See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: An Anonymous Email From An Airline Mechanic
Source:
rbnlive
URL Source: http://www.rbnlive.com/mechanic.html#email
Published: Jan 24, 2006
Author: A concerned citizen
Post Date: 2006-01-29 17:32:27 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Keywords: Anonymous, Mechanic, Airline
Views: 180
Comments: 44
An Anonymous Email From An Airline Mechanic For reasons you will understand as you read this I can not divulge my identity. I am an aircraft mechanic for a major airline. I work at one of our maintenance bases located at a large airport. I have discovered some information that I think you will find important. First, I should tell you something about the "pecking order" among mechanics. It is important to my story and to the cause to which you have dedicated yourself. Mechanics want to work on three things. The avionics, the engines, or the flight controls. The mechanics that work on these systems are considered at the top of the "pecking order". Next come the mechanics that work on the hydraulics and air conditioning systems. Then come the ones who work on the galley and other non-essential systems. But at the very bottom of the list are the mechanics that work on the waste disposal systems. No mechanic wants to work on the pumps, tanks, and pipes that are used to store the waste from the lavatories. But at every airport where I have worked there are always 2 or 3 mechanics that volunteer to work on the lavatory systems. The other mechanics are happy to let them do it. Because of this you will have only 2 or 3 mechanics that work on these systems at any one airport. No one pays much attention to these guys and no mechanic socializes with another mechanic who only works on the waste systems. Fact is, I had never even thought much about this situation until last month. Like most airlines we have reciprocal agreements with the other airlines that fly into this airport. If they have a problem with a plane one of our mechanics will take care of it. Likewise, if one of our planes has a problem at an airport where the other airline has a maintenance base, they will fix our plane. One day last month I was called out from our base to work on a plane for another airline. When I got the call the dispatcher did not know what the problem was. When I got to the plane I found out that the problem was in waste disposal system. There was nothing for me to do but to crawl in and fix the problem. When I got into the bay I realized that something was not right. There were more tanks, pumps, and pipes then should have been there. At first I assumed that the waste disposal system had been changed. It had been about 10 years since I had worked on this particular model of aircraft. As I tried to find the problem I quickly realized the extra piping and tanks were not connected to the waste disposal system, at all. I had just discovered this when another mechanic from my company showed up. It was one of the mechanics who usually works on this particular type of plane, and I happily turned the job over to him. As I was leaving I asked him about the extra equipment. He told me to "worry about my end of the plane and let him worry about his end!" The next day I was on the company computer to look up a wiring schematic. While I was there I decided to look up the extra equipment I had found. To my amazement the manuals did not show any of the extra equipment I had seen with my own eyes the day before. I even tied in to the manufacturer files and still found nothing. Now I was really determined to find out what that equipment did. The next week we had three of our planes in our main hanger for periodic inspection. There are mechanics crawling all over a plane during these inspections. I had just finished my shift and I decided to have a look at the waste system on one of our planes. With all the mechanics around I figured that no one would notice an extra one on the plane. Sure enough, the plane I choose had the extra equipment! I began to trace the system of pipes, pumps, and tanks. I found what appeared to be the control unit for the system. It was a standard looking avionics control box but it had no markings of any kind. I could trace the control wires from the box to the pumps and valves but there were no control circuits coming into the unit. The only wires coming into the unit was a power connection to the aircraft's main power bus. The system had 1 large tank and 2 smaller tanks. It was hard to tell in the cramped compartment, but it looked like the large tank could hold about 50 gallons. The tanks were connected to a fill and drain valve that passed through the fuselage just behind the drain valve for the waste system. When I had a chance to look for this connection under the plane I found it cunningly hidden behind a panel under the panel used to access the waste drain. I began to trace the piping from the pumps. These pipes lead to a network of small pipes that ended in the trailing edges of the wings and horizontal stabilizers. If you look closely at the wings of a large airplane you will see a set of wires, about the size of your finger, extending from the trailing edge of the wing surfaces. These are the static discharge wicks. They are used to dissipate the static electric charge that builds up on a plane in flight. I discovered that the pipes from this mystery system lead to every 1 out of 3 of these static discharge wicks. These wicks had been "hollowed out" to allow whatever flows through these pipes to be discharged through the fake wicks. It was while I was on the wing that one of the managers spotted me. He ordered me out of the hanger telling me that my shift was over and I had not been authorized any overtime. The next couple of days were very busy and I had no time to continue my investigation. Late one afternoon, two days after my discovery, I was called to replace an engine temperature sensor on a plane due to take off in two hours. I finished the job and turned in the paperwork. About 30 minutes later I was paged to see the General Manager. When I went in his office I found that our union rep and two others who I did not know were waiting on me. He told me that a serious problem had been discovered. He said that I was being written up and suspended for turning in false paperwork. He handed me a disciplinary form stating that I had turned in false paperwork on the engine temperature sensor I had installed a few hours before. I was floored and began to protest. I told them that this was ridiculous and that I had done this work. The union rep spoke up at this point and recommended that we take a look at the plane to see if we could straighten it all out. I then asked who the other two men were. The GM told me that they were airline safety inspectors but would not give me their names. We proceeded to the plane, which should have been in the air but was parked on our maintenance ramp. We opened the engine cowling and the union rep pulled the sensor. He checked the serial number and told everyone that it was the old instrument. We then went to the parts bay and went back into the racks. The union rep checked my report and pulled from the rack a sealed box. He opened the box and pulled out the engine temperature sensor with the serial number of the one I had installed. I was told that I was suspended for a week without pay and to leave immediately. I sat at home the first day of my suspension wondering what the hell had happened to me. That evening I received a phone call. The voice told me "Now you know what happens to mechanics who poke around in things they shouldn't. The next time you start working on systems that are no concern of yours you will lose your job! As it is, I'm feeling generous, I believe that you'll be able to go back to work soon." CLICK. Again, I had to pick myself from off the floor. As my mind raced, it was at this moment that I made the connection that what had happened to me must have been directly connected to my tracing the "mysterious" piping. That day at work went by as if nothing had happened. None of the other mechanics mentioned the suspension and my union rep told me not to talk about it. That night I logged onto the Internet to try to find some answers. I don't remember now how I got there but I came across a site that talked about chemically-laced contrails. That's when it all came together. But the next morning at work I found a note inside my locked locker. It said, "Curiosity killed the cat. Don't be looking at Internet sites that are no concern of yours." Well that's it. Now I know 'THEY' are watching me. While I don't know what THEY are spraying, I can tell you how they are doing it. I figure they are using the "honey trucks". These are the trucks that empty the waste from the lavatory waste tanks. The airports usually contract out this job and nobody goes near these trucks. Who wants to stand next a truck full of sh--. While these guys are emptying the waste tanks, it makes sense that they could easily be filling the tanks of the spray system. They know the planes flight path so they probably program the control unit to start spraying some amount of time after the plane reaches a certain altitude. The spray nozzles in the fake static wicks are so small that no one in the plane would see a thing. God help us all. -- A concerned citizen
The next morning the General Manager called me. He said that due to my past excellent employment record that the suspension had been reduced to one day and that I should report back to work immediately. The only thing I could think of was "what are they trying to hide" and "who are 'THEY'"!
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-3) not displayed.
.
.
.
#4. To: SKYDRIFTER (#2)
so it's BS?
Well if this is a valid email not some crackpot or disinformationalist.. there is enough info in this email for this person to be easily identified... so he'll be in the unemployment line.
http://www.weatherwars.info/index.p hp http://www.carnicom.com The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
Total BS. The "Chemtrail" argument starts with an altitude of 30,000 feet. What 'biological' can survive that temperature? It's obvious that the engines are pumping thousands of pounds of fuel per hour - to make the water-vapor contrails. There would be no room for pax/cargo, if "cmentrails" were the case. From 30,000 feet, imagine the dispersal pattern - 100% ineffective, whether 'chemical' or 'biological.' If one elected to poison a population, water supplies are vulnerable from any houshold, by back-presssuring the water system with a selected contaminant; who needs airplanes? This subject has to be a CIA propaganda credibility experiment. So far, it's working!
Something fishy here - this article is flawed, I think.
If you doubt that there are "chem-trails," please come visit us, soon, here in the CenTex - we are now being treated to a near daily dosing of God-only-knows- what.
I don't doubt the trails - they wreck my SE Utah camping area skies.
This article belongs on "The X-Files."
Shall we not believe our lying eyes? The crap has been all over the country for years, yet we aren't suppose to scratch our heads? Oh yeah, I developed asthma at 54 years old and it's been horrible this year. Neat.
IM
10 years ago, I never saw a trail from a plane that lasted longer than a couple minutes, no matter what altitude. Last week as an example, I live just south of Chicago, we had a clear blue sky all day, no long plume trails off of planes, and there were, as always, planes coming and going. The very next day, just before a front was moving in, it was a checkerboard. The sky was turned milky. Planes were laying down huge hanging clouds. What it is, I don`t know, but this isn`t normal, and it is not what was normal less than 10 years ago. Mark
HHMM. That sentence kind of popped out at me. It really just doesn't jive. "Hey, Jimbo, after you're done fixing the window crank on that Cessna go over and change the brake fluid on that 747 over there." And spraying chemicals from 35,000 feet--minus 60 degrees and 300 MPH winds or thereabouts? Chemicals sprayed out 35,000 feet over Mississippi could simply be wasted by dropping into the Atlantic or could possibly land on Madgascar and/or somewhere in between. A safe wager would be that not ONE molecule of said chemical would hit Mississippi. Nope, I'm staying with the mere ice crystals from a jet engine at high altitude explanation.
In 1947, the UN created a perpetual war and named it Israel.
And I have never seen anything coming out of those little antenna whisker/thingies on the wings--the "trails" are always coming from the engines or a very small trail from the very extreme tip of the wing--I've seen that.
In 1947, the UN created a perpetual war and named it Israel.
what is that stuff?
I saw this email or one very similar to it a couple years ago. I think this is an urban legend.
This is what I notice and I suspect others do as well. A clear, blue sky can change to what you just described in 30 minutes. I've not seen anything similar in my lifetime, but to notice the obvious, and dare to question it, is to step out of the box. Where are the environmental whackos when we need them?
I think they're all on the west coast, where the prevailing westerlies would blow any chemtrails inland.
"We don't need no stinkin' badges!" -Gold Hat, now starring Alberto Gonzales HA! Joke's on them. With pinpoint accuracy, those west coasters are getting deluged with the dreaded Asian variety of chemtrail--now fortified with Avian virus and other advancements.
In 1947, the UN created a perpetual war and named it Israel.
The actual trails could be the fake out. Releasing over time a genetically modified virus to convey immunity to a population to a select group of organisms could very easily be done with that quantity of agent if the planes merely released the agent over populated areas at landing and takeoff approach. There wasn't obvious multi-thousand gallon tanks and obvious sprays when agents were being dispersed in the SF bay experiments, and that was bacteria IIRC, and 30 some odd years ago...
Government blows, and that which governs least blows least...
HA! Joke's on them. With pinpoint accuracy, those west coasters are getting deluged with the dreaded Asian variety of chemtrail--now fortified with Avian virus and other advancements. Damn! And the worst is just ahead. "We don't need no stinkin' badges!" -Gold Hat, now starring Alberto Gonzales The duration of contrails is a function of local high-altitude weather. Wind & turbulence erase contrails, quickly. Take that from an airline captain.
The story has a hollow ring to it. Not that I don't believe that our government isn't capable of spraying chemical/bio agents over us, but I just don't think that they would run the risk of using commerial airlines to do it - not when they can used military or CIA contractor flights for the purpose. Hell, why diddle around with a 100 gal tank on a commercial plane when they can just use a couple of AF tankers and spay all day and all night. Richard W.
LOL....(love the tag, robin) (g)
So far, it's working! Just had that thought about you lately ... disinformation taliban morale booster specialist - experiment --- cracks - portals - charges - bait to destroy the liberal confederacy !
New Chemtrails Theory Just Might Make You Sick Brucellosis is a bacterial disease usually found in cattle, ... This program may explain the mysterious Chemtrails which have been noted over major ... http://w ww.geocities.com/area51/shadowlands/6583/project377.html - 10k - Cached - Similar pages New chemtrails theory just might make you sick by Jim Marrs 11/23/2000 "The Chemtrails program may well be a belated effort by the US and Canadian governments to get the brucellosis genie back in its bottle." ... http://pdhar ris0.tripod.com/Chemtrail_Theory_by_Jim_Marr.htm - 11k - Cached - Similar pages Dorothea's Yellow Brick Road - Environmental Information A report from a Canadian research foundation concluded that the much discussed, but little publicized Chemtrails, may be an attempt to hide a sickening ... http://www.ozybr.com/environ.htm - 12k - Cached - Similar pages Chemtrails And Terror In The Age Of Nuclear War If people were to consider the published science regarding chemtrails and DU, ... The Brucellosis Triangle, Donald W. Scott, Chelmstreet Publishers, 1998. ... http://www.rense.com/general53/ chemsd.htm - 70k - Cached - Similar pages Chemtrails - What You Need To Know - New Summary And Medical Data Chemtrails, as opposed to contrails, take three or more hours to dissipate. ... its citizenry against Anthrax, Tularemia, Brucellosis, or all three. ... http://www.rense.com/general/need.h tm - 26k - Cached - Similar pages Consumer Health Articles: CHEMTRAILS IN THE SKY AND THE NEW MICROBES (a) THE HIGH-FLYING SPRAY PROGRAM Chemtrails are not contrails from commercial ... Chronic fatigue and fibromyalgia are caused by brucellosis without doubt. ... http://www.consumerhealth.org/articles/ - 41k - Cached - Similar pages CHEMTRAILS OVER AMERICA #5 Similar plant problems are commonly associated with chemtrails in other regions of the US ... (See Dan Scott’s THE BRUCELLOSIS TRIANGLE.) ... http://www.netowne.com/environmental/ - 25k - Cached - Similar pages Chemtrails Over America/Chemtrail/Contrails/Jet Pollution/Jet Trails Chemtrails Over America, Chemtrails Not Contrails Over America. US Authority on Chemtrails talks about the ... (See Dan Scott’s THE BRUCELLOSIS TRIANGLE.) ... http://www.willthomas.net/Chemtrails/ - 117k - Cached - Similar pages chemtrails ... "The Chemtrails program may well be a belated effort by the US and Canadian governments to get the brucellosis genie back in its bottle.". ... http://www.ylana.com/1126news.htm - 20k - Supplemental Result - Cached - Similar pages chemtrails Chem Trails were sprayed heavily over Austin Texas (my home town) last night. ... its citizenry against Anthrax, Tularemia, Brucellosis, or all three. ... http://www.worldnewss tand.net/health/CHEMTRAILS.htm - 196k - Cached - Similar pages
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
"Stolen skies: the chemtrail mystery. (Jet Trails in the
Sky Used to Disappear. Now they Linger). Earth Island Journal;
6/22/2002; Thomas, William It was around noon on March 12, 2000 when
S.T. Brendt, the late night reporter for WMWV Radio, entered the kitchen of
her country home in Parsonsfield, Maine. Her partner, Lou Aubuchont, was
puzzling over what he had seen in the sky a half-hour before. The fat puffy
plumes arching up over the horizon were unlike any aircraft condensation
trails ("contrails") he had ever seen. Instead of dissipating like normal
contrails, these intersecting sky trails grew wider and began to merge.
Looking towards the sun, Aubuchont saw what appeared like "an oil and water
mixture" reflecting a prismatic band of colors. Ordinarily, contrails
flare briefly in the stratosphere as hot moist engine exhaust flash-freezes
into a stream of ice-crystals. These pencil-thin condensation trails are short-
lived, evaporating into invisibility as exhaust gases cool quickly to the
surrounding air temperature. As National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) meteorologist Thomas Schlatter explains, the formation
of condensation trails requires temperatures lower than about minus 76 F and
humidity of 70 percent or more. Because the Federal Aviation Authority
requires military tankers and transporters to cross continental airspace at
altitudes below 30,000 feet, ensuring safe separation from airliners flying
between 35,000 and 39,000 feet, these military flights should leave no
contrails at all. But in late 1997, Aubuchont began to notice thicker
trails extending from horizon to horizon. Hanging in the sky, these expanding
white ribbons would invariably be interwoven by more thick lines left by
unmarked Air Force jets, white or silver in color. As Brendt glanced out
the window, it looked like another gorgeous, cloudless day. But not quite. She
spotted two jets laying billowing white banners to the north. Turning her gaze
due west, Brendt saw two more lines extending over the horizon. She called
Lou. Within 45 minutes, the couple counted 30 jets. "This isn't right," Brendt
thought. "We just don't have that kind of air traffic here." While Aubuchont
kept counting, Brendt started calling airports. Alerted by a call from
Brendt, Richard Dean, WMWV's assistant news director and the WMWV news staff
filed outside and counted 370 lines of persistent contrails in skies usually
devoid of aerial activity. Brendt phoned a number of Air Traffic
Controllers. They all stated that nothing unusual was going on. After several
calls, Brendt reached one ATC manager who offered a different story. He told
Brendt that his radars showed nine commercial jets during the same 45-minute
span. From her location, he said, she should have been able to see only one
plane. "What about the other 29?" Brendt inquired. The ATC official
confided off- the-record that he had been ordered "by higher civil authority"
to re-route inbound European airliners away from an airborne "military
exercise" in the area. "They wouldn't give me any of the particulars and I
don't ask," he explained. The controller (who insisted on being identified
only as "Deep Sky,") subsequently repeated his statements on tape before
witnesses at the WMWV studio. `It's a Military Exercise' On
December 8, 2000, Terry Stewart, the Manager for Planning and Environment at
the Victoria International Airport, responded to a caller's complaint about
the strange patterns of circles and grids being woven over the British
Columbia capitol. Stewart left a message on an answering machine tape -- a
message that later was heard by more than 15 million radio listeners. Stewart
explained: "It's a military exercise, [a] US and Canadian Air Force exercise
that's going on. They wouldn't give me any specifics on it." Canadian
Forces Base (CFB) Comox on Vancouver Island is Canada's biggest radar
installation. CFB Comox is easily capable of tracking the US formations coming
up from the south. When asked for a response to Stewart's statement, the base
information officer at CFB Comox replied tersely that: "No military operation
is taking place." Stewart later told the Vancouver Courier that his
information had come directly from Comox. By the summer of 2001, pictures
of contrails were being circulated by the Associated Press and the
word "chemtrails" could be overheard in coffee shop conversations across the
continent `It's a Hoax' In an April 20, 2001, letter to a US senator,
Col. Walter Washbaugh, chief of the Congressional Inquiry Division for the
Secretary of the Air Force in Washington, DC, called chemtrails "a hoax."
Washbaugh blamed the increased number of contrails on "significant civil
aviation growth in the past decade." He is right on that score. A National
Science Foundation study has found that in certain heavily trafficked
corridors, artificial cloud cover has increased by as much as 20 percent.
Colonel Washbaugh ascribed widely reported grid patterns to overlapping
aircraft flying north-south, east-west airways. The only thing wrong with this
explanation, a Texas air traffic controller told me, is that US airways do not
run north-south. The colonel told the senator: "The Air Force is not
conducting any weather modification and has no plans to do so in the future."
In fact, the Pentagon has long been interested in using weather as a weapon of
war. Attempts to steer hurricanes by spraying heat-robbing chemicals in their
paths date from the 1950s. The recipe for creating "cirrus shields" was
outlined in a 1996 US Air Force study subtitled "Owning the Weather by 2025."
The report explained how "weather force specialists" were dispersing chemicals
behind high-flying tanker aircraft in a process called "aerial obscuration."
Official denials reached new altitudes of absurdity when another colonel
claimed: "The US Air Force (USAF) does not conduct spraying operations over
populated areas." Apparently the colonel had forgotten how USAF air tankers
dispensed thousands of tons of "Agent Orange" defoliants over the land and
people of Vietnam. Meanwhile, the Internet was abuzz with chemtrail
conspiracy theories ranging from aliens leaving messages in the sky to
government agencies dumping mind- control chemicals on an unsuspecting
populace. The only problem was none of the theories were plausible. The
Welsbach Patent In 1994, the Hughes aerospace company was issued a
remarkable patent. The Welsbach patent "for Reduction of Global Warming"
proposed countering global warming by dispensing microscopic particles of
aluminum oxide and other reflective materials into the upper atmosphere.
This "sky shield" would reflect one or two percent of incoming sunlight. The
patent suggested that tiny metal flakes could be "added to the fuel of jet
airliners, so that the particles would be emitted from the jet engine exhaust
while the airliner was at its cruising altitude." Computer simulations by
Ken Caldeira at California's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL)
calculated that employing Welsbach's chemical- sunscreen technology could stop
warming over 85 percent of the planet, despite an anticipated doubling of
atmospheric carbon within the next 50 years. LLNL estimated the cost of
creating thisso-called Sky Shield at $1 billion dollars a year -- a cheap fix
to avoid threatening the massive profits of the oil industry. At the 1998
International Seminar on Planetary Emergencies, Edward Teller, the "Father of
the H-bomb," presented his Next Big Idea. Teller called for spreading
reflective chemicals over the Earth to act like a mirror-shade. If it was
impossible to protect the entire planet, these chemical sky shields could, at
least, be extended to cover allies who secretly agreed to allow this
unprecedented geo-engineering experiment to be carried out over their
territory. In the July-August 1998 Science and Technology Review, Teller
argued that the Sky Shield offered a more "realistic" option for addressing
global warming than drastic cutbacks in C02 emissions. When asked if the
technology was being pursued, Teller replied: "To my knowledge the answer is
negative.... My recommendation was a tentative one depending on further
evidence whether expecting global warming is realistic." In fact, the
technology already exists. In 1975, the US Navy patented a device for
producing "a powder contrail having maximum radiation-scattering ability." The
powder contained a mixture of 0.3 micron-sized titanium dioxide pigment
particles coated with 0.007 micron hydrophobic colloidal silica and 4.5 micron
particles of silica gel. The purpose of the apparatus was "to generate
contrails or reflective screens for any desired purpose." The Welsbach
Patent proposed using "very fine, talcum-like" powder of 10 to 100 micron-
sized aluminum oxide to produce a "pure white plume" in the sky In a May
2000 draft report submitted to the International Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC), an expert panel chosen from among 3,000 atmospheric scientists,
concluded that Teller's scheme might work. But the IPCC warned against
unpredictable upsets of the atmosphere. The panel also warned against angry
populaces reacting to "the associated whitening of the visual appearance of
the sky." Caldeira was so concerned that he went public. Deflecting
sunlight would further cool the stratosphere, he warned, and this could
intensify icy clouds of ozone-gobbling CFCs that could destroy the ozone
layer -- the Earth's already damaged solar radiation shield. Was Teller's
Sky Shield experiment already underway? During his interview with WMWV
reporters, Deep Sky hinted that it was. Were the tankers observed on ATC
radars involved in climate modification? Our FAA source hesitated before
responding: "That approximates what I was told." Similar military activities
were ongoing in other regions, he stated. Chemtrails and Health Problems
The Internet buzzes with conspiracy theories about chemtrails being used
as part of a secret government biological experiment. But after more than
three years of intense investigation, I have found no proof that chemtrails
constitute a deliberate biological attack. (To be effective, bio-attacks must
conducted close to the ground and never in daylight, in order to avoid
ultraviolet sterilization of toxins.) In the spring of 1998, rain falling
through heavy chemtrails over Espanola, Ontario was found to contain
concentrations of aluminum particles seven times higher than permitted by
Canadian health safety laws. Provincial health officials ordered tests after
residents began complaining about severe headaches, chronic joint pain,
dizziness, sudden extreme fatigue, acute asthma attacks and feverless "flu-
like" symptoms. The results of the test were not released. The reports of
illness all came from residents inside a 50-square-role area who complained
that they had been subjected to "months of spraying" by photo- identified US
Air Force tanker planes. The USAF denied the intrusions. On November 18,
1998, Canadian Opposition Party Defense Critic Gordon Earle petitioned
Parliament on behalf of the people of Espanola. Speaking on behalf of Canada's
New Democratic Party, Earle stated: "Over 500 residents of the Espanola
area have signed a petition raising concern over possible government
involvement in what appears to be aircraft emitting visible aerosols. They
have found high traces of aluminum and quartz in particulate and rainwater
samples. These concerns combined with associated respiratory ailments have led
these Canadians to take action and seek clear answers from this government.
The petitioners call upon Parliament to repeal any law that would permit the
dispersal of military chaff or of any cloud- seeding substance whatsoever by
domestic or foreign military aircraft without the informed consent of the
citizens of Canada thus affected." A Harvard School of Public Health team
determined that particulates with a diameter less than 10 microns (one-tenth
the thickness of a human hair) pose a serious threat to public health. On
April 21, 2001, the New York Times warned: "These microscopic motes are able
to infiltrate the tiniest compartments in the lungs and pass readily into the
bloodstream, and have been most strongly tied to illness and early death,
particularly in people who are already susceptible to respiratory problems."
On December 14, 2000, the New England Journal of Medicine reported that
inhaling particulate matter of a size 10 microns or smaller leads to "a 5
percent increased death rate within 24 hours." Teller's sunscreen calls for
spraying 10 million tons of talcum-fine reflective particulates of 10 to 100
micron sizes. Congress Addresses Chemtrails On October 2, 2001,
Rep. Dennis Kucinich (DOH) introduced the "Space Preservation Act of 2001" (HR
2977), which called for the elimination of "exotic weaponry" from space. Among
the weapons to be banned were weather- modifying weapons such as HAARP (High
Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) and chemtrails. Though HR 3616
was later amended to remove the section that would have banned chemtrails, the
original bill acknowledging the existence of chemtrail technology remains on
the pages of the Congressional Record. With "chemtrails" now officially
admitted by the US government, an even bigger trial is set to begin in the
court of public opinion. An earlier version of this report
appeared in the October-November 2001 issue of Nexus Magazine [PO Box 30,
Mapleton Qld 4560 Australia. http://www.nexusmagazine.com].
Chemtrails Go Global Sightings of oddly Lingering plumes sometimes
resembling rocket traits are not confined to North American skies. While
on Leave in Italy in the summer of 1999, the US Navy's Kitty Chastain sat on
her hotel balcony and watched aerial grids being laid all day just offshore
over the Bay of Naples. In Spain, on April 27, 2000, American tourist John
Hendricks dashed off a quick email from El Cafe de Internet: "Were we
surprised to see that the chemtrails are as bad here as they are anywhere,
both in Mallorca and in Barcelona." "Add Sweden to the List," a Swedish
resident wrote after spotting eight to 10 parallel contrails. "I know the
commercial mutes, and we have a bunch of them, but not where these trails
were." Chemtrail activity has been reported in at Least 14 allied nations
including Australia, Belgium, Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Holland,
Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, Scotland, Sweden and the United States.
Chemtrail photos from France, Australia, Scotland and Germany may be viewed on
the author's website [www3.bc.simpatico.ca/Willthomas]. Another Scary
Scenario According to the National Center for Atmospheric Research in
Boulder, Co., the only way to form artificial Clouds in warm dry air is to
introduce enough particulates into the atmosphere to attract and accrete all
available moisture into visible vapor. If repeated often enough, the resulting
rainless haze can Lead to drought. Patrick Minnis, an atmospheric
researcher with California Environmental Resources Evaluation System (CERES)
and ardent chemtrails critic at NASA's Langley Research Center, reports that
cirrus cloud cover over the US is up 5 percent overall because particulates in
engine exhaust are acting as cloud- forming nuclei. As the number of flights
currently exceeds 15 million annually worldwide, artificial clouds will
intensify as air travel continues to climb. Perhaps the appearance of
chemtrails is a "sign from on high" that our atmosphere has become dangerously
burdened with pollutants. William Thomas' award-winning writing has
appeared in more than 50 publications in eight countries including The Globe
and Mail, Toronto Star, Vancouver Sun and Times-Colonist newspapers as well as
Earth Island Journal and Ecodecision magazines. He has also appeared on CBC
radio and TV, CNN and New Zealand national television. COPYRIGHT 2002
Earth Island Institute
Dare I ask if there are any suspicious chemtrails over all the Middle-East, or just parts of the Middle-East. Hey, do you suppose that no-fly zone over the Cheney/Rumsfeld estates in Maryland could also be to avoid chemtrails? Does Smirk have a no-fly zone over Crawford? I suppose. So what about D.C.?
"We don't need no stinkin' badges!" -Gold Hat, now starring Alberto Gonzales This is a far more believable account of chemtrails than the leading anonymous mechanic story. We should be careful in accepting any and all conspiracy accounts as true. It's not beyond some psychology majoring college student to create a hoax that plays on legitimate concerns. Unless you really do believe there's a kidney theft ring that does surgery on intoxicated party goers, that not wiping the tops of canned goods before opening can kill you, or that there's a little girl with cancer in Kansas collecting 20 bazillion pop tops. Extra equipment *secretly* mounted on *all* airlines? Like they'd keep that a secret. I'll bet Saddam had WMD's too. An increase of chem trails over time logically indicates something is changing over that time. It could be increased traffic or it could be a change to the fuel that aircraft use or perhaps the engines that burn it. Tech changes to the airline industry happen just like everywhere else, so that can't be ruled out. Aluminum being added to fuel is the most plausable explanation I've yet heard for persistant contrails, and as a toxin, that should be a crime.
BTW: I have a better name for the software .... Microsoft Internet Exploder. There is airspace that is restricted to all traffic. One zone surrounds the whitehouse and the capital, and Camp David is also restricted, which I know from my piloting days not too far from there. The zones aren't very big though, on weren't 13 years ago. But since contrails form at extreme altitudes, assuming that's still the case today, the high winds always blowing at that altitude pretty much ensures that none of it will come near the ground over which trails first form.
BTW: I have a better name for the software .... Microsoft Internet Exploder. I couldn't agree more.
So a specific target would be difficult, but with knowledge of the wind direction, a general area might be made a target.
"We don't need no stinkin' badges!" -Gold Hat, now starring Alberto Gonzales A "general area", maybe. But one thing about winds at altitude is that they don't usually blow in the same direction. There might be one wind up to 8000 feet and a second wind blowing a different direction from 8000 to 14500 feet, and a third going the rest of the way. Also, the higher you go, the stronger the winds. 50 MPH might be typical for winds at 30,000 feet at any given time. It's been a while since I've been in the field. Skydrifter should have more authoritative comment.
BTW: I have a better name for the software .... Microsoft Internet Exploder. A space alien invasion contains more probability of fact. Sure anything is possible; what's probable, applying a sane version of common sense.
Chemtrail = windmills! If an attack on a population is desired, water & food supplies are too readily available as a simple and inexpenisve attack platform. Nobody in their right mind is going to spray a population from 30,000 feet. Sheesh! If you want an environmental conspiracy, look to the HAARP cannons! That's factual!
Contrails are subject to local meteorology. They vary with pressure, temperature and humidity; naturally, wind & turbulence. They converge over common navigation points, such as Denver, Seattle or DC. Contrails are seemingly wierd. I've seen airplanes contrail for an hour, leaving the expected trail - then the contrails quit streaming, lasting for maybe half a mile, aft of the aircraft. Throw in a strong crosswind with some turbulence & they fade in a hurry. Chemtrail = windmill. It's that simple. You don't hear of pilots doing a preflight inspection asking, "Hey, what are those spray nozzles?" The volume of liquid required to produce the supposed volume of 'chemtrails' would not allow a load of passengers. There is plenty of conspiracy to go with the airline industry; 'chemtrails' are not on the list of rational topics.
I'm not saying the contrails as chemtrails has anything to with reality. I'm just saying the government could let people get some fragments of truth on something going on, the people "connect" it with contrails and then run with it. Those quantities would be highly effective dispersed at low altitude over populated areas (no trails or mists either) on approaches and no one would be the wiser...
Government blows, and that which governs least blows least...
Cannons???
Government blows, and that which governs least blows least...
Exactly. Chemicals sprayed from jet at 35,000 feet over Kentucky could, with pinpoint acurracy, hit between Myrtle Beach and Tibet.
In 1947, the UN created a perpetual war and named it Israel.
One item on the Canadian account of detecting aluminum in rainwater after con/chemtrailing that stood out to me: First, in order for rain to catch it, rain would have to fall through the trails, meaning the trails would have to be made somewhere below the rainclouds. Rain does not begin above 30,000 feet. Probably closer to 10K feet on the upside, and probably much lower in the 3-4K range, but I'm much less sure of those calls than I am the winds. So if they can see these trails with the backdrop of rain clouds above them (which is a question to answer by itself), then it probably means they must have formed at very low altitude. The next question is how a *low altitude* contrail could have formed, as that's not normal.
BTW: I have a better name for the software .... Microsoft Internet Exploder. If you can talk to a Mars orbiter with a few watts of RF power, what can be done with the mega-watts of the HAARP Cannons? (Try: blast a hole in the upper particle belts, allowing more solar enegry to penetrate the atmosphere - weather control.) The DARN (Dual Auroral Radar Network) system monitors the pre, and post conditions of a HAARP firing. Two more cannons are under construction; one in Geeenland & the other in Norway.
#5. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
#6. To: christine, SKYDRIFTER, LODWICK (#3)
http://www.tracers.8m.com/tracers. html
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com
http://www.bariumblues.com
http://www.theundergroundfiles.com
http://www.soulcore.net/chemtrails
www.enterprisemission.com ( A must read)
#7. To: christine (#4)
#8. To: SKYDRIFTER (#2)
The other mechanics are happy to let them do it. Because of this you will have only 2 or 3 mechanics that work on these systems at any one airport. No one pays much attention to these guys and no mechanic socializes with another mechanic who only works on the waste systems
#9. To: SKYDRIFTER (#7)
#10. To: lodwick (#9)
If you doubt that there are "chem-trails,"
#11. To: SKYDRIFTER (#2)
The topic is a magnet for those deficient of both adrenalin and intelligence.
#12. To: SKYDRIFTER (#2)
The topic is a magnet for those deficient of both adrenalin and intelligence.
#13. To: Jethro Tull (#12)
#14. To: SKYDRIFTER, lodwick, Red Jones, Christine, robin, Zipporah, All (#7)
#15. To: Itisa1mosttoolate, Skydrifter, christine, Zipporah (#0)
It had been about 10 years since I had worked on this particular model of aircraft.
#16. To: All (#15)
#17. To: Kamala, ALL (#14)
The very next day, just before a front was moving in, it was a checkerboard. The sky was turned milky. Planes were laying down huge hanging clouds.
#18. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
#19. To: Kamala, all (#14)
The sky was turned milky.
#20. To: Jethro Tull (#19)
Where are the environmental whackos when we need them?
#21. To: robin (#20)
I think they're all on the west coast, where the prevailing westerlies would blow any chemtrails inland.
#22. To: SKYDRIFTER (#2)
#23. To: wbales (#21)
I think they're all on the west coast, where the prevailing westerlies would blow any chemtrails inland.
#24. To: Kamala (#14)
#25. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
#26. To: robin (#20)
#27. To: SKYDRIFTER (#7)
This subject has to be a CIA propaganda credibility experiment.
#28. To: Jethro Tull, ALL (#26)
#29. To: All (#28)
#30. To: Itisa1mosttoolate, skydrifter, christine, Zipporah, robin, all (#28)
#31. To: Jethro Tull (#30)
#32. To: Jethro Tull (#30)
-- George Bonser
#33. To: robin (#31)
Does Smirk have a no-fly zone over Crawford? I suppose. So what about D.C.?
-- George Bonser
#34. To: Neil McIver (#32)
and as a toxin, that should be a crime.
#35. To: Neil McIver (#33)
But since contrails form at extreme altitudes, assuming that's still the case today, the high winds always blowing at that altitude pretty much ensures that none of it will come near the ground over which trails first form.
#36. To: robin, skydrifter (#35)
So a specific target would be difficult, but with knowledge of the wind direction, a general area might be made a target.
-- George Bonser
#37. To: Axenolith (#22)
#38. To: Jethro Tull (#30)
#39. To: Neil McIver, All (#36)
#40. To: SKYDRIFTER (#37)
#41. To: SKYDRIFTER (#38)
HAARP cannons!
#42. To: Neil McIver (#36)
A "general area", maybe. But one thing about winds at altitude is that they don't usually blow in the same direction. There might be one wind up to 8000 feet and a second wind blowing a different direction from 8000 to 14500 feet, and a third going the rest of the way. Also, the higher you go, the stronger the winds. 50 MPH might be typical for winds at 30,000 feet at any given time.
#43. To: Axenolith, robin, all (#40)
Those quantities would be highly effective dispersed at low altitude over populated areas (no trails or mists either) on approaches and no one would be the wiser...
-- George Bonser
#44. To: Axenolith (#41)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest