issues know that this Clinton and Harry Reid donor is as trustworthy as a used car salesman.

This week, it was reported: Donald Trump says he'd send back Syrian refugees taken in by the US

But less than a month ago, he said what he would really do, the exact opposite! It was widely reported worldwide:

On guns, Trump has openly called for gun bans, and to this day supports longer waiting lists and 'background checks.' And in a recent interview with a gun rights group, he did not retract his position on assault weapons ban, but rather quibbled about the defintion of what's considered an assault weapon.

Here are some of the priceless comments from the gun rights forum from people who don't fall for Trump's b.s.:

Here is Trump's waffling on immigration, backing away from his support of amnesty now that he's pretending to be a 'conservative.'

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 51.

#1. To: Artisan (#0)

As long as BOTH parties and FedGov hate and despise Donald Trump then he is still marginally better than any other candidate for POTUS in 2016. I don't see anybody better on the horizon, especially with Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren about to jump into it against Hitlery Clinton.

X-15  posted on  2015-10-06   14:39:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#3. To: X-15 (#1)

As long as BOTH parties and FedGov hate and despise Donald Trump then he is still marginally better than any other candidate for POTUS in 2016.

Have to agree. I'm still not sure I'm going to vote at all, but at least for now I'm rooting for him.

PnbC  posted on  2015-10-06   14:49:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#4. To: PnbC (#3)

If Trump's on your ballot, go for him.

Lod  posted on  2015-10-06   14:54:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#7. To: Lod (#4)

If Trump's on your ballot, go for him.

I presume he will be, although in CA the primaries are about 5 or 6 months away. I also have no faith in the honesty of electronic voting machines, so when I have voted in the last few years it has always been absentee since it preserves the paper document. But you can see my hesitancy to even participate. I've been disappointed too many times already with numerous reports of voter fraud and other non-prosecuted shenanigans.

I guess I could vote for Trump in the primary. In the general election it will probably come down to either a third-party candidate (as usual), not voting (or only local issues), or voting for whichever major candidate is less likely to get us into (or escalate) war with Russia.

PnbC  posted on  2015-10-06   15:20:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#8. To: PnbC (#7)

did you vote for scwarzenegger for ca governor?

Artisan  posted on  2015-10-06   15:21:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#9. To: Artisan (#8)

did you vote for scwarzenegger for ca governor?

Nope. I was never that desperate in my home state.

PnbC  posted on  2015-10-06   15:43:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#11. To: PnbC (#9)

Nope. I was never that desperate in my home state.

glad to hear it,. i was a big supporter of senator mcclintock at that time, he would ahve made a good governor,. as a congressman, however, he sucks, because is a zionist loon.

just like tom tancredo, a lot of these guys with otherwise good principles, bow when it comes to the jew.

by the way i didnt know there was anyone here from CA. if you ever geta traffic ticket check out my traffic ticket archive, we have had a great deal of success and i get emails regularly from people who have beaten their tickets and wanted to say thanks. its a lot of fun. libertyfight.com/traffic.html

Artisan  posted on  2015-10-06   15:48:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#12. To: Artisan (#11)

Since we have nothing/no one to pin our hope on, Trump, for me, is pure entertainment. I won't be voting for him or anyone. Matt Drudge fears that hillary is the chosen. I caught a little of his interview on AJ's show while driving.

christine  posted on  2015-10-06   17:01:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#13. To: christine (#12)

Matt Drudge fears that hillary is the chosen. I caught a little of his interview on AJ's show while driving.

I think Hilarity will only continue to go down in the polls in the months ahead. A year ago I would've said she is a shoo in, but things aren't that bright for her these days. The other day I read about how getting assigned to guard Hillary was considered punishment by the SS during Bill's presidency. And more news coming out about her awful personality in private. If the media is being run by the PTB, then I'm inclined to think that the bigwigs are already starting to jettison her as a bad bet.

Her best chance to win is if she is running against Carly Fiorina. Pray it doesn't come to that.

PnbC  posted on  2015-10-06   17:13:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#15. To: PnbC (#13)

Polls don't matter. Israel wants their woman in there. All these scandals will be ignored or swept under the rug. They won't matter. Barring some kind of divine intervention, you'll soon be calling Hillary "madame president".

Obnoxicated  posted on  2015-10-06   21:01:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#17. To: Obnoxicated, pnbc (#15)

Her best chance to win is if she is running against Carly Fiorina. Pray it doesn't come to that.

Ok, so I understand that trump wouldbe preferable to clinton, although I don't think that the general policy, practice or direction of the country would change either way.

Aside from that, I don't think a woman should ever be president. Or senator for that matter, or any elected office. Is that a rare stance nowadays?

Women should stick to their natural roles and not try to be men.

Artisan  posted on  2015-10-07   8:56:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#20. To: Artisan (#17)

Ok, so I understand that trump wouldbe preferable to clinton, although I don't think that the general policy, practice or direction of the country would change either way.

Supreme Court nominations and the Military are two reasons why Presidential elections aren't supposed to be popularity contests. A Democrat stacked both with Cultural Marxist idealogues, which resulted in the obliteration of Marriage and Freedom of Religion by SCOTUS and America's national security being jeopardized Militarily, too, by the Commie Culturati of "Political Correctness". If it really doesn't make much difference to you either way and you don't even intend to vote for anyone (as I read here somewhere recently), why are you once again (for the 2nd Presidential election in a row) campaigning so much against the very best option of the Republican candidates running? It's not like America is going to get perfect choices from any party but Democrats are the most Pro-Abortion party and to the point of denying Freedom of Religion to doctors and hospitals about it.

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-10-08   9:14:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#23. To: GreyLmist (#20)

really doesn't make much difference to you either way and you don't even intend to vote for anyone (as I read here somewhere recently), why are you once again (for the 2nd Presidential election in a row) campaigning so much against the very best option of the Republican candidates running? It's not like America is going to get perfect c

Are you really kidding me? I thought of all people you'd see through this fraud. And if you fall for the proven MYTH that GOPers are pro life and they'll give us good SC justices! They'll stop abortion"

GM that's such a sad naive contention. As if abortionist fag lover roberts who appointed by "conservative" gwbush, gifted us with obamacare.

If you fall for the absurd atrocity that this HARRY REID DONR; JEWISH TOADY AND NETANYAHU ENDORSEE trump is your hero, go for it. Btw he's also an abortionist, fag lover and high tax. Advocate. For myself, ill never make a deal with satanic filth.

Artisan  posted on  2015-10-08   11:16:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#24. To: Artisan (#23)

For myself, ill never make a deal with satanic filth.

Says the loyal papist !

noone222  posted on  2015-10-08   11:24:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#27. To: noone222 (#24)

That kind of name-calling is not necessary on this forum, noone.

randge  posted on  2015-10-08   11:35:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#37. To: randge (#27)

That kind of name-calling is not necessary on this forum, noone.

Hey, I ain't calling names ... I was a Catholic myself. Our country and the world is in danger of being bullshitted to death by these costume wearing posers.

Followers of the Pope are papists.

noone222  posted on  2015-10-08   12:36:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#41. To: noone222 (#37)

Right, that is definitely not name-calling:

dictionary.reference.com/browse/papist?s=t

I wouldn't expect any exciting results from trying to argue this with Artesian. Do you enjoy trying to get onto moving merry-go-rounds :-)

You're astute in saying "the Roman Church will destroy itself like Amerika from within." The RCC sees itself as destined for the top of the NWO pyramid of power over the finally mongrelized, impoverished masses, but -- just like amerika, Harvard, DC, Hollywood, the works -- it doesn't notice it's dynamiting the very ground it's planning to stand on to do it.

Or is dynamiting everything and leaving nothing the plan this whole time?

www.texemarrs.com /102011/jaws_of_serpent.htm

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-10-08   13:03:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#43. To: NeoconsNailed (#41)

The truth is more important to me than any ideology. I know myself and know that I don't have a personal agenda. I have been wrong in my thinking on issues at times because I was less informed or even ill informed. That being said, I haven't quit searching for the truth.

It's funny how the indoctrination we get as children remains with us forever unless something occurs that causes us to open up the Pandora's Box of truth. Then all of a sudden things we took for granted or things we thought sacrosanct appear ludicrous, like old men wearing black robes, white robes, and purple robes, around in public and cross dress in private.

Many of these artificial authorities are being bribed or blackmailed by others in order to keep those under their authority in check. Paying taxes to a criminal cabal intent upon using the dough to decimate the payers is ridiculous and further those paying tribute to the satanist murderers make it hard on those that refuse to pay it by complying.

Frankly, I am of the opinion that the Babylonians enjoyed a diaspora that eventually became the so-called JEWS in Israel, The Papacy in Rome, and the international banking cabal that reside in the "City" of London and D.C. / New York. They are all gentiles and none are "real" Hebrews or Israelite descendants. These are all posers that have created myths and costumes that should have been discarded by the public ages ago. In truth, those calling themselves Jews today are even named (along with others) as the enemy of true Israel in the Bibles collecting dust in most Christian's homes.

Like I mentioned earlier, I refrain from the seemingly endless and nauseating debates that organized religion and religious zealots instigate. That being said, it galls me so terribly to hear a fervent Catholic criticize someone else's political opinion that I cannot let it go. The Roman Catholic church is far more political than it is Biblical and has a terrible history of torture and bank fraud etc., in addition the "believers" refuse to look at the facts.

Lastly, all of the organized churches are in actuality Catholic Churches that have allowed themselves to be tutored, lectured, and converted to Catholic Church doctrines.

noone222  posted on  2015-10-08   13:46:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#48. To: noone222 (#43)

The truth is more important to me than any ideology. I know myself and know that I don't have a personal agenda. I have been wrong in my thinking on issues at times because I was less informed or even ill informed. That being said, I haven't quit searching for the truth. ... I refrain from the seemingly endless and nauseating debates that organized religion and religious zealots instigate. That being said, it galls me so terribly to hear a fervent Catholic criticize someone else's political opinion that I cannot let it go.

When you said, "I quit," at #35, I was thinking like, "Unfair -- doing that before I could get back online to make any counterpoint of dissent or so much as ask a question." Good if you've reconsidered since then because I think now that there's a slight chance even you will approve of these political criticisms from the fervent Catholic, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who became the Conservative Pope Benedict XVI:

Wikipedia Reference

Papal Statements

On February 8, 1992, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger criticized U. S. President George H. W. Bush's recent speech calling for "a New World Order" in a speech of his own at the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore. ... Cardinal Ratzinger proceeded to quote from Pope Benedict XV's 1920 encyclical Bonum sane:

"The coming of a world state is longed for, by all the worst and most distorted elements. This state, based on the principles of absolute equality of men and a community of possessions, would banish all national loyalties. In it no acknowledgement would be made of the authority of a father over his children, or of God over human society. If these ideas are put into practice, there will inevitably follow a reign of unheard-of terror."

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-10-08   20:07:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#49. To: GreyLmist (#48) (Edited)

Whew -- one whole paragraph in a private speech 23 years ago. The joint's really jumpin'!

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-10-08   20:17:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#51. To: NeoconsNailed (#49) (Edited)

Whew -- one whole paragraph in a private speech 23 years ago. The joint's really jumpin'!

I probably could have found a copy of his entire speech but doubtful you, et al, would have wanted to read it all anyway. Ergo, I decided not to go that wordier route. The Wikipedia source is about something along those lines in booklength form, if you're really that interested in more than just downrating Popes regardless of if they're Conservative or Liberal.

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-10-08   20:37:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Replies to Comment # 51.

        There are no replies to Comment # 51.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 51.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]