[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Cancer Starves When You Eat These Surprising Foods | Dr. William Li

Megyn Kelly Gets Fiery About Trump's Choice of Matt Gaetz for Attorney General

Over 100 leftist groups organize coalition to rebuild morale and resist MAGA after Trump win

Mainstream Media Cries Foul Over Musk Meeting With Iran Ambassador...On Peace

Vaccine Stocks Slide Further After Trump Taps RFK Jr. To Lead HHS; CNN Outraged

Do Trump’s picks Rubio, Huckabee signal his approval of West Bank annexation?

Pac-Man

Barron Trump

Big Pharma-Sponsored Vaccinologist Finally Admits mRNA Shots Are Killing Millions

US fiscal year 2025 opens with a staggering $257 billion October deficit$3 trillion annual pace.

His brain has been damaged by American processed food.

Iran willing to resolve doubts about its atomic programme with IAEA

FBI Official Who Oversaw J6 Pipe Bomb Probe Lied About Receiving 'Corrupted' Evidence “We have complete data. Not complete, because there’s some data that was corrupted by one of the providers—not purposely by them, right,” former FBI official Steven D’Antuono told the House Judiciary Committee in a

Musk’s DOGE Takes To X To Crowdsource Talent: ‘80+ Hours Per Week,’

Female Bodybuilders vs. 16 Year Old Farmers

Whoopi Goldberg announces she is joining women in their sex abstinence

Musk secretly met with Iran's UN envoy NYT

D.O.G.E. To have a leaderboard of most wasteful government spending

In Most U.S. Cities, Social Security Payments Last Married Couples Just 19 Days Or Less

Another major healthcare provider files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy

The Ukrainians have put Tulsi Gabbard on their Myrotvorets kill list

Sen. Johnson unveils photo of Biden-appointed crossdressers after reporters rage over Gaetz nomination

sted on: Nov 15 07:56 'WE WOULD LOSE' War with Iran: Col. Lawrence Wilkerson

Israeli minister says Palestinians should have no voting or land rights

The Case For Radical Changes In US National Defense: Col. Douglas Macgregor

Biden's Regulations Legacy Costs Taxpayers $1.8 Trillion, 800 Times Larger than Trumps

Israeli Soldiers are BUSTED!

Al Sharpton and MSNBC Caught in Major Journalism Ethics Fail in Accepting Kamala's Campaign Money

ABC News in panic mode to balance The View after anti-Trump panel misses voter sentiment

The Latest Biden Tax Bomb


War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: Obama: ‘No Boots on the Ground’ Just Meant No Battalions
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://news.antiwar.com/2015/12/03/ ... ound-just-meant-no-battalions/
Published: Dec 4, 2015
Author: Jason Ditz
Post Date: 2015-12-04 07:13:41 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 243
Comments: 10

Insists New Troops Will 'Squeeze and Ultimately Destroy' ISIS,

Throughout a year and a half of war against ISIS, President Obama’s “no boots on the ground” pledge has been repeatedly revised by officials, initially insisting it meant no troops, then no combat troops, and now, according to President Obama, it simply meant no battlion-level deployments.

Obama now insists he never had any intention not to send combat troops to Iraq and Syria, and that the American people always understood he simply meant deployments would be small and limited to company-sized deployments or smaller.

Obama insists that the latest deployment of troops into Iraq, which the Pentagon has suggested will be in the 100 soldier level, will “squeeze and ultimately destroy” ISIS. During his comments, he continued to play up the idea that the war is going well, insisting ISIS is totally incapable of launching Paris-style attacks within the US.

With US deployments by and large limited to numbers in the dozens or low hundreds, the administration seems to be gambling it can avoid serious debate about its repeated escalations. At the same time, the promise of “no battalions” is all but meaningless, since the deployments are happening with such regularity that they are building up into the thousands in short order.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

Throughout a year and a half of war against ISIS, President Obama’s “no boots on the ground” pledge has been repeatedly revised by officials, initially insisting it meant no troops, then no combat troops, and now, according to President Obama, it simply meant no battlion-level deployments.

Called "incremental war".

Street language, fool the rubes.

Pentagon VERY FIRM AND DIRECT YESTERDAY, all combat roles in military now open to females.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-12-04   9:12:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Ada (#0) (Edited)

the deployments are happening with such regularity that they are building up into the thousands in short order.

Congress should be putting a screeching stop to that, getting them out of there entirely and fast, along with all the resources of our Armed Forces too. Russia is the only foreign power rightfully conducting any counter-terrorism actions within Syria -- by invitation of the sovereign government. America's "government" hasn't even been identifying the terrorists as such -- irrationally insists, for instance, that the "Free Syrian Army" are "moderate rebels" that America needs to fund, arm and assist even though they've been blowing up Lebanon, as well, to expand the war there [4um Ref.] and they have no grounds to oppose Assad as a tyrant because he isn't one. So far, Syria and Russia have been kind enough not to target our bombers and Turkey's that have been violating Syrian airspace and blasting its territory like Syria doesn't have any right to protect its spaces from intruders, as NATO allies do. Since Turkey's intrusive act of war as a loose cannon to strike Russia at the risk of wreaking havoc on the world, Congress should also get all of our Military out of Incirlik and out of Erdogan's Turkey-theatre completely.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-12-04   9:35:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Ada (#0) (Edited)

See? He's taking a "no new taxes" swindle and GWB's numerous equivalents such as "WMDs," "stay the course," "mission accomplished" ad nauseam. Just like crooks in the pen, they teach each other.

Whatever one of these demons says, believe the opposite till proven otherwise -- especially if peace is hanging in the balance.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-12-04   9:47:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Cynicom (#1)

Pentagon VERY FIRM AND DIRECT YESTERDAY, all combat roles in military now open to females.

The Pentagon isn't authorized to order any such thing. Do your job, Congress, to stop that.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-12-04   9:52:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: GreyLmist, Cynicom (#4)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Def..._on_Women_in_the_Services

You may be correct; I'm not sure.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-12-04   10:01:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Fred Mertz (#5)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Def..._on_Women_in_the_Services

You may be correct; I'm not sure.

Thanks for your concerned investigation of the matter, which amounts to a jeopardizing of our national security for the "appeasement" of Cultural Marxists. You can be certain the Constitution says that Congress has the responsibility to set the rules and regulations governing the armed forces (Article I, Section 8) -- not the Executive branch, not the Judicial branch, not Pentagon Policywonks nor any office or branch of the Armed Forces, not the Council on Foreign Relations and not the UN. [Links and additional info at 4um Title: The Cowardly Push to Get Women into Combat]

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-12-04   10:39:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: GreyLmist (#6)

We agree: it's a crazy and dangerous policy.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-12-04   10:41:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Fred Mertz (#7)

We agree: it's a crazy and dangerous policy.

Indeed it is and it's good to know we agree about that.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-12-04   11:10:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Cynicom (#1)

Pentagon VERY FIRM AND DIRECT YESTERDAY, all combat roles in military now open to females.

Man, that's messed up. I don't think even the "Legend of Adolf Hitler" was that out-of-whack.

This must be the beginning of the end of the empire or something.

The light that burns twice as bright, burns half as long. - Dr. Eldon Tyrell

Godfrey Smith: Mike, I wouldn't worry. Prosperity is just around the corner.
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)

Esso  posted on  2015-12-04   11:53:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Esso (#9)

Man, that's messed up. I don't think even the "Legend of Adolf Hitler" was that out-of-whack.

Correct.

Hitler kept the ladies at home.

Stalin (communist) said lady for every mans bunk.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-12-04   12:49:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]