See other Resistance Articles
Title: Texas Ranchers, Counties Sue Feds Over BLM Land Grab Private landowners get help from counties in attempt to stave off federal takeover
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/texas-ranch ... s-sue-feds-over-blm-land-grab/
Published: Nov 18, 2015
Author: staff
Post Date: 2015-11-18 17:16:58 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 122
Comments: 4
Multiple ranchers, a sheriff and several Texas counties are suing the federal government for unconstitutionally attempting to seize thousands of acres of private property along the Red River. Claiming the US Bureau of Land Management is violating citizens’ Fourth and Fifth Amendments and “infringing upon the sovereignty of local county governments,” a lawsuit filed in US District Court by nine private landowners, including one county sheriff, in addition to Wichita, Clay, and Wilbarger counties, seeks to end the dispute with the feds once and for all. The lawsuit claims the federal government’s “ownership of property is limited to bottom-half of the sandy riverbed outside of Texas. “Nonetheless, the BLM asserts that its boundary extends well past the riverbed into Texas and, in some instances, more than a mile outside of its lawful territory.” Plaintiff and rancher Ken Aderholt spoke out last month about the federal takeover threatening nearly half of his family’s land and home. Despite Aderholt possessing a deed to 1,250 acres of property in Harrold, Texas since 1941, the BLM recently deemed the title worthless, asserting ownership of some 600 acres. “The BLM is saying we should have never had a deed to it. That Texas should have never produced that deed,” Aderholt told KAUZ. “It is a land grab,” Aderholt insists. “As far as I am concerned, this is private property.” aderholt-rancher-blm Other ranchers included in the lawsuit say the BLM is targeting more than half of their land, with some unaware of the exact acreage being claimed by the agency. Wichita, Clay and Wilbarger counties say the BLM’s claim “interferes with [their] ability to regulate and provide services for the health, benefit and welfare of [their] citizens, and infringes upon [their] sovereignty.” Wichita County Commissioners claim Texas Gov. Greg Abbott gave his blessing prior to participating in the lawsuit. Additionally, plaintiff and Clay County Sheriff Kenneth Lemons asserts the BLM’s “vague assertion of ownership and jurisdiction interferes with [his] ability to discharge his law enforcement duties by preventing him from being able to discern” local from federal land. “Furthermore, [the BLM’s] assertion of ownership causes trespassers to encroach onto private landowners’ land and engage in unlawful activity under the belief they cannot be removed because it is federal public land,” the lawsuit reads. The feds argue the 116-mile stretch along the Red River has been theirs all along. “The BLM has maintained that the entire parcel of land along 116-miles of the Red River in question has been public land managed by the federal government since the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, confirmed time and again with Spain and the Supreme Court of the United States rulings,” reports John Ingle for the Times Record News. The ranchers and counties worry the BLM’s “vague assertions” have cast “a cloud upon individual Plaintiffs’ titles, preventing them from disposing of their property, borrowing against it, or otherwise fully enjoying their property.” BLM Lawsuit by Spencer Williams https://www.scribd.com/doc/290040618/BLM-Lawsuit
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Horse (#0)
BLM is certifiably insane.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
Texas Attorney General's Office intervenes over federal Red River land grab Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton today intervened in Aderholt, et. al. v. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), challenging the federal encroachment on Texas land near the Red River and seeking to establish recognition of our state's rightful boundary. “The borders of any state are a fundamental expression of its sovereignty, and are established through extensive surveys and legal precedent,” said Attorney General Paxton. “We will not allow the federal government to arbitrarily infringe upon Texas land and undermine the private property rights of our citizens. The federal government must follow the law and recognize our correct borders, consistent with decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court defining the boundary formed by the Red River.” Pursuant to various U.S. Supreme Court cases in the 1920s, the federal government only has rights to a narrow part of the Red River up to its southern bank. The federal government, however, claims that it owns up to 90,000 acres of Texas property along 117 miles of the Red River, much of it miles from the banks of the Red River. The BLM’s failure and refusal to conduct a proper and complete boundary survey along the Red River directly injures the state’s ability to demand recognition of its boundary. The federal government’s inaccurate and arbitrary claim to land located in Texas conflicts with the requirements of the U.S. Supreme Court.
#2. To: Lod, Horse, *Texas!!* (#1)
-Alex Kurtagic
#3. To: X-15 (#2)
Thanks for some sanity here.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
#4. To: Horse (#0)
Once a federal court settles the issue an 8 foot high chain link fence with signs that read, "US GOVT PROPERTY-NO TRESPASSING, NO PHOTOGRAPHY, NO MOHADO HUNTING UNDER PENALTY OF DEATH" will clarify any jurisdictional questions the Sheriff may have now. And regarding a “vague assertion of (Federal) ownership....", the Feds can scribble their brief on a brown paper grocery sack and the first Art. Three Judge who reads it will find it "...so compelling that this court is shocked that a question that was settled by The Louisiana Purchase is brought before a modern court of competent jurisdiction... And the latest edition of BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY may now include Plaintiffs' claims as the very best examples of the legal term, "frivolous". Additionally, plaintiff and Clay County Sheriff Kenneth Lemons asserts the BLM’s “vague assertion of ownership and jurisdiction interferes with [his] ability to discharge his law enforcement duties by preventing him from being able to discern” local from federal land.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest