[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
(s)Elections See other (s)Elections Articles Title: Hillary Takes on Gun Lobby with New Anti-Gun Ad – Too Bad It’s the Same Old Poppycock Hillary Takes on Gun Lobby with New Anti-Gun Ad – Too Bad It’s the Same Old Poppycock November 4th, 2015 Elections Well, that didn’t take long for Hillary to show her true liberal colors. Mrs. Clinton released her first ad targeting gun control on Tuesday, a month after pledging to take on what she called the “powerful U.S. gun lobby.” The 30-second spot uses footage from an Oct. 5 town hall in Manchester, New Hampshire, where Clinton said she would pursue expanded background checks and take steps to hold gun manufacturers accountable for crimes committed with their weapons. Here’s the report from Newsmax: “‘This epidemic of gun violence knows no boundaries. Between 88 and 92 people a day are killed by guns. We’re better than this. We need to close the loopholes and support universal background checks,’ Clinton says as members of the audience nod in agreement. “How many people have to die before we actually act? Before we come together as a nation?” “The ad, titled ‘Together,’ will air in the early presidential primary voting states of Iowa and New Hampshire as part of a previously announced purchase, Clinton’s campaign said.” This is nothing more than well-worn, liberal anti-gun propaganda that Hillary is using to fire up the Democratic base for the primary run. “Coming together” sounds like such a nice, warm, touchy-feely phrase – until you remember how liberal Democrats want to make us “come together:” Through the full force of mandated legislation and government, carried out by men with guns. What liberals conveniently forget to address are the “Gun-Free Zones” in which almost all mass shootings the last several years have occurred, and most (if not all) of the shooters were on psychotropic, SSRI drugs prescribed by a doctor or their psychiatrist. This meant they had serious mental health issues (probably exacerbated by the drugs) before they decided to kill a lot of people, and that’s the “Inconvenient Truth” (as Al Gore would say) that liberals don’t want to bring up. Do you think that we should take a closer look at mental health issues and Gun-Free Zones when it comes to reducing gun violence? Sound off in the comments section below. Poster Comment: It's like the old boy at the doughnut shop said, "We own those guns to protect ourselves from the government." No more true words than that have ever been spoken. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||