See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: Loose Change 2nd Edition on Google Video
Source:
Google Video
URL Source: http://video.google.com/videoplay?d ... 581991288263801&q=loose+change
Published: Jan 27, 2006
Author: Dylan Avery/Louder Than Words production
Post Date: 2006-01-27 13:22:46 by valis
Keywords: Edition, Change, Google
Views: 3179
Comments: 156
An ARG reader has noticed that Google Video is now hosting a streaming version of For those who have seen it, this link serves as a handy reference. For those who have not, after viewing, you’ll probably want to pick up a copy or two.
Loose Change 2nd edition (hopefully with Dylan Avery’s permission)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 58.
#41. To: valis (#0)
Bout halfway through, is a great presentation of the real material.
What I liked is that they showed a variety of info using logic, engineering, follow the $$, historical stuff (Northwoods), tracing pilots, passengers, possible scenarios; all with supporting newsreels, quotes, audio clips, video, & interviews.
Same here.. it wasnt like the first video.. mainly physical evidence.. This video was much better because of the way it presented all you mentioned.
The narration is well done too.
It really was and I'm glad they included the Northwoods document in detail.. for that was what first made me question 9/11.. it was that document.. that was the beginning.
I seem to require being told things several times before they really sink in. I heard about Northwoods before, but honestly didn't know what all the chatter was about until watching this.
Any way you look at it the towers came down from the top. The other controlled demos go down from the bottom. That buildings should go down upon them selves isn't suprising, as buildings are empty boxes of air. I'm darn sure not saying something is amiss here, but these are my observations.
it looks to me like they come down from the bottom--like any controlled implosion or demolition. remember the implosion of the murrah building in okc? it came down the same way as did building 7. is it peter jennings in that one clip who says, "anybody whose ever watched a building demolished on purpose knows that if you're going to do this you have to get at the under infrastructure to bring it down." ?
I am confused by this. From what I see, the towers come down starting from the top stories and colapse from there onto the lower floors.. Seems pretty clear from the multiple videos. The top floors collapsed before the lower ones - that's what I see.
The top floors collapsed before the lower ones - that's what I see. Right and if you watch as it was shown on the video as each floor collapsed explosions were seen on lower floors..
There are no replies to Comment # 58. End Trace Mode for Comment # 58.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#43. To: tom007, christine (#41)
#45. To: robin (#43)
What I liked is that they showed a variety of info using logic, engineering, follow the $$, historical stuff (Northwoods), tracing pilots, passengers, possible scenarios; all with supporting newsreels, quotes, audio clips, video, & interviews.
#47. To: Zipporah (#45)
#48. To: robin (#47)
The narration is well done too.
#49. To: Zipporah (#48)
#52. To: all (#49)
#54. To: tom007 (#52)
#57. To: christine (#54)
it looks to me like they come down from the bottom-
#58. To: tom007 (#57)
I am confused by this. From what I see, the towers come down starting from the top stories and colapse from there onto the lower floors.. Seems pretty clear from the multiple videos.
Replies to Comment # 58.