See other Immigration Articles
Title: THERE'S STILL TIME TO RUIN RYAN -- BARELY! Here's how
Source:
numbersusa.com
URL Source: https://www.numbersusa.com/account/login
Published: Oct 22, 2015
Author: Roy Beck!
Post Date: 2015-10-22 14:44:06 by NeoconsNailed
Keywords: speaker
Views: 284
Comments: 17
What I wrote my rep: 'I heard you at a recent Tea Party meeting in Greenville. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST PAUL RYAN FOR SPEAKER. He is a total SELLOUT on immigration and a horrible neocon generally. And PLEASE LET ME HEAR YOUR POSITION on this. Not a form letter or message!' Get your Zip+4 handy and find your Rep here as needed: http://www.house.gov/representatives/find/ PLEASE do it -- pronto! Current headline per Drudge: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/paul-ryan-freedom-caucus-speaker- republicans-215044 NN
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 12.
#1. To: NeoconsNailed (#0)
Boner and McConnell's mission always was to destroy the TP. Both are closet socialists, just like Paul Ryan, who also wants to destroy the TP.
Right on, but did anybody call their CONgresscritter on this? Yeah, the TP is pathetic -- and so is my Rep, Jeff Duncan. Pitiful, pathetic, lamentable, but with NumbersUSA we've won one battle after another.
Depth of Amnesty Immigration Trickery by GOPe – Updates…
This is geared to my state -- Numbers may have done it for each: Leave a comment. Add a note to your Rep. The Charlotte Observer reports that "Most S.C. congressmen have pledged support" to Paul Ryan as the next Speaker of the House. Leave a comment on the story. Contact your Rep. or reach them on social media. The story quotes Rep. Mick Mulvaney saying "He {Ryan} promised he would not bring up comprehensive immigration reform while Obama is still president." And then what? Immigration wasn't going to come up again in this Congress anyway. What happens in 2017? In an unsettling sign of things to come, Ryan has chosen as his chief of staff a K street lobbyist with deep ties to pro-amnesty and immigration- expansionist organizations and politicians - a man who personally worked with the Chamber of Commerce to pass comprehensive immigration reform during President Obama's first term, and who previously worked for a firm that helped build a coalition meant to pass President Bush's comprehensive amnesty. jeremy Moved? Update your address information. Switched to another e-mail address? Change your e-mail address online. Sign up for text message action
#13. To: NeoconsNailed (#12)
============================================ Those three magical words: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MCCAIN TO HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: I'LL FIGHT FOR AMNESTY AS LONG AS 'I'M ALIVE
Senate Conservatives Huddle With House Members to Plot Immigration Revolt Senate Conservatives Huddle With House Members to Plot Immigration Revolt “Part of it is that leadership (as proxies for the Chamber of Commerce) wants the amnesty; Obama’s order provides a way to deliver cheap labor to the Chamber without having to vote for it. Part of it is an absolute fear of any conflict, including even a partial ‘shutdown.’”
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#4. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#1)
#11. To: NeoconsNailed (#4)
#12. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#11)
Replies to Comment # 12. In an unsettling sign of things to come, Ryan has chosen as his chief of staff a K street lobbyist with deep ties to pro-amnesty and immigration- expansionist organizations and politicians - a man who personally worked with the Chamber of Commerce to pass comprehensive immigration reform during President Obama's first term, and who previously worked for a firm that helped build a coalition meant to pass President Bush's comprehensive amnesty.
Crippling Consequences of Illegal Immigration
In 1965 President Lyndon Johnson signed the Immigration and Naturalization Services Act of 1965 (also known as the Hart-Celler Act or the INS Act of 1965) that abolished the national-origin quotas that had been in place in the United States since the Immigration Act of 1924. It was proposed by Emanuel Celler and heavily supported by Senator Ted Kennedy partly in response to the Civil Rights Movement.
1965 Immigration Law Changed Face of America
Illegal immigration critics muddy Voting Rights Act renewal
23 Defining Moments in Immigration Policy History - ALIPAC
History of Illegal Immigration in U.S.
There is a common sense, humane and cost-effective way to solve the problem of illegal immigration, without resorting to either mass deportation or amnesty. This is called “attrition through enforcement” wherein if our existing immigration laws are consistently enforced and jobs cut off, the number of illegal aliens will return to their home countries over time. This middle-ground strategy is endorsed by real immigration reform groups such as ALIPAC and NumbersUSA.
Ted Kennedy's Immigration Legacy -- and why did he do it?
Among those who disliked Kennedy the most, there has been a sense that Ted Kennedy fundamentally distrusted and disliked the citizens of this country.
The line of thinking is something like this: Even though the majority of these citizens had elected his brother President, and appeared likely to elect another brother to the office, Ted Kennedy wanted a different citizenry. Perhaps there was a sub-conscious hatred for the overall American people because of the assassinations (although one assassin was a foreigner and the other had tried to emigrate to the Soviet Union).
Perhaps he had some Irish immigrant chips on his shoulder about WASPS disrespecting his family. If he disliked the balance of power among the citizens of this country, wildly increasing immigration levels could largely shift the balance of political power and ideology in the country.
To whatever extent any of that was true, Kennedy's immigration policies certainly "elected a new citizenry." This country now has more than 50 million natives of other countries and their children. In a country of 300 million, that is an incredible influence on every aspect of our political and social and economic lives, don't you think.
Most of those 50 million are here as a result of the policies Kennedy put in place. 
#14. To: NeoconsNailed (#12)
The Corner
By Joel Gehrke
December 4, 2014 7:51 PM
A trio of senators crossed the Capitol last night to discuss the congressional response to President Obama’s recent executive orders on immigration. The consensus: Republican leadership doesn’t want to fight Obama, so the lawmakers have to hope that grassroots activists can goad their colleagues into a more aggressive posture.
“I hope that the American people will speak up and share their views with Congress and good strong language will come out of the House,” Senator Jeff Sessions (R., Ala.) told National Review Online Thursday afternoon.
Sessions demurred when asked about coordination with House colleagues — “all of us are curious about what they’re doing,” he said — but multiple sources tell NRO that Sessions, Senator David Vitter (R., La.), and Senator Mike Lee (R., Utah) met with a group of House members last night in the office of Arizona representative Matt Salmon. Vitter also organized a conference call with some House Republicans Wednesday afternoon. The purpose of the two encounters, which happened on the same day that Texas senator Ted Cruz met with Iowa representative Steve King, was to emphasize that “the first bill that you guys do was really our best and only chance,” according to one Senate aide; the Senate hawks won’t be able to instigate a fight if the House passes a bill that provides long-term funding for the entire government.
In the evening meeting, the lawmakers compared notes about their distrust for Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) and House speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio).
“There is a general belief that, despite the rhetoric from leadership after the executive order was announced, they really have no desire to do anything substantive to fight this,” one lawmaker who attended the meeting explained to NRO in a series of text messages. “Part of it is that leadership (as proxies for the Chamber [of Commerce]) wants the amnesty; Obama’s order provides a way to deliver cheap labor to the Chamber without having to vote for it. Part of it is an absolute fear of any conflict, including even a partial ‘shutdown.’”
Members of the small group believe that about 50 or 60 House Republicans are opposed to the House leadership’s current plan (a CRomnibus bill that passes several long-term appropriations bills but leaves the Department of Homeland Security operating on a short-term continuing resolution of as-yet-undetermined length).
“The thing is that Sessions’s opposition will likely flip the whole [Alabama and Mississippi] GOP delegations (these guys usually would vote for a bloated omnibus) so it won’t necessarily be the same 50 or 60 who voted against other bloated bills like the farm bill,” the lawmaker suggested.
House leaders are expected to partner with Democrats, so the conservative rank-and-file opponents think they’ll need the outside activist groups to ramp up the pressure on other lawmakers.
“Basically, [the] senators felt outside groups and the grassroots need to get engaged — the membership is largely behind the leadership so there is a need to get the members to whip ‘No’ so that leadership is forced to do something different,” the lawmaker said. That effort has already begun, to some degree, but it hasn’t been enough to convince Republicans to pass a bill in the lame-duck session that stipulates that federal funding may not be used to implement the executive orders.
“I’m very skeptical that outside groups will make a big difference because only some of them even engage on immigration and the ones that do aren’t as influential as they used to be,” the lawmaker lamented.
They aren’t giving up, the senators told the House members, even if they lose the funding fight. The Republican-controlled Senate, next year, could ask every presidential nominee with immigration-related responsibilities if they think Obama’s order is constitutional.
“If they say they will follow Obama then how can a GOP senator justify voting for a nominee who will violate his oath of office?” the lawmaker said.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...lt-joel-gehrke
End Trace Mode for Comment # 12.