[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Dead Constitution See other Dead Constitution Articles Title: Live Here? Expect to Pay An Extra TAX On Your Ammo Live Here? Expect to Pay An Extra TAX On Your Ammo Legislators really are out to discourage Americans from exercising their second amendment rights and they’ll stop at nothing to make the process of owning and using a gun as difficult as possible. And in the process they’ll make gun ownership unaffordable for you while it’s good for their pocketbook. Such is the case of Obama’s home state of Illinois where a proposed tax would be placed on every single round of ammunition you purchase. Making throwing lead down range an even more cost prohibitive activity. Guns.com fills us in. Commissioners in the most populous county in Illinois are on the cusp of approving a measure that would add a tax to each round of ammunition sold. Proposed by Cook County Commissioner Richard R. Boykin, the tax is a rehash of a 2012 proposal designed to address the county’s exploding homicide rate. That proposal, which mandated a $25 per gun and up to 5-cents per round of ammunition fee passed but without the bullet tax. Now, with 465 people murdered with guns in Cook County so far this year, Boykin is back for the ammo. And Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle thinks they now have enough votes on the 17-member board to push the measure through. “Commissioner Boykin came forward with the idea, and I pointed out to him that we’ve tried this before, and only gotten eight votes. One of the votes that we had hoped for at the time was the vote of his predecessor,” she said. The proposal, which Boykin and Preckwinkle editorialized in Monday’s Chicago Sun Times would mandate five cents per each centerfire round and one cent for rimfires such as .22LRs. “We should tax bullets just as we do guns to help government address the costs of violence. Currently taxpayers who do not purchase a bullet pay the full cost of gun violence,” they wrote. “We believe this is a fair measure, to make the cost of the product more accurately reflect the costs it has on the county and society. It’s no different than taxing alcohol or tobacco.” Earlier in the summer, Boykin proposed a seven-point plan to tackle gun violence in Chicago that blended a mix of social programs and increased law enforcement measures. These included seeking more Cook County Sheriffs in high crime areas, strict enforcement of curfew laws to keep urban youth off the streets at night, increasing penalties for those found with guns and appointing a Gun Violence Czar for the county. If approved, Cook County will join Seattle who instituted their own tax earlier this year and picked up a lawsuit from gun rights groups over the matter while Los Angeles is mulling over the concept. It’s an asinine measure to be sure. Especially considering there’s an already established precedent denying a commissions ability to do this. How so? In “Murdock V. Pennsylvania” [319 U.S. 105] (1948) it is stated: “‘A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the federal constitution… The power to impose a license tax on the exercise of these freedoms is indeed as potent as the power of censorship which this Court has repeatedly struck down… a person cannot be compelled ‘to purchase, through a license fee or a license tax, the privilege freely granted by the constitution.'” Basically your right to enjoy the second amendment cannot be erroneously taxed at the behest of misguided law makers. Tell us what you think of this idea, and be nice. Poster Comment: Same old tired malarky over and over. I'm glad I'm no longer there. If these idiots pass this, it will have to go all the way to the State Supreme Court to be struck down, just as the Chicago handgun ban was struck down. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
[Register]
|
||