[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Science/Tech See other Science/Tech Articles Title: Stellarator:world's largest nuclear-fusion machine (Science Magazine on YouTube) For more than 60 years, scientists have dreamed of a clean, inexhaustible energy source in the form of nuclear fusion. And they're still dreaming. But thanks to the efforts of the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, experts hope that might soon change. Last year, after 1.1 million construction hours, the institute completed the world's largest nuclear-fusion machine of its kind, called a stellarator. The machine, which has a diameter of 52 feet, is called the W7-X. And after more than a year of tests, engineers are finally ready to fire up the $1.1 billion machine for the first time. It could happen before the end of this month, Science reported. The black horse of nuclear reactors Known in the plasma physics community as the "black horse" of reactors that use nuclear fusion, stellarators are notoriously difficult to build. The GIF below shows the many different layers of W7-X, which took 19 years to complete: . From 2003 to 2007, as the project was being built, it suffered some major construction setbacks — including one of its contracted manufacturers going out of business — that nearly canceled the whole endeavor. Only a handful of stellarators have been attempted, and even fewer have been completed. By comparison, the more popular cousin to the stellarator, called a tokamak, is in wider use. Over three dozen tokamaks are operational around the world, and more than 200 have been built throughout history. These machines are easier to construct and, in the past, have performed better as a nuclear reactor than stellarators. But tokamaks have a major flaw that W7-X is reportedly immune to, suggesting that Germany's latest monster machine could be a game changer. How a nuclear-fusion reactor works Schematic of the average tokamak. Notice how it has fewer layers than the stellarator and the shape of the magnetic coils is different. The key to a successful nuclear-fusion reactor of any kind is to generate, confine, and control a blob of gas, called a plasma, that has been heated to temperatures of more than 180 million degrees Fahrenheit. At these blazing temperatures, the electrons are ripped from their atoms, forming ions. Under these extreme conditions the repulsive forces, which normally make ions bounce off one another like bumper cars, are overcome. The ions are therefore able to collide and fuse together, which generates energy, and you have accomplished nuclear fusion. Nuclear fusion is different from what fuels today's nuclear reactors, which operate with energy from atoms that decay, or break apart, instead of fusing together. Nuclear fusion is the process that has been fueling our sun for about 4.5 billion years and will continue to do so for another estimated 4 billion years. Once engineers have heated the gas in the reactor to the right temperature, they use super-chilled magnetic coils to generate powerful magnetic fields that contain and control the plasma. The W7-X, for example, houses 50 six-ton magnetic coils, shown in purple in the GIF below. The plasma is contained within the red coil: . The difference between tokamaks and stellarators For years, tokamaks have been considered the most promising machine for producing energy in the way the sun does because the configuration of their magnetic coils contains a plasma that is better than that of currently operational stellarators. But there's a problem: Tokamaks can control the plasma only in short bursts that last for no more than seven minutes. And the energy necessary to generate that plasma is more than the energy engineers get from these periodic bursts. Tokamaks thus consume more energy than they produce, which is not what you want from nuclear-fusion reactors, which have been touted as the "most important energy source over the next millennium." Because of the stellarators' design, experts suspect it could sustain a plasma for at least 30 minutes at a time, which is significantly longer than any tokamak. The French tokamak "Tore Supra" holds the record: Six minutes 30 seconds. If W7-X succeeds, it could turn the nuclear-fusion community on its head and launch stellarators into the limelight. "The world is waiting to see if we get the confinement time and then hold it for a long pulse," David Gates, the head of stellarator physics at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, told Science. Check out this awesome time-lapse video of the construction of W7-X on YouTube, or below: NOW WATCH: How scientists uncovered a completely new world inside the tunnels of the most powerful physics machine on Earth More From Business Insider The largest astronomy image of all time reveals something amazing This monster rocket that NASA is building to shuttle astronauts to Mars just passed a major milestone Gorgeous photos of a rapidly vanishing natural wonder that could be gone before 2100 Poster Comment: B H The longer that hot plasma can be held stable, the more fusion reaction happens in the plasma, and the enormous amount energy released would heat up the plasma further,and the hotter plasma would result in more fusion reaction. What they are trying to do is for these machines to keep this cycle going. Of course they haven't figured out if that actually happens, how they'd harness the energy from 300 million degree celsius plasma without destabilizing it and without the fusion becomes a runaway reaction with uncontrollable temperature. These are problems for the next millennium. hehe.2-1 Judge58... Very good article in this weeks "Time" magazine on fusion also. This could very well be mans next source of energy in the future. The Times article entertained the fact that we will be using fusion as a source of energy with in thirty years. Reading both articles, however leads me to believe otherwise. I hope Germany, and the researchers in the U.S. can eventually figure this out. This again, could change world order, in a heartbeat. I wish them all the luck in the world. 58-3 Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||