See other Neocon Nuttery Articles
Title: He'd Let Them Swarm In, Now He'd kick Them Out: Trump Does Drastic 180 on Syrian Immigrants In less Than A Month, His Desperate, Starry-Eyed Supporters Don't Even Notice
Source:
.
URL Source: http://libertyfight.com/2015/trump_ ... ic_180_on_Syrian_refugees.html
Published: Oct 6, 2015
Author: .
Post Date: 2015-10-06 14:00:35 by Artisan
Keywords: None
Views: 4163
Comments: 87
Look, everyone knows we need a real game-changer in this country, someone who cares about America. But let's not be so naive, gullible and desperate as to so easily fall for yet another one of these shysters. Just like his sudden, drastic "about-faces" on gun rights and illegal immigration, Donald "I'm A Big Fan Of Israel" Trump said less than 25 days ago that we must let Syrian immigrants in because it's a "humanitarian disaster" and the poor migrants were "in a living hell." This was reported worldwide including on CNN, Breitbart, Politico, Fox news and everywhere else. This week he's saying the exact opposite, that he would send them back, (presumably send back the same ones he promised to let in?) Where I come from theres an old saying which applies in this case. Trump's "so full of shit his eyes are brown." Also, here are his quotes supporting the assault weapons ban, longer 'waiting lists' and as well as his promotion of amnesty for the "good" illegal aliens who have not "broken the law." Yes his lines are good, (depending on which way the wind is blowing) but savvy political observers who know about gun rights, immigration and pro-life issues know that this Clinton and Harry Reid donor is as trustworthy as a used car salesman. This week, it was reported: Donald Trump says he'd send back Syrian refugees taken in by the US But less than a month ago, he said what he would really do, the exact opposite! It was widely reported worldwide: On guns, Trump has openly called for gun bans, and to this day supports longer waiting lists and 'background checks.' And in a recent interview with a gun rights group, he did not retract his position on assault weapons ban, but rather quibbled about the defintion of what's considered an assault weapon. Here are some of the priceless comments from the gun rights forum from people who don't fall for Trump's b.s.: Here is Trump's waffling on immigration, backing away from his support of amnesty now that he's pretending to be a 'conservative.' Pro-Choice! Pro Amnesy! Pro Oprah! All The Reasons You Should Not Vote For Donald Trump "(TAPPER) Would you be open-minded about a path to citizenship? Is that a nonstarter with you? Where are you on that issue? (TRUMP) . . . First of all -- and you said it -- you have to stop it (illegal immigration). You have to stop it fast. And we can do that. We can do that with combinations of walls and Border Patrol . . . and fencing. Once that's done, we have a situation that is going to be done immediately, before that's done. We're going to get the bad ones out. We have some really bad dudes right here in this country, and we're getting them out, and we're sending them back to where they came from. And I don't mean Mexico. I mean, it's -- they come from all over. . . . (TAPPER) There obviously will be -- will remain, after you get rid of the bad ones, millions and millions of undocumented workers who are not bad ones. And they're women and they're children and they're men who are here who came here for a better life, and -- but you're not going to yet take a position on whether or not you would favor a path to citizenship? (TRUMP) I will say, from a moral standpoint, from a physical standpoint, you're talking about at least 11 million people. I have heard the number is much higher than that, because that number has been bandied about for years. . . . But we're going to take the high ground. We're going to do what's right. Some (illegal aliens) are going to have to go. And some, we're just going to see what happens. It's a very, very big subject, and a very complicated subject. . . ." This is from the Fox interview with Hannity: (Also edited for the pertinent content.) "(TRUMP) . . . these (illegal aliens) can be some great people--... MUST READS: [Excerpts from] MUST SEE VIDEO: "My name is Donald Trump and I'm a BIG FAN of Israel" (Trump Endorses Netanyahu 1/15/13) Donal Trump Wishes Israel Happy 60th Birthday in New York Times Square Celebration May 13, 2008 ... "This is from the CNN interview with Jake Tapper: (I have edited out parts that don't deal with the question of what Trump's plan would do with illegal aliens who are in this country.)
Donald Trump Endorsement for Prime Minister Netanyahu
Published on Jan 15, 2013
In an unprecedented move, the U.S. billionaire and world-renowned entrepreneur, Mr. Donald Trump, took part in a video showing his support for the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu and The Likud Party in general elections in Israel next week: "Vote for Benjamin, terrific guy, terrific leader, great for Israel."
In the month of May 2008, on the Reuters and Nasdaq screens (next to the police station) are showing clips of Hollywood stars greeting "Happy Birthday" to the 60th Anniversary of the state of Israel.
Celebrities posing with Jewish Chabad "orthodox" fanatics, wearing kippahs, posing with Israeli War Criminals...
"The only [candidate] that's going to give real support to Israel is me," said the 69-year-old Trump. "The rest of them are all talk, no action. They're politicians. I've been loyal to Israel from the day I was born. My father, Fred Trump, was loyal to Israel before me. The only one that's going to give Israel the kind of support it needs is Donald Trump."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 74.
#65. To: Artisan (#0)
Just saying on the refugee issue that there's much difference between refugee status and illegal alien migration. Refugees aren't considered to be immigrants exactly, are verified as humanitarian or political asylum seeking cases, are monitored as such and limitless numbers are not permitted to swarm in, afaik.
tell that to the poor white europeans who are being raped, robbed and terrorized by these alleged ''refugee'' savages, who are all young black /muslim men! no gramdmas, mothers, toddlers at all. this whole thing is some sort of sham. but aside from that, even if refugees were different than migrants, (essentially economic refugees), my point was not to debate the difference between refugees and migrants, but rather to point out that TRUMP SAID WE NEED TO BRING THE SYRIANS IN, and then 20 some days later he's blustering I'D KICK THEM ALL OUT"! and people cheer him as if they have no freaking clue at all that a number of hours previously he said the polar, exact 180 opposite. he insists ludicrously that we need to let them flock in, and then 20 days later blusters "i'd kick them out." First of all, anyone not retarded knows that the president has zero authority to ''kick anyone out'' of the u.s. once they are in, they are entitled to a lengthy, very slow immigration hearing process. that pesky rule of law thing. hundreds of thousands of them would take years for this and none of them would ever leave. we dont live in a cartoon show. trump is like a bad cartoon character. this combover Harry reid donor is beyond a clown and reading some weird script, written by (???) depending on which way the wind blows at the moment. i actually miss rand paul at this point and thats saying a lot! lol!
The one thing I always thought odd about being a Catholic even as a kid was that the priests seldom read more than a single sentence from the Bible before expounding Catholic Doctrine. When the Bible states that "they will make merchandise of your souls" it is describing the Roman Church to a tee. Side Note: I went to a public high school after graduating from a Catholic grade school. I attended Catholic instruction classes one night a week during my freshman year as "mandated" by my parish. During my second year of public high school a priest, Father Ripperger, told us IT WAS A MORTAL SIN" to quit these instruction classes. That was the last instruction class I attended because I didn't think the priest had any authority to create a sin that damned a kid to hell. Christ taught that we should know the tree by its fruit. The fruit of Catholicism is a very secretive clique of self promoting elites that wear fine linens and pretend holiness while gobbling up the homes and wealth of their misguided and guilt riddled followers. Many widows leave their homes and other property to this vile organization. Today, the Holy See is handing out maps, money, and other necessary information to complete an underground railroad into the United States for all of those invaders from south of the U.S. border. The Papacy is teaming up with other secretive elites (banksters/Bilderbergers) to create a one world governing body while at the same time incrementally accepting blatant violations of scripture with respect to abortions and homosexuality. The Papacy has facilitated the reconstruction of the Roman Empire using NATO and the European Union along with the U.S. Military (Praetorian Guard) to enhance the globalist agenda. Why else do communist and capitalist alike kiss the Pope's ring whenever convenient to a G-20 or Bilderberg event ? The Catholic Church has always been a pagan organization, a wolf in sheep's clothing. There is nothing new under the sun.
#75. To: noone222 (#74)
The church has never approved of either abortion or homosexuality; it plainly forbids and condemns both. Matter of fact, Margaret Sanger, founder of planned parenbthood, admtitted that her main adversary was the Catholic church and her motivation was to go against the Catholic church. So the abortionists you rightly deride know who their main enemy was/is, even if you don't. Bush senior, the 'globalist' (Satanist) and population control advocate, was also against the church and vowed to fight the Catholic churhc, from the floor of congress no less! By the way, every single one of those protestant "martin luther inspired' break-offs from the true church wholeheartedly endorse artificial contraception, which is a sin and straight from satan. guess who forbids it? Thats right. Maybe because they know who's boss., and who will win in the end? We will never agree on this. If you are a Lutheran, your religion was founded by Martin Luther, an ex- monk of the Catholic Church, in the year 1517. If you belong to the Church of England, your religion was founded by King Henry VIII in the year 1534 because the Pope would not grant him a divorce with the right to remarry. If you are a Presbyterian, your religion was founded by John Knox in Scotland in the year 1560. If you are a Protestant Episcopalian, your religion was an offshoot of the Church of England founded by Samuel Seabury in the American colonies in the 17th century. If you are a Congregationalist, your religion was originated by Robert Brown in Holland in 1582. If you are a Methodist, your religion was launched by John and Charles Wesley in England in 1744. If you are a Unitarian, Theophilus Lindley founded your church in London in 1774. If you are a Mormon (Latter Day Saints), Joseph Smith started your religion in Palmyra, N.Y., in 1829. If you are a Baptist, you owe the tenets of your religion to John Smyth, who launched it in Amsterdam in 1605. If you are of the Dutch Reformed church, you recognize Michaelis Jones as founder, because he originated your religion in New York in 1628. If you worship with the Salvation Army, your sect began with William Booth in London in 1865. If you are a Christian Scientist, you look to 1879 as the year in which your religion was born and to Mrs. Mary Baker Eddy as its founder. If you belong to one of the religious organizations known as 'Church of the Nazarene," "Pentecostal Gospel." "Holiness Church," "Pilgrim Holiness Church," "Jehovah's Witnesses," your religion is one of the hundreds of new sects founded by men within the past century. If you are Catholic, you know that your religion was founded in the year 33 by Jesus Christ the Son of God, and it is still the same Church.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestCNN: Trump: U.S. Should Accept Some Syrian Refugees September 8, 2015 Washington (CNN)—Donald Trump thinks the United States should accept some refugees from Syria due to the "unbelievable humanitarian problem." Trump has made anti-immigration rhetoric a cornerstone of his campaign, but the Republican presidential candidate said Tuesday evening that though the migrants could pose a security risk -- floating the idea that there may be individuals with ties to Islamic militants -- he supported allowing them into America. "I hate the concept of it, but on a humanitarian basis, with what's happening, you have to," Trump said to Fox News' Bill O'Reilly.
#70. To: GreyLmist, neoconsnailed (#65)
Just saying on the refugee issue that there's much difference between refugee status and illegal alien migration.
#74. To: Artisan (#70)
Replies to Comment # 74. while at the same time incrementally accepting blatant violations of scripture with respect to abortions and homosexuality.
Mike Wallace questions Margaret Sanger on Eugenics, Her opposition to the Catholic Church, 1957
George H.W. Bush: Evil Population Control Ghoul: "RUBBERS GOES TO CONGRESS" Why else do communist and capitalist alike kiss the Pope's ring whenever convenient to a G-20 or Bilderberg event ?
The Catholic Church has always been a pagan organization, a wolf in sheep's clothing.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 74.