See other Activism Articles
Title: Dave McGowan battling aggressive cancer: wrote 9/11 was a lie on 9/12
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://truthandshadows.wordpress.c ... /05/23/mcgowan-battles-cancer/
Published: Nov 21, 2015
Author: Truth and Shadows
Post Date: 2015-11-21 01:18:43 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 471
Comments: 8
This post features the full text of an article Dave McGowan wrote on Sept. 12, 2001, questioning the official story of the “terrorist attacks” 9/11. This is preceded by introductions from me and from Truth and Shadows contributor Sheila Casey. ** Since the publication of this article, it has come to my attention that Dave McGowan is in desperate need of funds so that he can cope with the effects of his illness. His brother Craig wrote on Facebook: “As far as the donations, most of you know that dave has been struggling financially the last 8 months and made less than 5 grand total on the book “Weird Scenes.” Our family is, for no better term, poor, or, in the lower middle class realm, if that even is a class…Like David, I have a very difficult time asking for financial help from others so I’m not going to ask anyone here. Does david need the help? yes. Will he mention it? absolutely not.” You can donate to Dave via his web site, which has a donate button at the top.(CM) McGowan: insight and courage. McGowan: insight and courage. Craig McKee: We received some terrible news yesterday that Dave McGowan, one of the most important and engaging researchers in the “conspiracy” field, is seriously ill. He has a very aggressive and advanced form of cancer – affecting his lungs, liver, and bones – and has a very small chance of recovery. I thought it appropriate to honor Dave and his continuing contribution to truth seeking and to let people know just how valuable a writer he is, by reprinting a piece below that he wrote just a day after 9/11. He knew right away that the official story we were being fed about the so-called “terrorist attacks” did not add up. It doesn’t have all the answers, but it makes an excellent start on asking the right questions. The first thing I read from McGowan was his series on the Apollo Moon missions called “Wagging the Moondoggie.” This amazing 14-part series is what finally convinced me that the Moon landings never took place. What struck me was not only his insight but his wit. Very dry, which is the best kind. In addition to what became a whole series on 9/11, I was also blown away by series on the Boston Marathon “bombing” and dark side of the music scene in Laurel Canyon in the 1960s (which became a book). Other books he has written include Programmed to Kill, Understanding the F-Word: American Fascism and the Politics of Illusion, and Derailing Democracy: The America the Media Don’t Want You to See. Sheila Casey: One of my heroes has received a devastating diagnosis and I’m heartbroken. I had assumed we would have many more years of wit, insight, and terrific investigative journalism from dissident writer Dave McGowan. Like Craig, the first thing I read by Dave was “Wagging the Moondoggie.” I distinctly recall my feeling of dismay when I saw the length of it: 14 chapters in a none-too-friendly page layout. But a few pages in, and I was immersed, and steadily coming to the inescapable conclusion that those wacky conspiracy theorists I’d heard about all my life, the ones who believe we didn’t go to the moon, were right. But Dave doesn’t just do great research and display impeccable logic. He writes with so much wit that he can make the most incredible deceptions (such as the faked moon landings) seem downright hilarious. For example: “There was much about the Apollo flights that was truly miraculous, but arguably the greatest technological achievement was the design of the lunar modules. Has anyone, by the way, ever really taken a good look at one of those contraptions? I mean a detailed, up-close look? I’m guessing that the vast majority of people have not, but luckily we can quickly remedy that situation because I happen to have some really good, high-resolution images that come directly from the good people at NASA. While what is depicted in the images may initially appear, to the untrained eye, to be some kind of mock-up that someone cobbled together in their backyard to make fun of NASA, I can assure you that it is actually an extremely high-tech manned spacecraft capable of landing on the surface of the Moon. And incredibly enough, it was also capable of blasting off from the Moon and flying 69 miles back up into lunar orbit! Though not immediately apparent, it is actually a two-stage craft, the lower half (the part that looks like a tubular aluminum framework covered with Mylar and old Christmas wrapping paper) being the descent stage, and the upper half (the part that looks as though it was cobbled together from old air conditioning ductwork and is primarily held together, as can be seen in the close-up, with zippers and gold tape) being the ascent stage. The upper half, of course, is the more sophisticated portion, being capable of lifting off and flying with enough power to break free of the Moon’s gravity and reach lunar orbit. It also, of course, possessed sophisticated enough navigational capabilities for it to locate, literally out in the middle of fucking nowhere, the command module that it had to dock with in order to get the astronauts safely back to Earth. It also had to catch that command module, which was orbiting the Moon at a leisurely 4,000 miles per hour. But we’ll get to all that a little later. I think we can all agree for now that such a sleek, stylish, well-designed craft would have no problem flying with that kind of power, precision and stability.” Yes, this is a real lunar module – courtesy of NASA. Poster Comment: I actually laughed out loud at Dave's description of the lunar module. He's a great truthseeker, researcher, and writer. So sad to hear that he is in a coma and doesn't have much longer to live.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.
#1. To: christine (#0)
Stone used to have a poster at his site named mcgowanjm who was an encyclopedia of links and information who's been around the www longer than I. He'd have made a really good addition to 4um, but I haven't seen him in a couple years. I wonder if they're related. Anyway, I'm going to the link provided and kick in a little cash, cuz it's for a really good cause. Have you ever seen Turtle's web page, Christine? He actually has a tin cup (tip jar) where you can make donations to his poverty stricken ass.
I haven't visited Turtle's blog. Not interested for obvious reasons. Did you read Dave Mcgowan's day after 9/11 commentary? Wow. I'm interested now in reading his expose' on the Boston bombing.
9-11 was a set up to get America to invade Iraq. The "Dancing Israelis" are proof of foreknowledge of the attacks. It didn't help matters that NORAD kept the fighters out over the ocean so they could not shoot the planes down. The fact that Saddam was accepting Euros in payment for oil. This violated the U.S. policy of "Dollar Supremacy", so Saddam had to go. They didn't like what we did to them. The "Highway of Death" was the road from Kuwait to Baghdad. A-10s would strafe fleeing Iraqi columns. The "Boston Bombing" was another hoax. Imagine how these two guys could have caused all that havoc with bombs made from pressure cookers. That marathon race was very well attended by the public, and there was a lot of police security. It would have been impossible to place these devices at strategic locations without being noticed. ;)
that's not to say that there were not real victims, however.
#7. To: christine (#5)
I'm sure there are many.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: Obnoxicated (#1)
#4. To: christine (#2)
Did you read Dave Mcgowan's day after 9/11 commentary? Wow. I'm interested now in reading his expose' on the Boston bombing.
#5. To: BTP Holdings (#4)
Replies to Comment # 5.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 5.