[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Science/Tech See other Science/Tech Articles Title: Could This Engineer’s Discovery Destroy Climate Change Argument? Could This Engineer’s Discovery Destroy Climate Change Argument? October 13th, 2015 A mathmatical discovery by an Australian electrical engineer and former climate modeller could totally destroy the premise that man-made ‘climate change’ is real. Dr. David Evans has six degrees in applied mathematiccs and used to work for the Australian government’s Greenhouse Office. He analyzed the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all so-called ‘climate science.’ He discovered that while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly. Dr. Evans corrected two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was previously thought. It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times. Dr. Evans said on the Australian website NT News: “Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 percent of the global warming in the last few decades.” “… [his discovery] ought to change the world. But the political obstacles are massive.” His discovery explains why none of the climate models used by the IPCC reflect the evidence of recorded temperatures. The models have failed to predict the pause in global warming which has been going on for 18 years and counting. “The model architecture was wrong. Carbon dioxide causes only minor warming. The climate is largely driven by factors outside our control.” This is an extremely damaging argument to the climate change cheerleaders in politics and the media. It’s our view that the “climate change” argument has been nothing more than a Trojan horse to implement more government control and socialism. CO2 (aka carbon dioxide) is a naturally-occurring substance that plants need to grow and thrive. Liberals will still try beat the climate change drum to implement their agenda, but they’re on very shaky scientific ground. Do you think Dr. Evan’s findings could be a political game-changer? Give us your take in the comments section below. Poster Comment: I always said that climate change was a bunch of hooey. We are in a "Maunder Minimum", which is minimal sun spot activity. This has a cooling effect on the Earth. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maunder_Minimum Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||