Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Pious Perverts
See other Pious Perverts Articles

Title: Donald Trump Thinks You Should Be Able To Bring Guns Anywhere, Except His Own Hotels
Source: .
URL Source: http://thinkprogress.org/election/2 ... d-trump-hotels-gun-free-zones/
Published: Oct 6, 2015
Author: .
Post Date: 2015-10-06 15:12:00 by Artisan
Keywords: None
Views: 425
Comments: 21

Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump regularly calls for getting rid of gun-free zones. However, if the real estate magnate is to succeed in his quest, he’ll have to start with places like Trump-branded hotels and golf courses.

For years, the New York businessman has boisterously voiced his opposition to gun-free zones. In a 2014 interview with the Washington Times, Trump criticized the Aurora theater where James Holmes massacred 12 people and injured 70 more for being a gun-free zone. “If some of the people in the movie theater had a gun, they’d have been shooting at him,” he said. “Nobody had a gun so they were totally defenseless.”

Getting rid of gun-free zones has also been a regular talking point for Trump on the campaign trail. “We have to get rid of that whole gun-free zone nonsense and just stop it,” Trump declared during a speech in Charleston, South Carolina on July 21. “We gotta stick up for the Second Amendment.” He made a similar call on Twitter days earlier following the shootings at two military centers that left five individuals, as well as the gunman, dead.

Get rid of gun free zones. The four great marines who were just shot never had a chance. They were highly trained but helpless without guns.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 17, 2015

ThinkProgress spoke with a number of hotels and golf courses in the Trump empire and found that multiple locations were gun-free zones, even for guests with concealed-carry permits.

“No, we don’t allow any firearms in the hotel,” a manager at Trump International Hotel & Tower Chicago told ThinkProgress over the phone.

Guns are also banned at Trump National Golf Club in Los Angeles. An employee at the course told ThinkProgress that “we don’t allow firearms on the property.” Asked whether that ban applies even to those with a concealed-carry permit, he said that “with a permit we still don’t allow firearms.”

Nor are weapons, even for those with a concealed carry license, permitted at the Trump International Hotel Waikiki Beach Walk in Honolulu. “It’s a gun-free zone, even for people with a permit,” a customer service agent told ThinkProgress. (Though Hawaii is a “may issue” state with respect to licenses to carry a concealed firearm, it should be noted that, in practice, very few permits are granted.)

Not every Trump-branded hotel and golf course are gun-free. Trump International Hotel & Tower Central Park in New York City told ThinkProgress that a gun could be brought on the premises, but “you have to have a permit to carry it” and “it would have to be concealed.” Likewise, the Trump International Hotel Las Vegas said that “Our security department would have to note as to why you have it and see some paperwork, but other than that it’s fine.”


Poster Comment:

thetruthaboutguns.com reports: "I spoke to the security department at the Trump International Hotel and Tower in Chicago. He confirmed that the hotel has a “gun with a slash through it” sign at the main entrance. The sign bans Illinois concealed carry firearms permit holders from the premises." yet people believe that Trump, this POS Harry Reid donor and clinton donor, who stands by his assault weapon ban comments, is pro gun! what can you do with anyone who is so severely mentally deficient?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 12.

#3. To: Artisan (#0)

Right or wrong his hotels are technically private property so he can make whatever rules he wants on his personal property. It may be a bad example for some who want his views of public property to translate to rules on his private property, but I think this misses the point.

Even if all firearms laws are abolished there will still be those who insist on people disarming when they are on the property of someone that desires it to be so, even if that means the property owner has a monopoly on carrying a weapon (which Trump would have essentially if his hotels have private security).

If Trump is attacked on not being consistently pro-gun, they will have to look elsewhere than his hotel rules. JMHO.

PnbC  posted on  2015-10-06   16:25:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: PnbC, Artisan, Lod (#3)

It may be a purely financial/liability issue as well, such as having to pay exorbitant insurance unless he has such a policy.

Dakmar  posted on  2015-10-06   16:59:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Dakmar (#4)

It may be a purely financial/liability issue

I believe you are right about this, Dak. Insurance rates are something these businesses have no control over. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2015-10-06   17:43:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: BTP Holdings, pnbc, dakmar, cynicom, lod, pinguinite, christine (#5)

I appreciate all the "insurance" replies, but I don't believe for one minute that a property liability policy would expressly forbid or mandate that owners post gun ban signs. Many corporate billion dollar companies allow open carry, that controversy has been in the news for years.

A shooting range for example would probably have a higher premium, but to argue that trump is justified or required to have policy banning guns in order to qualify for liability insurance or to make it affordable is totally bogus.

Lod have you ever had an insurer dictate or even ask you about guns on your properties,?

I had a 2 million dollar liability policy some years back for a business and it was only a few hundred bucks a year.

No, trump posts no guns signs (by the way if you read the article it points out that a few of his properties do allow guns, but they will "ask what they're for). That in itself negates the need to explain all I did above.

Anti gunners like trump who advocate "assault weapon bans and longer waiting periods" ban guns because they're F-ing twisted leftist trash (and harry reid/ clinton donors in trumps case) not because some imaginary prohibition on guns on private property in america.

I wonder if anyone at 4um has ever donated millions to harry reid and bill clinton? ;-)

Artisan  posted on  2015-10-07   9:07:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Artisan (#7)

I've never been asked about weapons, or lack thereof, for any of my insurance needs.

Lod  posted on  2015-10-07   14:27:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Lod (#8)

In South many stores, businesses have signs etc, NO GUNS.

All for insurance purposes. Without sign their insurance is void.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-10-07   17:44:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Cynicom (#9)

They should be given premium reductions for having armed employees and patrons.

Lod  posted on  2015-10-07   17:56:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Lod (#10)

I thought it was rather dumb. A criminal will not rob cause guns are not allowed?

Cynicom  posted on  2015-10-07   18:09:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Cynicom (#11)

They could put up a sign: No Robberies Allowed

I'm sure that would be just as effective.

Lod  posted on  2015-10-07   18:17:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 12.

        There are no replies to Comment # 12.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 12.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest